!«">
;o>
I
CO
CO
Thomas Jefferson
Age about $8 years
From a portrait painted by Gilbert Stuart at Philadelphia, in May, 1800, now in the pos
session of Bowdoin College, Brunswick, Me.
Stuart painted Jefferson's portrait from life three times. This superb picture was the
first of the three paintings, and was the one preferred by the illustrious statesman, who paid
Stuart $100 for it. Stuart, however, as was his practise, sold the picture twice and turned it
over to Governor James Bowdoin, who bequeathed it to the College named ai'lor him.
[11
1 he Jeffersonian Cyclopedia
A COMPREHENSIVE COLLECTION OF THE
VIEWS OF
(.in/
THOMAS JEFFERSON
Classified and Arranged in Alphabetical Order Under Nine Thousand
Titles Relating to Government, Politics, Law, Education,
Political Economy, Finance, Science, Art,
Literature, Religious Freedom,
Morals, Etc.
EDITED BY
JOHN P. FOLEY
"I have sworn upon the altar of God
eternal hostility against every form of tyranny
over the mind of man." — Thomas Jefferson.
FUNK & WAGNALLS COMPANY
NEW YORK AND LONDON
COPYRIGHT, 1900, BY
FUNK & WAGNALLS COMPANY
REGISTERED AT STATIONERS* HALL, LONDON, ENGLAND
f Printed in the United States of America]
PREFACE
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA is designed to be a complete classified
arrangement of the Writings of Thomas Jefferson on Government, Politics,
Law, Education, Commerce, Agriculture, Manufactures, Navigation, Finance,
Morals, Religious Freedom, and many other topics of permanent human
interest. It contains everything of importance that Jefferson wrote on these
subjects.
Why and wherefore the publication of this volume now ? The answer is
this : More than three-quarters of a century ago, one of the earlier biogra
phers of Jefferson wrote : "It would be a happy circumstance for America
and for the mass of mankind if the works of Jefferson could obtain a circula
tion which would place them in the hands of every individual. Unfortunately,
the form in which they have appeared is not the most advantageous to the
accomplishment of this desirable purpo.se. The publication is too voluminous,
and consequently too expensive, to admit of a general introduction among all
classes, nor is the mode of arrangement the best adapted to its reception into
ordinary use as a work of reference. ' '
From that distant day to the present time, no attempt has been made to
arrange and classify the theories and principles of Jefferson, so as to make
them available in ready reference form.
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA aims to do this — to be a Manual of
Jeffersonian Doclrine, accurate, complete, impartial, giving Jefferson's views,
theories, and ideas in his own words. No edition of Jefferson's Writings,
printed at either public or private expense, contains so comprehensive a collec
tion of Jefferson's opinions as this volume. This fa(5l will be clearly seen by
all who consult it.
Not alone to the American people, but to all peoples, are Jefferson's opin
ions on Government of deep and abiding interest. Among the Statesmen of
all time, he is the foremost Expounder of the Rights of Man, of the unalien-
able right of every human being to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
That is the object of all just Government, to preserve which Jeffersonian
principles must be sacredly cherished.
J. P. F.
Brooklyn, July jist, 1900.
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
PAGE
Portrait by Stuart Frontispiece
Portrait by Peale .... . . . 96
Portrait by Desnoyers . . . 192
Portrait by Brumidi ... ...... 288
Bronze Statue by d' Angers . , 384
Portrait by Stuart .... ...,.'. 480
Monticello, the Home of Thomas Jefferson , . , 590
Portrait by Sully . 714
Marble Statue by Powers ........ 800
Portrait by Otis .... . , ,896
CHRONOLOGY OF THOMAS JEFFERSON
Born at Shadwell, Albemarle Co., Va April 2 (O. S.), 13 (N. S.), 1743
Death of his Father, Peter Jefferson August 17, 1757
Entered William and Mary College „ ....... March, 1760
Graduation ............ April 25, 1762
Entered Law Office of George Wythe ........ April, 1762
Admitted to Bar . ... . . . . 1767
Elected to Virginia House of Burgesses ....... March, 1769
Marriage to Martha Wayles Skelton . . . . . . . . January, 1772 *
Birth of his First Daughter, Martha ...... September 27, 1772
/Appointed Surveyor of Albemarle County ...... October, 1773
Birth of Second Daughter, Jane Randolph ....... April 3, 1774
Elected Deputy to Continental Congress ....... March, 1775
Attends Continental Congress June 21, 1775
Death of his Mother .......... March 31, 1776
, ' Appointed on Committee to prepare Declaration of Independence . . June n, 1776
Draft of Declaration Reported ......... June 28, 1776
Elected Commissioner to France . . . . . . September 26, 1776
Attends Virginia Assembly October, 1776
Appointed on Committee to Revise Virginia Laws .... November 6, 1776
Birth of Son May 28, 1777
Death of Son ............. June 14, 1777
Birth of Third Daughter, Mary August I, 1778
Elected Governor of Virginia June i, 1779
Reelected Governor of Virginia . , . . . . . . . June I, 1780
Fourth Daughter Born November 3, 1780
Resigns Governorship ........... June i, 1781
Assembly Orders Investigation of his Administration ..... June 5, 1781
Appointed Peace Commissioner by Continental Congress .... June 14, 1781
Appointment Declined .......... June 30, 1781
Attends Virginia Assembly November 5. 1781
Committee Appointed to State Charges Against Him . . . November 26, 1781
Elected Delegate to Congress November 30, 1781
Voted Thanks of Assembly ........ December 12, 1781
Daughter Lucy Elizabeth Born May 8, 1782
Death of Mrs. Jefferson .......... September 6, 1782
Appointed Peace Commissioner to Europe ..... November 12, 1782
Appointment Withdrawn ........... April i, 1783
Elected Delegate to Congress .......... June 6, 1783
Elected Chairman of Congress ........ March 12, 1784
S Elected Minister to France .......... May 7, 1784
Arrived in Paris August 6, 1784
Elected French Minister by Congress ....... March 10, 1785
Audience at French Court May 17, 1785
Death of Youngest Daughter, Lucy ....... November, 1785
Presented to George III. at Windsor ....... March 22, 1786
Made an LL.D. by Yale October, 1786
Made an LL.D. by Harvard .......... June, 1788
H Prepares Charter for France .......... June 3, 1789 f
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
J Nominated to be Secretary of State
Confirmed by Senate . . . . . .
Leaves France . . . . . . .
At Monticello . . . . .
Accepts Secretaryship of State
/ Marriage of Daughter Martha to Thomas Mann Randolph ,
Writes to Washington of Intention to Resign from Cabinet .
Reconsiders Resignation ........
Offered French Mission . .
Resigns Secretaryship of State ......
Offered Foreign Mission ........
Elected Vice-President ........
.'< Elected President of Philosophical Society ....
Takes Oath of Office as Vice-President
Marriage of Mary Jefferson to John Wayles Eppes
' Writes Essay on Study of Anglo-Saxon
Drafts Kentucky Resolutions .......
Revises Madison's Virginia Resolutions .....
f Plans University of Virginia
Prepares Parliamentary Manual ......
Republican Caucus Nominates Jefferson and Burr
Congress Begins to Ballot for President ....
Elected President
Farewell Address to Senate .......
Inauguration as President
Louisiana Treaty Signed at Paris ......
Louisiana Treaty Ratified .......
Message on Taking Possession of Louisiana ....
Reelected President of United States
? Elected President of American Philosophical Society
Signs Bill to End Slave Trade
Proposes to Seize the Floridas ......
Embargo Act Signed ........
Repeal of Embargo Signed .......
Retires from Presidency ........
Arrives at Monticello ........
Resigns Presidency of American Philosophical Society
Congress Passes Bill to Buy Library .....
'Drafts Virginia Protest
Executes Will
Declines Invitation to Fourth of July Celebration in Washington
Writes Last Letter
Death .
September 25,
September 26,
October,
December 24,
February 14,
February 28,
May 23,
January,
February,
December 31,
September,
, November 4,
January,
March 4,
October 13,
October,
October,
November,
January 18,
February,
May,
. February n,
. February 17,
, February 28,
March 4,
May 2,
October 20,
. January 18,
November,
January,
March 2,
, September i,
December 22,
March i,
March 4,
March 17,
November,
. ' January,
December,
March 16,
. June 24.
. June 25,
. July 4,
1789
1789
1789
1789
1790
1790
1792
1793
1793
1793
1794
1796
1797
1797
1797
1798
1798
1798
1800*-
1800
1800
iSoi
1801
1801
1801
1803
1803
1804
1804
1807
1807 •*
1807
1807
1809
1809
1809
1814
1815
1825 *•
1826
1826
1826
1826
LIST OF PATRONS
THIS CYCLOPEDIA HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO A SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION AND ITS PUBLI
CATION MADE PRACTICABLE THROUGH THE CO-OPERATION OF A LARGE NUMBER OF
ADMIRERS OF THOMAS JEFFERSON, WHO RECOGNIZED IN ADVANCE THE DESIRABILITY
OF SUCH A WORK AND WHO SHARE IN THE HONOR OF ITS PRODUCTION. THE NAMES
OF THESE PATRONS OF THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA ARE AS FOLLOWS:
Abbott, A. F Fredericktown, Mo.
Abbott, M. J Hayes Centre, Neb.
Abersol, Edward J Metamora, 111.
Adams, Hon. Alva Pueblo, Colo.
Adams, Charles B Kansas City, Mo.
Adams, Charles S Volga City, Iowa
Adams, C. M Alexandria, Va.
Adams, Jed. C Kaufman, Tex.
Adams, William R New York, N. Y.
Adkins, William H Easton, Md.
Agar, John G New York City
Aikens, Frank R Sioux Falls, So. Dak.
Ainslie, George Boise City, Idaho
Albert Barnes Memorial Library. ..Philadelphia, Pa.
Albright, Fontaine E Fort Worth Tex.
Albright, J. G Milwaukee.Wis.
Alden, Charles A New York City
Aldrich, Charles H Evanston, 111.
Alexander, Hope H Thomasville, Ga.
Alexander, Hugh Concordia, Kan.
Alison, T. Smvser, M.D Swartz, La.
Alice, W. S., "M.D Olean, Mo.
Allen, G. R. C Wheeling, W. Va.
Allen, Harry K Gallatin, Mo.
Allen, H. Jerome, M.D Washington, D. C.
Allen, John L. M New York City
Allen, Richard E Augusta, Ga.
Alley, S. S Wilber, Neb.
Allison, Hon. William B Dubuque, Iowa
Alrich, Enrique El Paso Tex.
Alston, David M Pittsburg, Pa.
Altgelt, George C San Antonio, Tex.
Alvord, W. C Peoria, 111.
Anderbery, C. P Minden, Neb.
Anderson, E. B Harmony Grove, Ga.
Anderson, Henry W Richmond, Va.
Anderson, James T Stanberry, Mo.
Anderson, Jefferson Randolph Savannah, Ga.
Anderson, Joseph R Lee, Va.
Anderson, T. P Kansas City, Kan.
Andrews, Theodore E Minneapolis, Minn.
Andrus, John A Ashton, 111.
Ansley, Hudson Salamanca, N. Y.
Archibald, J. W Jacksonville, Fla.
Armgardt, H., M.D Brooklyn, N. Y.
Armstrong, Hunter S St. Clairsville, Ohio
Armstrong, W. E Waco, Tex.
Arner, Calvin E Allentown, Pa.
Arthur, John G Omaha, Neb.
Asbury, D. F Newport News, Va.
Ash, Robert San Francisco, Cal.
Ashworth, J. S Bristol, Va.
Atkinson, J. A Creede, Colo.
Atkinson, Louis E Mifflintown, Pa.
Autenrieth, Henry G New York City
Avritt, Samuel Louisville, Ky.
Aycock, William T Columbia, S. C.
Ayers, Harry J Big Stone Gap, Va.
Bacon, Rev. T. S., D.D Buckeystown, Md.
Bader, D. M Cleveland, Ohio
Bagley, George C Minneapolis, Minn.
Bagley, W. D Rockdale, Tex.
Bailey, Mrs. James Stacey Waycross, Ga.
Baird, C. E Philadelphia, Pa.
Baird, William Marine City, Mich.
Baker, Rosa Rochester, N. Y.
Baker, William H Buffalo, N. Y.
Baker, William V Columbus, Ohio
Baldwin, B. J., Jr Paris, Tex.
Baldwin, Frank A Bowling Green, Ohio
Baldwin, W. H Rockport, Tex.
Ballance, William P., M.D Tuneau, Alaska
Ballard, Guy, A.B Anderson, Ind.
Ballard, W. Harrison, M.D Los Angeles, Cal.
Banta, D. A Great Bend, Kan.
Barber, Theodore M Pittsburg, Pa.
Bard, H. Burton Lansing, Mich.
Barker, Joseph D Petersburg, Ind.
Barnes, Carl L., M.D., LL.B Chicago, 111.
Barnes, Charles A Jacksonville, 111.
Barnes, E. H Healdsburg, Cal.
Barnes, O. H Middlebourne, W. Va.
Barnett, DeWitt C Harrisonville, Mo.
Barnett, M. S Cuba, Mo.
Barney, J. A May ville, Wis.
Barrett, James M Fort Wayne, Ind.
Barrick, Charles W New Martinsville, W. Va.
Bartlett, C. L Macon, Ga.
Bartlett, George A Eureka, Nev.
Barton, Alexander J Allegheny, Pa.
Batcheller, George Clinton New York City
Batchelor, R. Horton New York City
Bates, Benjamin F Brooklyn, N. Y.
Bates, William S Houston, Miss.
Uausman, Frederick Seattle, Wash.
Bayne, John Salem, Ore.
Beach, M. W Carroll, Iowa
Beach, W. H Holland, Mich.
Beach, William A Syracuse, N. Y.
Beale Memorial Library Bakersfield, Cal.
Beall & Kemp El Paso, Tex.
Beeber, William P Williamspprt, Pa.
Beecher, Walter H Cincinnati, Ohio
Behrns, C. L Cherokee, Tex.
Beidelman, William Easton, Pa.
Belcher, Bart Dikeville, Ky.
Belford, James B Denver, Colo.
Bell, Hal New York City
Bell, James D Brooklyn, N. Y.
Bell, R. R Gainesville, Tex.
Bell, Theodore A Napa, Cal.
Bender, John S Plymouth, Ind.
Benedict, C. B Attica, N. Y.
Bennett, Lewis J Buffalo, N. Y.
Bentley, A. C Pittsfield, 111.
Bentley, James H Ridley Park, Pa.
Benton, J. M Winchester, Ky.
Berdrow, L. G David City, Neb.
Bernheim, Isaac W Louisville, Ky.
Bernstein, Ernest R Shreveport, La
Berrien, R. Noble, Jr Waynesboro, Ga.
Bertram, G. Webb Oberlin, Kan.
Betts, Frederick New York City
Bettzhoover, F. E Carlisle, Pa.
Biddle, W. R Fort Scott, Kan.
Bidwell, H. G., M.D Jersey City, N. J.
Birnie, C., M.D Taneytown, Md.
Bischoff, Henry, Jr New York City
Bittenbender, H. C Lincoln, Neb.
Bittiner, Edmund New York City
Black, Charles J Jersey City, N. J.
Black, Chauncey F York, Pa.
Black, Cyrenius P Lansing, Mich.
Black. Howard C Plain City, Ohio
Blackford, William M Lewistown, Mont.
Blackmore, Tames W Gallatin, Tenn.
Blackwcll, S'amuel New Decatur, Ala.
Blain, Alexander W Detroit, Mich.
Blair, George New York City
Blake, W. H Wetumpka, Ala.
Blakeley, W. A Pittsburg, Pa.
Blanchard, Nathan W Santa Paula, Cal.
Blanck, Joseph E., M.D Green Lane, Pa
Blee, John W Sandwich, 111.
Bloom, S. S Shelby, Ohio
Blose, G. Ament Hamilton, Pa.
Bohannan, T. E Falmouth, Ky.
Bohannon, L. T.. M.D Orphan Home, Tex.
xiv
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Boles, Thomas Fort Smith, Ark.
Boiler, J. F Porterville, Cal.
Bomar, T. B Forth Worth Tex.
Boney, Richard K Duckport, La.
Bonsall, Charles Salem, Ohio
Booher, Charles F Savannah, Mo.
Booker, A. G Wadena, Minn.
Boone, L. L San Diego, Cal.
Boothe, J. B Sardis, Miss.
Boren, George E Bristol, Tenn.
Borkert, Rev. J. W Grass Creek, Ind.
Bouck, Gabe Oshkosh, Wis.
Bouldin, Virgil Scottsboro, Ala.
Bowers, F. E Perrysburg, Ohio
Bowie, J. C Talladega, Ala.
Bowie, Sydney J Anniston, Ala.
Bowser, O. P ._. .Dallas, Tex.
Boyce, John J Santa Barbara, Cal.
Boyd, Henry A Warrenton, N. C.
Boyle, Wilbur F St. Louis, Mo.
Brace, William Chicago, 111.
Bradford, Ernest W Washington, D. C.
Bradford, Mary S Cleveland, Ohio
Bradley, Herbert E Columbus, Ohio
Bradley, John H Senath, Mo.
Bradley, Washington Kinmundy, 111.
Bradshaw, Homer S Ida Grove, Iowa
Branch, Oliver E Manchester, N. H.
Branch, W. W Charleston, W. Va.
Brandon, William R., M.D Brandon, La.
Bransford, C. W Owensboro, Ky.
Brantley, W. G Brunswick, Ga.
Breckinridge, Hon. William C. P. . .Lexington, Ky.
Brenner, G San Francisco, Cal.
Briant, Paul H San Angelo, Tex.
Brice, J. S Yorkville, S. C.
Bridenbaugh, W. H Altoona, Pa.
Bridges, W. A Center, Tex.
Brock, Cyrus C Pittsburg, Pa.
Bronson, Alice Wellsville, N. Y.
Brooks, W. P., M.D Cook Neb.
Brougher, E. E Linden, Tex.
Brown, Irving Haverstraw, N. Y.
Brown, J. A ' Chadbourn, N. C.
Brown, James L Oklahoma City, Okla.
Brown, James R New York City
ames W Falls Church, Va.
. E Scottsboro, Ala.
Brown,
Brown,
Brown,
)r. J. W Camden, Ark.
Brown, M. R Bellefontaine, Ohio
Brown, Ralph H Atlanta, Ga.
Browne, Jefferson B Key West, Fla.
Browne, Richard H New Orleans, La.
Browne, Dr. Walker G Atlanta, Ga.
Brubaker, Joseph Stauffer Vinton, Iowa
Bruce, George W Pleasant Hill, Mo.
Brumback, Hon. O. S Toledo, Ohio
Bruyere, Dr. John Trenton, N. J.
Bryan, H. A Ruthven, Iowa
Bryan, John D El Paso, Tex.
Bryan, R. W. D Albuquerque, New Mexico
Buchman, Edwin Valley Falls, N. Y.
Buckner, James H Cincinnati, Ohio
Budd, J. D., M.S., M.D Two Harbors, Minn.
Budd, William N Bunker Hill, 111.
Burbank, William F Los Angeles, Cal.
Burckhalter, James B Vinita, I. T.
Burgess, Edward G Montclair, N. J.
Burke, Frank B Indianapolis, Ind.
Burke, John F Milwaukee, Wis.
Burke, Walter J New Iberia, La.
Burson, George Winamac, Ind.
Burtt, Henry A Jeffersonville, Ind.
Bush, Matthew Corunna, Mich.
Bushnell, A. R Madison, Wis.
Butler, Sarah Cincinnati, Ohio
Butler, William J Springfield, 111.
Butt, I. T Clarksdale, Miss.
Byrd, R. E Winchester, Va.
Byrne, E. J Austin, Tex.
Cadwallader, A. D Springfield, 111.
Cahill, John H New York City
Cain, William M David City, Neb.
Calhoon, Judge S. S Jackson, Miss.
Camp, E. T Gadsden, Ala.
Campbell, Daniel West New Brighton, N. Y.
Campbell, Edward, Jr Fairfield, Iowa
Carey, Henry W Eastlake, Mich.
Carmichael, D. W Sacramento, Cal.
Carr, John Lincoln, Neb.
Carr, Julian S Durham, N. C.
Carson, J. A. G Savannah, Ga.
Carter, A. Edson Los Angeles, Cal.
Carter, F. M....
.Farmington, Mo.
Carton, James D Asbury Park, N. J.
Carver, Edwin O Fitzhugh, Fla.
Carver, M. H Natchitoches, La.
Case, Halbert B Chattanooga, Tenn.
Cass, J. E Eau Claire, Wis.
Castle, Bryan J Madison, Wis.
Caywood, John Miles City, Mont.
Cazier, M. H Chicago, 111.
Cease, D. L Cleveland, Ohio
Chalkley, John W Big Stone Gap, Va.
Chambers, David W New Castle, Ind.
Chambers, Emmett Dallas, Tex.
Champlin, John W Grand Rapids, Mich.
Chapman, Oliver J Breckinridge, Mo.
Charters, W. A Dahlonega, Ga.
Chase, C. C Covington, Ky.
Chidester, Arthur Mercer New Waterford, Ohio
Chidester, T. Edwin Philadelphia, Pa.
Child, James E Waseca, Minn.
Chisholm, W. W Salt Lake City, Utah
Cissel, W. W. L Highland, Md.
Clancy, William Butte, Mont.
Clardy, Martin L St. Louis, Mo.
Clark, Ezra W League Island, Pa.
Clark, Frank Jacksonville, Fla.
Clark, Gibson Cheyenne, Wyo.
Clark, Orlando E Appleton, Wis.
Clark, R. S Eau Claire, Wis.
Clark, William H .Daflas, Tex.
Clarke, Enos Kirkwood, Mo.
Clarke, James T., M.D Mount Solon, Va.
Clarke, James W East Orange, N. J.
Clarke, Peyton Neale Louisville, Ky.
Clay, Rhodes Mexico, Mo.
Clay, William Lewis Huntsville, Ala.
Clement, Charles M Sunbury, Pa.
Clemson Agricultural College, Clemson College, S. C.
Cleveland Cider Co Unionville, Lake Co., Ohio
Clinch, Edward S New York City
Closson, James Harwood, M.D.,
Germantown, Philadelphia, Pa.
Clute, Lemuel Ionia, Mich.
Clute, S. R Montezuma, Iowa
Clyne, Benjamin, M.D Yale, Mich.
Cochran, Rev. F. J Roxana, Del.
Cockrell, Joseph E Dallas, Tex.
Cohen, Ira New York City
Cohen, Lewis Bloomsburg, Pa.
Colby University Library Waterville, Me.
Coleman, Henry, President Nat'l Business College,
Newark, N. J.
Collier, B. K Etna Mills, Cal.
Collier, F. S Hampton, Va.
Collier, Thomas A Jamestown, Tenn.
Collins, Charles H Hillsboro, Ohio
Collins. John T Rutherford, N. J.
Collins, Winfield S Basin, Wyo.
Colton, William H Wapello, Iowa
Comstock, C. N Albany, Mo.
Condon, John T Seattle, Wash.
Condon, William H Chicago, 111.
Coney, P. H Topeka, Kan.
Conkling, Cook Rutherford, N. J.
Conkling, Newlan Norborne, Mp.
Connaughton, J. J Wapekoneta, Ohio
Connell, J. H College Station, Tex.
Conover, William A Chicago 111.
Conroy, E. M., M.D Ogden, Utah
Cook, Benjamin H., M.D Wilkinson, Ind.
Cook, John T Albany, N. Y.
Cook, Samuel E Huntington, Ind.
Cooke, J. H Moultrie, Ga.
Cookinham, D. A., M.D Holton, Kan.
Coolidge, T. Jefferson Boston, Mass.
Cooper, A. W Forest, Miss.
Cooper, H. P Lebanon, Ky.
Cooper, J. M. F., M.D Waterville, Wash.
Copeland, Alfred M Springfield, Mass.
Corbett, William P Detroit, Mich.
Corbin, John New Harmony, Ind.
Cosgrave, George Fresno, Cal.
Coshocton Free School Library Coshocton, Ohio
Costello, S. V San Francisco, Cal.
Coulter, J. E Grand Rapids, Mich.
Courtney, Major A. R Richmond, Va.
Courtright, Samuel W., LL.D Circleville, Ohio
Courts, Dr. W. J Reidsville, N. C.
Covell, A. G Sykeston, No. Dak.
Cowen, Gen. B. R Cincinnati, Ohio
Cowdery, J. F San Francisco, Cal.
Cowles, George M Monroe, Iowa
Cowper, George Winston, N. C.
Cox, Henry C La Grange, 111.
Cox, Jefferson D Claremore, I. T.
LIST OF PATRONS
xv
Cox, Jennings S New York City.
Cox, Stephen J New York City
Crain, Robert Baltimore, Md.
Crane, Elvin W Newark, N. J.
Cranston, John A Alexandria, Minn.
Cravath, E. M Nashville, Term.
Cravath, Paul D New York City
Cravens, Robert O Sacramento, Cal.
Crawford, E. C Oakdale, Cal.
Crawford, Thomas Olin Oakland, Cal.
Crocheron, David E New York City
Crossland, Samuel H Mayfield, Ky.
Crouch, B. W Saluda, S. C.
Crouch, David N Humphreys, Mo.
Crunden, Frederick M St. Louis, Mo.
Cullen, John J Jersey City, N. J.
Gumming, Robert Peoria, 111.
Cunningham, Oliver M South Bend, Ind.
Cunningham, W. J Abilene, Tex.
Curd, Thomas N Richmond, Va.
Curdy, Scott Eugene Kingsley, Mich.
Curley, John J Rockaway Beach, N. Y.
Cussons, John Glen Allen, Va.
Dabney, I. T Bloomfield, Iowa
Dagg, J. L Vidalia, La.
Dalton, James L Poplar Bluff, Mo.
Daly, Peter Francis New Brunswick, N. J.
Dalzell, John Washington, D. C.
Danforth, C. R Minonk, 111.
Daniels, Josephus Raleigh, N. C.
Darden, W. M Speights Bridge, N. C.
Darlington, Barton Los Angeles, Cal.
Darlington, J. J Washington, D. C.
Davidson, O. C Commonwealth, Wis.
Davies, William Gilbert New York City
Davis, C. E Deadwood, S. Dak.
Davis, Charles E Madison, Fla.
Davis, Ernest M Camilla, Ga.
Davis, William L Canton, Ohio
Davispn, Charles Stewart New York City
Dawkins, Walter I Baltimore, Md.
Dayton, George D Worthington, Minn.
Dean, Claude M Richmond, Va.
Dean, Gerard Q New York City
Dean, J. A Owensboro, Ky.
Dean, J. R Broken Bow, Neb.
Dean, J. R Woodward, Okla.
Dean, S. W Centerville, Tex.
Dean, Walter E San Francisco, Cal.
Dechert, Henry M Philadelphia, Pa.
De Haven, John J San Francisco, Cal.
De Lacy, John F Eastman) Ga.
Delery, W. S Houston, Tex.
Denmark, Brantley A Savannah, Ga.
Dent, William Hamilton Decorah, Iowa
Denton, John S Cookeville, Tenn.
Denver Athletic Club Library Denver, Colo.
De Pue, E. L Olivia, Minn.
Dersheimer, C. O Tunkhannock, Pa.
de Steuben, T. J Jensen, Fla.
-Ueuel, Joseph M New York City
Devecmon, W. C Cumberland, Md.
Devine, Michael A Atlantic City, N. J.
Devine, Miles J Chicago, 111
Deweese, B. C Lexington, Ky.
De Weese, K. McC Kansas City, Mb.
Dierking, John St. Clair, Mo.
Diggs, Annie L Topeka, Kan.<
Diggs, Rev. P. W Unity, Va.
Digney, John M White Plains, N. Y.
Diller, Peter Bluffton, Ohio
Dillon, Thomas H Petersburg, Ind.
Dines, Tyson S Denver, Colo.
Dively, A. V Altoona, Pa.
Dixon, Warren Jersey City, N. J.
Dixon, W. W Union, S. C.
Dobbins, W. P Corinth, Miss.
Dockstader, G. W Cawker City, Kan.
Dodd, Amzi Newark, N. J.
Dodge, Frank L Lansing, Mich.
Dodge, Geo. E Little Rock, Ark.
Dodge, Samuel D Cleveland, Ohio
Dollard, Robert Scotland, S. Dak.
Domer, S. P Spokane, Wash.
Donahoe, John T Joliet, 111.
Doocy, Edward Pittsfield, 111.
Dooley, Edward J Brooklyn, N. Y.
Dorsey, J. S Columbia, Mo.
Dougherty, J. W Washington, 111.
Douglas, John A New York City
Douglass, P. A Danville, Ark.
Douglass, Joshua Meadville, Pa.
Dowd, Thomas H Salamanca, N. Y.
Dowling, James E Springfield, 111.
Downing, H. H Front Royal, Va.
Downing, Thomas J New London, Mo.
Downs, S. A Mena, Ark.
Doyle, Michael J Green Bay, Wis.
Drake, Thomas Pierre, S. Dak.
Draper, A. L Glenville, Ohio
Dressier, Rev. John M Boelus, Neb.
Dreys, Otto L Delray, Mich.
Drinkle, H. C Lancaster, Ohio
Dudley, James G Paris, Tex.
Duffy, Rodolph Catharine Lake, N. C.
Dunbar, D. C Salt Lake City, Utah
Duncan, John F Lewisburg, Pa.
Duncan, John M Tyler, Tex.
Duncan, W. C Columbus, Ind.
Dunford, P. P Montague, Tex.
Dunn, Chauncey H Sacramento, Cal.
Durand, John S New York City
Durham, T. F Danville, Ky.
Durst, George M Thayer, Mo.
Dxttcher, Frederick L Rochester, N. Y.
Dyer, Elihu B Saybrook, 111.
Dygert, George B Butte, Mont.
Dykman, William N Brooklyn, N. Y.
Eagan, John J Hoboken, N. J.
' • 'ames J Seattle, Wash.
Eastham, H. C..... Baker City, Ore.
Eastman, Charles H Nashville, Tenn.
Eaton, Willard L Osage, Iowa
Ebner, F. E Aitkin, Minn.
Echols, John Warnock Washington, D. C.
Eckert, O. V Northwood, Iowa
Edmunds, Earl Correction ville, Iowa
Edwards, Charles W Bordentown, N. J.
Edwards, S. B Pottsville, Pa.
Edwards, T. M., D.Ps Fortuna, Cal.
Egan, John F Sapulpa, I. T.
Eggen, J. A Milwaukee, Wis.
Eickhoff, Henry San Francisco, Cal.
Einstein, Louis Fresno, Cal.
Eldridge, E. R Chicago, 111.
Eliel, Adolph Dillon, Mont.
Ellegood, James E Salisbury, Md.
Elliott, Frank W Topeka, Kan.
Ellis, G. W Hattiesburg, Miss.
Ellis, Matt H Philadelphia, Pa.
Ellis, O Uvalde, Tex.
Ellis, Stephen D Amite City, La.
Ellison, T. E Fort Wayne, Ind.
Elver, Elmore Theodore Madison, Wis.
Embry, James H Washington, D. C.
Emery, George D ..Minneapolis, Minn.
Emmert, J. M., M.D Atlantic, Iowa
English, John C Helena, Mont.
Ennes, John D Norfolk, Va.
Epes, T. Freeman Blackstone, Va.
Eskridge, J. T., M.D Denver, Colo.
Evans, E. G Des Moines, Iowa
Evarts, H. P Grand Rapids, Mich.
Everett, Howard Terril, Iowa
Ewing, Pressley K Houston, Tex.
F. & C. Co-operative Co Fort Gaines, Ga.
Falconer, John — San Francisco, Cal.
Falloon, Edwin Falls City, Neb.
Fanner, Charles H Walterboro, S. C.
Fanning, William J New York City
Farmer, R. J Detroit, Mich.
Farnham, George R Evergreen, Ala.
Farnsworth, W. H Sioux City, Iowa
Farr, Mark C Chicago, 111.
Farrar, J. H Groesbeeck, Tex.
Farrell, Clinton P New York City
Farrell, Rev. W. B Hempstead, L. L, N. Y.
Farrelly, Robert W Washington, D. C.
Faulkner, Charles J Martinsburg, W. Va.
Faxon, John W Chattanooga, Tenn.
Featherston, W. B Cleburne, Tex.
Feliz, F. P Monterey, Cal.
Ferguson, F. S Birmingham, Ala.
Ferguson, H. G St. Louis, Mo.
Ferris, M. J. II New York City
Ficke, C. A Davenport, Iowa
Field, Frank Harvey Brooklyn, N. Y.
Field, J. H Dickinson, N. Dak.
Filson, Frank M Cameron, Mo.
Finch, A. T., M.D Blacksburg, Va.
Finley, D. C Kansas City, Mo.
Firehammer, J. H Alameda, Cal.
Fischer, Frederick Brooklyn, N. Y.
Fishback, W. II Laramie, Wyo.
Fisher. William Pensacola, Fla.
Fitzgerald, H. R Danville, Va.
Fitzgerald, John E New York City
Fitz-Randolph, Leslie Nortonville, Kan.
xvi
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Flagg, John H New York City
Fleming, Hon. William H Augusta, Ga.
Fletcher, A. S Huntsville, Ala.
Fletcher, James H., Jr Accomack C. H., Va.
Fletcher, R. D Titusville, Pa.
Flournoy, George, Jr Bakersfield, Cal.
Floyd, G. S Waterville, Wash.
Foley, Hamilton, U.S.A
Foley, Paul, U.S.N
Follett, A. D Marietta, Ohio
Ford, Charles M Denver, Colo.
Fordyce, John Weyauwega, Wis.
Foster, E. Agate, M.D Patchogue, L. I., N. Y.
Foster, Samuel M Fort Wayne, Ind.
Fox, Hon. A. F West Point, Miss.
Frank, Henry New York City
Frankenheimer, John New York City
Franklin, David, M.D New York City
Freeman, W. R Denver, Colo.
French, D. E Keystone, W. Va.
French, E. L Lancaster, Mo.
Frick, J. E Salt Lake City, Utah
Frost, A. C Chicago, 111.
Frost, E. Allen Chicago, 111.
Fuller, Judge Ceylon Canfield Big Rapids Mich.
Fuller, Edward M., M.D Chicago, 111.
Fuller, T. A San Antonio, Tex.
Funk, M. P Rantoul, 111.
Furlong, Henry J New York City
Gaffney, F. O Lake City, Mich.
Gage, George W Chester, S. C.
Gail Borden Public Library Elgin, 111.
Gaither, Charles A Erie, Pa.
Galloway, Charles V Park Place, Ore.
Garcin, Ramon D., M.D Richmond, Va.
Gardner, Lawrence Washington, D. C.
Gardner, Levi Atlanta, N. Y.
Garman, John M Nanticoke, Pa.
Garner, James W Kansas City, Mo.
Garth, Col. William Willis Huntsville, Ala.
Gates, Theodore B Brooklyn, N. Y.
Gaylord, Samuel A St. Louis, Mo.
Gearhart, Cicero • Stroudsburg, Pa.
Gehrz, Gustave G Milwaukee, Wis.
Center, E. W Salt Lake City, Utah
George, James A Deadwood, S. Dak.
Gibbes, Heyward M Jerome, Ariz.
Gibbes, Hunter A Columbia, S. C.
Gibbons, James E Purcell, I. T.
Gibson, T. B McColl, S. C.
Gibson, William F San Francisco, Cal.
Gillan, George C Lexington, Neb.
Gillespie, George W Tazewell, Va.
Gillespie, John F Pine Bluff, Ark.
Ginter, H. E Du Bois, Pa.
Gleason, Orton W Detroit, Mich.
Gleason, P Le Roy, N. Y.
Godsman, P. B Burlington, Colo.
Goeke, J. H Wapakoneka, Ohio
Goeschel, Louis Bay City, Mich.
Goldberg, Abraham New Orleans, La.
Goodding, Roscoe E La Plata, Mo.
Goode, George W Grangeville, Idaho
Goodnight, I. H Franklin, Ky.
Gordon, Wellington Columbia, Mo.
Goss. D. F Seymour, Tex.
Gould, Will D Los Angeles, Cal.
Goulder, Holding & Masten Cleveland, Ohio
Gourley, William B Paterson, N. J.
Gow, John R Bellaire, Ohio
Graham, W. H Uniontown, Pa.
Grant, Bishop A Philadelphia. Pa.
Grant, M. R Meridian, Miss.
Grason, William Towson, Md.
Graves, Alvin M Cincinnati, Ohio
Graves, Ernest San Luis Obispo, Cal.
Graves, Hamilton Roanoke, Va
Gray, Alfred W Niagara Falls, N. Y.
Graybill, Capt. George York, Pa.
Grayston, W. E Joplin, Mo.
Greaves, Charles D ,...Hot Springs, Ark.
Greble, H. K Hamilton, Ohio
Green, Henry D Reading, Pa.
Greenburg, Rev. Dr. William H Sacramento, Cal.
Greene, Thomas G Portland, Ore.
Greenfield, Leo New York City
Greenway, J. Henry Havre de Grace, Md".
Greenwood, A. G Palestine, Tex.
Greenwood, Frederick Norfolk, Va.
Greer, H. H Mount Vernon, Ohio
Gregory, James P Louisville, Ky.
Griffiths, G. Charles Chicago, 111.
Grimes, H. H Lincoln, Neb.
Grosshans, Frank E East Liverpool, Ohio
Group, John W Rauchtown, Pa.
Grout, Edward M Brooklyn, N. Y.
Guerin, Claude V Asbury Park, N. J.
Guerry, Du Pont Macon, Ga.
Guerry, Homer Washington, D. C.
Guigon, A. B Richmond, Va.
Guilfoyle, Frank J Syracuse, N. Y.
Gunn, Julien Richmond, Va.
Gunnell, W. M Marlin, Tex.
Gustavus, C. D Oakwoods, Tex.
Guthrie, Ben Eli Macon, Mo.
Guthrie, William A Durham N C
Hackney, Edward T Wellington, Kan.
Hager, John F Ashland, Ky.
Haggan, Rodney Winchester, Ky.
Haire, Col. R. J New York City
Halderman, Grant E Longmont, Colo.
Hale, Hon. Horace M Denver, Colo.
Hale, Morris Hot Springs, Ala.
Hale, S. J Milner, Ga.
Hall, Anthony Paris, Ark.
Hall, Charles S Binghamton, N. Y.
Hall, Dr. D. H Pikeville, Tenn.
Hall, R. W Vernon, Tex.
Hall, William Roland Houston, Miss.
Halligan, John J North Platte, Neb.
Ham, H. W. J Gainesville, Ga.
Hamby, C. C Prescott, Ark.
Hamill, F. P Temple, Tex.
Hamilton, Gen. E. B Quincy, 111.
Hamlin, Byron D Smethport, Pa.
Hammersley, H Cleveland, Ohio
Hammond, George T Brooklyn, N. Y.
Hammond, J. T Salt Lake City, Utah
Hammond, Dr. Robert L Woodsboro, Md.
Hampson, J. K., M.D Nodena, Ark.
Hampton, Charles D El Reno, Okla. T.
Hampton, Charles S Detroit, Mich.
Hampton, William Wade Gainesville, Fla.
Hansbrough, Hon. Henry C Washington, D. C.
Hanson, Dr. T. C Winnemucca, Nev.
Harden, Alfred D New York City
Harding, Gilbert N Lacona, N. Y.
Hardman, Rev. A. L Natchez, Miss.
Harmon, Gilbert Toledo, Ohio
Harne, j. Lee New Martinsville, W. Va.
Harper, P. L Wallace, Neb.
Harrington, M. F O'Neill, Neb.
Harris, A. A Duluth, Minn.
Harris, James C Sheffield, Ala.
Harris, John T Harrisonburg, Va.
Harrison & Long Lynchburg, Va.
Hart, E. H San Francisco, Cal.
Hartigan, M. A Hastings, Neb.
Hartjen, John Brooklyn, N. Y.
Hartman, J. H Claflin, Kan.
Harvey, Edwin Clinton New York City
Hatcher, E. H Columbia, Tenn.
Hatfield, Charles S Clifton, Ohio
Hatton, Goodrich Portsmouth, Va.
Haviland, C. Augustus Brooklyn, N. Y.
Hawkins, A. S Midland, Tex.
Hawkins, J. E Langlois, Ore.
Hawkins, John J Prescott, Ariz.
Hawley, David Yonkers, N. V,
Hayes, George B New York Citj
Hayes, John E New York City
Hayman, L. H., M.D Boscobel, Wis.
Haynie, William Duff Chicago, 111.
Head, J. C Richmond, Ark.
Heagany, Richard Hartford City, Ind.
Heath, Thomas T Cincinnati, Ohio
Heatley, Thomas W Cleveland, Ohio
Heaton, Willis Edgar Hoosick Falls, N. Y.
Hebroy, J. L., Jr Leland, Miss.
Hedden, C. P Irvington, N. J.
Heffelfinger, Jacob Hampton, Va.
Heinly, Harvey F Reading, Pa.
Heiskell, S. G Knoxville, Tenn.
Held, W. D. L Ukiah, Cal.
Hemmeter, John C Cleveland, Ohio
Hemphill, John J Washington, D. C.
Hendrick, C. C Jersey City, N. J.
Henkel, Vernon A Farmersville, Ohio
Henry, John N Champlin, Minn.
Hensler, Gus Anacortes, Wash.
Hermann, Dr. G. J Newport, Ky.
Hero, William S New Orleans, La.
Hewitt, Hon. Abram S New York City
Hewitt, Robert A., Jr Maysyille, Mo.
Hibbard, Bertrand Lesly Monroeville, Ala.
Hickey, W. H., M.D Leipslc, Ohio
Hickok, S. J Canton, Pa.
Higgins, W. E La Porte, Ind.
LIST OF PATRONS
xvii
Higginson, O. F Needles, Cal.
Hildebrand, Edward New York City
Hildebrand, H. E San Antonio, Tex.
Hildreth, Melvin A Fargo, N. Dak.
Hill, Ex-Gov. David B Albany, N. Y.
Hill H. W., M.D Mooresville, Ala.
Hill, James W Peoria, 111.
Hill, Joseph M Fort Smith, Ark.
Hill, W. D Defiance, Ohio
Hilton, Charles S Clarksburg, Md.
Hilton, George Oshkosh, W is.
Himes, George W Shippensburg, Pa.
Hinckley, J. F Sapulpa, I. T.
Hine, Willis G Savannah, Mo.
Hines, Fletcher S Malatt Park, Ind.
Hines, James D Bowling Green, Ky.
Hinson, William G James Island, S. C.
Hite, W. W Louisville, Ky.
Hitt, Orlando Mexico, Mo.
Hobbs, J. W Nineveh, N. Y.
Hobson, F. G Norristown, Pa.
Hoffman, George W Boonsbpro, Md.
Hoffmann, L. O Price, Utah
Holcomb, O. R Ritzville, Wash.
Holcomb, Ex-Gov. Silas A Lincoln, Neb.
Holding, S. H Cleveland, Ohio
Holihan, John Auburn, N. Y.
Holland, L. T., M.D Los Angeles, Cal.
Holliday, W. H Laramie, Wyo.
Hollister, W. R Monticello, Mo.
Holman, J. H Fayetteville, Tenn.
Holmes, D. A Chicago, 111.
Holmes, John T Detroit, Mich.
Holmes, J. T Columbus, Ohio
Hood, R. B Weatherford, Tex.
Hooper, George J Richmond, Va.
Hooper, P. O., M.D Little Rock, Ark.
Hooper & Hooper Oshkosh, Wis.
Hoos, Hon. Edward Jersey City, N. J.
Hoover, S. S Elkhart, Ind.
Hopkins, J. G Hampstead, Albemarle Co., Va.
Hopper, P. L Havre de Grace, Md.
Hopwood, R. F Uniontown, Pa.
Horton, Hiler H St. Paul, Minn.
Horton, H. M Midland, Tex.
Hoskins, H. C Madera, Cal.
Houser, Frederick W Los Angeles, Cal.
Howard, Josiah Emporium, Pa.
Howard, W. A., M.D Waco, Tex.
Hoyt, Dr. Frank C Mt. Pleasant, Iowa
Hubbert, George Neosho, Mo.
Huber, A. H Westminster, Md.
Hudson, F. M Pine Bluff, Ark.
Hudson, Less. L Fort Worth, Tex.
Hudson, T. J Fredonia, Kan.
Hug, Edward V., M.D Lprain, Ohio
Hughes, Adrian Baltimore, Md.
Hughes, Charles J., Tr Denver, Colo.
Hughes, C. W., M.D Eleanor, Pa.
Hughes, L. C. ..../• Tucson, Ariz.
Hull, John M....1 Cleveland, Ohio
Humes, Milton Huntsville, Ala.
Humphrey, J. O Springfield, 111.
Humphries, W. A Portland, Ind.
Hunt, C. C Montezuma, Iowa
Hunter, Henry B Milwaukee, Wis.
Hunter, Peter Eddystone, Pa.
Hunter, Sam J Fort Worth, Tex.
Huntington, D. W. C Lincoln, Neb.
Huntington, R. M Hot Springs, Ark.
Hurley, Rev. John A Emerald, Kan.
Hurst, Elmore W Rock Island, 111.
Hutchings, William T Muscogee, I. T.
Hutter, C. S Lynchburg, Va.
Hutton, A. W Los Angeles, Cal.
Hyde, G. W., M.D Clinton, 111.
Hyde, W. L Buchanan, Va.
Hyland, Judge M. H San Jose, Cal.
Inches, Dr. James W St. Clair, Mich.
Ingersoll, Henry H Knoxville, Tenn.
Irwin, Charles Kingston, N. Y.
Israel, G. C Olympia, Wash.
Itell, Thomas J Johnstown, Pa.
Jackson, E. G Hoboken, N. J.
Jackson, George P. B St. Louis, Mo.
Jackson, J. K. P Margaretville, N. Y.
Jacobs, J. H Reading, Pa.
James, C. F., D.D Danville, Va.
James, H. Clay Huntsville, Tenn.
Janes, F. P., M.D .....Lake Creek, Tex.
Jarvis, George J Faulkton, S. Dak.
Jelleff, A. C Ripon, Wis.
Jenkins, C. H Brownwood, Tex.
Jenkins, J. C MarysvilJe, Cal.
enkins, John J Chippewa Falls, Wis.
ennings, Hyde Fort Worth, Tex.
cnnings, T. A Tampa, Fla.
eter, W. M Dumas, Tex.
ewett, F. T San Francisco, Cal.
ewks, George A Brookville, Pa.
ohanson, Fritz Chinook, Wash.
ohn, Samuel Will Birmingham, Ala.
ohns, John E Massillon, Ohio
ohnson, Alvin J Knoxville, Tenn.
ohnson, Clyde B St. Mary's, W. Va.
ohnson, Ex-Gov. Charles P St. Louis, Mo.
ohnson, David M., Jr Chester, Pa.
ohnson, Francis Little Rock, Ark.
ohnson, Greene F Monticello, Ga.
ohnson, James Pittsburg, Pa.
ohnson, Mrs. James V Brooklyn, N. Y.
ohnson, J. B Nevada, Mo.
Johnson, J. B Des Moines, Iowa
Johnson, J. M Hillsboro, Tex.
Johnson, John G Peabody, Kan.
Johnson, L. H Eureka, Kan.
Johnson, Owens Brunswick, Ga.
Johnson, Col. R. M Elkhart, Ind.
Johnson, Thomas M Osceola, Mo.
Johnson, W. Carter Louisville, Ky.
Johnston, H. M Fresno, Cal.
Jolly, George W Owensboro, Ky.
"ones, Benjamin O Metropolis, 111.
ones, Daniel M Anson, Tex.
ones, Dr. H. C Mt. Vernon, N. Y.
ones, James C St. Louis, Mo.
ones, James H Henderson, Tex.
ones, J. Dunlop Grayson, Ky.
ones, L. A Como, Miss.
ones, Richard A St. Louis, Mo.
ones, Richmond L Reading, Pa.
ones, Ricy H Brigham City, Utah
ones, W. H Riverside, Iowa
ones, William H., M.D Bethlehem, Pa.
ones, William Jarvis Chicago, 111.
ordan, Judge James H Martinsville, Ind.
ordan, J. Eugene Seattle, Wash.
ordan, Warren S Peekskill, N. Y.
ordin, J. F Gallatin, Mo.
udd, John W Nashville, Tenn.
^ane, M. N Warwick, N. Y.
Keast, Alderman J. W St. John, N. B.
Keenan, S. A Clark, S. Dak.
Keene, John Henry Baltimore, Md.
Keffer, J. L Dunbar, Pa.
Reiser, C. W Hazleton, Pa.
Keizer, Lewis R Baltimore, Md.
Keller, John W New York City
Kelley, Marshall C Muskegon, Mich.
Kellogg, A. C Portage, Wis.
Kellogg, Frank E Goleta, Cal.
Kelly, B. A Benton, La.
Kelly, Frank P San Francisco, Cal.
Kelly, James R San Francisco, Cal.
Kelly, John T Milwaukee, Wis.
Kelso, A. W Grant City, Mo.
Kelton, W. H. S Alvarado, Tex.
Kenfield, William F Woonsocket, S. Dak.
Kennedy, Hon. A. M Mexia, Tex.
Kennedy, Crammond Alpine, N. J.
Kennedy, James L Greensburg, Pa.
Kent, Henry T St. Louis, Mo.
Kent, Volney Marshalltown, Iowa
Kern, John W Indianapolis, Ind.
Kern, R. H St. Louis, Mo.
Kerr, Charles Lexington, Ky.
Keyes, W. S San Francisco, Cal.
Kidd, Gideon P., M.D Roann, Ind.
Kilbourne, James Columbus, Ohio
Killebrew, J. B Nashville, Tenn.
Kimbrough, E. R. E Danville, 111.
King, Henry B Augusta, Ga.
King, Col. H. M Evergreen, Ala.
King, John C Baltimore, Md.
King, J. W Kittanning, Pa.
King, Wilbur E Columbus, Ohio
Kingsbury, S. B Boise, Idaho
Kinne, James G Ft. Edward, N. Y.
Kirkpatrick, J. M Dodge City, Kan.
Kissick, W. A Brooklyn, N. Y.
Kitts, Charles W Grass Valley, Cal.
Klaas, Albert R Pittsburg, Pa.
Klar, A. Julian Brooklyn, N. Y.
Klein, Alfred Philadelphia, Pa.
Kleberg, Robert J Corpus Christi, Tex.
KHnedinst, David P York, Pa.
Klugh, James C Abbeville, S. C.
Kluttz, Theodore F Salisbury, N. C.
xviii
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Knapp, F. M Racine, Wis.
Knappe, W, Trevitt, M.D Vincennes, Ind.
Knight, George A Brazil, Ind.
Knight, R. Huston Los Angeles, Cal.
Knoebel, Thomas East St. Louis, 111.
Knox, Chris L Corsicana, Tex.
Knox, J. W Merced, Cal.
Knudson, Charles O Canton, S. Dak.
Kocher, Charles F Newark, N. J.
Koepke, Charles A Chicago, 111.
Kontz, Ernest C Atlanta, Ga.
Koontz, J. B Washington C. H., Ohio
Koontz, J. R Ansted, W. Va.
Krebs, David L Clearfield, Pa.
Kroeer, Lewis Sheffield, Pa.
Kruttschnitt, E. B New Orleans, La.
Krum, Chester St. Louis, Mp.
Kryder, John F Alliance, Ohio
La Buy, M. A Chicago, 111.
Lackland, H. C St. Charles, Mo.
La Due, A Mt. Dora, Fla.
La Force, William N Portland, Ore.
Lake, Lewis F Rpckford, 111.
Lake, Luther E Huntingdon, Ark.
Lamar, J. R Augusta, Ga.
Lamb, Edwin M Butte, Mont.
Lambert, Stenson, M.D Owensboro, Ky.
Lambeth, J. T Lambethville, Ark.
Lamoreaux, Frank B Stevens Point, Wis.
Lamson, John D. R Toledo, Ohio
Landes, S. Z Mt. Carmel, 111.
Landis, William P Philadelphia, Pa.
Lansden, John M Cairo, 111.
Lapp, J. E Cincinnati, Ohio
Larkins, Rev. S. C Long Creek, N. C.
Lamer, John B Washington, D. C.
Larrazolo, O. R Las Vegas, New Mexico
Latham, W. H Curtis, Neb.
Laughlin, Randolph St. Louis, Mo.
Laurence, Howard E Brooklyn, N. Y.
Lawson McGhee Library Knoxville, Tenn.
Lawther, Henry P Dallas, Tex.
Lawyer, George Albany, N. Y.
Lay, W. P .' Gadsden, Ala.
Leber, Henry Oakland, Cal.
Lee, Prof. Duncan Campbell, Cornell University,
Ithaca, N. Y.
Lee, Harry H Denver, Colo.
Lee, N. L Junction City, Ore.
Leek, Rev. John D Dixon, 111.
Leeper, A. B., Ad'jt Gen'l., G.A.A.V., Owaneco, 111.
Lees, Robert Alma, Wis.
Leffler, John, M.D San Francisco, Cal.
Lehmayer, Martin Baltimore, Md.
Leigh, A., A.M., M.D., F.R.M.S... Hiawatha, Kan.
Lentz, Hon. John J Columbus, Ohio
Leonard, Charles R Butte, Mont.
Leonard, H. B Yoakum, Tex.
Leslie, Preston H Helena, Mont.
Lester, Ruf us E Savannah, Ga.
Letcher, Greenlee D Lexington, Va.
Levagood, M. H Elyria, Ohio
Levis, G. W Madison, Wis.
Lewis, Rev. Barney W Chunkey, Miss.
Lewis, H. Claude Salt Lake City, Utah
Lewis, Dr. John V Alliance, Ohio
Lewis, Lyman W Kewanee, 111.
Lewis, Dr. Walter Decatur, Neb.
Libby, M. D El Reno, Okla. T.
Liebig, G. M Sparrow's Point, Md.
Lienesch, T. H Dayton, Ohio
Lightfoot, Henry W Paris, Tex.
Lindsey, S. A Tyler, Tex.
Line, Benajah A., M.D Alexandria, Ind.
Lippmann, Leopold J New York City
Litz, A. W Charleston, 111.
Livingston, Alfred T., M.D Jamestown, N. Y.
Livingston, Hon. J. B Lancaster, Pa.
Livingston, John Henry Tivoli-on-Hudson, N. Y.
Locker, W. H Waynesville, Mo.
Lockett, John W Henderson, Ky.
Lodge, J. C Waverly, Wash.
Logan. D. B Pineville, Ky.
Logan, J. A Kingman, Ariz.
Lomax, Tennent Montgomery, Ala.
Long, Eugene R Batesville, Ark.
Long, George S Troy, Ohio
Long, J. Grier Spokane, Wash.
Long, Solomon L Grenola, Kan.
Long, Theodore K Chicago, 111.
Longan, Edward Everett St. Louis, Mo.
Longfelder, David Wabash, Ind.
Lonigo, E. V Jackson, Cal.
Lookabaugh, I. H Watonga, Okla. T.
Looney, R. H Colorado, Tex.
Loucks, Zachariah Kepner Philadelphia, Pa.
Love, J. King, M.D Yardley, Pa.
Low, M. A Topeka, Kan.
Lowden, Frank Orren Chicago, 111.
Lowe, J. M Kansas City, Mo.
Lowe, Robert J Birmingham, Ala.
Lowenberg, Harry L Norfolk, Va.
Lower, J. C Cleveland, Ohio
Lowry, T. C Richmond, Ky.
Lozier, Ralph F Carrpllton, Mo.
Lubers, H. L Las Animas, Colo.
Lucas, J. T Moshannon, Pa.
Lucking, Alfred Detroit, Mich.
Ludlow, James M., D.D., L.H.D..E. Orange, N. J.
Ludwig, Henry T. J Mt. Pleasant, N. C.
Ludwig, John H New York City
Luf, Charles B New York City
Lumbard, Samuel J Chicago, 111.
Lykins, Joseph C Campton, Ky.
Lyman, J. P Grinnell, Iowa
Lynch, Martin P., LL.B Brooklyn, N. Y.
Lynham, J. Arthur Washington, D. C.
Lyter, M. M Great Falls, Mont.
McAtee, Judge John L Enid, Okla.
McCarren, P. H Brooklyn, N. Y.
McCarthy, C. C Grand Rapids, Minn.
McCarthy, John Henry New York City
McCarty, A. P Bronte, Tex.
McCarty, Homer Monroe, Utah
McCaskill, J. M Rison, Ark.
McComas, George J Huntington, W. Va.
McCoy, Benjamin Oskaloosa Iowa
McCoy, D. W. F New York City
McCoy John W Fairmont, W. Va.
McCravy, S. T Spartanburg, S. C.
McCullock, P. D Marianus, Ark.
McCully, H. G Jersey City, N. L
McDaniel, P. A Abbeville, Ala.
McDavitt, J. C Memphis, Tenn.
McDermot, R. B Coshocton, Ohio
McDonald, Tames H Detroit, Mich.
McDonald, J. H Cedar City, Utah
McDowell, John A Millersburg, Ohio
McElligott, Thomas G Chicago, 111.
McGoorty, John P Chicago, 111.
McGowan, P. J Astoria, Ore.
McGrath, Robert H Philadelphia, Pa.
McGraw, E. W San Francisco, Cal.
McGraw, John T Grafton, W. Va.
McGuffey, John G Columbus, Ohio
McGuire, John C Brooklyn, N. Y.
McHolland (Miss) B Durango, Colo.
Mcllwaine, C. R Knoxville, Tenn.
Mcllwaine, William B Petersburg, Va.
Mclntyre, John F New York City
Mclntyre, William J Riverside, Cal.
McKeighan, J. E St. Louis, Mo.
McKinley, H. C Gaylord, Mich.
McKnight, William F Grand Rapids, Mich.
McLaughlin, I. W Macedon, N. Y.
McLaughlin. W. L Deadwood, S. Dak.
McLean, W. T., M.D., D.D.S Cincinnati, Ohio
McMahon, Charles C Fulton, 111.
McMahon, J. K Chicago, 111.
McMahon, Richard Randolph,
Harper's Ferry, W. Va.
McMackin, John Albany, N. Y.
McMillan, F. H Atlanta, Ga.
McMorrow, M Brazil, Ind.
McNair, A. C Brookhaven, Miss.
McNamara, James J Baltimore, Md.
McNamara, John W Albany, N. Y.
McNamee, F. R Delamar, Nev.
McNaughton, D. W • Boardman, N. C.
McNiel, Dr. W. N Longfield, Va.
McPheeters, James Benton, Mo.
McRae, A. J West Superior, Wis.
McRae, Thomas C Prescott, Ark.
McMurray, J. L Tacoma, Wash.
McSherry, Tames Frederick, Md.
McWilliams, Howard New York City
McWilliams, J. K Sunbury, Pa.
MacDougall, R. S Los Angeles, Cal.
Mackenzie, John R., M.D Weatherford, Tex.
Mackey, C. H Sigourney, Iowa
Mackey, Robert K New York City
MacPhail, Donald T., M.D Purdy Sta., N. Y.
Macquarrie, Neil A Jackson, Cal.
MacRae, Donald Wilmington, N. C.
Macomber, Charles S Ida Grove, Iowa
Madden, Charles J Tennille, Ga.
Magee, Judge Christopher Pittsburg. Pa.
Maloney, Thomas Ogden, Utah
LIST OF PATRONS
xix
Mann, Edgar P Greenfield, Mo.
Mapes, Dorchester Chicago, 111.
Markey, Edward J Brooklyn, N. Y.
Marsh, Craig A Plainfield, N. J.
Marsh, E. J Big Rapids, Mich.
Marshall, Linus R Springfield, Ohio
Martin, I. L Uvalde, Tex.
Martin, John Burlington Covington, Ind.
Martin, Lyman W Scale, Ala.
Martine, Hon. Godfrey R., M.D.. Glens Falls, N. Y.
Marvin, Charles Elmira, N. Y.
Marvin, D. P Woodward, Okla.
Marvin, John L Jacksonville, Fla.
Mason, F. O Geneva, N. Y.
Mason, Tames H Brooklyn, N. Y.
Mason, P. G Le Roy, N. Y.
Masters, Edgar L Chicago, 111.
Mathews. Thomas J Merrill, Wis.
Matoon, Charles M., M.D Brookville, Pa.
Mattes, John, Jr Nebraska City, Neb.
Matthews, W. B Washington, D. C.
Maulsby, Israel T Tillamook City, Ore.
May, S. D Tazewell, Va.
Maybury, Hon. William C Detroit, Mich.
Means, George W Brookville, Pa.
Medill, Thomas J Rock Island, 111.
Meek, J. F Coshocton, Ohio
Mercantile Library St. Louis, Mo.
Merchant, Edward L Horatio, Ark.
Meredith, Milo Wrabash, Ind.
Merrill, John B Long Island City, N. Y.
Metcalf, "Arthur A., M.D Dunbar, Wis.
Millar, A. C Conway, Ark.
Miller, B. S Columbus, Ga.
Miller, Dewitt Philadelphia, Pa.
Miller, George Knox Talladega, Ala.
Miller, Jacob F New York City
Miller, James R Watertown, N. Y.
Miller, John A., M.D San Francisco, Cal.
Miller, John D Susquehanna, Pa.
Miller, Mary E Chicago, 111.
Million, E. C Mt. Vernon, Wash.
Mills, W. P Sidney, Neb.
Milner, J. Cooper Vernon, Ala.
Minor, F. D Galveston, Tex.
Mitchell, Edward P New York City
Mitchell, R. C Duluth, Minn.
Momsen, John Mt. Vernon, S. Dak.
Monahan, Patrick W Red Cliff, Colo.
Monjeau, C Middletown, Ohio
Monnette, O. E Bucyrus, Ohio
Monroe, Chilton Dallas, Tex.
Monroe, Henry S Chicago, 111.
Monroe. Robert W Kingwood, W. Va.
Montandon, A. F Boise City, Idaho
Moon, George C New York City
Mooney, John H New York City
Mooney, William Joliet, 111.
Moore, A. C., M.D North Amherst, Ohio
Moore, Felix W Union City, Tenn.
Moore, Frank N Chicago, 111.
Moore, M. Herndon Columbia, S. C.
Moran, Dr. James New York City
Moroney, John F Brooklyn, N. Y.
Morris, James E Arthur, 111.
Morrissey, Andrew M Valentine, Neb.
Morrow, Thomas R Kansas City, Mo.
Morse, S. F. B Houston, Tex.
Moss, Nathanel P Lafayette, La.
Mott, John Sabert, M.D Kansas City, Mo.
Mountjoy, Wiley Twin Bridges, Mont.
Mounts, William L Carlinville, 111.
Mouton, Homer Lafayette, La.
Moyer, George W Salt Lake City, Utah
Muir, P. B Louisville, Ky.
Mullins, G. M Papillion, Neb.
Mumford, Beverley B Richmond, Va.
Murphy, D. E Milwaukee, Wis.
Murphy, John H Denver, Colo.
Murphy, J. M. C Lodi, Cal.
Murphy, T. J Mayfield, Ky.
Murphy, Rev. William Seward, Neb.
Murray, Arthur Pine Bluff, Ark.
Murray, William H Tishomingo, I. T.
Napton, Charles M St. Louis, Mo.
Nash, John A Audubon, Iowa
Nash, Wiley N Starkville, Miss.
Neal, E. A Cuero, Tex.
Neff, George H Sunbury, Pa.
Nelms, W. W Georgetown, Tex.
Neville, Richard L New York City
Newby, Nathan Los Angeles, Cal.
Newson, John A Buffalo, Tex.
Newton, Hon. C Monroe, La.
New York University Library,
University Heights, New York City
Nicholas, S. H Coshocton, Ohio
Nichols, Joseph F Greenville, Tex.
Nicholson, B. II Attala, Ala.
Nilsson, M. T Laurens, Iowa
Noe, Noah S Kearny, N. J.
Norman, J. Felix Thayer, Mo.
Norman, Louis W Kandiyohi, Minn.
Norrell, A. G Salt Lake City, Utah
Northern State Normal School Marquette, Mich.
Norton, James Garrettsville, Ohio
Norwood, G. A., Jr Goldsboro, N. C.
Nutt, George D., M.D \\illiamsport, Pa.
Nye, Frederick A Kearney, Neb.
O'Brien, Ouin Chicago, 111.
O'Brien, Thomas E New York City
O'Bryan, William H Altruria, Cal.
O'Callaghan, M. J Philadelphia, Pa.
O'Connell, J. B Chicago, 111.
O'Connor, Cornelius New York City
O'Donnell, Joseph A Chicago, 111.
O'Gorman, Hon. James A New York City
O'Hara, R. A Hamilton, Mont.
O'Keeffe, P. T Chicago, 111.
O'Malley, John, M.D Scranton, Pa.
O'Sullivan, Michael New York City
O'Sullivan, W. J New York City
Oakes, Dr. I. N North Ridgeville, Ohio
Oakley, Horace S Chicago, 111.
Ockford, George M., M.D Ridgewood, N. J.
Odell, Spurgeon Marshall, Minn.
Ogden, R. N Deadwood, S. Dak.
Oliver, George A Onawa, Iowa
Olney, Peter B New York City
Oneonta Public Library Oneonta, N. Y.
Ornelas, Dr. P San Antonio, Tex.
Orr, J. S Steel City, Neb.
Orrick, William P., D.D Reading, Pa.
Osborne, H. E Chicago, 111.
Osborne, John E Rawlins, Wyo.
Osborne. S. J Quanah, Tex.
Osthaus, Herman Scranton, Pa.
Otis, A. Walker New York City
Otts, J. Cornelius Gaffney, S. C.
O vermyer, John North Vernon, Ind.
Owsley, Alvin C Denton, Tex.
Packwood, S. E Magnolia, Miss.
Paden, George Armona, Cal.
Paine, Bayard H Grand Island, Neb.
Paine, Karl Idaho City, Idaho
Palmer, Clarence S Kansas City, Mo.
Palmer, Irving H Cortland, N. Y.
Panabaker, P. F Hartington, Neb.
Parker. Silas C Mansfield, Ohio
Parker, Dr. Thomas J Detroit, Mich.
Parker, W. S Henderson, N. C.
Parker, W. W Baltimore, Md.
Parkhurst, Frank B Frankfort, N. Y.
Parrish, Robert L Covington, Va.
Parrott, James M Kinston, N. C.
Parrott, R. B Des Moines, Iowa
Paterson, Van R San Francisco, Cal.
Patrick, Albert T New York City
Patrick, John E Jackson, Ky.
Patterson, Benjamin New York City
Patterson, Charles B El Paso, Tex.
Patterson, R. S Safford, Ariz.
Patterson, Thomas M Denver, Colo.
Patton, D. H Woodward, Okla.
Patton, George S San Gabriel, Cal.
Patty, C. N Pontiac, 111.
Pauly, R. J., Sr St. Louis, Mo.
Pavne, Gen. Walter S Fostoria, Ohio
Pearson, L. W., M.D Brooklyn, N. Y.
Peck, John H Troy, N. Y.
Pendennis Club Louisville, Ky.
Penney, James E New Decatur, Ala.
Penwell, Lewis Helena Mont.
Peoria Public Library Peoria, 111.
Pereles, Thomas Jefferson Milwaukee, Wis.
Perkins, Hon. George C Washington, D. C.
Perkins, John C Sisseton, S. Dak.
Perky, K. I Mountain Home, Idaho
Perry, W. C Kansas City, Mo.
Peterkin, Dr. Guy S Seattle, Wash.
Peterkin, W. G Parkersburg, W. Va.
Pettit, William B Palmyra, Va.
Pettus & Lester Athens, Ala.
Pharr, Olin McRae, Ga.
Phelps, O. C Warren, Ohio
Philips, H. B Jacksonville, Fla.
Phillips, George B Key West, Fla.
Phipps, T. M Key West, Fla.
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Pickens, Samuel O Indianapolis, Ind.
Pickering, A. O., M.D Chuckey City, Tenn.
Pickett, N. J., M.D Milford, Tex.
Pike, Vinton St. Joseph, Mo.
Pile, J. M Wayne, Neb.
Pinckney, John M Hempstead, Tex.
Pinney, William E Valparaiso, Ind.
Pitts, John A Nashville, Tenn.
Pitzer, U. S. G Martinsburg, W. Va.
Planten, J. R New York City
Platt, George G Butte, Mont.
Plumer, Samuel Franklin, Pa.
Plummer, Edwin L Indianapolis, Ind.
Pock, John H Troy, N. Y.
Poindexter, Joseph Cleburne, Tex.
Pool, Lawrence P Manchester, Va.
Porter, Charles H Baltimore, Md.
Porter, Dr. L. L Roslyn, Wash.
Porter, S. W Sherman, Tex.
Porter, W. F Baltimore, Md.
Post, Charles A Cleveland, Ohio
Post, Duff Tampa, Fla.
Post, Floyd L Midland, Mich.
Poston, R. C Corydon, Iowa
Potter, C. C Gainesville, Tex.
Potter, C. L Gainesville, Tex.
Potts, H. Cameron.. Germantown, Philadelphia, Pa.
Potts, W. S Lisbon, Ohio
Pound, James T Newton, Iowa
Pounders, R. L Mt. Vernon, Tex.
Powell, Arthur Gray Blakely, Ga.
Powell, Joseph H Bridgeton, N. J.
Power, John Escanaba, Mich.
Powers, J. N Salt Lake City, Utah
Prendergast, Joseph, M.D Chicago, 111.
Prest, John E Cohoes, N. Y.
Preston, E. F San Francisco, Cal.
Preston, Joseph W., Jr Macon, Ga.
Price, Daniel T Yoakum, Tex.
Price, Sim T St. Louis, Mo.
Price, William B Lincoln, Neb.
Price, William S Philadelphia, Pa.
Pritchett, H. C Huntsville, Tex.
Public Library and Museum Dayton, Ohio
Quackenbush, A. W Stanberry, Mo.
Quick, W. H Rockingham, N. C.
Quinn, Frank J Peoria, 111.
Quinn, Lawrence R New York City
Rader, Perry S Jefferson City, Mo.
Ragland, H. Clay Logan, W. Va.
Rainey, Anson Dallas, Tex.
Ralston, Jackson H Hyattsville, Md.
Ralston, Samuel M Lebanon, Ind.
Ralston, T. A New York City
Ralston, Thomas E St. Louis, Mo.
Ramsland, O. T Sacred Heart, Minn.
Ranney, Henry C Cleveland, Ohio
Rathbun, W. A Springfield, Mo.
Ravenel, Rene Monks Corner, S. C.
Ray, Al Charleston, 111.
Read, Charles A Atlanta, Ga.
Rector, H. M., M.D Hot Springs, Ark.
Redd, Samuel C Beaver Dam P. O., Va.
Reid, James W Lewiston, Idaho
Reid, Rev. J. L Bardstown, Ky.
Reid, Willard P Babylon, N. Y.
Reifkogel, William % Plainview, Minn.
Reppy, Samuel A De Soto, Mo.
Reuter, Dominic Trenton, N. J.
Reynolds, Walter D Philadelphia, Pa.
Rice, Charles E Wilkes-Barre, Pa.
Rich, Albert R Du Bois, Pa.
Richards, F. S Salt Lake City, Utah
Richardson, Edmund F Denver, Colo.
Rickards, Hon. J. E Butte, Mont.
Ricketts, A Wilkes-Barre, Pa.
Riddle, George D Pittsburg, Pa.
Riley, Harry I Pittsburg, Pa.
Riordan, T. J Salinas, Cal.
Ritchie, Alfred G Los Angeles, Cal.
Riviere, Georges Alphonse Mobile, Ala.
Roark, Joe Sam Valparaiso, Ind.
Roberts, John W Riverside, Cal.
Robertson, Andrew C Pittsburg, Pa.
Robertson, George Mexico, Mo.
Robertson, James, Jr Washta, Iowa
Robertson, W. F Georgetown, Tex.
Robinson, C. W Newport News, Va.
Robinson, Edward M Mobile, Ala.
Robinson, George L. F Highmore, S. Dak.
Robinson, George R Minneapolis, Minn.
Robinson, H. R Minneapolis, Minn.
Robinson, Joe T Lonoke, Ark.
Robinson, M. L Columbus, Ga.
Rochford, William E Minneapolis, Minn.
Rodgers, James M Watsonville, Cal.
Rogers, J. R Olympia, Wash.
Roote, Jesse B Butte, Mont.
Rosenwald, David S Roswell, N. Mex.
Ross, P. A Eustis, Fla.
Rubrecht, Franklin Columbus, Ohio
Rush, J. S Des Moines, Iowa
Russel, Andrew Jacksonville, 111.
Russell, William Hepburn New York City
Ryan, Joseph T New York City
Ryan, O'Neill St. Louis, Mo.
Ryan, T. C Wausau, Wis.
Ryan, William J Menominee, Mich.
Rynearson, J. M La Fayette, Ind.
Sackett, Henry W New York City
Saffolds, W. S Guyton, Ga.
Sale, Lee St. Louis, Mo.
Sample, A Bloomington, 111.
Sanders, George A Springfield, 111.
Sankey, R. A Wichita, Kan.
Sargent, Brad V Salinas City, Cal.
Sargent, C. H Jefferson, Ohio
Savage, John H McMinnville, Tenn.
Savage, Michael Clarksville, Tenn.
Sawdey, D. A Erie, Pa.
Sawyer, A. J Lincoln, Neb.
Sawyer, A. L Menominee, Mich.
Sawyer, John H Auburn, N. Y.
Scales, S. S Crawford, Miss.
Scarlett, James Danville, Pa.
Scattergood, Caleb Philadelphia, Pa.
Schaef er, Charles Sedgwick, Kan.
Scharfer, E Toccoa, Ga.
Schevers, A. J Chicago, 111.
Schieck, Christian, Jr New York City
Schilling, A. J Urbana, 111.
Schilling, N Cedar Bayou, Tex
Schlegel, Hon. Henry Lapeer, Mich.
Schlichter, G. V Brooklyn, N. Y..
Schnell, L St. Charles, Miss.
Schoenfeld, Rev. W New York City
Schroeder, James Guttenberg, Iowa
Schubert, C Brooklyn, N. Y.
Schurnight, W. J Mishawaka, Ind
Schultz, Irvine W Phillipsburg, N. J.
Scott, A. G Chicago, III
Scott, C. H Elkins, W. Va.
Scott, George W Davenport, lowt
Scott, Joseph Los Angeles, Cal.
Scott, Tully Oberlin, Kan.
Scott, W Clarksburg, W. Va.
Scott, Wralter E., M.D Adel, Iowa
Scott, W. W., State Librarian Richmond, Va.
Seaberg, Hugo Springer, N. Mex.
Seabury, Samuel New York City
Searcy, Jefferson B Eminence, Mo.
Sebastian. James M Booneville, Ky.
Seiders, C. A Toledo, Ohio
Seiss, Joseph A., D.D., LL.D Philadelphia, Pa.
Selby, T. J Hardin, 111.
Seney, Hon. Henry W Toledo, Ohio
Sennott, John S., M.D Waterloo, 111.
Sentinel of Liberty Chicago, 111.
Sexton, H. A. J Jefferson City, Mo.
Shabad, Henry M Chicago, 111.
Shackleford, Thomas M Tampa, Fla.
Shaffer, C. W Emporium, Pa.
Shank, Corwin S Seattle, Wash.
Shannon, I. M Clarion, Pa.
Shattuck, F. R Philadelphia, Pa.
Shaw, James H Bloomington, 111.
Shaw, O. W Austin, Minn.
Sheard, Titus Little Falls, N. Y.
Shearman, Thomas G Brooklyn, N. Y.
Sheean, David Galena, 111.
Sheeks, Ben Tacoma, Wash.
Shelton, D. C Tulsa, I. T.
Shepherd, W. C Hamilton, Ohio
Shepherd, William G Seneca Falls, N. Y.
Sheppard, Howard R Philadelphia, Pa.
Shick, Robert P Reading, Pa.
Shields, Moses, Jr Nicholson, Pa.
Shime, Patrick C Spokane, Wash.
Shipp, C. J Cordele, Ga.
Shirley, D. D Allerton, Iowa
Shirley, Robert B Carlinville, 111.
Short, John P Brooklyn, N. Y.
Shortz, Edwin Wilkes-Barre, Pa.
Sibley, Hiram S Marietta, Ohio
Sidebottom, Earl E Santa Fe, N. Mex.
Silberman, Louis Albany, N. Y.
Silha, John A Chicago, 111.
Sim, John R New York City
LIST OF PATRONS
Simms, A. H Birmingham, Ala.
Simonds, C. H Conneaut, Ohio
Simonton, Dr. A. C Roslyn, Wash.
Simpson, William J., M.D Western, Mo.
Sioux City Public Library Sioux City, Iowa
Skelton, W. H Alvarado, Tex.
Skipworth, E. R Eugene, Ore.
Slack, Dr. Henry R La Grange, Ga.
Slater, W. T Salem, Ore.
Slinkard, W. L Bloomfield, Ind.
Sloan, J. R Stanley, Kan.
Slocum, C. E., Jr Beatrice, Neb.
Slocum, Charles E., M.D., Ph.D Defiance, Ohio
Smith, Benjamin N Los Angeles, Cal.
Smith, Ephraim P Yorkville, Tenn.
Smith, Gilbert D Middebourne, W. Va.
Smith, Harrison B Charleston, W. Va.
Smith, J. Alfred Philadelphia, Pa.
Smith, J. P Fort \Vorth, Tex.
Smith, Oscar B Washington, Ga.
Smith, Ouincy A Lansing, Mich.
Smith, W. Wickham Brooklyn, N. Y.
Smyth, David Wichita, Kan.
Smythe, P. Henry Burlington, Iowa
Snedeker, J. Q Marshall, 111.
Snider, Millard F Clarksburg, W. Va.
Soliday, George W Carrington, N. Dak.
Solter, George A Baltimore, Md.
Somermier, W. H Winfield, Kan.
Somers, James W San Diego, Cal.
Somerville, Robert Greenville, Miss.
Southall, E. \V., M.D Geneseo, N. Y.
Spain, John A Sardis, Miss.
Spannhorst, Henry J St. Louis, Mo.
Sparr, R. W Lawrence, Kan.
Spearman, Robert F Greenville, Tex.
Speer, D. R Greenville, S. C.
Speer, James A New York City
Spekker, Staas Lewiston, Idaho
Spell, W. E Hillsboro, Tex.
Spencer, H. N., M.D St. Louis, Mo.
Spencer, H. R Duluth, Minn.
Spencer, S. S Eugene, Ore.
Spencer, Thomas H Chicago, 111.
Spencer, William W Indianapolis, Ind.
Spooner, Lewis C Morris, Minn.
Sporer, Thomas D Jacksboro, Tex.
Spratt, William E St. Joseph, Mo.
Sprigg, Joseph Cumberland, Md.
Spriggs, J. P Woodfield, Ohio
Squire, VVilliam Russell New York City
Stahlman, E. C Nashville, Tenn.
Standish, A. B St. Ignace, Mich.
Stansel, M. L Carrollton, Ala.
Staples, John W Harriman, Tenn.
Starnes, P. M Des Moines, Iowa
Starrett, William R New York City
Steck, John M Winchester, Va.
Sleekier, Louis New York City
Steele, Robert W Denver, Colo.
Steenerson, H Crookston, Minn.
Stehle, Rev. Wralter, O.S.B Allegheny, Pa.
Steinman, E. W Belleville, 111.
Stephens, H. A Wallace, N. Y.
Stephenson, Albert G New York City
Stephenson, W . H Hart ington, Neb.
Sterrett, David Washington, Pa.
Stevens, B. J Madison, Wis.
Stewart, I. J Richfield, Utah
Stewart. William C Soapstone, Ala.
Stewart, W. E Clanton, Ala.
Stewart, Hon. William M Washington, D. C.
Stimpson, H. C. S New York City
Stites, O. W Durham, N. C.
Stocker, R. M Honesdale, Pa.
Stoddart, George B Oyster Bay, N. Y.
Stokes, J. William Orangeburg, S. C.
Stone, Alfred Holt Greenville, Miss.
Stone, Russell J Attica, N. Y.
Stone, William J St. Louis, Mo.
Stonesipher, John R Zanesville, Ohio
Straka, Louis David City, Neb.
Stranahan, N. N Fulton, N. Y.
Strattan, Edward K Newcastle, Ind.
Strattan, Oliver H Louisville, Ky.
Street, Oliver Day Guntersville, Ala.
Street, Robert G Galveston, Tex.
Strode, Aubrey E Amherst, Va.
Strong, William J Chicago, 111.
Stuart, Wesley A Sturgis, S. Dak.
Sullivan, John J New York City
Sulzer, Hon. William New York City
Summers, L. P Abingdon, Va.
Sumpter, Orlando H Hot Springs, Ark.
Sure, A. T. H Alameda, Cal.
Sutton, R. H., M.D Shenandoah, Iowa
Sutton, Robert L Troy, Mo.
Sutton, W. Henry Haverford, Pa.
Sweet, Silas C.... Des Moines, Iowa
Swigart, Frank Logansport, Ind.
Sydnor, \Valker Ashland, Va.
Sykes, M. L New York City
Sypher, Gen. J. Hale Washington, D. C.
Syracuse Central Library Syracuse, N. Y.
Tadlock, J. M ". Phillipsburg, Kan.
Tait, A. O Oakland, Cal.
Tartt, J. B Terrell, Tex.
Tatum, I. R Corsicana, Tex.
Tayloe, S. G Sonora, Tex.
Taylor, Col. Charles H Boston, Mass.
Taylor, C. S Keeseville, N. Y.
Taylor, Edward B Pittsburg, Pa.
Taylor, G. F Effingham, 111.
Taylor, John H Chillicothe, Mo.
Taylor, John L Boonville, Ind.
Taylor, Hon. Thomas I' Bridgeport, Conn.
Taylor, Thomas T Lake Charles, La.
Teall, Frank DeWitt Gettysburg, S. Dak.
Templer, James N Muncie, Ind.
Ten Broeck, W. H Paris, 111.
Terrell, J. C, Jr Fort Worth, Tex.
Terrell, R. A Birmingham, Ala.
The Free Library of Philadelphia. .Philadelphia, Pa.
Theobald, Thomas D Grayson, Ky.
The World New York City
Thiele, Theodore B Evanston, 111.
Thomas, Alfred Jefferson Wooster, Ohio
Thompson, Cleveland C Plattsburg, Mo.
Thompson, Col. J. K. P Rock Rapids, Iowa
Thompson, Oliver Silas, D.D Cherokee, Iowa
Thompson, Seymour D Brooklyn, N. Y.
Thompson, William D Racine, Wis.
Thompson, W. H Grand Island, Neb.
Thorn, Samuel S., M.D Toledo, Ohio
Thornburgh, A., M.D Chattanooga, Tenn.
Thorp, F. S South Bend, Wash.
Thrift, J. E Madison, Va.
Thurman, William J., M.D Lisbon, Ark.
Tileston, H. B., D.D.S Louisville, Ky.
Titus, Robert C Buffalo, N. Y.
Tobey, Walter L Hamilton, Ohio
Todd, Robert S Owensboro, Ky.
Toler, Frank Carbondale, 111.
Tongue, Thomas H Hillsboro, Ore.
Tompkins, Prof. Leslie J New York City
Toomer, John Sheldon Lake Charles, La.
Towne, Charles A Duluth, Minn.
Trainor, P. F New York City
Trammell, John W Oxford, Neb.
Travis, John W Traverse City, Mich.
Treacy, Daniel F New York City
Trevyett, Herbert E Utica, N. Y.
Trewin, James H Lansing, Iowa
Trice, H. H Norfolk, Va.
Trimble, James M Montclair, N. T.
Tritch, Dr. J. C Findlay, Ohio
Trueworthy, Dr. J. \V Los Angeles, Cal.
Truitt, Warren Moscow, Idaho
Tuchock, I. W Pueblo, Colo.
Tucker, C. H Lawrence, Kan.
Tucker, Joseph T Winchester, Ky.
Turley, Hon, Thomas B Memphis, Tenn.
Turman, Solon B Tampa, Fla.
Turner, E. J Washington, D. C.
Turner,!. Frank Easton, Md.
Turner, Jesse Van Buren, Ark.
Turner, J. H Henderson, Tex.
Turner, T. A Jackson, Tenn.
Turney, Thomas K Cameron, Mo
Tuttle, G. N Painesville, Ohio
Tuttle, Dr. Jay Astoria, Ore.
Urlls, P. A So. Omaha, Neb.
Utopian Club Library Ballston Spa, N. Y.
Van Alstyne, P New York City
Van Auken, M. W Utica, N. Y.
van Benschoten, H. L Belding, Mich.
Van Cott, Ray Salt Lake City, Utah
Van Deusen, Claudius Leeds, N. Y.
Van Etten, John E Kingston, N. Y!
Van Loo, C Zeeland, Mich.
Van Sickle, W. L Columbus, Ohio
\ an Siclen, J. C New York Citv
Van Vliet, Purdy New York City
Van Wyck, Stephen New York City
Vaughan, Horace W Texarkana, Tex".
Vaughan, W. A., M.D Timberville, Va.
Veale, John W Amarillo, Tex.
Vernier, R. P Ansonia, Ohio
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Vert, C. J...
Vickers, Carl
Plattsburgh, N. Y.
B New Comerstown, Ohio
Vincent', James U Stephenville, Tex.
Virginia State Library Richmond, Va.
Volger, Bernard G Brooklyn, N. Y.
Volger, Theodore G Park Ridge, N. J.
Vollmer, Henry Davenport, Iowa
Vollrath, Edward Bucyrus, Ohio
von Beust, Bernhard, M.D New Albany, Ind.
Wakefield, Tudge George W Sioux City, Iowa
Wakeman, Prof. Thaddeus B., Liberal University,
Silverton, Ore.
Walker, Frank State Centre, Iowa
Walker, F. A., M.D Norfolk, Va.
Walker, John F Luverne, Ala.
Walker, Stuart W Martinsburg, W. Va.
Wall, James A Salinas, Cal.
Wallace, Richard T New York City
Ward, A. D New Bern, N. C.
Ward, C. A., Jr Douglas, Ga.
Ward, Warren P Douglas, Ga.
Warner, C. O Beloit, Wis.
Warner, P. G Red Bank, N. J.
Warren, George M Swainsbpro, Ga.
Wash, Frank H San Antonio, Tex.
Wasson, J. E Giltedge, Mont.
Waters, John H Johnstown, Pa.
Watkins, Charles B Clinton, Miss.
Watkins, O. W Eureka Springs, Ark.
Watkins, R. A Lancaster, Wis.
Watson, E. P Bentonville, Ark.
Watson, John C Nebraska City, Neb.
Watterson, Henry Louisville, Ky.
Watts, Legh R Portsmouth, Va.
Weadock, Thomas A. E Detroit, Mich.
Weaver, William R Philadelphia, Pa.
Webb, B. W Fort Smith, Ark.
Webb, Dr. DeWitt St. Augustine, Fla.
Weedon, L. W Tampa, Fla.
Wehmeyer, Aug. H Quincy, 111.
Weinberg, Benjamin M Newark, N. J.
Weinstock, H N Sacramento, Cal.
Weir, A. R Au Sable, Mich.
Welborne, R. D Chickasha, I. T.
Welbourn, E. L., M.D Union City, Ind.
Welch, Aikman St. Louis, Mo.
Welch, Judge Stanley Corpus Christi, Tex.
Wellman, B. J Fort Madison, Iowa
Wells, G. Wiley Santa Monica, Cal.
Wells, R. H Clarksville, Tex.
Wslsh, John New York City
Westbrook, M. H Lyons, Iowa
Wester, J. K Jacksboro, Tex.
Westerfield, William W New Orleans, La.
Weston, Francis H Columbia, S. C.
Wetmore, Hon. George Peabody Newport, R. I.
Wetmore, J. Douglas Jacksonville, Fla.
Wetmore, J. W Erie, Pa.
Weygandt, C. N Philadelphia, Pa.
Whalen, Frank Ballston Spa, N. Y.
Whalen. Hon. John New York City
Wheeler, B. A Denver, Colo.
Wheeler, Charles H Greeley, Colo.
Wheeler, W. C., M.D Huntsville, Ala.
White, E. D Livingston, Tenn.
White, Harry Indiana, Pa.
White, Henry Kirk Birmingham, Ala.
White, L. E Columbus, Ga.
White, Lewis P New Whatcom, Wash.
White, Robert E. L Washington, D. C.
White, Samuel Baker City, Ore.
White, W. H Oiympia, Wash.
White, Dr. William W Cuero, Tex.
Whitecraf t, John E Macksville, Kan.
Whitehead, N. E Greenwood, Miss.
Whitmore, John A Aurora, Neb.
Whitney, Thomas H Atlantic, Iowa
Wilcox, E. K Cleveland, Ohio
Wilcox, H. D Elmira, N. Y.
Wilcox, M. C Oakland, Cal.
Wildermuth, P. A. Philadelphia, Pa.
Williams, James T Greenville, S. C.
Williams, P. B Rocky Comfort, Ark.
Willis, H. C Norfolk, Va.
Willis, W. L Houston, Tex.
Willits, J. Quincy Lakeview, Ore.
Wilson, Edwin A Springfield, 111.
Wilson, N. V. F Bridgeport, Ohio
Wilson, Stephen Eugene Hot Springs, S. Dak.
Wilson, Sidney Sherman, Tex.
Wilson, Thomas A Jackson, Mich.
Wilson, Thomas E Sylvan Lake, Fla.
Wilson, Thomas F Tucson, Ariz.
Wilsson, M. T Laurens, Iowa
Winborne, R. W Buena Vista, Va.
Wing, John D New York City
Wingo, Col. Charles E Richmond, Va.
Winkler, F. C Milwaukee, Wis.
Winne, Douglas T Appleton, Wis.
Winship, John O Cleveland, Ohio
Winslow, H. M Carrollton, Ky.
Winter, Phil E Omaha, Neb.
Witcover, H Marion, S. C.
Withey, Charles A Reed City, Mich.
Witmark, Isidore New York City
Witter, William C New York City
Wolverton, S. P Sunbury, Pa.
Womack, Thomas B Raleigh, N. C.
Wood, William P Washington, D. C.
Wood, Will R Lafayette, Ind.
Woodard, F. A Wilson, N. C.
Woodard, John Nashville, Tenn.
Woodring, James T So. Bethlehem, Pa.
Woodward, C. S Ballinger, Tex.
Woods, D. A Kokomo, Ind.
Woolling, J. H Indianapolis, Ind.
Worley, Joshua, M.D Belle Plaine, Iowa
Wrenn, Rev. V Amelia C. H., Va.
Wright, E. B Boardman, N. C.
Wright, Eugene L Chicago, 111.
Wright, Lucius W Chicago, 111.
Wright, William B Effingham, 111.
Wyatt, W. F Galena, Kan.
Yancey, John C Batesville, Ark.
Yates, Benjamin New York City
Yeaman, Caldwell Denver, Colo.
Yerex, A. E Chicago, 111.
Yonge, Henry Brooklyn, N. Y
Young, Duncan F Amite City, La.
Young, Hugh Wellsboro, Pa,
Young, James R Raleigh, N. C.
Zabel, John O Petersburg, Mich.
Zallars, Allen Fort Wayne, Ind.
Zang, William Kewanee, 111.
Zangerle, John A Cleveland, Ohio
Zenk, Frederick G., M.D Troy, 111
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
PLAN OF THE WORK AND EXPLANATION
OF ABBREVIATIONS
l\vo editions of Jefferson's Writings have been utilized in the prepara
tion of this volume. One of them is THE WRITINGS OF THOMAS JEFFERSON,
edited by H. A. Washington and printed by the United States Congress in
1853-54. The other edition is THE WRITINGS OF THOMAS JEFFERSON, collected
and edited by Paul Leicester Ford, and published by G. P. Putnam's Sons,
1892-99. The FORD EDITION contains a large number of valuable letters and
papers which are not printed in the WASHINGTON EDITION, while the latter
gives many letters that are not included by Mr. Ford in his volumes.
The quotations in THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA are credited to both
works if they contain them. Quotations with a single credit are printed only
in the edition indicated.
There are, in addition, some quotations from the DOMESTIC LIFE OF JEF
FERSON. Th'ese are marked D. L. J.
The name of the person written to is given after the extract as, under
Abuse, "To EDWARD RUTLEDGE," then the volume and edition where found
are given, as " iv, 151," refers to the WASHINGTON EDITION, while " FORD
ED., viii, 93," is self-explanatory ; next the place and date are given, as (M.,
Dec. 1796) = Monticello, Dec. 1796.
The names of places from which Jefferson wrote are abbreviated as
follows :
Albemarle, Va., . . . Alb. Nice Ne.
Annapolis, A. Nismes, Ns.
Baltimore, B. Paris P.
Chesterfield, Va., . . Ches. Philadelphia, .... Pa.
Eppington, Va., . . . Ep. Popular Forest, Va., . P.F.
Fairfield, Va F. Richmond R.
Germantown. . . G. Tuckahoe, Va T.
London, L. Washington, .... W.
Monticello, M. Williamsburg, Va., . . Wg.
New York N.Y.
In the quotations the mark * * * indicates an omission in the text.
Words not in the text, but supplied by the Editor are, in all cases,
enclosed within brackets.
THE
JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
1. ABILITIES, Appreciate.— I cannot
help hoping that every friend of genius, when
the other qualities of the competitor are
equal, will give a preference to superior abili
ties. — To WILLIAM PRESTON. FORD ED., i,
368. (1768.)
2. ABILITIES, Attract.— Render the
[State] executive a more desirable post to
men of abilities by making it more independ
ent of the legislature. — To ARCHIBALD STUART.
iii, 315. FORD ED., v, 410. (Pa., 1791.)
3. ABILITIES, Education and.— It is
often said there have been shining examples
of men of great abilities, in all businesses of
life, without any other science than what they
had gathered from conversation and inter
course with the world. But, who can say
what these men would not have been, had
they started in the science on the shoulders of
a Demosthenes or Cicero, of a Locke, or
Bacon, or a Newton? — To JOHN BRAZIER.
vii, 133. (1819.)
4. ABILITIES, Few Men of.— Men of
high learning and abilities are few in every
country: and by taking in [the judiciary]
those who are not so, the able part of the body
have their hands tied by the unable. — To
ARCHIBALD STUART, iii, 315. FORD ED., v,
410. (Pa., 1791.) See ARISTOCRACY, TALENTS.
— ABLATIVE CASE IN GREEK.—
See LANGUAGES.
_ ABOLITION OF SLAVERY.— See
SLAVERY.
5. ABORIGINES OF AMERICA, Deri
vation. — Whence came those aboriginals of
America? Discoveries, long ago made, were
sufficient to show that the passage from Europe
to America was always practicable, even to the
imperfect navigation of ancient times. In go
ing from Norway to Iceland, from Iceland to
Greenland, from Greenland to Labrador, the
first traject is the widest; and this having been
practised from the earliest times of which we
have any account of that part of the earth, it is
not difficult to suppose that the subsequent tra-
jects may have been sometimes passed. Again,
the late discoveries of Captain Cook, coasting
from Kamchatka to California, have proved that
if the two continents of Asia and America be
separated at all, it is only by a narrow strait.
So that from this side also, inhabitants may
have passed into America ; and the resemblance
between the Indians of America and the eastern
inhabitants of Asia, would induce us to conjec
ture, that the former are the descendants of the
latter, or the latter of the former ; excepting
indeed the Esquimaux, who, from the same cir
cumstance of resemblance, and from identity of
language, must be derived from the Greenland-
ers, and these probably from some of the north
ern parts of the old continent. — NOTES ON VIR
GINIA, viii, 344. FORD ED., iii, 205. (1782.)
6. ABORIGINES OF AMERICA, Lan
guages. — A knowledge of their several lan
guages would be the most certain evidence of
their derivation which could be produced. In
fact, it is the best proof of the affinity of nations
which ever can be referred to. How many ages
have elapsed since the English, the Dutch, the
Germans, the Swiss, the Norwegians, Danes and
Swedes have separated from their common
stock? Yet how many more must elapse before
the proofs of their common origin, which exist
in their several languages will disappear? It is
to be lamented, then, very much to be lamented,
that we have suffered so many of the Indian
tribes already to extinguish without our having
previously collected and deposited in the records
of literature, the general rudiments at most of
the languages they spoke. Were vocabularies
formed of all the languages spoken in North
and South America, preserving their appella
tions of the most common objects in nature, of
those which must be present to every nation
barbarous or civilized, with the inflections of
their nouns and verbs, their principles of regi
men and concord, and these deposited in all the
public libraries, it would furnish opportunities
to those skilled in the languages of the old
world to compare them with those, now, or at
any future time, and hence to construct the best
evidence of the derivation of their part of the
human race. — NOTES ON VIRGINIA, viii, 344.
FORD ED., iii, 206. (1782.)
7. The question whether the
Indians of America have emigrated from an
other continent is still undecided. Their vague
and imperfect traditions can satisfy no mind on
that subject. I have long considered their lan
guages as the only remaining monument of
connection with other nations, or the want of it,
to which we can now have access. They will like
wise show their connection with one another.
Aborigines of America
Abuses
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Very early in life, therefore, I formed a vocabu
lary of such objects as, being present every
where, would probably have a name in every
language ; and my course of life having given
me opportunities of obtaining vocabularies of
many Indian tribes, I have done so on my
original plan, which, though far from being
perfect, has the valuable advantage of identity,
of thus bringing the languages to the same
points of comparison. * * * The Indians
west of the Mississippi and south of the Ar
kansas, present a much longer list of tribes than
I had expected ; and the relations in which you
stand with them * * * induce me to hope
you will avail us of your means of collecting
their languages for this purpose. — To DR. SIB-
LEY, iv, 580. (W., 1805.)
8. I suppose the settlement of
our continent is of the most remote antiquity.
The similitude between its inhabitants and
those of eastern parts of Asia renders it prob
able that ours are descended from them, or they
from ours. The latter is my opinion, founded
on this single fact : Among the red inhabitants
of Asia, there are but a few languages radically
different, but among our Indians, the number of
languages is infinite, and they are so radically
different as to exhibit at present no appearance
of their having been derived from a common
source. The time necessary for the generation
of so many languages must be immense. — To
EZRA STILES. FORD ED., iv, 298. (P., 1786.)
See INDIANS.
— ABSENCE FROM THE CAPITAL.—
See VACATION.
— ABSTINENCE.— See INTEMPERANCE.
9. ABUSE, Newspaper. — It is hardly
necessary to caution you to let nothing of
mine get before the public : a single sentence
got hold of by the " Porcupines," * will suffice
to abuse and persecute me in their papers
for months. — To JOHN TAYLOR, iv, 248.
FORD ED., vii, 266. (Pa., 1798.) See LIBELS,
MINISTERS, NEWSPAPERS and SLANDER.
10. ABUSE, Personal. — You have seen
my name lately tacked to so much of
eulogy and of abuse that I dare say you hardly
thought that it meant your old acquaintance
of '76. In truth, I did not know myself under
the pens either of my friends or foes. It is
unfortunate for our peace that unmerited
abuse wounds, while unmerited praise has
not the power to heal. These are hard wages
for the services of all the active and healthy
years of one's life. — To EDWARD RUTLEDGE.
iv, 151. FORD ED., vii, 93. (M., Dec. 1796.)
See CALUMNY, LIBELS, MINISTERS, NEWS
PAPERS and SLANDER.
11. If you had lent to your
country the excellent talents you possess, on
you would have fallen those torrents of abuse
which have lately been poured forth on
me. So far I praise the wisdom which has
descried and steered clear of a waterspout
ahead. — To EDWARD RUTLEDGE. iv, 152.
FORD ED., vii, 94. (M., 1796.)
— ABUSE OF POWER.— See POWER.
— ABUSE OF THE PRESS.— See CAL
UMNY, LIBELS, NEWSPAPERS, and SLANDER.
*" Peter Porcupine " was the pen-name of William
Cobbett.— EDITOR.
12. ABUSES, Arraignment of.— The ar
raignment of all abuses at the bar of public
reason, I deem [one of the] essential princi
ples of our government and consequently,
[one] which ought to shape its administra
tion. FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS, viii, 4.
FORD ED., viii, 5. (1801.)
13. ABUSES, Barriers against— We are
to guard against ourselves; not against our
selves as we are, but as we may be ; for who
can now imagine what we may become under
circumstances not now imaginable ? — To JEDE-
DIAH MORSE, vii, 236. FORD ED., x, 206.
(M., 1822.)
14. ABUSES, The Constitution and.—
In questions of power * * * let no more
be heard of confidence in man, but bind him
down from mischief by the chains of the
Constitution. — KENTUCKY RESOLUTIONS, ix,
471- FORD ED., vii, 305. (1798.) See CON
FIDENCE.
15. Aware of the tendency of
power to degenerate into abuse, the worthies
of our own country have secured its in
dependence by the establishment of a Consti
tution and form of government for our na
tion, calculated to prevent as well as to cor
rect abuse. — R. TO A WASHINGTON TAMMANY
SOCIETY, viii, 156. (1809.)
16. ABUSES, Correction of.— My confi
dence is that there will for a long time be
virtue and good sense enough in our country
men to correct abuses. — To E. RUTLEDGE. ii,
435. FORD ED., v, 42. (P., 1788.)
17. ABUSES, Economy and. — The new
government has now, for some time, been
under way. Abuses under the old forms have
led us to lay the basis of the new in a rigor
ous economy of the public contributions. —
To M. DE PINTO, iii, 174. (N. Y., 1790.)
18. ABUSES, Education and. — Educa
tion is the true corrective of abuses of consti
tutional power. — To WILLIAM C. JARVIS. vii,
179. FORD ED., x, 161. (M., 1820.)
19. ABUSES, Elections and.— A jealous
care of the right of election by the people, —
a mild and safe corrective of abuses which are
lopped by the sword of revolution where
peaceable remedies are unprovided, I deem
[one of the] essential principles of our gov
ernment and, consequently, [one] which
ought to shape its administration. — FIRST IN
AUGURAL ADDRESS, viii, 4. FORD ED., viii, 4.
(1801.)
20. ABUSES, Liability to.— What insti
tution is insusceptible of abuse in wicked
hands?— To L. H. GIRARDIN. vi, 440. FORD
ED., ii, 151. (M., 1815.)
21. ABUSES, Monarchical.— Nor should
we wonder at the pressure [for a fixed Con
stitution in France in 1788-9], when we con
sider the monstrous abuses of power under
which this people were ground^ to powder,
when we pass in review the weight of their
taxes, and inequality of their distribution:
the oppressions of the tithes, of the tailles,
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Abuses
Academy
the corvces, the gabelles, the farms and bar
riers : the shackles on commerce by monop
olies : on industry by guilds and corporations :
on the freedom of conscience, of thought, and
of speech : on the press by the Censors and
of person by lettres de cachet; the cruelty of
the criminal code generally, the atrocities of
the Rack, the venality of judges, and their
partialities to the rich ; the monopoly of mili
tary honors by the noblesse; the enormous
expenses of the Queen, the princes and the
court ; the prodigalities of pensions ; and the
riches, luxury, indolence, and immorality of
the clergy. Surely under such a mass of mis
rule and oppression, a people might justly
press for a thorough reformation, and might
even dismount their rough-shod riders, and
leave them to walk on their own legs. — AUTO
BIOGRAPHY, i, 86. FORD ED., i, 118. (1821.)
22. ABUSES, Patrimonies in.— Happy
for us that abuses have not yet become patri
monies, and that every description of interest
is in favor of rational and moderate govern
ment.— To RALPH IZARD. ii, 429. (P., 1788.)
— ABUSES OF POWER.— See POWER.
23. ABUSES, Revolution and.— When a
long train of abuses and usurpations begun at
a distinguished period and * pursuing invaria
bly the same object, evinces a design to reduce
them under absolute despotism, it is their
right, it is their duty, to throw off such gov
ernment, and to provide new guards for their
future security. — DECLARATION OF INDEPEND
ENCE AS DRAWN BY JEFFERSON.
24. ABUSES, Temptations to.— Nor
should our Assembly be deluded by the in
tegrity of their own purposes, and conclude
that these unlimited powers will never be
abused, because themselves are not disposed
to abuse them. They should look forward to
a time, and that not a distant one, when
corruption in this as in the country from
which we derive cur origin, will have seized
the heads of government, and be spread by
them through the body of the people ; when
they will purchase the voices of the people
and make them pay the price. Human
nature is the same on each side of the
Atlantic, and will be alike influenced by the
same causes. The time to guard against cor
ruption and tyranny is before they shall have
gotten hold of us. It is better keep the wolf
out of the fold, than to trust to drawing his
teeth and talons after he shall have entered.
—NOTES ON VIRGINIA, viii, 362. FORD ED.,
Hi, 224. (1782.)
25. ABUSES, Tendency to. — Mankind
soon learns to make interested uses of every
right and power which they possess, or may
assume. The public money and public liberty
* * will soon be discovered to be sources
of wealth and dominion to those who hold
them; distinguished, too, by this tempting
circumstance, that they are the instrument,
as well as the object of acquisition. With
money we will get men, said Caesar, and with
* Congress struck out the words in italics.—
EDITOR.
men we will get money. — NOTES ON VIRGINIA.
viii, 362. FORD ED., iii, 224. (1782.)
26. ACADEMY (The Military), Begin
ning-.— It was proposed [at a meeting of the
cabinet] to recommend [in the President's
speech to Congress] the establishment of a
Military Academy. I objected that none of
the specified powers given by the Constitution
to Congress would authorize this. * * *
The President [said], though it would be a
good. thing, he did not wish to bring on any
thing which might generate heat and ill
humor. It was, therefore, referred for fur
ther consideration and inquiry. [At the next
meeting] I opposed it as unauthorized by the
Constitution. Hamilton and Knox approved
it without discussion. Edmund Randolph
was for it, saying that the words of the Con
stitution authorizing Congress to lay taxes
&c., for the common defence, might compre
hend it. The President said he would not
choose to recommend anything against the
Constitution; but if it was doubtful, he was
so impressed with the necessity of this meas
ure, that he would refer it to Congress, and
let them decide for themselves whether the
Constitution authorized it or not. — ANAS.
ix, 182. FORD ED., i, 270. (Nov. 1793.)
27. ACADEMY (The Military), En
largement. — The scale on which the Military
Academy at West Point was originally estab
lished, is become too limited to furnish the
number of well-instructed subjects in the
different branches of artillery and engineering
which the public service calls for. The want
of such characters is already sensibly felt,
and will be increased with the enlargement
of our plans of military preparation. The
chief engineer having been instructed to con
sider the subject, and to propose an augmen
tation which might render the establishment
commensurate with the present circumstances
of our country, has made the report I now
transmit for the consideration of Congress. —
SPECIAL MESSAGE, viii, 101. (March 1808.)
28. ACADEMY (The Military), Impor
tance of. — I have ever considered lhat estab
lishment as of major importance to our
country, and in whatever I could do for it,
I viewed myself as performing a duty only.
* * * The real debt of the institution is
to its able and zealous professors. — To JARED
MANSFIELD, vii, 203. (M., 1821.)
29. ACADEMY (The Military), Re
moval. — The idea suggested by the chief en
gineer of removing the institution to this
place [Washington], is worthy of attention.
Beside the advantage of placing it under
the immediate eye of the Government, it
may render its benefits common to the naval
department, and will furnish opportunities of
selecting on better information, the characters
most qualified to fulfil the duties which the
public service may call for. — SPECIAL MES
SAGE, viii, 101. (March 1808.)
30. ACADEMY, A National.— I have
often wished we could have a Philosophical
Society, or Academy, so organized as that
Academy
Academies
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
while the central academy should «be at the
seat of government, its members dispersed
over the States, should constitute filiated
academies in each State, publish their com
munications, from which the Central Acad
emy should select unpublished what should
be most choice. In this way all the members,
wheresoever dispersed, might be brought into
action, and an useful emulation might arise
between the filiated societies. Perhaps the
great societies, now existing, might incorpo
rate themselves in this way with the National
one. To JOEL BARLOW. FORD ED., viii, 424.
(Feb. 1806.)
31. ACADEMY, Need of a Naval.— I
think * * * that there should be a school
of instruction for our Navy as well as artil
lery ; and I do not see why the same establish
ment might not suffice for both. Both re
quire the same basis of general mathematics,
adding projectiles and fortifications for the
artillery exclusively, and astronomy and the
ory of navigation exclusively for the naval
students. Berout conducted both schools
in France, and has left us the best book ex
tant for their joint and separate instruction.
It ought not to require a separate professor.*
— To JOHN ADAMS, vii, 218. (M., 1821.)
32. ACADEMY, Transfer of Geneva. —
I * * * enclose for your perusal and con
sideration * * * the proposition of M. D'lyer-
nois, a Genevan of .considerable distinction,
to translate the Academy of Geneva in a body
to this country. You know well that the col
leges of Edinburgh and Geneva as seminaries
of science, are considered as the two eyes of
Europe. While Great Britain and America give
the preference to the former, all other coun
tries give it to the latter. I am fully sensible
that two powerful obstacles are in the way of
this proposition. First, the expense ; secondly,
the communication of science in foreign lan
guages ; that is to say, in French and Latin ;
but I have been so long absent from my own
country as to be an incompetent judge either of
the force of the objections, or of the disposi
tion of those who are to decide on them. * *
What I have to request of you is, that you will
* * * consider his proposition, consult on
its expediency and practicability with such gen
tlemen of the Assembly [of Virginia], as you
think best, and take such other measures as you
shall think best to ascertain what would be the
sense of that body, were the proposition to be
hazarded to them. If yourself and friends ap
prove of it, and there is hope that the Assembly
will do so, your zeal for the good of our coun
try in general, and the promotion of science, as
an instrument towards that, will, of course, in
duce you and them to bring it forward in such a
way as you shall judge best. If, on the con
trary, you disapprove of it yourselves, or think
it would be desperate with the Assembly, be so
good as to return it to me with such information
as I may hand forward to M. D'lvernois, to
put him out of suspense. Keep the matter by
all means out of the public papers, and particu
larly, * * * do not couple my name with
the proposition if brought forward, because ^it
is much my wish to be in nowise implicated in
public affairs. — To WILSON NICHOLAS, iv, 109.
FORD EDM vi, 513. (M., Nov. 1794.)
* The Naval Academy at Annapolis was opened in
1845. The credit of its foundation is due to George
Bancroft, who was then Secretary of the Navy.—
EDITOR.
33. I have returned, with infinite
appetite, to the enjoyment of my farm, my fam
ily and my books, and had determined to med
dle in nothing beyond their limits. Your propo
sition, however, for transplanting the college of
Geneva to my own country, was too analogous
to all my attachments to science, and freedom,
the first-born daughter of science, not to excite a
lively interest in my mind, and the essays which
were necessary to try its practicability. This
depended altogether on the opinions and dis
positions of our State Legislature, which was
then in session. I immediately communicated
your papers to a member of the Legislature,
whose abilities and zeal pointed him out as
proper for it, urging him to sound as many of
the leading members of the Legislature as he
could, and if he found their opinions favorable,
to bring forward the proposition ; but if he
should find it desperate, not to hazard it ; be
cause I thought it best not to commit the honor
either of our State or of your college, by an
useless act of eclat. * * * The members
were generally well-disposed to the proposition,
and some of them warmly ; however, there was
no difference in the conclusion, that it could not
be effected. The reasons which they thought
would with certainty prevail against it, were i,
that our youth, not familiarized but with their
mother tongue, were not prepared to receive in
structions in any other ; 2, that the expense of
the institution would excite uneasiness in their
constituents, and endanger its permanence ; and
3, that its extent was disproportioned to the
narrow state of the population with us. What
ever might be urged on these several subjects,
yet as the decision rests with others, there re
mained to us only to regret that circumstances
were such, or were thought to be such, as to
disappoint your and our wishes. — To M.
D'lvERNois. iv, 113. FORD ED., vii, 2. (M.,
Feb. I795-)
34. ACADEMY, Wish for Geneva.— -I
should have seen with peculiar satisfaction the
establishment of such a mass of science in my
country, and should probably have been tempted
to approach myself to it, by procuring a resi
dence in its neighborhood, at those seasons of
the year at least when the operations of agricul
ture are less active and interesting. — To M.
D'IVERNOIS. iv, 114. FORD ED., vii, 4. (M.,
Feb. I795-)
35. ACADEMIES, Architectural Be-
form. — I consider the common plan followed
in this country, but not in others, of making one
large and expensive building, as unfortunately
erroneous. It is infinitely better to erect a
small and separate lodge for each separate pro
fessorship, with only a hall below for his class,
and two chambers above for himself; joining
these lodges by barracks for a certain portion
of the students, opening into a covered way to
give a dry communication between all the
schools. The whole of these arranged around
an open square of grass and trees, would make
it, what it should be in fact, an academical vil
lage, instead of a large and common den of
noise, of filth and of fetid air. It would afford
that quiet retirement so friendly to study, and
lessen the dangers of fire, infection and tumult.
Every professor would be the police officer of
the students adjacent to his own lodge, which
should include those of his own class of
preference, and might be at the head of their
table, if, as I suppose, it can be reconciled with
the necessary economy to dine them in smaller
and separate parties, rather than in a large and
common mess. These separate buildings, too,
might be erected successively and occasionally,
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Accent
Actions
as the number of professors and students should
be increased, as the funds become competent. —
To HUGH L. WHITE, v, 521. (M., 1810.)
— ACCENT, The Greek.— See LAN
GUAGES.
36. ACCOUNTS, Complicated.— Alexan
der Hamilton * * * in order that he
might have the entire government of his
[Treasury] machine, determined so to com
plicate it as that neither the President nor
Congress should be able to understand it, or
to control him. He succeeded in doing this,
not only beyond their reach, but so that he at
length could not unravel it himself. He
gave to the debt, in the first instance, in fund
ing it, the most artificial and mysterious form
he could devise. He then moulded up
his appropriations of a number of scraps
and remnants, many of which were noth
ing at all, and applied them to differ
ent objects in reversion and remainder,
until the whole system was involved in im
penetrable fog ; and while he was giving him
self the airs of providing for the payment of
the debt, he left himself free to add to it con
tinually, as he did in fact, instead of paying
it. — To ALBERT GALLATIN. iv, 428. FORD
ED., viii, 140. (W., 1801.)
37. ACCOUNTS, Keeping.— All these
articles are very foreign to my talents, and
foreign also, as I conceive, to the nature of
my duties. * * * I suppose it practicable
for your board to direct the administration of
your moneys here [Paris] in every circum
stance. — To SAMUEL OSGOOD. i, 451. (P.,
1785.)
38. ACCOUNTS, Neglected.— It is a fact,
which we [Virginia] are to lament, that, in the
earlier part of our struggles, we were so wholly
occupied by the great object of establishing our
rights, that we attended not at all to those little
circumstances of taking receipts and vouchers,
keeping regular accounts, and preparing sub
jects for future disputes with our friends. If
we could have supported the whole Continent,
I believe we should have done it, and never
dishonored our nation by producing accounts ;
sincerely assured that, in no circumstances of
future necessity or distress, a like free applica
tion of anything therein would have been
thought hardly of, or would have rendered nec
essary an appeal to accounts. Hence, it has
happened that, in the present case, the collec
tion of vouchers of the arms furnished by this
State has become tedious and difficult. — To THE
PRESIDENT OF CONGRESS. FORD LD., ii, 283,
(W., 1779.)
39. ACCOUNTS, Simple.— The accounts
of the United States ought to be, and may be
made, as simple as those of a common
farmer, and capable of being understood by
common farmers. — To JAMES MADISON, iv,
131. FORD ED., vii, 61. (M., 1706.)
40. . if * * * [there] can be
added a simplification of the form of accounts
in the Treasury department, and in the or
ganization of its officers, so as to bring every
thing to a single centre, we might hope to
see the finances of the Union as clear and
intelligible as a merchant's books, so that
every member of Congress, and every man
of any mind in the Union, should be able to
comprehend them, to investigate abuses, and
consequently to control them. Our pre
decessors have endeavored by intrica
cies of system, and shuffling the investi
gation over from one officer to another, to
cover everything from detection. I hope we
shall go in the contrary direction, and that,
by our honest and judicious reformations, we
may be able in the limits of our time, to bring
things back to that simple and intelligible
system, on which they should have been or
ganized at first. — To ALBERT GALLATIN. iv,
429. FORD ED., viii, 141. (W., 1802.)
- ACQUISITION OF TERRITORY.—
See TERRITORY.
41. ACTIONS, Approved.— The very ac
tions [on] which Mr. Pickering arraigns
[me] have been such as the great majority
of my fellow citizens have approved. The
approbation of Mr. Pickering, and of those
who thought with him [the Federalists], I
had no right to expect.— To MARTIN VAN-
BUREN. vii, 363. FORD ED., x, 306. (M.,
1824.)
42. ACTIONS, Disinterested.— I am con
scious of having always intended to do what
was best for my fellow citizens ; and never,
for a single moment, to have listened to any
personal interest of my own. — To RICHARD
M. JOHNSTON, v, 256. (W., 1808.)
43. My public proceedings were
always directed by a single view to the best
interests of our country. — To DR. E. GRIFF
ITH, v, 450. (M., 1809.)
44. In the transaction of the
[public] affairs I never felt one interested
motive. — To W. LAMBERT, v, 450. (M May
1809.)
45. ACTIONS, Government and.— The
legislative powers of government reach
actions only and not opinions. — R. TO A.
DANBURY BAPTIST ADDRESS, viii, 113. (1802.)
46. ACTIONS, Honest Principles and.—
Every honest man will suppose honest acts
to flow from honest principles, and the rogues
may rail without intermission.— To DR. BEN
JAMIN RUSH, iv, 426. FORD ED., viii, 126.
(W., 1801.)
47. ACTIONS, Indulgent to.— I owe in
finite acknowledgments to the republican
portion of my fellow citizens for the indul
gence with which they have viewed my pro
ceedings generally. — To W. LAMBERT, v, 450.
(M., May 1809.) See DISINTERESTEDNESS.
48. ACTIONS, Judgment and.— Up
wards of thirty years passed on the stage of
public life and under the public eye, may
surely enable them to judge whether my
future course is likely to be marked with
those departures from reason and moderation,
which the passions of men have been willing
to foresee. — To WILLIAM JACKSON, iv, 358.
(M., 1801.)
Actions
Adams (John)
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
49. ACTIONS, Lawful.— Every man
should be protected in his lawful acts. — To
ISAAC McPHERSON. vi, 175. (M., 1813.)
50. ACTIONS, Present and future.—
Our duty is to act upon things as they are,
and to make a reasonable provision for what
ever they may be. — SIXTH ANNUAL MESSAGE.
viii, 69. FORD ED., viii, 405- (Dec. 1806.)
51. ACTIONS, Publicity and.— I fear no
injury which any man can do me. I have
never done a single act, or been concerned in
any transaction, which I fear to have fully
laid open, or which could do me any hurt if
truly stated. I have never done a single
thing with a view to my personal interest, or
that of any friend, or with any other view
than that of the greatest public good ; there
fore, no threat or fear on that head will ever
be a motive of action with me. * — ANAS, ix,
209. FORD ED., i, 312. (1806.)
52. ACTIONS, Purity of.— I can con
scientiously declare that as to myself, I wish
that not only no act but no thought of mine
should be unknown.— To JAMES MAIN, v,
373- (W., 1808.)
53. ACTIONS, Bight.— The precept of
Providence is, to do always what is right, and
leave the issue to Him.— To MRS. COSWAY.
ii, 41. FORD ED., iv, 320. (P., 1786.)
54. ACTIONS, Rule for.— Whenever you
are to do a thing, though it can never be
known but to yourself, ask yourself how you
would act were all the world looking at you,
and act accordingly, f— To PETER CARR. i, 396.
(Ps., 1785.)
55. When tempted to do any
thing in secret, ask yourself if you would
do it in public ; if you would not, be sure it
is wrong.}— To FRANCIS EPPES. D. L. J. 365.
56. ACTIONS, Virtuous.— If no action is
to be deemed virtuous for which malice can
imagine a sinister motive, then there never
was a virtuous action ; no, not even in the
life of our Saviour Himself. But He has
taught us to judge the tree by its fruit, and
to leave motives to Him who can alone see
into them. — To MARTIN VAN BUREN. vii, 363.
FORD ED., x, 307 (M., 1824.)
— AD AIR (James), Views on Indians.—
See INDIANS.
57. ADAMS (John), Administration of.
— If the understanding of the people could be
rallied to the truth on the subject [of the
French negotiations and the X. Y. Z. plot,]^
by exposing the deception practiced on them,
there are so many other things about to bear
on them favorably for the resurrection of
their republican spirit, that a reduction of the
administration to constitutional principles
cannot fail to be the effect. There are the
* Aaron Burr, in asking Jefferson for office, inti
mated that he could do Jefferson "much harm"
This was Jefferson's defiance.— EDITOR.
i Peter Carr was the young nephew of Jefferson —
EDITOR.
$ Francis Eppes was a grandson, then at school.—
EDITOR.
§See X. Y. Z. plot post.— EDITOR.
Alien and Sedition laws, the vexations of the
stamp act, the disgusting particularities of the
direct tax, the additional army without an
enemy, and recruiting officers lounging at
every court house, a navy of fifty ships, five
millions to be raised to build it, on the
ruinous interest of eight per cent., the perse
verance in war on our part, when the French
government shows such an anxious desire to
<eep at peace with us, taxes of ten millions
now paid by four millions of people, and yet
a necessity, in a year or two, of raising five
millions more for annual expenses. Those
things will immediately be bearing on the
public mind, and if it remain not still blinded
a supposed necessity, for the purpose of
maintaining our independence and defending
our country, they will set things to rights. I
hope you will undertake this statement. — To
EDMUND PENDLETON. iv, 275. FORD ED., vii,
337. (Pa., Jan. 1799.) See 1056.
58. We were far from consider
ing you as the author of all the measures we
blamed. They were placed under the pro
tection of your name, but we were satisfied
they wanted much of your approbation. We
ascribed them to their real authors, the Pick
erings, Wolcotts, the Tracys, the Sedgwicks,
et id genus omne, with whom we supposed you
in a state of duresse. I well remember a
conversation with you in the morning of the
day on which you nominated to the Senate
a substitute for Pickering, in which you ex
pressed a just impatience under " the legacy
of secretaries which General Washington had
left you," and whom you seemed, therefore,
to consider as under public protection.
Many other incidents showed how differently
you would have acted with less impassioned
advisers; and subsequent events have proved
that your minds were not together. You
would do me great injustice, therefore, by
taking to yourself what was intended for men
who were then your secret, as they are now
your open enemies. — To JOHN ADAMS, vi,
126. FORD ED., ix, 387. (M., June 1813.)
— ADAMS (John), Aristocracy and.
— See ARISTOCRACY.
59. ADAMS (John), Attacks on.— With
respect to the calumnies and falsehoods
which writers and printers at large published
against Mr. Adams, I was as far _ from
stooping to any concern or approbation of
them, as Mr. Adams was respecting those of
" Porcupine, " Fenno, or Russell, who pub
lished volumes against me for every sentence
vended by their opponents against Mr.
Adams. But I never supposed Mr. Adams
had any participation in the atrocities of these
editors, or their writers. I knew myself in
capable of that base warfare, and believed
him to be so. On the contrary, whatever I
may have thought of the acts of the adminis
tration of that day, I have ever borne testi
mony to Mr. Adams's personal worth; nor
was it ever impeached in ^my presence,
without a just vindication of it on my part.
I never supposed that any person who knew
either of us, could believe that either of us
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Adams (tiohn)
meddled in that dirty work. — To MRS. JOHN
ADAMS, iv, 555. FORD ED., viii, 309. (W., July
1804.)
60. Mr. Adams has been alien
ated from me, by belief in the lying sugges
tions contrived for electioneering purposes,
that I perhaps mixed in the activity and in
trigues of the occasion. My most intimate
friends can testify that I was perfectly
passive. They would sometimes, indeed, tell
me what was going on; but no man ever
heard me take part in such conversations ;
and none ever misrepresented Mr. Adams
in my presence, without my asserting his just
character. With very confidential persons I
have doubtless disapproved of the principles
and practices of his administration. This was
unavoidable. But never with those with whom
it could do him any injury. Decency would
have required this conduct from me, if dispo
sition had not, and I am satisfied Mr.
Adams's conduct was equally honorable to
wards me. But I think it part of his charac
ter to suspect foul play in those of whom he is
jealous, and not easily to relinquish his sus
picions. — To DR. BENJAMIN RUSH, v, 563.
FORD ED., ix, 299. (M., Jan. 1811.)
61. ADAMS (John), Character.— He is
vain, irritable, and a bad calculator of the
force and probable effect of the motives
which govern men. This is all the ill
which can possibly be said of him. He is
as disinterested as the Being who made him.
He is profound in his views, and accurate
in his judgment, except where knowledge of
the world is necessary to form a judgment.
He is so amiable that I pronounce you will
love him, if ever you become acquainted with
him. He would be, as he was, a great man in
Congress. — To JAMES MADISON, ii, 107.
(P, 1787.)
62. His vanity is a lineament in
his character which had entirely escaped me.
His want of taste I had observed. Notwith
standing all this he has a sound head on sub
stantial points, and I think he has integrity. —
To JAMES MADISON. FORD ED., iii, 309. (B.,
Feb. 1783.)
63. - - The President's title, as
Eroposed by the Senate, was the most super-
itively ridiculous thing I ever heard of. It
is a proof the more of the justice of the
character given by Dr. Franklin of my friend.
Always an honest man, often a great one.
but sometimes absolutely mad. — To JAMES
MADISON. FORD ED., v, 104. (P., July 1789.)
64. ADAMS (John) .Declaration of In
dependence and. — John Adams was the pil
lar of its [Declaration of Independence] sup
port on the floor of Congress ; its ablest advo
cate and defender against the multifarious
assaults it encountered. For many excellent
persons opposed it on doubts whether we
were provided sufficiently with the means of
supporting it, whether the minds of our con
stituents were yet prepared to receive it &c.,
who, after it was decided, united zealously
in the measures it called for. — To WILLIAM P.
GARDNER. FORD ED., ix, 377. (M., 1813.)
65. He supported the Declara
tion with zeal and ability, fighting fearlessly
for every word of it. No man's confident
and fervent addresses, more than Mr.
Adams's encouraged and supported us
through the difficulties surrounding us, which,
like the ceaseless action of gravity, weighed
on us by night and by day. * — To JAMES MAD
ISON, -vii, 305. FORD ED., x, 268. (M., 1823.)
66. . His deep conceptions, ner
vous style, and undaunted firmness, made him
truly our bulwark in debate. — To SAMUEL A.
WELLS, i, 121. FORD ED., x. 131. (M., 1819.)
See DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE.
67. ADAMS (John), Departure from
Europe. — I learn with real pain the resolution
you have taken of quitting Europe. Your pres
ence on this side the Atlantic gave me a con
fidence that, if any difficulties should arise
within my department, I should always have one
to advise with on whose counsels I could rely.
I shall now feel bewidowed. I do not wonder
at your being tired out by the conduct of the
court you are at. — To JOHN ADAMS, ii, 127.
(P., 1787.)
— ADAMS (John), France and.— See
FRANCE.
68. ADAMS (John), Friendship of Jef
ferson for. — Mr. Adams's friendship and
mine began at an early date. It accompanied
us through long and important scenes. The dif
ferent conclusions we had drawn from our
political reading and reflections, were not per
mitted to lessen personal esteem ; each party
being conscious they were the result of an
honest conviction in the other. Like differences
of opinion existing among our fellow citizens,
attached them to one or the other of us, and
produced a rivalship in their minds which did
not exist in ours. We never stood in one an
other's way ; for if either had been withdrawn
at any time, his favorers would not have gone
over to the other, but would have sought for
some one of homogeneous opinions. This con
sideration was sufficient to keep down all jeal
ousy between us, and to guard our friendship
from any disturbance by sentiments of rival-
ship.f — To MRS. JOHN ADAMS, iv, 545. FORD
ED., viii, 306. (W., June 1804.)
69. . I write you this letter as
clue to a friendship coeval with our government,
and now attempted to be poisoned, when too late
in life to be replaced by new affections. I had
for some time observed in the public papers,
dark hints and mysterious innuendoes of a cor
respondence of yours with a friend, to whom
you had opened your bosom without reserve, and
which was to be made public by that friend or
* Daniel Webster visited Jefferson at Monticello
toward the close of 1824. He quoted Jefferson as
having then said in conversation: "John Adams
was our Colossus on the floor. He was not graceful,
nor elegant, nor remarkably fluent ; but he came
out, occasionally, with a power of thought and ex
pression that moved us from our seats." Webster
introduced the quotation in his speech on "Adams
and Jefferson," August 2, 1826. The conversation
entire is printed in the Private Correspondence of
Webster (i, 364), and in the FORD ED. of Jefferson's
Writings, x, 327.— EDITOR.
t A reference to the u Midnight Appointments"of
Mr. Adams in this letter led Mrs. Adams to make a
spirited attack on Jefferson's administration. Jef
ferson's reply, and also his correspondence with Dr.
Rush, which led to a reconciliation with Mr. Adams
will be found in the Appendix to this volume.—
EDITOR.
Adams (John)
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
8
his representative. And now it is said to be
actually published. It has not yet reached us,
but extracts have been given, and such as
seemed most likely to draw a curtain of separa
tion between you and myself. Were there no
other motive than that of indignation against
the author of this outrage on private confi
dence, whose shaft seems to have been aimed at
yourself more particularly, this would make it
the duty of every honorable mind to disappoint
that aim, by opposing to its impression a seven
fold shield of apathy and insensibility. With
me, however, no such armor is needed. The cir
cumstances of the times in which we have hap
pened to live, and the partiality of our friends
at a particular period, placed us in a state of
apparent opposition, which some might suppose
to be personal also ; and there might not be
wanting those who wished to make it so, by
filling our ears with malignant falsehoods, by
dressing up hideous phantoms of their own
creation, presenting them to you under my
name, to me under yours, and endeavoring to
instil into our minds things concerning each
other the most destitute of truth. And if there
had been, at any time, a moment when we were
off our guard, and in a temper to let the whis
pers of these people make us forget what we
had known of each other for so many years, and
years of so much trial, yet all men who have
attended to the workings of the human mind,
who have seen the false colors under which
passion sometimes dresses the actions and mo
tives of others, have seen also those passions
subsiding with time and reflection, dissipating
like mists before the rising sun, and restoring
to us the sight of all things in their true shape
and colors. It would be strange, indeed, if,
at our years, we were to go back an age to
hunt up imaginary or forgotten facts, to dis
turb the repose of affections so sweetening to
the evening of our lives. Be assured, my
dear sir, that I am incapable of receiving the
slightest impression from the effort now made
to plant thorns on the pillow of age, worth and
wisdom, and to sow tares between friends who
have been such for near half a century. Be
seeching you, then, not to suffer your mind to
be disquieted by this wicked attempt to poison
its peace, and praying you to throw it by
among the things which have never happened,
I add sincere assurances of my unabated and
constant attachment, friendship and respect. —
-To JOHN ADAMS, vii, 314. FORD EDV x, 273.
(M., 1823.)
70. . Fortune had disjointed our
first affections, and placed us in opposition in
every point. This separated us for awhile.
But on the first intimation through a friend,
we re-embraced with cordiality, recalled our
ancient feelings and dispositions, and every
thing was forgotten but our first sympathies. —
I bear ill-will to no human being. — To JAMES
MONROE. FORD ED., x, 298. (M., 1824.)
71. ADAMS (John), George III. and.—
The sentiments you expressed [in your ad
dress on presentation to the King] were such
as were entertained in America till the com
mercial proclamation, and such as would
again return were a rational conduct to be
adopted by Great Britain. I think, therefore,
you by no means compromised yourself, or
our country, nor expressed more than it
would be our interest to encourage, if they
were disposed to meet us. — To JOHN ADAMS.
i, 436. (P., September 1785.)
72. ADAMS (John), Honesty.— I have
the same good opinion of Mr. Adams which I
ever had. I know him to be an honest man,
an able one with his pen, and he was a powerful
advocate on the floor of Congress. — To DR. BEN
JAMIN RUSH, v, 562. FORD ED., ix, 298. (M.,
1811.)
73. ADAMS (John), Integrity .—Though
I saw that our ancient friendship was affected
by a little leaven, produced partly by his con
stitution, partly by the contrivance of others,
yet I never felt a diminution -of confidence
in his integrity, and retained a solid affection
for him. His principles of government I knew
to be changed, but conscientiously changed. —
To JAMES MADISON, iv, 161. FORD ED., vii,
108. (M., Jan. 1797.)
74. ADAMS (John), Jefferson and
Election of. — The public and the papers have
been much occupied lately in placing us in
a point of opposition to each other. I trust
with confidence that less of it has been felt
by ourselves personally. In the retired can
ton where I am, I learn little of what is pass
ing ; pamphlets I never see ; papers but a few,
and the fewer the happier. Our latest in
telligence from Philadelphia at present is of
the i6th inst., but though at that date your
election to the first magistracy seems not
to have been known as a fact, yet with me
it has never been doubted. I knew it impossi
ble you should lose a vote North of the
Delaware, and even if that of Pennsylvania
should be against you in the mass, yet that
you would get enough South of that to place
your succession out of danger. I have never
one single moment expected a different issue ;
and though I know I shall not be believed, yet
it is not the less true that I have never wished
it. My neighbors as my compurgators could
aver that fact, because they see my occupa
tions and my attachment to them. Indeed
it is impossible that you may be cheated of
your succession by a trick worthy the subtle
ty of your arch-friend of New York [Alex
ander Hamilton] who has been able to make
of your real friends tools to defeat their and
your just wishes. Most probably he will be
disappointed as to you; and my inclinations
place me out of his reach. I leave to others
the sublime delights of riding in the storm,
better pleased with sound sleep and a warm
berth below, with the society of neighbors,
friends and fellow-laborers of the earth,
than of spies and sycophants. No one
then will congratulate you with purer disin
terestedness than myself. The share, indeed,
which I may have had in the late vote, I
shall value highly as an evidence of the share
I have in the esteem of my fellow citizens.
But while in this point of view, a few votes
less would be little sensible, the difference in
the effect of a few more would be very sensi
ble and oppressive to me. I have no ambition
to govern men. It is a painful and thankless
office. Since the day, too, on which you
signed the treaty of Paris our horizon was
never so overcast. I devoutly wish you may
be able to shun for us this war by which our
agriculture, commerce and credit will be de
stroyed. If you are, the glory will be all your
own ; and that your administration may be
filled with glory^ and happiness to yourself
and advantage to us is the sincere wish of one
9
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Adams (John)
who, though in the course of our own voyage
through life various little incidents have hap
pened or been contrived to separate us, re
tains still for you the solid esteem of the mo
ments when we were working for our inde
pendence, and sentiments of respect and af
fectionate attachment.* — To JOHN ADAMS, iv,
153. FORD ED., vii, 95. (Dec. 28, 1796.)
75. . Mr. Adams and myself
were cordial friends from the beginning of the
Revolution. Since our return from Europe,
some little incidents have happened, which
were capable of affecting a jealous mind like
his. His deviation from that line of politics
on which we had been united, has not made
me less sensible of the rectitude of his heart;
and I wished him to know this, and also an
other truth, that I am sincerely pleased at
having escaped the late draft for the helm,
and have not a wish which he stands
in the way of. That he should be convinced
of these truths, is important to our mutual
satisfaction, and perhaps to the harmony and
good of the public service. But there was a
difficulty in conveying them to him, and a
possibility that the attempt might do mischief
there or somewhere else; and I would not
have hazarded the attempt, if you had not
been in place to decide upon its expediency. —
To JAMES MADISON, iv, 166. FORD ED., vii,
115. (M., Jan. 1797.)
76. . You express apprehensions
that stratagems will be used to produce a
misunderstanding between the President and
myself. Though not a word having this
tendency has ever been hazarded to me by
anyone, yet I consider as a certainty that
nothing will be left untried to alienate
him from me. These machinations will pro
ceed from the Hamiltonians by whom he is
surrounded, and who are only a little less hos
tile to him than to me. It cannot but damp
the pleasure of cordiality when we suspect
that it is suspected. I cannot help thinking
that it is impossible for Mr. Adams to believe
that the state of my mind is what it really is
that he may think I view him as an ob
stacle in my way. I have no supernatura
power to impress truth on the mind oi
another, nor he any to discover that the esti
mate he may form, on a just view of the
human mind as generally constituted, may
not be just in its application to a special con
stitution. This may be a source of private nn
easiness to us ; I honestly confess that it i
so to me at this time. But neither of us is
capable of letting it have effect on our publi
duties. Those who may endeavor to separat
us, are probably excited by the fear that I
might have influence on the Executive coun
cils; but when they shall know that I con
* Jefferson sent this letter to Madison who decidei
that it would be inexpedient to forward it to Adams
" I am very thankful," Jefferson wrote to Madison
m January, 1797 (iv, 166, FORD ED., vii, 115), "to
the discretion you have exercised over the letter
That has happened to be the case, which I knew t
be possible, that the honest expression of my feeling
towards Mr. Adams might be rendered malapropo
from circumstances existing, and known at the sea
of government, but not known by me in my retire
situation. "—EDITOR.
ider my office as constitutionally confined
o legislative functions, and that I could not
ake any part whatever in executive consulta-
ions, even were it proposed, their fears
nay perhaps subside, and their object be
ound not worth a machination. — To EL-
miDGE GERRY, iv, 171. FORD ED., vii, 120. (May
797-)
77. ADAMS (John), Jefferson's Elec-
ion and. — The nation passed condemnation
m the political principles of the federalists,
Dy refusing to continue Mr. Adams in the
Dresidency. On the day on which we learned
n Philadelphia the vote of the citv of New
^ork, which it was well known would decide
:he vote of the State, and that, again, the vote
of the Union, I called on Mr. Adams on some
official business. He was very seriously
affected, and accosted me with these words :
' Well, I understand that you are to beat me
n this contest, and I will only say that I
will be as faithful a subject as any you will
lave." " Mr. Adams," said I, " this is no
personal contest between you and me. Two
systems of principles on the subject of govern
ment divide our citizens into two parties.
With one of these you concur, and I with
the other. As we have been longer on the
public stage than most of those now living,
our names happen to be more generally
known. One of these parties, therefore, has
put your name at its head, the other mine.
Were we both to die to-day, to-morrow two
other names would be in the place of ours,
without any change in the motion of the
machinery. Its motion is from its principle,
and not from you or myself. " " I believe
you are right," said he, " that we are but
passive instruments, and should not suffer
this matter to affect our personal disposi
tions." But he did long retain this just view
of the subject. I have always believed that the
thousand calumnies which the federalists, in
bitterness of heart, and mortfication at their
ejection, daily invented against me, were car
ried to him by their busy intriguers, and
made some impression. — To DR. BENJAMIN
RUSH, v, 560. FORD ED., ix, 296. (M., Jan.
1811.)
78. . When the election between
Burr and myself was kept in suspense by the
federalists, and they were meditating to place
the President of the Senate at the head of the
government, I called on Mr. Adams with a
view to have this desperate measure prevented
by his negative. He grew warm in an in
stant, and said with a vehemence he had not
used towards me before : " Sir, the event of
the election is within your own $ power. You
have only to say you will do justice to the
public creditors, maintain the navy, and not
disturb those holding offices, and the gov
ernment will instantly be put into your hands.
We know it is the wish of the people it should
be so." " Mr. Adams," said I, " I know not
what part of my conduct, in either public or
private life, can have authorized a doubt of
my fidelity to the public engagements. I say.
however, I will not come into the government
by capitulation. I will not enter on it, but in
Adams (JoUii)
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
10
perfect freedom to follow the dictates of my
own judgment." I had before given the same
answer to the same intimation from Gouver-
neur Morris. " Then," said he, " things
must take their course." I turned the con
versation to something else, and soon took
my leave. It was the first time in our lives
we had ever parted with anything like dis
satisfaction. — To DR. BENJAMIN RUSH, v,
561. FORD ED., ix, 297. (M., Jan. 1811.)
79. ADAMS (John), Jefferson, Paine
and. — I am afraid the indiscretion of a printer
has committed me with my friend Mr. Adams,
for whom, as one of the most honest and dis
interested men alive, I have a cordial esteem,
increased by long habits of concurrence in
opinion in the days of his republicanism : and
even since his apostasy to hereditary monarchy
and nobility, though we differ, we differ as
friends should do. Beckley had the only copy
of Paine's pamphlet [Rights of Man], and lent
it to me, desiring when I should read it, that
I would send it to a Mr. J. B. Smith, who had
asked it for his brother to reprint it. Being
an utter stranger to J. B. Smith, both by
sight and character, I wrote a note to explain
to him why I (a stranger to him) sent him
a pamphlet, to wit, that Mr. Beckley had de
sired it ; and to take off a little of the dryness
of the note, I added that I was glad to find it
was to be reprinted, that something would,
at length, be publicly said against the political
heresies which had lately sprung up among
us, and that I did not doubt our citizens would
rally again round the standard of " Common
Sense. " That I had in my view the " Dis
courses on Davila, " which have filled Fenno's
papers for a twelvemonth, without contra
diction, is certain, but nothing was ever
further from my thoughts than to become my
self the contradictor before the public. To my
great astonishment, however, when the pamphlet
came out, the printer had prefixed my note
to it, without having given me the most dis
tant hint of it. Mr. Adams will unquestionably
take to himself the charge of political heresy,
as conscious of his own views of drawing the
present government to the form of the English
constitution, and, I fear, will consider me as
meaning to injure him in the public eye. I
learn that some Anglo-men have censured it
in another point of view, as a sanction of
Paine's principles tends to give offence to the
British government. Their real fear, however,
is that this popular and republican pamphlet,
taking wonderfully, is likely at a single stroke,
to wipe out all the unconstitutional doctrines
which their bell-weather, " Davila, " has been
preaching for a twelvemonth. I certainly never
made a secret of my being anti-monarchical,
and anti-aristocratical ; but I am sincerely morti
fied to be thus brought forward on the public
stage, where to remain, to advance or to re
tire, will be equally against my love of silence
and quiet, and my abhorrence of dispute. — To
PRESIDENT WASHINGTON, iii, 257. FORD ED.,
v, 329. (Pa., 1791-)
80. . I have a dozen times taken
up my pen to write to you, and as often laid
it down again, suspended between opposing
considerations. I determine, however, to write
from a conviction that truth, between candid
minds, can never do harm. The first of Paine's
pamphlets on the " Rights of Man, " which
come to hand here, belonged to Mr. Beckley.
He lent it to Mr. Madison, who lent it to
me ; and while I was reading it. Mr. Beckley
called on me for it, and, as I had not finished it.
he desired me, as soon as I should have done so
to send it to Mr. Jonathan B. Smith, whose
brother meant to reprint it. I finished reading
it, and, as I had no acquaintance with Mr.
Jonathan B. Smith, propriety required that
L should explain to him why I, a stran
ger to him, sent him the pamphlet. I ac
cordingly wrote a note of compliment, in
forming him that I did it at the desire of
Mr. Beckley, and, £p take off a little of the
dryness of the note, I added that I was glad it
was to be reprinted here, and that something
was to be publicly said against the political
heresies which had sprung up among us &c I
thought so little of this note, that I did not
even keep a copy of it; nor ever heard a tittle
more of it, till, the week following, I was
thunderstruck with seeing it come out at the
head of the pamphlet.* I hoped, however, it
would not attract notice. But I found, on my
return from a journey of a month, that a writer
came forward, under the signature of " Pub
licola," attacking not only the author and prin
ciples of the pamphlet, but myself as its spon
sor, by name. Soon after came hosts of other
writers, defending the pamphlet, and attacking
you, by name, as the writer of " Publicola."
Thus were our names thrown on the public
stage as public antagonists. That you and I dif
fer in _our ideas of the best forms of govern
ment, is well known to us both ; but we have
differed as friends should do, respecting the
purity of each other's motives, and confining our
difference of opinion to private conversation.
And I can declare with truth, in the presence of
the Almighty, that nothing was further from my
intention or expectation than to have either
my own or your name brought before the public
on this occasion. The friendship and con
fidence which have so long existed between
us, required this explanation from me, and I
know you too well to fear any misconstruction
of the motives of it. Some people here who
would wish me to be, or to be thought, guilty
of improprieties, have suggested that I was
" Agricola," that I was " Brutus," &c., &c. I
never did in my life, either by myself or by
any other, have a sentence of mine inserted
in a newspaper without putting my name to
it; and I believe I never shall. — To JOHN
ADAMS, iii, 270. FORD ED., v, 353. (Pa.,
1791.)
81. . I was happy to find that
you saw in its true point of view the way in
which I had been drawn into the scene, which
must have been so disagreeable to you. The
importance which you still seem to allow to
my note, and the effect you suppose it to have
had, though unintentional in me, induce me to
show you that it really had no effect. Paine's
pamphlet, with my note, was published here about
the second week in May. Not a word ever
appeared in the public papers here [Philadel
phia] on the subject for more than a month ;
and I am certain not a word on the subject
would ever have been said, had not a writer,
under the name " Publicola " [John Quincy
Adams] at length undertaken to attack Mr.
Paine's principles, which were the principles of
the citizens of the United States. Instantly a
host of writers attacked " Publicola " in support
* The note was as follows : "After some prefatory
remarks, the Secretary of State, Mr. Jefferson, in a
note to a Printer in Philadelphia, accompanying a
copy of this Pamphlet for republication observes :
'I am extremely pleased to find it will be reprinted
here, and that something is at length to be publicly
said against the political heresies which have
sprung up among vis. I have no doubt our citizens
will rally a second time round the standard of
Common Sense.' "—EDITOR.
II
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Adams (John)
of those principles. He had thought proper to
misconstrue a figurative expression in my note ;
and these writers so far noticed me as to place
the expression in its true light. But this was
only an incidental skirmish preliminary to the
general engagement, and they would not have
thought me worth naming, had he not thought
proper to have brought me on the scene. His
antagonists, very criminally, in my opinion,
presumed you to be " Publicola, " and on that
presumption hazarded a personal attack on
you. No person saw with more uneasiness
than I did, this unjustifiable assault ; and the
more so, when I saw it continued after the
printer had declared you were not the author.
But you will perceive from all this, my dear
sir, that my note contributed nothing to the
production of these disagreeable pieces. As
long as Paine's pamphlet stood on its own
feet and on my note, it was unnoticed. As
soon as "Publicola" attacked Paine, swarms
appeared in his defence. To " Publicola," then,
and not in the least degree to my note, this
whole contest is to be ascribed and all its
consequences. You speak of the execrable
paragraph in the Connecticut papers. This, it
is true, appeared before " Publicola " ; but it
has no more relation to Paine's pamphlet and
my note than to the Alcoran. I am satisfied
the writer of it had never seen either ; for
when I passed through Connecticut about the
middle of June, not a copy had ever been
seen by anybody, either in Hartford or New
Haven, nor probably in that whole State : and
that paragraph was so notoriously the re
verse of the disinterestedness of character
which you are known to possess by everybody
who knows your name, that I never heard a
person speak of the paragraph, but with an
indignation in your behalf, which did you entire
justice. This paragraph, then, certainly did
not flow from my note, any more than the
publications which " Publicola " produced. In
deed it was impossible that my note should
occasion your name to be brought into question ;
for so far from meaning you, I had not even in
view any writing which I might suppose to be
yours, and the opinions I alluded to were
principally those I had heard in common con
versation from a sect aiming at the subversion
of the present government to bring in their
favorite form of a king, lords and commons.
Thus I hope, my dear sir, that you will see
me to have been as innocent in effect as I was
in intention. I was brought before the public
without my own consent, and from the first
moment of seeing the effort of the real ag
gressors, in this business to keep me before the
public, I determined that nothing should in
duce me to put pen to paper in the controversy.
The business is now over, and I hope its effects
are over, and that our friendship will never
be suffered to be committed, whatever use
others may think proper to make of our names.
— To JOHN ADAMS, iii, 291. FORD ED., v,
380. (Pa., Aug. 1791-)
82. ADAMS (John), Midnight Appoint
ments of.— One act of Mr. Adams's life, and
one only, ever gave me a moment's personal
displeasure. I did consider his last appoint
ments to office as personally unkind. They
were from among my most ardent political
enemies, from whom no faithful cooperation
could ever be expected ; and laid me under
the embarrassment of acting through men
whose views were to defeat mine, or to en
counter the odium of putting others in their
places, It seemed but common justice to
leave a successor free to act by instruments
of his own choice. If my respect for him
did not permit me to ascribe the whole blame
to the influence of others, it left something for
friendship to forgive, and after brooding over
it for some little time, and not always resist
ing the expression of it, I forgave it cordially,
and returned to the same state of esteem and
respect for him which had so long existed.
* * * I maintain for him, and shall carry into
private life, an uniform and high measure of
respect and good will, and for yourself a sin
cere attachment. — To MRS. JOHN ADAMS, iv,
546. FORD ED., viii, 307. (W., June 1804.)
See COMMISSIONS.
83. . Those scenes of midnight
appointment, * * * have been condemned by
all men. The last day of his political power,
the last hours, and even beyond the midnight,
were employed in filling all offices, and es
pecially permanent ones, with the bitterest
federalists, and providing for me the alterna
tive, either to execute the government by my
enemies, whose study it would be to thwart
and defeat all my measures, or to incur the
odium of such numerous removals from of
fice, as might bear me down. — To DR. BENJA
MIN RUSH, v, 561. FORD ED., ix, 297. (M.,
Jan. 1811.)
— ADAMS (John)» Opinions on IT. S.
Senate.— See SENATE.
84. ADAMS (John), Peace Commission.
— I am glad that he is of the [Peace] Com
mission, and expect he will be useful in it. His
dislike of all parties and all men, by balancing
his prejudices, may give them some fair play
to his reason as would a general benevolence of
temper. At any rate honesty may be extracted
even from poisonous weeds. — To JAMES MADI
SON. FORD ED., iii, 309. (B., Feb. 1783.)
_ ADAMS (John), Political Addresses
of. — See 103, 105.
85. ADAMS (John), Political Princi
ples of. — Mr Adams had originally been a
republican. The glare of royalty and nobil
ity, during his mission to England, had made
him believe their fascination a necessary in
gredient in government ; and Shays's rebel
lion, not sufficiently understood where he then
was, seemed to prove that the absence of
want and oppression, was not a sufficient
guarantee of order. His book on the " Amer
ican Constitutions" having made known his
political bias, he was taken up by monarchical
Federalists, in his absence, and on his return
to the United States, he was by them made to
believe that the general disposition of our
citizens was favorable to monarchy. He then
wrote his " Davila," as a supplement to the
former work, and his election to the Presi
dency confirmed him in his errors. Innumer
able addresses, too, artfully and industriously
poured in upon him, deceived him into a con
fidence that he was on the pinnacle of popu
larity, when a gulf was yawning at his feet,
which was to swallow up him and his de
ceivers. For, when General \Vashington was
withdrawn, these encrgtiincui of royalism.
kept in check hitherto by the dread of his
Adams (John)
Adams (John Quincy)
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
12
honesty, his firmness, his patriotism, and the
authority of his name, now mounted on the
car of state and free from control, like
Phaeton on that of the sun, drove headlong
and wild, looking neither to right nor left,
nor regarding anything but the objects they
were driving at ; until, displaying these fully,
the eyes of the nation were opened, and a
general disbandment of them from the public
councils took place. Mr. Adams, I am sure,
has been long since convinced of the treach
eries with which he was surrounded during
his administration. He has since thoroughly
seen that his constituents were devoted to re
publican government, and whether his judg
ment is resettled on its ancient basis, or not,
he is conformed as a good citizen to the will
of the majority, and would now, I am per
suaded, maintain its republican structure with
the zeal and fidelity belonging to his charac
ter. For even an enemy has said, " he is al
ways an honest man, and often a great one."
But in the fervor of the fever and follies of
those who made him their stalking horse, no
man who did not witness it, can form an idea
of their unbridled madness, and the terrorism
with which they surrounded themselves. —
THE ANAS, ix, 97. FORD ED., i, 166. (1818.)
86. . Adams was for two hered
itary [legislative] branches and an honest
elective one. — THE ANAS, ix, 96. FORD ED.,
i, 166. (1818.)
87. . Can anyone read Mr.
Adams's " Defence of the American Con
stitutions," without seeing that he was a
monarchist? And J. Q. Adams, the son, was
more explicit than the father in his answer to
Paine's " Rights of Man." — T o WILLIAM
SHORT, vii, 390. FORD ED., x, 332. (M.,
1825.)
88. ADAMS (John), Proposed office
for. — A little time and reflection effaced in
my mind this temporary dissatisfaction [be
cause of the midnight appointments, &c.] with
Mr. Adams, and restored me to that just esti
mate of his virtues and passions, which a
long acquaintance had enabled me to fix. And
my first wish became that of making his re
tirement easy by any means in my power ; for
it was understood he was not rich. I suggested
to some republican members of the delegation
from his State, the giving him, either directly
or indirectly, an office, the most lucrative
in that State, and then offered to be resigned,
if they thought he would not deem it affront-
ive. They were of opinion he would take great
offence at the offer ; and moreover, that the
body of republicans would consider such a
step in the outset as arguing very ill of the
course I meant to pursue. I dropped the idea,
therefore, but did not cease to wish for some
opportunity of renewing our friendly under
standing. — To DR. BENJAMIN RUSH, v., 562.
FORD ED., ix,, 298. (M.,Jan. 1811.)
— ADAMS (John), Saves Fisheries. —
See FISHERIES.
89. ADAMS (John), Views on English
Constitution.-— While Mr. Adams wasVice-
President, and I Secretary of State, I re
ceived a letter from President Washington,
then at Mount Vernon, desiring me to call to
gether the Heads of Departments, and to in
vite Mr. Adams to join us (which, by-the-bye,
was the only instance of that being done) in
order to determine on some measure which
required despatch; and he desired me to act
on it, as decided, without again recurring to
him. I invited them to dine with me, and
after dinner, sitting at our wine, having set
tled our question, other conversation came on,
in which a collision of opinion arose between
Mr. Adams and Colonel Hamilton, on the
merits of the British Constitution, Mr. Ad
ams giving it as his opinion, that, if some of
its defects and abuses were corrected, it
would be the most perfect constitution of
government ever devised by man. Hamilton,
on the contrary, asserted, that with its exist
ing vices, it was the most perfect model of
government that could be formed; and that
the correction of its vices would render it an
impracticable government. And this you may
be assured was the real line of difference be
tween the political principles of these two
gentlemen. Another incident took place on
the same occasion, which will further deline
ate Mr. Hamilton's political principles. The
room being hung around with a collection of
the portraits of remarkable men, among them
were those of Bacon, Newton and Locke.
Hamilton asked me who they were. I told
him they were my trinity of the three great
est men the world had ever produced, naming
them. He paused for some time : " The
Greatest man," said he, " that ever lived, was
ulius Caesar." Mr. Adams was honest as a
politician as well as a man ; Hamilton honest
as a man, but, as a politician, believing in the
necessity of either force or corruption to
govern men. To DR. BENJAMIN RUSH, v,
559. FORD ED., ix, 295. (M., Jan. 1811.)
90. ADAMS (John), Washington and.
— General Washington certainly did not love
Mr. Adams. — To DR. BENJAMIN RUSH, iv,
508. FORD ED., viii, 265. (W., 1803.)
91. ADAMS (John), Writings of.— I
have read your book with infinite satisfaction
and improvement. It will do great good in
America. Its learning and its good sense will.
I hope, make it an institute for our politicians,
old as well as young. — To JOHN ADAMS, ii,
128. (P., 1787.)
92.
paper
I enclose you a Boston
You will recognize Mr. A.-
under the signature of " Camillus. " He writes
in every week's paper now and generally under
different signatures This is the first in which
he has omitted some furious incartade against
me. — To JAMES MADISON, iv, 53. FORD ED..
vi, 402. (Pa., Sept. 1793.)
— ADAMS (Mrs. John), Correspond
ence with. — See APPENDIX.
93. ADAMS (John Quincy), Early
Promise. — This young gentleman is I think
very promising. To a vast thirst after ^useful
knowledge he adds a facility in acquiring it.
What his judgment may be I am not well
enough acquainted with him to decide ; but I
expect it is good, and much hope it, as he
may become a valuable and useful citizen. — To
JAMES MONROE. FORD ED., iv, 42. (P., 1785.)
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Adams (John Quincy)
Addresses
94. ADAMS (John Quincy), Foreign
Minister. — The nomination of John Quincy
Adams to Berlin, had been objected to as ex
tending our diplomatic establishment. It was
approved by eighteen to fourteen. — To JAMES
MADISON, iv, 179. FORD ED., vii, 132. (Pa.,
June I797-)
95. ADAMS (John Quincy), Respect
for. — I have never entertained for Mr. Adams
any but sentiments of esteem and respect ; and
if we have not thought alike on political sub
jects, I yet never doubted the honesty of his
opinions. — To . vii, 432. (M.,
1826.) See EMBARGO.
96. ADAMS (John Quincy), Secretary
of State. — I have barely left myself room to
express my satisfaction at your call to the im
portant office * you hold, and to tender you the
assurance of my great esteem and respect. —
To JOHN QUINCY ADAMS, vii, 90. (1817.)
97. . I congratulate Mrs. Adams
and yourself on the return of your excellent
and distinguished son, and our country still
more on such a minister of their foreign
affairs. — To JOHN ADAMS, vii, 83. FORD ED.
(1817.)
98. ADAMS (Samuel), Ability. —He was
truly a great man, wise in council, fertile in
resources, immovable in his purposes, and
had, I think, a greater share than any other
member, in advising and directing our meas
ures in the northern war especially. * * *
Although not of fluent elocution, he was
so rigorously logical, so clear in his views,
abundant in good sense, and master always
of his subject, that he commanded the most
profound attention whenever he rose in an
assembly by which the froth of declamation
was heard with the most sovereign contempt.
— To S. A. WELLS, vii, 126. FORD ED., x,
131. (M.. 1819.)
99. ADAMS (Samuel), Patriarch of
Liberty. — I addressed a letter to you, my
very dear and ancient friend, on the 4th of
March ; not indeed to you by name, but
through the medium of some of my fellow
citizens, whom occasion called on me to ad
dress. In meditating the matter of that ad
dress, I often asked myself, is this exactly in
the spirit of the patriarch of liberty, Samuel
Adams? Is it as he would express it? Will
he approve of it? I have felt a great deal
for our country in the times we have seen.
But, individually, for no one so much as
yourself. When I have been told that you
were avoided, insulted, frowned on, I could
not but ejaculate, " Father, forgive them, for
they know what they do." I confess I felt
an indignation for you, which for myself I
have been able, under every trial, to keep en
tirely passive. * * How much I lament
that time has deprived me of your aid. It
would have been a day of glory which should
have called you to the first office of the Ad
ministration. But give us your counsel, and
give us your blessing, and be assured that
there exists not in the heart of man a more
faithful esteem than mine to you. — To SAM
UEL ADAMS, iv, 389. FORD ED., viii, 38 (W.,
1801.)
* Secretary of State.— EDITOR.
100. ADAMS (Samuel), Principles of.—
His principles, founded on the immovable ba
sis of equal right and reason, have continued
pure and unchanged. Permit me to place
here my sincere veneration for him. — To
JAMES SULLIVAN, iv, 169. FORD ED., vii,
118. (M., 1797.)
101. . Your principles have been
tested in the crucible of time, and have come
out pure. You have proved that it was mon
archy, and not merely British monarchy, you
opposed. — To SAMUEL ADAMS, iv, 321. FORD
ED., vii, 425. (Pa., 1800.)
102. ADAMS (Samuel), Services of.—
I always considered him as more than any
other member [in Congress] the fountain of
our important measures. And although he
was neither an eloquent nor easy speaker,
whatever he said was sound, and commanded
the profound attention of the House. In the
discussions on the floor of Congress he re
posed himself on our main pillar in debate,
Mr. John Adams. These two gentlemen were
verily a host in our councils. — To DR. BEN
JAMIN WATERHOUSE. FORD ED., x, 124. (M.,
1819.)
— ADDRESS, History of Washington's
Farewell.— See WASHINGTON.
— ADDRESS, Jefferson to Inhabitants
of Albemarle Co.,Va. — See APPENDIX.
103. ADDRESSES, Indiscreet Political.
— Indiscreet declarations and expressions of
passion may be pardoned to a multitude act
ing from the impulse of the moment. But
we cannot expect a foreign nation to show
that apathy to the answers of the President
[Adams] which are more thrasonic than the
addresses. Whatever choice for peace might
have been left us * * * is completely lost by
these answers. — To JAMES MADISON, iv, 238.
FORD ED., vii, 247. (Pa., May 1798.)
104. ADDRESSES, Self Respect and.—
Though the expressions of good will from
my fellow citizens cannot but be grateful to
me, yet I would rather relinquish the grati
fication, and see republican self-respect pre
vail over movements of the heart too capable
of misleading the person to whom they are
addressed. However, their will, not mine, be
done. — To SAMUEL SMITH. FORD ED., viii,
28. (W., March 1801.)
— ADDRESSES, Text of Jefferson's In
augural Addresses. — See APPENDIX. *
105. ADDRESSES, Threatening Replies
to. — Nor is it France alone, but his own
fellow citizens, against whom President
[Adams's]threats are uttered. In Fennof's
paper] * * * you will see one, wherein he
says to the address from Newark, " the de
lusions and misrepresentations which have
misled so many citizens, must be discounte
nanced by authority as well as by the citizens
at large," evidently alluding to those letters
from the Representatives to their constituents,
which they have been so in the habit of seek-
* The principles in the Inaugural Addresses are
classified in this work.— EDITOR.
Addresses
Adjournment
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
ing after and publishing ; while those sent by
the tory part of the House to their constit
uents, are ten times more numerous, and re
plete with the most atrocious falsehoods and
calumnies. What new law they will propose
on this subject has not yet leaked out.* —
To JAMES MADISON. ' iv, 239. FORD ED., vii,
247. (Pa., May 1798.)
106. ADDRESSES, Utilizing. — Averse to
receive addresses, yet unable to prevent them,
I have generally endeavored to turn them to
some account, by making them the occasion,
of sowing useful truths and principles among
the people, which might germinate and be
come rooted among their political tenets. — To
LEVI LINCOLN, iv, 427. FORD ED., viii, 129.
(1802.)
107. ADJOURNMENT, Congress and.
— A bill having passed both houses of Con
gress, and being now before the President,
declaring that the seat of the Federal Gov
ernment shall be transferred to the Potomac in
the year 1790, that the sessions of Congress
next ensuing the present shall be held in Phila
delphia, to which place the offices shall be
transferred before the 1st of December next,
a writer in a public paper of July 13, has urged
on the consideration of the President, that
the Constitution has given to the two houses
of Congress the exclusive right to adjourn
themselves ; that the will of • the President
mixed with theirs in a decision of this kind,
would be an inoperative ingredient, repug
nant to the Constitution, and that he ought
not to permit them to part, in a single in
stance, with their constitutional rights ; conse
quently, that he ought to negative the bill.
That is now to be considered.
Every man, and every body of men on
earth, possesses the right of self-govern
ment. They receive it with their being from
the hand of nature. Individuals exercise it
by their single will ; collections of men by
that of their majority; for the law of the
majority is the natural law of every society
of men. When a certain description of men
are to transact together a particular business,
the times and places of their meeting and
separating, depend on their own will; they
make a part of the natural right of self-gov
ernment. This, like all other natural rights,
may be abridged or modified in its exercise
by their own consent, or by the law of those
who depute them, if they meet in the right of
others; but as far as it is not abridged or
modified, they retain it as a natural right, and
may exercise it in what form they please,
either exclusively by themselves, or in asso
ciation with others, or by others altogether,
as they shall agree.
Each house of Congress possesses this nat
ural right of governing itself, and. conse
quently, of fixing its own times and places of
meeting, so far as it has not been abridged
by the law of those who employ them, that is
to say, by the Constitution. This act mani
festly considers them as possessing this right
* Jefferson added a P. S. suggesting that Adams
may have been looking to the sedition bill that had
been spoken of. —EDITOR
of course, and, therefore, has nowhere given
it to them. In the several different passages
where it touches this right, it treats it as an
existing thing, not as one called into ex
istence by them. To evince this, every pass
age of the Constitution shall be quoted, where
the right of adjournment is touched; and it
will be seen that no one of them pretends to
give that right; that, on the contrary, every
one is evidently introduced either to enlarge
the right where it would be too narrow, to re
strain it where, in its natural and full exercise,
it might be too large, and lead to inconven
ience, to defend it from the latitude of its own
phrases, where these were not meant to com
prehend it, or to provide for its exercise by
others, when they cannot exercise it them
selves.
" A majority of each house shall constitute
a quorum to do business ; but a smaller num
ber may adjourn from day to day, and may
be authorized to compel the attendance of
absent members." Art. I. Sec. 5. A majority
of every collection of men being naturally
necessary to constitute its' will, and it being
frequently to happen that a majority is not
assembled, it was necessary to enlarge the
natural right by giving to " a smaller num
ber than a majority " a right to compel the
attendance of the absent members, and, in
the meantime, to adjourn from day to day.
This clause, then, does not pretend to give
to a majority a right which it knew that
majority would have of themselves, but to a
number less than a majority, a right to which
it knew that lesser number could not have of
themselves.
" Neither house, during the session of Con
gress, shall, without the consent of the other,
adjourn for more than three days, nor to any
other place than that in which the two houses
shall be sitting." Ibid. Each house exercising
separately its natural right to meet when and
where it should think best, it might happen
that the two houses would separate either in
time or place, which would be inconvenient.
It was necessary, therefore, to keep them to
gether by restraining their natural right of
deciding on separate times and places, and
by requiring a concurrence of will.
But, as it might happen that obstinacy, or
a difference of object, might prevent this con
currence, it goes on to take from them, in that
instance, the right of adjournment altogether.
and to transfer it to another, by declaring,
Art. 2. Sec. 3, that " in case of disagreement
between the two houses, with respect to the
time of adjournment, the President may ad
journ them to such time as he shall think
proper."
These clauses, then, do not import a gift,
to the two houses, of a general right of ad
journment, which it was known they would
have without that gift, but to restrain or ab
rogate the right it was known they would
have, in an instance where, exercised in its
full extent, it might lead to inconvenience,
and to give that right to another, who would
not naturally have had it. It also gives to
the President a right, which he otherwise
would not have had, " to convene both houses.
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Adjournment
or either of them, on extraordinary occa
sions." Thus substituting the will of another,
where they are not in a situation to exercise
their own.
" Every order, resolution, or vote, to which
the concurrence of the Senate and House of
Representatives may be necessary (except on
a question of adjournment), shall be pre
sented to the President for his approbation,
&c., Art. i. Sec. 7. The latitude of the gen
eral words here used would have subjected
the natural right of adjournment of the two
houses to the will of the President, which was
not intended. They, therefore, expressly
" except questions of adjournment " out of
their operation. They do not here give a
right of adjournment, which it was known
would exist without their gift, but they de
fend the existing right against the latitude
of their own phrases, in a case where there
was no good reason to abridge it. The ex
ception admits they will have the right of
adjournment, without pointing out the source
from which they will derive it.
These are all the passages of the Constitu
tion (one only excepted, which shall be pres
ently cited,) where the right of adjournment
is touched ; and it is evident that none of
these are introduced to give that right ; but
every one supposes it to be existing, and pro
vides some specific modification for cases
where either defeat in the natural right, or a
too full use of it, would occasion inconven
ience.
The right of adjournment, then, is not
given by the Constitution, and consequently
it may be modified by law without interfer
ing with that instrument. It is a natural
right, and, like all other natural rights, may
be abridged or regulated in its exercise by
law and the concurrence of the third branch
in any law regulating its exercise is so ef
ficient an ingredient in that law, that the
right cannot be otherwise exercised but after
a repeal by a new law. The express terms of
the Constitution itself show that this right
may be modified by law, when, in Art. i.
Sec. 4. (the only remaining passage on the
subject not yet quoted) it says, " The Con
gress shall assemble at least once in every
year, and such meeting shall be the first Mon
day in December, unless they shall, by law,
appoint a different day." Then another day
may be appointed by law; and the President's
assent is an efficient ingredient in that law.
Nay, further, they cannot adjourn over the
first Monday of December but by a law. This
is another constitutional abridgment of their
natural right of adjournment; and complet
ing our review of all the clauses in the Con
stitution which touch that right, authorizes
us to say no part of that instrument gives it ;
and that the houses hold it. not from the Con
stitution, but from nature.
A consequence of this is, that the houses
may, by a joint resolution, remove themselves
from place to place, because it is a part of
their right of self-government ; but that as
the right of self-government does not com
prehend the government of others, the two
houses cannot, by a joint resolution of their
majorities only, remove the Executive and
Judiciary from place to place. These branches
possessing, also, the rights of self-government
from nature, cannot be controlled in the ex
ercise of them but by a law, passed in the
forms of the Constitution The clause of the
bill in question, therefore, was necessary to be
put into the form of a law, and to be sub
mitted to the President, so far as it proposes
to effect the removal of the Executive and
Judiciary to Philadelphia. So far as respects
the removal of the present houses of legisla
tion thither, it was not necessary to be sub
mitted to the President ; but such a submis
sion is not repugnant to the Constitution.
On the contrary, if he concurs, it will so far
fix the next session of Congress at Philadel
phia that it cannot be changed but by a reg
ular law.
The sense of Congress itself is always re
spectable authority. It has been given very
remarkably on the present subject. The ad
dress to the President in the paper of the
I3th, is a complete digest of all the arguments
urged on the floor of the Representatives
against the constitutionality of the bill now
before the President ; and they were over
ruled by a majority of that house, compre
hending the delegation of all the States south
of the Hudson, except South Carolina. At
the last session of Congress, when the bill
for remaining a certain term at New York,
and then removing to Susquehanna, or Ger-
mantown, was objected to on the same
ground, the objection was overruled by a ma
jority comprehending the delegations of the
northern half of the Union with that of
South Carolina. So that the sense of every
State in the Union has been expressed, by
its delegation, against this objection, South
Carolina excepted, and excepting also Rhode
Island, which has never yet had a delegation
in place to vote on the question. In both
these instances, the Senate concurred with the
majority of the Representatives. The sense
of the two houses is stronger authority in this
case, as it is given against their own supposed
privilege.
It would be as tedious, as it is unnecessary,
to take up and discuss one by one, the ob
jects proposed in the paper of July 13. Every
one of them is founded on the supposition
that the two houses hold their right of ad
journment from the Constitution. This er
ror being corrected, the objections founded
on it fall of themselves.
It would also be work of mere supereroga
tion to show that, granting what this writer
takes for granted, (that the President's as
sent would be an inoperative ingredient, be
cause excluded by the Constitution, as ^ he
says.) yet the particular views of the writer
would be frustrated, for on every hypothesis
of what the President may do. Congress must
go to Philadelphia, i. If he assents to the
bill, that assent makes good law of the part
relative to the Potomac ; and the part for
holding the next session at Philadelphia is
good, either as an ordinance, or a vote of the
two houses, containing a complete declaration
of their will in a case where it is competent to
Ad j ournment
Administration
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
16
the object; so that they must go to Philadel
phia in that case. 2. If he dissents from the
bill, it annuls the part relative to the Poto
mac; but as to the clause for adjourning to
Philadelphia, his dissent being as inneficient
as his assent, it remains a good ordinance, or
vote, of the two houses for going thither,
and consequently they must go in this case
also. 3. If the President withholds his will
out of the bill altogether, by a ten day's si
lence, then the part relative to the Potomac
becomes a good law without his will, and that
relative to Philadelphia is good also, either
as a law, or an ordinance, or a vote of the
two houses ; and consequently in this case
also they go to Philadelphia. — OPINION ON
RESIDENCE BILL, vii, 495. FORD ED., v, 205.
(July 1790.)
108. ADJOURNMENT, Executives and.
— The Administrator shall not possess the
prerogative * * * of dissolving, proroguing,
or adjourning either House of Assembly. —
PROPOSED VA. CONSTITUTION. FORD ED., ii,
18. (June 1776.)
109. ADMINISTRATION, Acceptable.
— The House of Representatives having con
cluded their choice of a person for the chair
of the United States, and willed me that of
fice, it now becomes necessary to provide an
administration composed of persons whost
qualifications and ' standing have possessed
them of the public confidence, and whose
wisdom may ensure to our fellow citizens the
advantage they sanguinely expect. — To HENRY
DEARBORN, iv, 356. FORD ED., vii, 495. (W.,
Feb. 1801.) See CABINET.
— ADMINISTRATION, John Adams's.
—See 57, 58, 142.
110. ADMINISTRATION, Antagonism
to. — I have received many letters stating to
me in the spirit of prophecy, caricatures which
the writers, it seems, know are to be the prin
ciples of my administration. To these no an
swer has been given, because the prejudiced
spirit in which they have been written proved
the writers not in a state of mind to yield
to truth or reason.— To WILLIAM JACKSON.
iv, 357- (W., 1801.)
111. ADMINISTRATION, Arduous.—
The helm of a free government is always
arduous, and never was ours more so, than
at a moment when two friendly peoples are
likely to be committed in war by the ill tem
per of their administrations. — To JAMES SUL
LIVAN, iv, 168. FORD ED., vii, 117. (M.,
Feb. 1797.)
112. ADMINISTRATION, Confidence
in. — In a government like ours it is necessary
to embrace in its administration as great a
mass of confidence as possible, by employing
those who have a character with the public,
of their own, and not merely a secondary one
through the Executive. * — ANAS, ix, 208.
FORD ED., i, 312. (April, 1806.)
113. . On the whole, I hope we
shall make up an administration which will
* Answer to Aaron Burr's solicitations for an office.
—EDITOR.
unite a great mass of confidence, and bid de
fiance to the plans of opposition meditated
by leaders who are now almost destitute of
followers. — To HORATIO GATES. FORD ED.,
viii, ii. (W., March 1801.)
114. ADMINISTRATION, Confident.—
The important subjects of the government I
meet with some degree of courage and con
fidence, because I do believe the talents to be
associated with me, the honest line of conduct
we will religiously pursue at home and
abroad, and the confidence of my fellow citi
zens dawning on us, will be equal to these
objects.— To WILLIAM B. GILES, iv, 380.
FORD ED., viii, 25. (W., March 1801.)
115. ADMINISTRATION, Devoted.— If
ever the earth has beheld a system of admin
istration conducted with a single and stead
fast eye to the general interest and happiness
of those committed to it, one which, pro
tected by truth, can never know reproach, it
is that to which our lives have been devoted.
—To JAMES MADISON, vii, 435. FORD ED.,
x, 378. (M., 1826.)
116. ADMINISTRATION, Difficult.—
Our situation is difficult ; and whatever we do
is liable to the criticism of those who wish
to represent it awry. If we recommend
measures in a public message, it may be said
that members are not sent here to obey the
mandates of the President, or to register the
edicts of a sovereign. If we express opinions
in conversation, we have then our Charles
Jenkinsons, and back-door counsellors. If
we say nothing, " we have no opinions, no
plans, no cabinet." In truth, it is the fable
of the old man, his son and ass, over again. —
To WILLIAM DUANE. iv, 592. FORD ED., viii,
433- (W., 1806.)
117. ADMINISTRATION, Disapproved.
— There was but a single act of my whole
administration of which the federal party ap
proved. That was the proclamation on the
attack of the Chesapeake. And when I found
they approved of it, I confess I began strongly
to apprehend I had done wrong, and to ex
claim with the Psalmist, " Lord, what have I
done that the wicked should praise me." —
To ELBRIDGE GERRY, vi, 63. FORD ED., ix,
359. (M., 1812.)
118. ADMINISTRATION, Disinterest
ed. — A disinterestedness administration of the
public trusts is essential to perfect tranquillity
of mind. — To SAMUEL HAWKINS, v, 392.
(W., 1808.)
119. ADMINISTRATION, England and
the. — All the troubles and difficulties in the
government during our time proceeded from
England; at least all others were trifling in
comparison with them. — To HENRY DEAR
BORN, v, 455. (M., 1809.)
120. ADMINISTRATION, Errors in.—
It is our consolation and encouragement that
we are serving a just public, who will be in
dulgent to any error committed honestly, and
relating merely to the means of carrying into
effect what they have manifestly willed to be a
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Administration
law. — To W. H. CABELL. v, 162. FORD ED.,
ix, 96. (M., 1807.) See ERROR.
121. ADMINISTRATION, Foreign Pol
icy. — In the transaction of your foreign af
fairs, we have endeavored to cultivate the
friendship of all nations, and especially of
those with which we have the most important
relations. We have done them justice on all
occasions, favored where favor was law
ful, and cherished mutual interests and inter
course on fair and equal terms. We are
firmly convinced, and we act on that convic
tion, that with nations, as with individuals,
our interests soundly calculated, will ever be
found inseparable from our moral duties;
and history bears witness to the fact, that a
just nation is taken on its word, when re
course is had to armaments and wars to
bridle others. — SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS.
viii, 40. FORD ED., viii, 343. (1805.)
122. ADMINISTRATION, Formalities
and. — The necessity of these abridgments of
formalities in our present distant situations
requires that I should particularly suggest to
you the expediency of desiring General Knox
to communicate to the foreign ministers him
self directly any matters relative to the inter
positions of his department through the gov
ernors. For him to send these to me from
Boston to this place [Monticello] merely that
I may send them back to the ministers at
Philadelphia or New York, might be an in
jurious delay of business. — To PRESIDENT
WASHINGTON. FORD ED., vi, 435. (M., Oct.
I793-) See FORMALITIES.
123. ADMINISTRATION, Fundamen
tal Principles.— To cultivate peace and main
tain commerce and navigation in all their
lawful enterprises ; to foster our fisheries and
nurseries of navigation and for the nurture of
man, and protect the manufactures adapted to
our circumstances; to preserve the faith of
the nation by an exact discharge of its debts
and contracts, expending the public money
with the same care and economy we would
practice with our own, and impose on our
citizens no unnecessary burden ; to keep in all
things within the pale of our constitutional
powers, and cherish the Federal Union as the
only rock of our safety — these are the land
marks by which we are to guide ourselves in
all our proceedings. By continuing to make
these our rule of action, we shall endear to
our countrymen the true principles of their
Constitution, and promote a union of senti
ment and of action equally auspicious to their
happiness and safety. — SECOND ANNUAL MES
SAGE, viii, 21. FORDED., viii, 186. (1802.) See
INAUGURAL ADDRESSES, APPENDIX.
124. - — . Our wish is * * * that the
public efforts may be directed honestly to the
public good, that peace be cultivated, civil
and religious liberty unassailed, law and or
der preserved, equality of rights maintained,
and that state of property, equal or unequal,
which results to every man from his own in
dustry or that of his fathers.— SECOND IN
AUGURAL ADDRESS, viii, 44. FORD ED., viii,
347- (1805.)
125. . That all should be satis
fied with any one order of things is not to be
expected, but I indulge the pleasing persua
sion that the great body of our citizens will
concur in honest and disinterested efforts,
which have for their object to preserve the
General and State governments in their con
stitutional form and equilibrium ; to maintain
peace abroad and order and obedience to the
laws at home ; to establish principles and prac
tices of administration favorable to the se
curity of liberty and prosperity, and to re
duce expenses to what is necessary for the
useful purposes of government. — FIRST AN
NUAL MESSAGE, viii, 15. FORD ED., viii, 125.
(Dec. 1801.)
126. . Believing that (excepting
the ardent monarchists) all our citizens
agreed in ancient whig principles, I thought
it advisable to define and declare them, and
let them see the ground on which we could
rally. And the fact proving to be so, that
they agree in these principles, I shall pursue
them with more encouragement. — To GEN
ERAL HENRY KNOX. iv, 386. FORD ED., viii,
36. (W., March 1801.)
127. ADMINISTRATION, Good Repub
lican. — A good administration in a republi
can government, securing to us our dearest
rights, and the practical enjoyment of all our
liberties, can never fail to give consolation to
the friends of free government, and mortifica
tion to its enemies. — R. TO A. RHODE ISLAND
REPUBLICANS, viii, 162. (1809.)
128. ADMINISTRATION, Harmoni
ous. — That there is only one minister who is
not opposed to me, is totally unfounded.
There never was a more harmonious, a more
cordial administration, nor ever a moment
when it has been otherwise. And while dif
ferences of opinion have been always rare
among us, I can affirm, that as to present
matters, there was not a single paragraph in
my message to Congress, or those supplement
ary to it, in which there was not a unanimity
of concurrence in the members of the admin
istration. — To WILLIAM DUANE. iv, 591.
FORD ED., viii, 432. (W., March 1806.)
129. ADMINISTRATION, Hesitancy
and. — On every question the lawyers are
about equally divided, and were we to act but
in cases where no contrary opinion of a law
yer can be had, we should never act. — To
ALBERT GALLATIN. v, 369. (M., 1898.)
130. ADMINISTRATION, Honest.—
The measures of my administration * * *
have been pursued with honest intentions, un
biased by any personal or interested views. —
R. TO A. WILMINGTON CITIZENS, viii, 149.
(1809.)
131. ADMINISTRATION, Indebted.— I
do not mean, fellow citizens, to arrogate to
myself the merit of the measures [of the ad
ministration] ; that is due, in the first place, to
the reflecting character of our citizens at
large, who, by the weight of public opinion,
influence and strengthen the public measures ;
it is due to the sound discretion with which
Administration
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
18
they select from among themselves those to
whom they confide the legislative duties; it
is due to the zeal and wisdom of the char
acters selected, who lay the foundations of
public happine s in wholesome laws, the ex
ecution of which alone remains for others ;
and it is due to tl.e able and faithful auxil
iaries, whose patriotism has associated with
me in the executive functions. — SECOND IN
AUGURAL ADDRESS, viii, 43. FORD ED., viii,
345. (1805.)
132. ADMINISTRATION, Indulgence
to.-— There are no mysteries in the public ad
ministration. Difficulties indeed sometimes
arise; but common sense and honest inten
tions will generally steer through them, and,
where they cannot be surmounted, I have ever
seen the well-intentioned part of our fellow
citizens sufficiently disposed not to look for
impossibilities.— To DR. J. B. STUART, vii,
64. (M., 1817.)
133. . A consciousness that I
feel no desire but to do what is best, without
passion or predilection, encourages me to
hope for an indulgent construction of what I
do.— To JOHN PAGE, iv, 377. (W., 1801.)
— ADMINISTRATION, Madison's.—
See MADISON.
134. ADMINISTRATION, Meritorious.
—I wish support^from no quarter longer than
my object, candidly scanned shall merit it;
and especially, not longer than I shall vig
orously adhere to the Constitution. — To BEN
JAMIN STODDERT. iv, 360. FORD ED., vii, 400.
(W., Feb. 1801.)
135. ADMINISTRATION, Moderate.—
I am very much in hopes we shall be able to
restore union to our country. Not, indeed,
that the federal leaders can be brought over.
They are invincibles; but I really hope their
followers may. The bulk of these last were
real republicans, carried over from us by
French excesses. This induced me to offer
a political creed [in the inauguration address],
and to invite to conciliation first; and I am
pleased to hear, that these principles are rec
ognized by them, and considered as no bar
of separation. A moderate conduct through
out which may not revolt our new friends,
and which may give them tenets with us,
must be observed.— To JOHN PAGE, iv, 378.
(W., March 1801.)
136. ADMINISTRATION, Public Opin
ion and. — It will always be interesting to me
to know the impression made by any particu
lar thing on the public mind. My idea is
that where two measures are equally right, it
is a duty to the people to adopt that one
which is most agreeable to them; and where
a measure not agreeable to them has been
adopted, it is desirable to know it, because it
is an admonition to a review of that measure
to see if it has been really right, and to cor
rect it if mistaken. — To WILLIAM FINDLEY.
FORD ED., viii, 27. (W., March 1801.)
137. ADMINISTRATION, Reasonable.
— Unequivocal in principle, reasonable in
manner, we shall be able, 1 hope, to do a great
deal of good to the cause of freedom and har
mony. — To ELBRIDGE GERRY, iv, 392. FORD
ED., viii, 43. (W., March 1801.)
138. ADMINISTRATION, Responsibil
ity and.— We can only be answerable for
the orders we give and not for the execution.
If they are disobeyed from obstinacy of spirit,
or want of coercion in the laws, it is not our
fault. — To GENERAL STEUBEN. FORD ED ii
492. (R., 1781.)
139. ADMINISTRATION, Routine.—
The ordinary affairs of a nation offer little
difficulty to a person of any experience. — To
JAMES SULLIVAN, v, 252. (W., 1808.)
140. ADMINISTRATION, Salutary.—
I am sure the measures I mean to pursue
are such as would in their nature be approved
by every American who can emerge from pre
conceived prejudices; as for those who can
not, we must take care of them as of the sick
in our hospitals. The medicine of time and
fact may cure some of them. — To THEODORE
FOSTER. FORD ED., viii. 50. (W., May 1801.)
141. ADMINISTRATION, Secrecy in.—
The same secrecy and mystery are affected to
be observed by the present, which marked the
former administration. — To AARON BURR.
iv, 185. FORD ED., vii, 147. (Pa., June 1797.)
142. ADMINISTRATION, Slip-shod.—
The administration [of Mr. Adams] had no
rule for anything. — To WILLIAM SHORT, iv,
413. FORD ED., viii, 96. (W., 1801.)
143. ADMINISTRATION, Successors
in- — I have thought it right to take no part
myself in proposing measures, the execution
of which will devolve on my successor. — To
DR. LOGAN, v, 404. (W., Dec. 1808.) .
144. . I should not feel justified
in directing measures which those who are to
execute them would disapprove. — To LEVI
LINCOLN, v, 387. FORD ED., ix, 227. (W.,
Nov. 1808.)
145. . I am now so near the
moment of retiring, that I take no part in af
fairs beyond the expression of an opinion. I
think it fair that my successor should now
originate those measures of which he will be
charged with the execution and responsibility,
and that it is my duty to clothe them with the
forms of authority. — To JAMES MONROE, v,
420. FORD ED., ix, 243. (W., Jan. 1809.)
146. . I hope that my successor
will enter on a calmer sea than I did. He
will at least find the vessel of State in the
hands of his friends, and not of his foes. — To
RICHARD M. JOHNSON, v, 257. (W., 1808.)
147. ADMINISTRATION, Summary of
Jefferson's first. — To do without a land
tax, excise, stamp tax and the other internal
taxes, to supply their place by economies,
so as still to support the government prop
erly, and to apply $7,300,000 a year steadily
to the payment of the public debt; to dis
continue a great portion of the expenses on
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Administration
Admiralty Courts
armies and navies, yet protect our country
and its commerce with what remains; to
purchase a country as large and more fertile
than the one we possessed before, yet ask
neither a new tax, nor another soldier to be
added, but to provide that that country shall
by its own income, pay for itself before the
purchase money is due; to preserve peace
with all nations, and particularly an equal
friendship to the two great rival powers,
France and England, and to maintain the
credit and character of the nation in as high
a degree as it has ever enjoyed, are measures
which I think must reconcile the great body
of those who thought themselves our ene
mies; but were in truth only the enemies
of certain Jacobinical, atheistical, anarchical,
imaginary caricatures, which existed only in
the land of the raw head and bloody bones,
beings created to frighten the credulous. By
this time they see enough of us to judge our
characters by what we do, and not by what
we never did, nor thought of doing, but in
the lying chronicles of the newspapers. — To
TIMOTHY BLOODWORTH. iv, 523. (W., Jan.
1804.)
148. ADMINISTRATION, Temporiz
ing.— Mild laws, a people not used to prompt
obedience, a want of provisions of war, and
means of procuring them render our orders
often ineffectual, oblige us to temporize, and
when we cannot accomplish an object in one
way to attempt it in another. Your knowl
edge of these circumstances, with a temper
to accommodate them, ensure me your co
operation in the best way we can, when we
shall not be able to pursue the way we would
wish. — To MAJOR GENERAL DE LAFAYETTE.
FORD ED., ii, 493. (R., March 1781.)
149. ADMINISTRATION, Tranquil.—
The path we have to pursue is so quiet that
we have nothing scarcely to propose to our
Legislature. A noiseless course, not med
dling with the affairs of others, unattractive
of notice, is a mark that society is going
on in happiness. — To THOMAS COOPER, iv,
453. FORD ED., viii, 178. (W., Nov. 1802.)
150. ADMINISTRATION, Unmed-
dling. — The quiet track into which we are
endeavoring to get, neither meddling with
the affairs of other nations, nor with those
of our fellow citizens, but letting them go
on in their own way, will show itself in the
statement of our affairs to Congress.— To
DR JOSEPH PRIESTLEY. FORD ED., viii, 180.
(W., Dec. 1802.)
151. ADMINISTRATION, Unsuccess
ful. — Two measures have not been adopted,
which I pressed on Congress repeatedly at
their meetings. The one, to settle the whole
ungranted territory of Orleans, by donations
of land to able-bodied young men, to be en
gaged and carried there at the public expense,
who would constitute a force always ready
on the spot to defend New Orleans. The
other was to class the militia according to the
years of their birth, and make all those from
twenty to twenty-five liable to be trained and
called into service at a moment's warn-
ng. This would have given us a force of
;hree hundred thousand young men, prepared
}y proper training, for service in any part
of the United States ; while those who had
passed through that period would remain at
lome, liable to be used in their own or ad
jacent States. Those two measures would
have completed what I deemed necessary
for the entire security of our country. They
would have given me, on my retirement from
the government of the nation, the consola
tory reflection, that having found, when I
was called to it, not a single seaport town
in a condition to repel a levy of contribution
by a single privateer or pirate, I had left
every harbor so prepared by works and gun
boats, as to be in a reasonable state of secur
ity against any probable attack; the territory
of Orleans acquired, and planted with an
internal force sufficient for its protection ; and
the whole territory of the United States or
ganized by such a classification of its male
force, as would give it the benefit of all its
young population for active service, and that
of a middle and advanced age for stationary
defence. But these measures will. I hope,
be completed by my successor. — To GENERAL
KOSCIUSKO. v, 507. (M., Feb. 1810.)
— ADMINISTRATION, Washington's.
— See WASHINGTON.
152. ADMINISTRATIONS, British.— In
general the [British] administrations are so
changeable, and they are obliged to descend
to such tricks to keep themselves in place,
that nothing like honor or morality can ever
be counted on in transactions with them. —
To PRESIDENT MADISON, v, 465. (M., Aug.
1809.)
153. ADMINISTRATIONS, Ill-temp
ered. — We have received a report that the
French Directory has proposed a declaration
of war against the United States to the Coun
cil of Ancients, who have rejected it. Thus
we see two nations, who love one another
affectionately, brought by the ill temper of
their executive administrations, to the very
brink of necessity to imbrue their hands in
the blood of each other. — To AARON BURR.
iv, 187. FORD ED., vii, 148. (Pa., June
I/97-)
154. ADMIRALTY COURTS, Decisions
of British. — I thank you for the case of
Demsey vs. the Insurers, which I have read
with great pleasure, and entire conviction.
Indeed it is high time to withdraw all respect
from courts acting under the arbitrary orders
of governments who avow a total disregard of
those moral rules which have hitherto been
acknowledged by nations, and have served
to regulate and govern their intercourse,
should respect just as much the rules of
conduct which governed Cartouche or Black-
beard, as those now acted on by France or
England. If your argument is defective in
anything, it is in having paid to the antecedent
decisions of the British Courts of Admiralty
the respect of examining them on grounds of
reason; and not having rested the decision
at once on the profligacy of those tribunals,
Admiralty Courts
Advice
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
20
and openly declared against permitting their
sentences to be ever more quoted or listened
to until those nations return to the practice
of justice, to an acknowledgment that there
is a moral law which ought to govern man
kind, and by sufficient evidences of contrition
for their present flagitiousness, make it safe
to receive them, again into the society of civi
lized nations. I hope this will be done on a
proper occasion. Yet knowing that religion
does not furnish grosser bigots than law, I
expect little from old judges. Those now at
the bar may be bold enough to follow reason
rather than precedent, and may bring that
principle on the bench when promoted to
it; but I fear this effort is not for my day.
It has been said that when Harvey discovered
the circulation of the blood, there was not
a physician of Europe of forty years of age,
who assented to it. I fear you will experi
ence Harvey's fate; but it will become law
when the present judges are dead. — To
THOMAS COOPER, v, 531. (M., 1810.)
155. ADMIRALTY COURTS, Jurisdic
tion. — They [Parliament] have extended the
jurisdiction of courts of admiralty beyond
their ancient limits. — DECLARATION ON TAK
ING UP ARMS. FORD ED., i, 468. (July 1775.)
— ADMISSION OF NEW STATES.—
See STATES.
156. ADVERTISEMENTS, Appreciat
ed. — I read but one newspaper and that * * *
more for its advertisements than its news. —
To CHARLES PINCKNEY. vii, 180. FORD ED., x,
162. (M., 1820.)
157. ADVERTISEMENTS, Principle
and. — I think it might be well to advertise my
lands at Elkhill for sale, and therefore enclose
you the form of an advertisement, in which,
you will observe, I have omitted the name
of the proprietor, which, as long as I am in
public, I would wish to keep out of view in
everything of a private nature. — To NICHOLAS
LEWIS. FORD ED., v, 281. (Pa., 1791.)
158. ADVERTISEMENTS, Truth and.
— Advertisements contain the only truths to
be relied on in a newspaper. — To NATHANIEL
MACON. vii, in. FORD ED., x, 120. (M.,
1819.)
159. ADVICE, A Duty.— -Duty tells me
that the public interest is so deeply concerned
in your perfect knowledge of the characters
employed in its high stations, that nothing
should be withheld which can give you useful
information. — To PRESIDENT MADISON, vi
101. (M., 1813.)
160. ADVICE, Friendship in.— No apol
ogies for writing or speaking to me freely
are necessary. On the contrary, nothing my
friends can do is so dear to me, and proves
to me their friendship so clearly, as the in
formation they give me of their sentiments
and those of others on interesting points
where I am to act, and where information
and warning are so essential to excite in me
that due reflection which ought to preced
action.— To WILSON C. NICHOLAS, iv, 507
FORD EDV viii, 248. (M., 1803.)
161. . I always consider it as
he most friendly service which can be ren-
tered me, to be informed of anything which
s going amiss, and which I can remedy. —
To WILSON C. NICHOLAS, v, 400. (W.,
1808.)
162. ADVICE, A Legacy of.— Your af-
ectionate mother requests that I would ad
dress to you, as a namesake, something which
night have a favorable influence on the
course of life you have to run. Few words
are necessary, with good dispositions on your
)art. Adore God ; reverence and cherish
our parents ; love your neighbor as your
self, and your country more than life. Be
ust; be true; murmur not at the ways of
Providence — and the life into which you
may have entered will be one of eternal and
neffable bliss. And if to _the dead it is per
mitted to care for the things of this world,
every action of your life will be under my
regard. Farewell. — To THOMAS JEFFERSON
GROTJAN. FORD ED., x, 287. (M., 1824.)
163. ADVICE, Proffering.— How easily
we prescribe for others a cure for their diffi
culties, while we cannot cure our own. — To
JOHN ADAMS, vii, 201. FORD ED., x, 187.
(M., 1821.)
164. ADVICE, Ten Precepts of.— A
Decalogue of Canons for Observation in
Practical Life: —
1. Never put off till to-morrow what you
can do to-day.
2. Never trouble another for what you can
do yourself.
3. Never spend your money before you
have it.
4. Never buy what you do not want, be
cause it is cheap ; it will be dear to you.
5. Pride costs us more than hunger, thirst
and cold.
6. We never repent of having eaten too
little.
7. Nothing is troublesome that we do
willingly.
8. How much pain have cost us the evils
which have never happened.
9. Take things always by their smooth
handle.
10. When angry, count ten, before you
speak: if very angry, an hundred.— To
THOMAS JEFFERSON SMITH, vii, 401. FORD
ED., x, 341. (M., 1825.)
165. ADVICE, Thankful for. — I am ever
thankful for communications which may
guide me in the duties which I wish to per
form as well as I am able.— To JOHN DICK
INSON, v, 29. FORD ED., ix, 8. (W., 1807.)
166. . I have always received
with thankfulness the ideas of judicious per
sons on subjects interesting to the public. —
To BENJAMIN STODDERT. v, 426. FORD ED.,
ix, 246. (W., 1809.)
167. • In all cases I invite and
shall receive with great thankfulness your
opinion and that of others on the course of
things, and particularly in the suggestion of
21
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Advice
Age
characters who may worthily be appointed. —
TO PlERREPONT EDWARDS. FORD ED., Vlii, 45-
(W., March 1801.)
168. . Far from arrogating the
office of advice, no one will more passively
acquiesce in it than myself. — To JOHN H.
PLEASANTS. vii, 346. FORD ED., x, 304. (M.,
1824.)
169. ADVICE, Valued.—! value no act
of friendship so highly as the communicating
facts to me, which I am not in the way of
knowing otherwise, and could not therefore
otherwise guard against. — To W. C. NICHO
LAS, v, 260. (W., 1808.)
170. . It is impossible for my
friends ever to render me so acceptable a
favor, as by communicating to me, without
reserve, facts and opinions. I have none
of that sort of self-love which winces at
it; indeed, both self-love and the desire to
do what is best strongly invite unreserved
communication. — To WILSON C. NICHOLAS.
v, 48. FORD ED., ix, 32. (W., 1807.)
171. ADVICE, Unbiased.— The greatest
favor which can be done me is the communi
cation of the opinions of judicious men, of
men who do not suffer their judgments to
be biased by either interests or passions. —
To CHANDLER PRICE, v, 46. (W., 1807.)
— AERONAUTICS.— See BALLOONS.
172. AFFECTION, Early.— I find as I
grow older, that I love those most whom I
loved first. — To MRS. JOHN BOLLING. FORD
ED., iv, 412. (P., 1787.)
173. AFFECTION, Of friendship.— The
happiest moments my heart knows are those
in which it is pouring forth its affections to
a few esteemed characters. — To MRS. TRIST.
FORD ED., iv, 331. (P., 1786.) See FRIEND
SHIP.
174. AFFECTION, Parental.— Is not
parental love the strongest affection known?
Is it not greater than that of self-preserva
tion?— NOTE, i, 149. FORD ED., ii, 206. (1778.)
175. . Although parental be yet
stronger than filial affection. * * * .
NOTE, i, 150. FORD ED., ii, 207. (1778.)
176. AFFECTION, Patriotic.— My affec
tions are first for my own country, and then,
generally, for all mankind. — To THOMAS
LAW. v, 556. FORD ED., ix, 293. (M., 1811.)
177. AFFECTION, Rewarded by.— The
affection of my countrymen * * * was
the only reward I ever asked or could have
felt. — To JAMES MONROE, i, 318. FORD ED.,
iii, 57. (M., 1782.) See FAMILY, HOME.
178. AFFLICTION, Consolation in.—
Tried myself in the school of affliction, by the
loss of every form of connection which can
rive the human heart, I know well, and feel
what you have lost, what you have suffered,
are suffering, and have yet to endure. The
same trials have taught me that for ills so
immeasurable, time and silence are the only
medicine. I will not, therefore, by useless
condolences, open afresh the sluices of your
grief, nor, although mingling sincerely my tears
with yours, will I say a word more where words
are vain. — To JOHN ADAMS, vii, 107. FORD
EU., x, 114. (M., 1818.)
179. AFFLICTION, Schooled in.— There
is no degree of affliction, produced by the loss
of those dear to us, which experience has not
taught me to estimate. I have ever found
time and silence the only medicine, and these
but assuage, they never can suppress, the deep
drawn sigh which recollection forever brings
up, until recollection and life are extinguished
together. — To JOHN ADAMS, vi, 221. (M.,
1813.)
180. AFFLICTION, Sympathy in.— Long
tried in the same school of affliction, no loss
which can rend the human heart is unknown to
mine ; and a like one particularly, at about the
same period in life, had taught me to feel the
sympathies of yours. The same experience has
proved that time, silence and occupation are
its only medicines. — To GOVERNOR CLAIBORNE.
v, 520. (M., 1810.)
— AFRICAN SLAVE TRADE.— See
SLAVERY.
181. AGE, Advancing.— Being very sen
sible of bodily decays from advancing years,
I ought not to doubt their effect on the
mental faculties. To do so would evince
either great self-love or little observation of
what passes under our eyes; and I shall be
fortunate if I am the first to perceive and
to obey this admonition of nature. — To MR.
WEAVER, v, 88. (W., June 1807.)
182. AGE, Change and.— I am now of an
age which does not easily accommodate itself
to new manners and new modes of living. —
To BARON GEISMER. i, 427. (P., 1785.)
183. AGE, Deformity in.— Man, like the
fruit he eats, has his period of ripeness. Like
that, too, if he continues longer hanging to
the stem, it is but an useless and unsightly
appendage. — To HENRY DEARBORN, vii, 214.
FORD ED., x, 191. (M., 1821.)
184. AGE, Desire in.— Tranquillity is the
summum bonum of old age. — To MARK L.
HILL, vii, 154. (M., 1820.)
185. AGE, Dread of old. — I have ever
dreaded a doting old age; and my health
has been generally so good, and is now so
good, that I dread it still. The rapid decline
of my strength during the last winter has
made me hope sometimes that I see land.
During the summer I enjoy its temperature,
but I shudder at the approach of winter, and
wish I could sleep through it with the dor
mouse, and only wake with him in the spring,
if ever. — To JOHN ADAMS, vii, 244. FORD
ED., x, 216. (M., 1822.)
186. AGE, Duty in old.— Nothing is more
incumbent on the old, than to know when
they should get out of the way, and re
linquish to younger successors the honors they
can no longer earn, and the duties they can
no longer perform. — To JOHN VAUGHAN. vi,
417. (M., 1815.)
187. — — . I resign myself cheerfully
to the managers of the ship, and the more
Age
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
22
contentedly, as I am near the end of my voy
age. — To EDWARD LIVINGSTON, vii, 342. FORD
ED., x, 300. (M., 1824.)
188. AGE, Evils of protracted.— The
solitude in which we are left by the death of
our friends is one of the great evils of pro
tracted life. When I look back to the days of
my youth, it is like looking over a field of
battle. All, all dead ! and ourselves left alone
midst a new generation whom we know not,
and who know not us. — To FRANCIS A. VAN
DER KEMP. FORD ED., x, 337. (M., 1825.)
189. AGE, Fear of old.— -My only fear is
that I may live too long. This would be
a subject of dread to me. — To PHILIP
MAZZEI. FORD ED., viii, 15. (M., March
1801.)
190. AGE, Insensible to. — It is wonder
ful to me that old men should not be sensible
that their minds keep pace with their bodies
in the progress of decay. Our old revolu
tionary friend Clinton, for example, who
was a hero, but never a man of mind,
is wonderfully jealous on this head. He
tells eternally the stories of his younger days
to prove his memory, as if memory and
reason were the same faculty. Nothing be
trays imbecility so much as the being in
sensible of it. Had not a conviction of the
danger to which an unlimited occupation,
of the Executive chair would expose the re
publican constitution of our government,
made it conscientiously a duty to refuse when
I did, the fear of becoming a dotard, and of
being insensible of it, would of itself have
resisted all solicitations to remain. — To DR.
BENJAMIN RUSH, vi, 3. FORD ED., ix, 328.
(P.F., 1816.)
191. AGE, Offerings of. — Good wishes
are all an old man has to offer to his country
or friends. — To THOMAS LAW. v, 557. FORD
ED., ix, 293. (M., 1811.)
192. AGE, Oppressed by.-— The hand of
age is upon me. All my old friends are
nearly gone. Of those in my neighborhood,
Mr. Divers and Mr. Lindsay alone remain.
If you could make it a panic quarree, it
would be a comfort indeed. We would be
guile our lingering hours with talking over
our youthful exploits, our hunts on Peter's
mountain, with a long train of et cetera, in
addition, and feel, by recollection at least,
a momentary flash of youth. Reviewing the
course of a long and sufficiently successful
life, I find in no portion of it happier mo
ments than those were. — To JAMES MAURY.
vi, 54. FORD ED., ix, 351. (M., 1812.)
193. . The hand of age is upon
me. The decay of bodily faculties apprizes me
that those of the mind cannot be un
impaired, had I not still better proofs. Every
year counts my increased debility, and depart
ing faculties keep the score. The last year
it was the sight, this it is the hearing, the
next something else will be going, until all
is gone. Of all this I was sensible before I
left Washington, and probably my fellow
laborers saw it before I did. The decay of
memory was obvious ; it is now become dis
tressing. But the mind, too, is weakened.
When I was young, mathematics was the
passion of my life. The same passion has
returned upon me, but with unequal powers.
Processes which I then read off with the
facility of common discourse, now cost me
labor, and time, and slow investigation.
When I offered this, therefore, as one of the
reasons deciding my retirement from office,
it was offered in sincerity and a conscious
ness of truth. And I think it a great blessing
that I retain understanding enough to be
sensible how much of it I have lost, and to
avoid exposing myself as a spectacle for the
pity of my friends; that I have surmounted
the difficult point of knowing when to retire.
As a compensation for faculties departed,
nature gives me good health, and a perfect
resignation to the laws of decay which she
has prescribed to all the forms and combina
tions of matter. — To WILLIAM DUANE. vi,
80. FORD ED., ix, 367. (M., Oct. 1812.)
194. — - — . The epistolary industry
* * is gone from me. The aversion
has been growing on me for a considerable
time, and now, near the close of seventy-
five, is become almost insuperable. I am
much debilitated in body, and my memory
sensibly on the wane. Still, however, I en
joy good health and spirits, and am as in
dustrious a reader as when a student at
college. Not of newspapers. These I have
discarded. I relinquish, as I ought to do,
all intermeddling with public affairs, com
mitting myself cheerfully to the watch and
care of those for whom, in my turn, I have
watched and cared. — To BENJAMIN WATER-
HOUSE, vii, 100. FORD ED., x, 103. (M..
1818.)
195. AGE, Vigor in.— It is objected * * *
that Mr. Goodrich is seventy-seven years of
age ; but at a much more advanced age, our
Franklin was the ornament of human nature.
— To THE NEW HAVEN COMMITTEE, iv, 403.
FORD ED., viii, 68. (W., 1801.)
196. AGE, Warned by.— Time, which
wears all things, does not spare the energies
of body and mind of a prcsque octogenaire.
While I could, I did what I could, and now
acquiesce cheerfully in the law of nature
which, by unfitting us for action, warns us
to retire and leave to the generation of the
day the direction of its own affairs. The
prayers of an old man are the only con
tributions left in his power. To MRS. K. D.
MORGAN. FORD ED., viii, 473. (M., 1822.)
197. . A decline of health at the
age of 76, was naturally to be expected, and
is a warning of an event which cannot be dis
tant, and whose approach I contemplate with
little concern ; for indeed, in no circumstance
has nature been kinder to us, than in the
soft gradations by which she prepares us
to part willingly with what we are not des
tined always to retain. First one faculty
is withdrawn and then another, sight, hear
ing, memory, affection and friends, filched
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Age
Agriculture
one by one, till we are left among strangers,
the mere monuments of times, facts, and
specimens of antiquity for the observation of
the curious. — To MR. SPAFFORD. vii, 118.
(M., 1819.)
198. AGE, Yielding to.— I am not the
champion called for by our present dangers.
" Non tali auxilio, nee defcnsoribus istis,
tempus eget." A waning body, a waning
mind, and waning memory, with habitual
ill health warn me to withdraw and relinquish
the arena to younger and abler athletes. I
am sensible myself, if others are not, that
this is my duty. If my distant friends know
it not, those around me can inform them that
they should not, in friendship, wish to call
me into conflicts, exposing only the decays
which nature has inscribed among her un
alterable laws, and injuring the common
cause by a senile and puny defence. — To C.
W. GLOOCH. vii, 430. (M., 1826.) See LIFE.
— AGENTS.— See FOREIGN AGENTS.
199. AGGRESSION, Condemned.— We
did not invade their [the British peoples'] is
land, carrying death or slavery to its inhabit
ants. — DECLARATION ON TAKING UP ARMS.
FORD ED., i, 475. (July 1775.)
200. AGGRESSION, Encouraging.— It
is to be lamented that any of our citizens, not
thinking with the mass of the nation as to the
principles of our government, or of its ad
ministration, and seeing all its proceedings
with a prejudiced eye, should so misconceive
and misrepresent our situation as to encourage
aggressions from foreign nations. Our ex
pectation is, that their distempered views
will be understood by others as they are by
ourselves; but should wars be the conse
quence of these delusions, and the errors of
our dissatisfied citizens find atonement only
in the blood of their sounder brethren, we
must meet it as an evil necessarily flowing
from that liberty of speaking and writing
which guards our other liberties. — R. TO
PHILADELPHIA DEMOCRATIC REPUBLICANS.
viii, 128. (May 1808.)
— AGGRESSION, Equal Rights and.—
See RIGHTS.
201. AGGRESSION, Maritime.— The
ocean, which, like the air, is the common
birthright of mankind, is arbitrarily wrested
from us, and maxims, consecrated by time,
by usage, and by an universal sense of right,
are trampled on by superior force. — R. TO
A. N. Y. TAMMANY SOCIETY, viii, 127.
(1808.) See OCEAN.
202. AGGRESSION, Military.— We did
not embody a soldiery to commit aggression
on them [the British people]. — DECLARATION
ON TAKING UP ARMS. FORD ED., i, 475.
(July 1775.)
203. AGGRESSION, Prohibited.— We
will not permit aggressions to be committed
on our part, against which we remonstrated to
Spain on her part. — To ROBERT SMITH, v,
368. (M., Sep. 1808.)
204. AGGRESSION, Punishment for.—
The interests of a nation, when well un
derstood, will be found to coincide with
their moral duties. Among these it is an im
portant one to cultivate habits of peace and
friendship with our neighbors. To do this
we should make provisions for rendering
the justice we must sometimes require from
them. I recommend, therefore, to your con
sideration whether the laws of the Union
should not be extended to restrain our citi
zens from committing acts of violence within
the territories of other nations, which would
be punished were they committed within our
own.* — PARAGRAPHS FOR PRESIDENT'S MES
SAGE. FORD ED., vi, 119. (1792.) See FILI
BUSTERS.
205. AGITATION, Necessity for.— In
peace as well as in war, the mind must be
kept in motion. — To MARQUIS LAFAYETTE.
vii, 325. FORD ED., x, 280. (M., 1823.)
206. AGITATION, Submission.— The
force of public opinion cannot be resisted,
when permitted freely to be expressed. The
agitation it produces must be submitted to.
It is necessary to keep the waters pure. — To
MARQUIS LAYFAYETTE vii, 325. FORD ED,
x, 280. (M., 1823.)
207. AGRARIANISM, Laws of.— The
tax on importations * * * falls exclu
sively on the rich, and with the equal parti
tion of intestates' estates constitutes the best
agrarian law. — To DUPONT DE NEMOURS, v,
584. FORD ED., ix, 321. (M., 1811.) See
ENTAILS, PRIMOGENITURE, MONOPOLY.
208. AGRICULTURE, Art of.— The first
and most precious of all the arts. — To ROBERT
R. LIVINGSTON. FORD ED., vii, 445. (Pa., 1800.)
209. AGRICULTURE, Atmosphere and.
— The atmosphere is certainly the great work
shop of nature for elaborating the fertilizing
principles and insinuating them into the soil.
It has been relied on as the sole means of re
generating our soil by most of the land-hold
ers in the canton I inhabit, and where rest
has been resorted to before a total ex
haustion, the soil has never failed to recover.
If, indeed, it be so run down as to be in
capable of throwing weeds or herbage of any
kind, to shade the soil from the sun, it either
goes off in gullies, and is entirely lost, or
remains exhausted till a growth springs up of
such trees as will rise in the poorest soils.
Under the shade of these and the cover soon
formed of their deciduous leaves, and a
commencing herbage, such fields sometimes
recover in a long course of years; but this
is too long to be taken into a course of hus-
* Jefferson subsequently recast these paragraphs
as follows : " All observations are unnecessary on
the value of peace with other nations. It would be
wise however, by timely provisions, to guard against
those acts of our own citizens, which might tend to
disturb it, and to put ourselves in a condition to give
satisfaction to foreign nations, which we may some
times have occasion to require from them. I particu
larly recommend to your consideration the means of
preventing those aggressions by our citizens on the
territory of other nations, and other infractions of
the law of nations, which, furnishing just subject of
complaint, might endanger our peace with them."
Agriculture
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
bandry. Not so, however, is the term within
which the atmosphere alone will reintegrate
a soil rested in due season. A year of wheat
will be balanced by one, two, or three years
of rest and atmospheric influence, according
to the quality of the soil. — To iv, 224.
(Pa., 1798.)
210. AGRICULTURE, Commerce and.
— With honesty and self-government for her
portion, agriculture may abandon content
edly to others the fruits of commerce and
corruption. — To HENRY MIDDLETON. vi, 91.
(M., Jan. 1813.)
211. AGRICULTURE, Corn vs. pastur
age. — In every country as fully peopled as
France, it would seem good policy to encour
age the employment of its lands in the cul
tivation of corn rather than in pasturage,
and consequently to encourage the use of all
kinds of salted provisions, because they can
be imported from other countries. — To M.
NECKAR. iii, 120. (P., 1789.)
212. AGRICULTURE, Devastated.— A
very considerable portion of this country
[trance] has been desolated by a hail [storm]
* * * Great contributions, public and
private, are making for the sufferers. But
they will be like the drop of water Lorn the
finger of Lazarus. There is no remedy for
the present evil, .but to bring the people to
such a state of ease, as not to be ruined
by the loss of a single crop. This hail may
be considered as the coup de grace to an ex
piring victim. — To M. DE CREVECOEUR. ii, 458.
(P., Aug. 1788.)
213. AGRICULTURE, Discrimination
against. — Shall we permit the greatest part
of the produce of our fields to rot on our
hands, or lose half its value by subjecting
it to high insurance, [in the event of war,]
merely that our shipbuilders may have
brisker employ? Shall the whole mass of
our farmers be sacrificed to the class of ship
wrights? — OFFICIAL OPINION. vii, 625.
(I793-)
214. AGRICULTURE, Encouragement
of. — [The] encouragement of agriculture, and
of commerce as its handmaid, I deem
[one of the] essential principles of our gov
ernment and, consequently [one] which ought
to shape its administration. — FIRST INAU
GURAL ADDRESS, viii, 4. FORD ED., viii, 5.
(1821.)
215. AGRICULTURE, Equilibrium of.
— An equilibrium of agriculture, manufactures
and commerce is certainly become essential to
our independence. — To JAMES JAY. v, 440.
(M., 1809.)
216. AGRICULTURE, Freedom of.—
Agriculture, manufactures, commerce and
navigation, the four pillars of our prosperity,
are the most thriving when left most free to
individual enterprise. Protection from casual
embarrassments, however, may sometimes be
seasonably interposed. — FIRST_ ANNUAL MES
SAGE, viii, 13. FORD ED., viii, 123. (Dec.
1801.)
217. AGRICULTURE, French and Eng
lish. — I traversed England much, and own
both town and country fell short of my ex
pectations. Comparing it with France, I
found a much greater proportion of barrens,
a soil, in other parts, not naturally so good
as this, not better cultivated, but better ma
nured, and therefore more productive. This
proceeds from the practice of long leases
there, and short ones here. — To JOHN PAGE.
i, 549. FORD ED., iv, 213. (P., 1786.)
218. AGRICULTURE, Grasses.—! send
some seeds of a grass, found very useful
in the southern part of Europe, and par
ticularly, and almost solely cultivated in
Malta. It is called by the names of Sulla,
and Spanish St. Foin, and is the Hedysarum
coronarium of Linnaeus. It is usually sown
early in autumn. — To WILLIAM DRAYTON.
i, 554- (P, 1786.)
219. . I send a little Spanish
San Foin, represented to me as a very
precious grass in a hot country. I would
have it sowed in one of the vacant lots of my
grass ground. — To NICHOLAS LEWIS. FORD
ED., iv, 344. (P., 1786.)
220. . I am much obliged to you
for your attention to my trees and grass. The
latter is one of the principal pillars on which
I shall rely for subsistence when I shall be at
liberty to try projects without injury to any
body. — To NICHOLAS LEWIS. FORD ED., iv,
343. (P, 1786.)
221. AGRICULTURE, Happiness and.
—The United States * * * will be more
virtuous, more free and more happy, em
ployed in agriculture, than as carriers or man—
ufacturers. It is a truth, and a precious one
for them, if they could be persuaded of it. —
To M. DE WARVILLE. ii, n. FORD ED., iv,
281. (P., 1786.)
222. . How far it may lessen
our happiness to be rendered merely agricul
tural; how far that state is more friendly to
principles of virtue and liberty, are questions
yet to be solved. — To HORATIO GATES, iv,
213. FORD ED., vii, 205. (Pa., 1798.)
223. . In general, it is a truth
that if every nation will employ itself in
what it is fittest to produce, a greater quan
tity will be raised of the things contributing
to human happiness, than if every nation at
tempts to raise everything it wants within it
self. — To MR. LASTEYRIE. v, 315. (W., 1808.)
224. AGRICULTURE, Hunting and.—
A little labor in the earth will produce more
food than the best hunts you can now make,
and the women will spin and weave more
clothing than the men can procure by hunt
ing. We shall very willingly assist you in
this course by furnishing you with the neces
sary tools and implements, and with persons
to instruct you in the use of them. — ADDRESS
TO CHICKASAWS. viii, 199. (1805.)
225. AGRICULTURE, Income from. —
The moderate and sure income of husbandry
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Agriculture
begets permanent improvement, quiet life,
and orderly conduct, both public and private.
— To GENERAL WASHINGTON, ii, 252. (P.,
1787.)
226. AGRICULTURE, Land, labor
and. — The indifferent state of agriculture
among us does not proceed from a want of
knowledge merely ; it is from our having such
quantities of land to waste as we please. In
Europe the object is to make the most of
their land, labor being abundant; here it is
to make the most of our labor, land being
abundant. — NOTES ON VIRGINIA, viii, 332.
FORD ED., iii, 190. (1782.)
227. AGRICULTURE, Manufactures,
commerce and. — I trust the good sense of
pur country will see that its greatest prosper
ity depends on a due balance between agricul
ture, manufactures and commerce. — To
THOMAS LEIPER. v, 417. FORD ED., ix, 239.
(W., 1809.)
228. AGRICULTURE, Model plow.— I
shall with great pleasure attend to the con
struction and transmission to the Society
[Agricultural Society of Paris] of a plow
with my mould board. This is the only part
of that useful instrument to which I have
paid any particular attention. But knowing
how much the perfection of the plough must
depend, 1st, on the line of traction ; 2nd, on
the direction of the share; 3rd, on the angle
of the wing; 4th, on the form of the mould
board; and persuaded that I shall find the
three first advantages, eminently exemplified
in that which the Society sends me, I am anx
ious to see combined with these a mould-
board of my form, in the hope it will still ad
vance the perfection of that machine. — To
M. SYLVESTRE. v, 313. (W., 1808.)
229. . I have received the medal
of gold by which the Society of Agriculture
at Paris have been pleased to mark their ap
probation of a form of the mould-board which
I had proposed; also * * * the information
that they had honored me with the title of for
eign associate to their society. I receive with
great thankfulness these testimonies of their
favor, and should be happy to merit them by
greater services. — To M. SYLVESTRE. v, 83.
(W., 1807.)
230. AGRICULTURE, Morals and.—
The pursuits of agriculture * * * are the
best preservative of morals. — To J. BLAIR, ii,
248. (Pa., 1787.)
231. AGRICULTURE, New cultures.—
The greatest service which can be rendered
any country is to add an useful plant to its
culture; especially a bread grain; next in
value to bread is oil. — SERVICES OF JEFFERSON.
i, 176. FORD ED., vii, 477. (1800?)
232. . Perhaps I may render
some service by forwarding to the [Agricul
tural] Society* [of South Carolina] such new
objects of culture, as may be likely to suc
ceed in the soil and climate of South Caro
lina. In an infant country, as ours is, these
* The Society had elected Jefferson a member. —
EPITOR,
experiments are important. We are probably
far from possessing, as yet, all the articles of
culture for which nature has fitted our coun
try. To find out these, will require abundance
of unsuccessful experiments. But if, in a
multitude of these, we make one useful ac
quisition, it repays our trouble. Perhaps it is
the peculiar duty of associated bodies to un
dertake these experiments. Under this sense
of the views of the society, * * * I shall be
attentive to procure for them the seeds of
such plants as they will be so good as to
point out to me, or as shall occur to myself as
worthy their notice. — To WILLIAM DRAYTON.
i, 554- (P., 1786.)
233. m I received the seeds of
the bread-tree. * * * One service of this kind
rendered to a nation, is worth more to them
than all the victories of the most splendid
pages of their history, and becomes a source
of exalted pleasure to those who have been in
strumental in it. — To M. GIRAUD. iv, 17^.
(I797-)
234. . The introduction of new
cultures, and especially of objects of leading
importance to our comfort, is certainly worthy
the attention of every government, and noth
ing short of the actual experiment should dis
courage an essay of which any hope can be
entertained. — To M. LASTEYRIE. v, 315. (W.,
1808.)
235. AGRICULTURE, Prosperity and.
— A prosperity built on the basis of agricul
ture is that which is most desirable to us,
because to the efforts of labor it adds the ef
forts of a greater proportion of soil. — CIR
CULAR TO CONSULS, iii, 431. (Pa., 1792.)
See 216.
236. AGRICULTURE, Prostration of.—
The long succession of years of stunted crops,
of reduced prices, the general prostration of
the farming business, under levies for the
support of manufacturers, &c., with the cal
amitous fluctuations of value in our paper
medium, have kept agriculture in a state of
abject depression, which has peopled the
western States by silently breaking up those
on the Atlantic, and glutted the land market,
while it drew off its bidders. In such a state
of things, property has lost its character of
being a resource for debts. Highland in Bel-
ford, which, in the days of our plethory,
sold readily for from fifty to one hundred
dollars the acre, (and such sales were many
then,) would not now sell for more than
from ten to twenty dollars, or one-quarter or
one-fifth of its former price. — To JAMES MAD
ISON, vii, 434. FORD ED., x, 377. (M., Feb
ruary 1826.)
— AGRICULTURE, Rice.— See RICE.
237. AGRICULTURE, Riches and.—
The pursuits of agriculture are the surest
road to affluence. — To J. BLAIR, ii, 248. (P.,
1787.)
238. AGRICULTURE, Rotation of
crops. — By varying the articles of culture, we
multiply the chances for making something
Agriculture
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
26
and disarm the seasons in a proportionable
degree, of their calamitous effect. — To WILL
IAM DRAYTON. ii, 199. (P., 1787-)
239. . I find * * * that a ten
years abandonment of my lands to the rav
ages of overseers, has brought on them a de
gree of degradation far beyond what I had
expected. As this obliges me to adopt a
milder course of cropping, * * * I have de
termined on a division of my farm into six
fields, to be put under this rotation : first year,
wheat; second, corn, potatoes, peas; third,
rye or wheat, according to circumstances;
fourth and fifth, clover where the fields will
bring it, and buckwheat dressings where they
will not ; sixth, folding, and buckwheat dress
ings. But it will take me from three to six
years to get this plan under way. — To PRESI
DENT WASHINGTON, iv, 106. FORD ED., vi,
509. (M., May I794-)
240. . I find the degradation of
my lands by ill usage much beyond what I had
expected, and at the same time much more
open land than I had calculated on. One of
these circumstances forces a milder course ol
cropping on me, and the other enables me to
adopt it. I drop, therefore, two crops in my
rotation, and instead of five crops in eight
years, take three in six years, in the follow
ing order. I. Wheat. 2. Corn and potatoes
in the strongest moiety, potatoes alone or
pease alone in the other moiety, according to
its strength. 3. Wheat or rye. 4. Clover. 6.
Folding and buckwheat dressing. Tn such of
my fields as are too much worn for clover, I
propose to try St. Foin, which I know will
grow in the poorest land, bring plentiful
crops, and is a great ameliator. — To JOHN
TAYLOR. FORD ED., vi, 506. (M., 1794.)
241. . It has been said that no
rotation of crops will keep the earth in the
same degree of fertility without the aid of
manure. But it is well known here that a
space of rest greater or less in spontaneous
herbage, will restore the exhaustion of a
single crop. This then is a rotation; and as
it is not to be believed that spontaneous herb
age is the only or best covering during rest,
so may we expect that a substitute for it may
be found which will yield profitable crops.
Such perhaps are clover, peas, vetches, &c.
A rotation then may be found, which by giv
ing time for the slow influence of the atmos
phere, will keep the soil in a constant and
equal state of fertility. But the advantage of
manuring is that it will do more in one than
the atmosphere would require several years
to do, and consequently enables you so much
the oftener to take exhausting crops from the
soil, a circumstance of importance where
there is much more labor than land. — To .
iv, 225. (Pa., 1798.)
242. . I have lately received the
proceedings of the Agricultural Society of
Paris. * * * I have been surprised to find
that the rotation of crops and substitution of
some profitable growth preparatory for grain,
instead of the useless and expensive fallow,
is yet only dawning among them. — To ROBERT
R. LIVINGSTON, v, 224. (W., 1808.)
243. AGRICULTURE, Societies.— I have
on several occasions been led to think on some
means of uniting the State agricultural so
cieties into a central society ; and lately it has
been pressed from England with a view to
a cooperation with their Board of Agricul
ture. You know some have proposed to Con
gress to incorporate such a society. I am
against that, because I think Congress cannot
find in all the enumerated powers any one
which authorizes the act, much less the giving
the public money to that use. I believe, too,
if they had the power, it would soon be used
for no other purpose than to buy with sine
cures useful partisans. I believe it will thrive
best if left to itself, as the Philosophical So
cieties are. There is certainly a much greater
abundance of material for Agricultural So-:;
cieties than Philosophical. But what should
be the plan of union? Would it do for the
State societies to agree to meet in a central
society by a deputation of members? If this
should present difficulties, might they not be
lessened by their adopting into their society
some one or more of their delegates in Con
gress, or of the members of the Executive
residing here, who assembling necessarily for
other purposes, could occasionally meet on
the business of their societies? Your [New
York] Agricultural Society, standing un
doubtedly on the highest ground, might set
the thing agoing by writing to such State so
cieties as already exist, and these once meet
ing centrally might induce the other States to
establish societies, and thus complete the in
stitution. This is a mere idea of mine, not
sufficiently considered or digested, and haz
arded merely to set you to thinking on the
subject, and propose something better or to
improve this. Will you be so good as to con
sider it at your leisure, and give me your
thoughts on the subject? — To ROBERT R.
LIVINGSTON. FORD ED., vii, 492. (W., Feb.
1801.)
244. . Our Agricultural Society
has at length formed itself. Like our Ameri
can Philosophical Society, it is voluntary, and ^
unconnected with the public, and is precisely '*
an execution of the plan I formerly sketched
to you. Some State societies have been
formed heretofore ; the other States will do
the same. Each State society names two of
its members of Congress to be their members
in the Central Society, which is of course to
gether during the sessions of Congress. They
are to select matter from the proceedings of
the State societies, and to publish it. * * *
Mr. Madison, the Secretary of State, is their
President. — To SIR JOHN SINCLAIR, iv, 491.
(W., 1803.)
245. . Were practical and observ
ing husbandmen in each county to form them
selves into a society, commit to writing them
selves, or state in conversations at their meet
ings to be written down by others, their prac
tices, and observations, their experiences and
ideas, selections from these might be made
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Agriculture
Alexander of Rusaii
from time to time by every one for his own
use, or by the society or a. committee of it,
for more general purposes. By an interchange
of these selections among the societies of the
different counties, each might thus become
possessed of the useful ideas and processes of
the whole ; and every one adopt such of them
as he should deem suitable to his own situa
tion. Or to abridge the labor of such mul
tiplied correspondences, a central society
might be agreed on to which, as a common
deposit, all the others should send their com
munications. The society thus honored by
the general confidence would doubtless feel
and fulfil the duty of selecting such papers as
should be worthy of entire communication, of
extracting and digesting from others what
ever might be useful, and of condensing their
matter within such compass as might recon
cile it to the reading, as well as to the pur
chase of the great mass of practical men.
Many circumstances would recommend, for
the central society, that which should be es
tablished in the county of the seat of govern
ment. — PLAN FOR AGRICULTURAL SOCIETIES.
ix, 480. (1811.)
246. AGRICULTURE, Strawberry.—
There are two or three objects which you
should endeavor to enrich our country with.
One is the Alpine strawberry. — To JAMES
MONROE. FORD ED., vii, 21. (M., 1795.)
247. AGRICULTURE, Support from. —
Agriculture is the basis of the subsistence,
the comforts and the happiness of man. — To
BARON DE MOLL, vi, 363. (M., 1814.)
248. AGRICULTURE, Threshing ma
chine. — I shall thank you most sincerely for
the model of the threshing machine, besides
replacing the expense of it. The threshing
out our wheat immediately after harvest being
the only preservative against the weavil in
Virginia, the service you will thereby render
that State will make you to them a second
Triptolemus. — To THOMAS PINCKNEY. FORD
ED., vi, 214. (Pa., 1793.)
249. AGRICULTURE, Tobacco.— To
bacco is a culture productive of infinite
wretchedness. Those employed in it are in a
continual state of exertion beyond the power
of nature to support. Little food of any kind
is raised by them; so that the men and an
imals on these farms are badly fed, and the
earth is rapidly impoverished. The cultiva
tion of wheat is the reverse in every circum
stance. Besides clothing the earth with herb
age, and preserving its fertility, it feeds the
laborers plentifully, requires from them only
a moderate toil, except in the season of har
vest, raises great numbers of animals for food
and service, and diffuses plenty and happiness
among the whole. We find it easier to make
an hundred bushels of wheat than a thousand
weight of tobacco, and they are worth more
when made. — NOTES ON VIRGINIA, viii, 407.
FORD ED., iii, 271. (1782.)
250. AGRICULTURE, Utility.— Agri
culture is the most useful of the occupations
of man.— To M. SILVESTRE. v, 83. (W.. 1807.)
251. AGRICULTURE, Virginia.— Good
husbandry with us consists in abandoning In
dian corn and tobacco ; tending small grain, some
red clover, fallowing, and endeavoring to have,
while the lands are at rest, a spontaneous
cover of white clover. I do not present this
as a culture judicious in itself, but as good,
in comparison with what most people there
pursue. Mr. [Arthur] Young has never had
an opportunity of seeing how slowly the fertil
ity of the soil is exhausted^ with moderate
management of it. I can affirm that the James
River low-grounds, with the cultivation of small
grain, will never be exhausted ; because we
know, that, under that condition, we must now
and then take them down with Indian corn, or
they become, as they were originally, too rich
to bring wheat. The highlands where I
live, have been cultivated about sixty years.
The culture was tobacco and Indian corn, as
long as they would bring enough to pay the
labor ; then they were turned out. After four
or five years rest, they would bring good corn
again, and in double that time, perhaps, good
tobacco. Then they would be exhausted by a
second series of tobacco and corn. — To PRESI
DENT WASHINGTON, iv, 4. FORD ED., vi, 83.
— AGRICULTURE, Wheat.— See 249,
and WHEAT.
252. AGRICULTURE, Wisest of pur
suits. — Agriculture is the wisest pursuit of
all.— To R. IZARD. i, 442. (P., 1785.)
253. -- . Agriculture is our wisest
pursuit, because it will in the end contribute
most to real wealth, good morals and hap
piness. — To GENERAL WASHINGTON, ii, 252.
(P., 1787-)
254. AGRICULTURE, Writings on.—
Writings on agriculture are peculiarly pleas
ing to me, for, as they tell us, we are sprung
from the earth, so to that we naturally re
turn. * — To ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON, v., 224.
(W., 1808.) See FARMERS and FARMING.
— AIR.— See 209.
— ALBEMARLE COUNTY.— See AP
PENDIX.
255. ALEXANDER OF RUSSIA, Char
acter of. — A more virtuous man, I believe,
does not exist, nor one who is more enthu
siastically devoted to better the condition of
mankind. He will probably, one day. fall a
victim to it, as a monarch of that principle
does not suit a Russian noblesse. He is not
of the very first order of understanding, but
* Jefferson was always an enthusiast in agriculture.
He was never too busy to find time to note the dates
of the planting and the ripening' of his vegetables
and fruits. He left behind him a table enumerating
thirty-seven esculents, and showing the earliest date
of the appearance of each one of them in the Wash
ington market in each of eight successive years. He
had ever a quick observation and a keen intelligence
ready for every fragment of new knowledge or hint
of a useful invention in the way of field work. All
through his busy official life, abroad and at home, he
appears ceaselessly to have an eye on the soil and1
one ear open to its cultivators ; he is always compar
ing varying methods and results, sending new seeds \
hither and thither, making suggestions^ trying ex
periments, till, in the presence of his enterprise and
activity, one begins to think that the stagnating
character so commonly attributed to the Virginia
planters must be fabulous.— JOHN T. MORSE, JR. , Life
of Jefferson.
Alexander of Russia
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
28
he is of a high one. He has taken a peculiar
affection to this country and its government,
of which he has given me public as well as
personal proofs. Our nation being, like his,
habitually neutral, our interests as to neutral
rights, and our sentiments agree. And when
ever conferences for peace shall take place, we
are assured of a friend in him. In fact, al
though in questions of restitution he will be
with England, in those of neutral rights he
will be with Bonaparte, and with every other
power in the world except England ; and I do
presume that England will never have peace
until she subscribes to a just code of marine
law. I am confident that Russia (while her
present monarch lives) is the most cordially
friendly to us of any power on earth, will go
furthest to serve us, and is most worthy of
conciliation.— To WILLIAM DUANE. v, 140.
FORD ED., ix, 120. (W., June 1807.)
256. . I owe an acknowledg
ment to your Imperial Majesty for the great
satisfaction I have received from your letter
of Aug. 20th, 1895, and embrace the opportu
nity it affords of giving expression to the sincere
respect and veneration I entertain for your
character. It will be among the latest and most
soothing comforts of my life, to have seen ad
vanced to the government of so extensive a
portion of the earth, and at so early a period
of his life, a sovereign whose ruling passion
is the advancement of the happiness and
prosperity of his people ; and not of his own
people only, but who can extend his eye and
his good will to a distant and infant nation,
unoffending in its course, unambitious in its
views. — To THE EMPEROR OF RUSSIA, v, 7
FORD ED., viii, 430. (W., April 1806.)
257. ALEXANDER OF BUSSIA,
France and. — I have no doubt that the firm
ness of Alexander in favor of France, after
the disposition of Bonaparte, has saved that
country from evils still more severe than she
is suffering, and perhaps even from partition. —
To GEORGE LOGAN, vii, 20. (M., 1816.)
258. ALEXANDER OF RUSSIA
Friendliness to U. S.— Of Alexander's sense
of the merits of our form of government, of its
wholesome operation on the condition of the
people, and of the interest he takes in the
success of our experiment, we possess the mos
unquestionable proofs ; and to him we shall be
indebted if the rights of neutrals, to be settlec
whenever peace is made, shall be extendec
beyond the present belligerents ; that is to say
European neutrals, as George and Napoleon, o
mutual consent and common hatred agains
us, would concur in excluding us. I though
it a salutary measure to engage the powerful pat
ronage of Alexander at conferences for peace
at a time when Bonaparte was courting him
and although circumstances have lessened it
weight, yet it is prudent for us to cherish hi
good dispositions, as those alone which wi!
be exerted in our favor when that occasion
shall occur. He, like ourselves, sees and feel
the atrociousness of both the belligerents. — T
WILLIAM DUANE. v, 553. FORD ED., ix, 287
(M., Nov. 1810.)
259. . He is the only sovereig
who cordially loves us. — To WILLIAM DUANF
v, 553. FORD ED., ix, 287. (M., 1810.)
260. ALEXANDER OF RUSSIA, Gif
of Books to.— A little before Dr. Priestley'
eath, he informed me that he had received
ntimations, through a channel he confided in,
lat the Emperor entertained a wish to know
omething of our Constitution. I have, there-
ore, selected the two best works we have on
hat subject, for which I pray you to ask a
lace in his library. — To MR. HARRIS, v, 6.
W., 1806.)
261. ALEXANDER OF RUSSIA, Mis-
ion to. — Desirous of promoting useful in-
ercourse and good understanding between
rour Majesty's subjects and the citizens of the
Jnited States and especially to cultivate the
riendship of your Majesty, I have appointed
William Short,* one of our distinguished citi
zens, to be in quality of Minister Plenipo-
entiary of the United States, the bearer to
you of assurances of their sincere friendship,
,nd of their desire to maintain with your
Vlajesty and your subjects the strictest relations
of amity and commerce ; he will explain to your
Vlajesty the peculiar position of these States,
separated by a wide ocean from the powers
of Europe, with interests and pursuits distinct
rom theirs, and consequently without the
motives or the appetites for taking part in the
associations or oppositions which a different
system of interests produces among them : he
s charged to assure your Majesty more partic
ularly of our purpose to observe a faithful
neutrality towards the contending powers, in
the war to which your Majesty is a party,
rendering to all the services and courtesies of
friendship, and praying for the reestablishment
of peace and right among them ; and we enter-
:ain an entire confidence that this just and
faithful conduct on the part of the United
States will strengthen the friendly dispositions
you have manifested towards them, and be a
fresh motive with so just and magnanimous
a sovereign to enforce, by the high influence of
your example, the respect due to the character
and the rights of a peaceable nation. — To THE
EMPEROR OF RUSSIA, v, 358. FORD ED., ix,
206. (W., Aug. 1808.)
262. ALEXANDER OF RUSSIA, Neu
tral Rights and.— The northern nations of
Europe, at the head of which your Majesty
is distinguished, are habitually peaceable. The
United States of America, like them, are
attached to peace. We have then with them
a common interest in the neutral rights. Every
nation indeed, on the continent of Europe,
belligerent as well as neutral, is interested
in maintaining these rights, liberalizing them
progressively with the progress of science and
refinement of morality, and in relieving them
trom restrictions which the extension of the
arts has long since rendered unreasonable and
vexatious, — To THE EMPEROR OF RUSSIA, v, 8.
FORD ED., viii, 440. (W., April 1806.)
263. . The events of Europe
come to us so late, and so suspiciously, that
observations on them would certainly be stale,
and possibly wide of their actual state. From
their general aspect, however, I collect that
your Majesty's interposition in them has been
disinterested and generous, and having in view
only the general good of the great European
family. When you shall proceed to the pacifi
cation which is to reestablish peace and com
merce, the same dispositions of mind will lead
you to think of the general intercourse of
nations, and to make that provision for its
* Mr. Short's appointment was negatived by the
senate partly on personal grounds, but more espec
ially because of an unwillingness to increase the
diplomatic establishment.— EDITOR.
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Alexander of Russia
future maintenance which, in times past, it has
so much needed. — To THE EMPEROR OF RUSSIA.
v, 8. FORD ED., viii, 439. (W., April 1806.)
264. . Having taken no part in
the past or existing troubles of Europe, we have
no part to act in its pacification. But as
principles may then be settled in which we have
a deep interest, it is a great happiness for us
that we are placed under the protection of
an umpire, who, looking beyond the narrow
bounds of an individual nation, will take under
the cover of his equity the rights of the ab
sent and unrepresented. It is only by a happy
concurrence of good characters and good
occasions, that a step can now and then be
taken to advance the well-being of nations.
If the present occasion be good, I am sure your
Majesty's character will not be wanting to
avail the world of it. By monuments of such
good offices, may your life become an epoch
in the history of the condition of man ; and may
He who called it into being, for the good of
the human family, give it length of days and
success, and have it always in His holy keep
ing. — To THE EMPEROR OF RUSSIA, v, 8.
FORD ED., viii, 440. (W., April 1806.)
265. . Two personages in Eu
rope, of which your Majesty is one, have it
in their power, at the approaching pacification,
to render eminent service to nations in general,
by incorporating into the act of pacification a
correct definition of the rights of neutrals on
the high seas. Such a definition declared by all
the powers lately or still belligerent, would give
to those rights a precision and notoriety, and
cover them with an authority, which would pro
tect them in an important degree against future
violation ; and should any further sanction
be necessary, that of an exclusion of the vio
lating nation from commercial intercourse with
all the others, would be preferred to war, as
more analogous to the offence, more easily and
likely to be executed with good faith. The
essential articles of these rights, too, are so
few and simple as to be easily defined. — To THE
EMPEROR OF RUSSIA, v, 8. FORD ED., viii, 440.
(W., April 1806.)
266. . That the Emperor may
be able, whenever a pacification takes place,
to show himself the father and friend of the
human race, to restore to nations the moral
laws which have governed their intercourse,
and to prevent, forever, a repetition of those
ravages by sea and land, which will distinguish
the present as an age of Vandalism, I
sincerely pray. — To COUNT PAHLEN. v, 527.
(M., 1810.)
267. ALEXANDER OF RUSSIA, Re
form and. — The apparition of such a man
[as Alexander] on a throne is one of the phe
nomena which will distinguish the present epoch
so remarkable in the history of man. But he
must have an herculean task to devise and
establish the means of securing freedom and
happiness to those who are not capable of
taking care of themselves. Some preparation
seems necessary to qualify the body of a nation
for self-government. Who could have thought
the French nation incapable of it? Alexander
will doubtless begin at the right end, by taking
means for diffusing instruction and a sense of
their natural rights through the mass of his
people, and for relieving them in the mean
time from actual oppression. — To DR. JOSEPH
PRIESTLEY. FORD ED., viii, 179. (W., Nov. 1802.)
268. . The information * * * as
to Alexander kindles a great deal of interest
in his existence, and strong spasms of the
heart in his favor. Though his means of doing
good are great, yet the materials on which he is
to work are retractory. Whether he engages
in private correspondences abroad, as the King
of Prussia did much, his grandfather some
times, I know not ; but certainly such a corres
pondence would be very interesting to those
who are sincerely anxious to see mankind
raised from their present abject condition. — To
THOMAS COOPER, iv, 452. FORD ED., viii, 177.
(W., Nov. 1802.)
269. ALEXANDER OF RUSSIA, Trib
ute to.— I am much flattered by the kind no
tice of the Emperor, which you have been
so obliging as to communicate to me. The
approbation of the good is always consoling;
but that of a sovereign whose station and en
dowments are so pre-eminent, is received with
a sensibility which the veneration for his char
acter inspires. Among other motives of com
miseration which the calamities of Europe can
not fail to excite in every virtuous mind, the
interruption which these have given to the
benevolent views of the Emperor, is prominent.
The accession of a sovereign, with the dis
positions and qualifications to improve the con
dition of a great nation, and to place its happi
ness on a permanent basis, is a phenomenon
so rare in the annals of mankind that when the
blessing occurs, it is lamentable that any
portion of it should be usurped by occurrences
of the character we have seen. If separated
from these scenes by an ocean of a thousand
leagues breadth, they have required all our cares
to keep aloof from their desolating effects,
I can readily conceive how much more they
must occupy those to whose territories they are
contiguous. — To COUNT PAHLEN. v, 526. (M.,
1810.)
270. ALEXANDER OF RUSSIA, Tri
umphs of. — To the wonders of Bonaparte's
rise and fall, we may add that of a Czar of
Muscovy, dictating, in Paris, laws and limits
to all the successors of the Caesars, and holding
even the balance in which the fortunes of this
new world are suspended. — To JOHN ADAMS.
vi> 353- FORD ED., ix, 461. (M., 1814.)
271. ALEXANDER OF RUSSIA, Vi
enna Congress and.— The magnanimity of
Alexander's conduct on the first capture of
Paris still magnified everything we had believed
of him ; but how he will come out of his
present trial ^ remains to be seen. That the
sufferings which France had inflicted on other
countries justified severe reprisals, cannot be
questioned; but I have not yet learned what
crimes of Poland, Saxony, Belgium, Venice,
Lombardy and Genoa, had merited for them,
not merely a temporary punishment, but that
of permanent subjugation and a destitution
of independence and self-government. The
fable of ^Esop of the lion dividing the spoils,
is, I fear, becoming true history, and the moral
code of Napoleon and the English government
a substitute for that of Grotius, of Puffendorf,
and even of the pure doctrine of the great au
thor of our holy religion. — To DR. GEORGE LO
GAN, vi, 497. (M., Oct. 1815.)
272. . His character is un
doubtedly good, and the world, I think, may ex
pect good effects from it. * * * I sincerely
wish that the history of the secret proceedings
at Vienna may become known, and may recon
cile to our good opinion of him his participa
tion in the demolition of ancient and inde
pendent States, transferring them and their
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
inhabitants as farms and stocks of cattle at a
market to other owners, and even taking a
part of the spoil himself. It is possible to sup
pose a case excusing this, and my partiality for
his character encourages me to expect it, and to
impute to others, known to have no moral
scruples, the crimes, of that conclave, who
under pretence of punishing the atrocities of
Bonaparte, reached them themselves, and
proved that with equal power they were equally
flagitious. — To DR. LOGAN, vii, 20. (Mv
1816.)
273. ALEXANDER OF RUSSIA, Vir
tues of. — I had * * * formed the most
favorable opinion of the virtues of Alexander,
and considered his partiality to this country as
a prominent proof of them. — To DR. GEORGE
LOGAN, vi, 497. (M., 1815.)
274. ALEXANDRIA, Baltimore and.—
It is not amiss to encourage Alexandria, be
cause it is a rival in the very bosom of Balti
more. — To TAMES MONROE. FORD ED., iv, 10.
(P., 1784.)
275. ALEXANDRIA, Future of.—
Alexandria on the Potomac will undoubtedly
become a very great place, but Norfolk would
be best for cotton manufactures. — To M. DE
LA VALEE. i, 430. (P., 1785.)
— ALGIERS.— See BARBARY POWERS and
H37.
276. ALIENAGE, Law of Violated.—
The bill for establishing a National Bank un
dertakes * * * to form the subscribers into a
corporation, [and] to enable them, in their
corporate capacities, to make alien subscribers
capable of holding lands; and so far is
against the laws of Alienage. — OPINION ON
THE BANK BILL. vii, 555. FORD ED., v, 284.
(February 1791.)
— ALIENATION OF TERRITORY.
— See TERRITORY.
277. ALIEN AND SEDITION LAWS,
Hatching. — One of the war party, in a fit of
unguarded passion, declared some time ago
they would pass a citizen bill, an alien bill,
and a sedition bill ; accordingly, some days
ago, Coit laid a motion on the table of the
House of Representatives for modifying the
citizen law. Their threats point at Gallatin,
and it is believed they will endeavor to reach
him by this bill. Yesterday Mr. Hillhouse
laid on the table of the Senate a motion for
giving power to send away suspected aliens.
This understood to be meant for Volney and
Collot. But it will not stop there when it
gets into a course of execution. There is now
only wanting, to accomplish the whole dec
laration before mentioned, a sedition bill,
which we shall certainly soon see proposed. —
To JAMES MADISON, iv, 237. FORD ED., vii,
244. (Pa., April 26 1798.)
278. ALIEN AND SEDITION LAWS,
Introduction of.— They have brought into
the lower House a sedition bill, which, among
other enormities, undertakes to make printing
certain matters criminal, though one of the
amendments to the Constitution has so ex
pressly taken religion, printing presses, &c.
out of their coercion. Indeed this bill, and the
alien bill are both so palpably in the teeth of
the Constitution as to show they mean to
pay no respect to it. — To JAMES MADISON.
FORD ED., vii, 266. (Pa., June 1798.)
279. ALIEN AND SEDITION LAWS,
Petitions against.— Petitions and remon
strances against the Alien and Sedition laws
are coming from various parts of New York,
Jersey and Pennsylvania. * * * I am in hopes
Virginia will stand so countenanced by those
States as to repress the wishes of the Gov
ernment to coerce her, which they might ven
ture on if they supposed she would be left
alone. Firmness on our part, but a passive
firmness, is the true course. Anything rash or
threatening might check the favorable dispo
sitions of these middle States, and rally them
again around the measures which are ruin
ing us.— To JAMES MADISON, iv, 279. FORD
ED., vii, 341. (Pa., Jan. 1799.)
280. ALIEN AND SEDITION LAWS,
Planning Insurrection against.— In Penn
sylvania, we fear that the ill-designing may
produce insurrection [against the Alien and
Sedition laws]. Nothing could be so fatal.
Anything like force would check the progress
of the public opinion, and rally them around
the government. This is not the kind of op
position the American people will permit.
But keep away all show of force, and they
will bear down the evil propensities of the
government, by the constitutional means of
election and petition. — To EDWARD PENDLE-
TON. iv, 287. FORD ED., vii, 356. (Pa., Feb.
I799-)
281. . Several parts of this
State [Pennsylvania] are so violent that we
fear an insurrection. This will be brought
about by some if they can. It is the only
thing we have to fear. The appearance of an
attack of force against the government would
check the present current of the middle
States, and rally them around the govern
ment; whereas if suffered to go on, it will
pass on to a reformation of abuses. — To
ARCHIBALD STUART, iv, 286. FORD ED., vii,
354- (Pa., Feb. 1799.)
282. ALIEN AND SEDITION LAWS,
Report on. — Yesterday witnessed a scandal
ous scene in the House of Representatives.
It was the day for taking up the report of
their committee against the Alien and Sedi
tion laws, &c. They [the Federalists] held a
caucus and determined that not a word should
be spoken on their side, in answer to anything
which should be said on the other. Gallatin
took up the Alien, and Nicholas the Sedition
law ; but after a little while of common si
lence, they began to enter into loud conversa
tions, laugh, cough, &c., so that for the last
hour of these gentlemen's speaking, they must
have had the lungs of a vendue master to
have been heard. Livingston, however, at
tempted to speak. But after a few sentences,
the Speaker called him to order, and told him
what he was saying was not to the question.
It was impossible to proceed. The question
was carried in favor of the report, 52 to 48;
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA Alien and Sedition Laws
the real strength of the two parties is 56 to
50. — To JAMES MADISON, iv, 298. FORD ED.,
vii, 371. (Pa., Feb. 1799.)
283. ALIEN AND SEDITION LAWS,
Scheme of. — I consider these laws as merely
an experiment on the American mind, to see
how far it will bear an avowed violation of
the Constitution. If this goes down, we shall
immediately see attempted another act of
Congress, declaring that the President shall
continue in office during life, reserving to an
other occasion the transfer of the succession
to the heirs, and the establishment of the
Senate for life. At least, this may be the
aim of the Oliverians, while Monk and the
Cavaliers, (who are perhaps the strongest,)
may be playing their game for the restoration
of his most gracious Majesty, George III.
That these things are in contemplation, I
have no doubt ; nor can I be confident of
their failure, after the dupery of which our
countrymen have shown themselves suscep
tible. — To S. T. MASON, iv, 258. FORD ED.,
vii, 283. (M., 1798.)
284. ALIEN AND SEDITION LAWS,
Suits under. — I discharged every person
under punishment or prosecution under the
Sedition law, because I considered, and MOV
consider, that law to be a nullity, as absolute
and as palpable as if Congress had ordered us
to fall down and worship a golden image ;
and that it was as much my duty to arrest
its execution in every stage, as it would have
been to have rescued from the fiery furnace
those who should have been cast into it for
refusing to worship the image. It was ac
cordingly done in every instance, without
asking what the offenders had done, or
against whom they had offended, but whether
the pains they were suffering were inflicted
under the pretended Sedition law. — To MRS.
JOHN ADAMS, iv, 536. FORDED., viii, 309. (W.,
July 1804.)
285. . With respect to the dis
mission of the prosecutions for sedition in
Connecticut, it is well known to have been
a tenet of the republican portion of our fellow
citizens, that the Sedition law was contrary
to the Constitution and, therefore, void. On
this ground I considered it as a nullity when
ever I met it in the course of my duties ; and
on this ground I directed nolle prosequis in
all the prosecutions which had been insti
tuted under it ; and, as far as the public senti
ment can be inferred from the occurrences of
the day, we must say that this opinion had
the sanction of the nation. The prosecutions,
therefore, which were afterwards instituted
in Connecticut, of which two were against
printers, two against preachers, and one
against a judge, were too inconsistent with
this principle to be permitted to go on. We
were bound to administer to others the same
measure of law, not which they had meted
to us, but we to ourselves, and to extend to
all equally the protection of the same consti
tutional principles. These prosecutions, too.
were chiefly for charges against myself, and
I had from the beginning laid it down as a
rule to notice nothing of the kind. I believed
that the long course of services in which I
had acted on the public stage, and under the
eye of my fellow citizens, furnished better
evidence to them of my character and prin
ciples, than the angry invectives of adverse
partisans in whose eyes the very acts most
approved by the majority were subjects of
the greatest demerit and censure. These
prosecutions against them, therefore, were to
be dismissed as a matter of duty — To GIDEON
GRANGER, vi, 332. FORD ED., ix, 456. (M.,
1814.)
286. ALIEN AND SEDITION LAWS,
Tyrannical.— If the Alien and Sedition Acts
should stand, these conclusions would flow
from them: that the General Government
may place any act they think proper on the
list of crimes, and punish it themselves
whether enumerated or not enumerated by
the Constitution as cognizable by them : that
they may transfer its cognizance to the Presi
dent, or any other person, who may himself
be the accuser, counsel, judge and jury,
whose suspicion may be the evidence, his
order the sentence, his officer the executioner,
and his breast the sole record of the transac
tion : that a very numerous and valuable de
scription of the inhabitants of these states
being, by this precedent, reduced, as outlaws,
to the absolute dominion of one man, and
the barrier of the Constitution thus swept
away from us all, no rampart now remains
against the passions and the powers of a ma
jority in Congress to protect from a like ex
portation, or other more grievous punish
ment, the minority of the same body, the
legislatures, judges, governors, and counsel
lors of the States, nor their other peaceable
inhabitants, who may venture to reclaim the
constitutional rights and liberties of the
States and people, or who for other causes,
good or bad. may be obnoxious to the views,
or marked by the suspicions of the Presi
dent, or be thought dangerous to his or their
election, or other interests, public or per
sonal : that the friendless alien has indeed
been selected as the safest subject of a
first experiment; but the citizen will soon
follow, or rather, has already followed,
for already has a Sedition Act marked
him as its prey: that these and successive
acts of the same character, unless arrested
at the threshold, necessarily drive these
States into revolution and blood, and
will furnish new calumnies aerainst republi
can government, and new pretexts for those
who wish it to be believed that man cannot
be governed but by a rod of iron. — KEN
TUCKY RESOLUTIONS, ix, 469. FORD ED., vii,
302. (1798.)
287. ALIEN AND SEDITION LAWS,
Unconstitutional.— For the present, I should
be for resolving the Alien and Sedition laws
to be against the Constitution and merely
void, and for addressing the other States to
obtain similar declarations : and I would not
do anything at this moment which should
commit us further, but reserve ourselves to
Alien and Sedition Laws THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Alliance
shape our future measures, or no measures,
by the events which may happen. — To JOHN
TAYLOR, iv, 260. FORD ED., vii, 311. (M., Nov.
1798.)
288. . Alien friends are under
the jurisdiction and protection of the laws of
the State wherein they are: no power over
them has been delegated to the United States,
nor prohibited to the individual States, dis
tinct from their power over citizens. And it
being true as a general principle, and one of
the amendments to the Constitution having
also declared that " the powers not delegated
to the United States by the Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to
the States respectively, or to the people," the
act of the Congress of the United States,
passed on the day of July, 1798, intituled
" An Act concerning Aliens," which assumes
powers over alien friends, not delegated by
the Constitution, is not law, but is altogether
void, and of no force.— KENTUCKY RESOLU
TIONS, ix, 466. FORD ED., vii, 296. (1798.)
289. ALIEN AND SEDITION LAWS,
Viciousness of. — The Alien bill * * * is a
most detestable thing.— To JAMES MADISON.
iv, 244. FORD ED., vii, 260. (Pa., May 1798.)
290. . That libel on legislation.
— To DR. JOSEPH PRIESTLEY, iv, 374. FORD
ED., viii, 22. (W., March 1801.) See SEDITION
LAW.
291. ALIENS, Forcible Bemoval of.— In
addition to the general principle, as well as
the express declaration, that powers not
delegated are reserved, another and more
special provision, inserted in the Constitution
from abundant caution, has declared that
" the migration or importation of such per
sons as any of the States now existing shall
think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited
by the Congress prior to the year 1808." * * *
This Commonwealth [Kentucky] does admit
the migration of alien friends, described as
the subject of the said act concerning aliens.
* * * A. provision against prohibiting
their migration is a provision against all
acts equivalent thereto, or it would be
nugatory. * * * To remove them
when migrated, is equivalent to a pro
hibition of their migration, and is, therefore,
contrary to the said provision of the Consti
tution, and void. — KENTUCKY RESOLUTIONS.
ix, 466. FORD ED., vii, 296. (1798.)
292. ALIENS, The Revolution and.— I
do not know that there has been any Ameri
can determination on the question whether
American citizens and Britsh subjects, born
before the Revolution, can be aliens to one an
other? I know there is an opinion of Lord
Coke's, in Colvin's case, that if England and
Scotland should, in the course of descent,
pass to separate kings, those born under the
same sovereign during the union, would re
main natural subjects and not aliens. Com
mon sense urges some considerations against
this. Natural subjects owe allegiance; but
we owe none. Aliens are the subjects of a
foreign power; we are not subjects of a for
eign power. The King, by the treaty, ac
knowledges our independence ; how, then, can
we remain natural subjects? The King's
power is, by the Constitution, competent to
the making peace, war and treaties. He had,
therefore, authority to relinquish our alle
giance by treaty. But if an act of parliament
had been necessary, the parliament passed an
act to confirm the treaty. So that it appears
to me that, in this question, fictions of law
alone are opposed to sound sense. — To JOHN
ADAMS, i, 530. (P., 1786.)
293. ALLEGIANCE, Renounced.— We,
therefore, the representatives of the United
States of America in General Congress as
sembled, do in the name and by the authority
of the good people of these States reject and
renounce all allegiance and subjection to the
kings of Great Britain and all others who
may hereafter claim by, through, or under
them; we utterly dissolve all political con
nection which may heretofore have subsisted
between us and the people or parliament of
Great Britain* — DECLARATION OF IN
DEPENDENCE AS DRAWN BY JEFFERSON.
294. ALLEGIANCE, Repudiated.— He
has abdicated government here, withdraw
ing his governors, and declaring us out
of his allegiance and protection.^ — DECLARA
TION OF INDEPENDENCE AS DRAWN BY JEFFER
SON.
295. ALLEN, Protection of Ethan.— It
is with pain we fear that Mr. [Ethan] Allen
and others, taken with him while fighting
bravely in their country's cause, are sent to
Britain in irons, to be punished for pretended
treason; treasons, too, created by one of
those very laws whose obligation we deny,
and mean to contest by the sword. This ques
tion will not be decided by seeking vengeance
on a few helpless captives but by achieving
success in the fields of war, and gathering
there those laurels which grow for the war
rior brave. * * * We have ordered Brig
adier General Prescot to be bound in irons,
and to be confined in close jail, there to ex
perience corresponding miseries to those
which shall be inflicted on Mr. Allen. His
life shall answer for that of Mr. Allen.}: —
CONGRESS RESOLUTION. FORD ED., i, 494.
(Dec. I775-)
296. ALLIANCE, Abjure.— I sincerely
join you in abjuring all political connection
with every foreign power ; and though I cor
dially wish well to the progress of liberty in
all nations, and would forever give it the
weight of our countenance, yet they are not
* Congress struck out the italicized words and
inserted : " Colonies, solemnly publish and declare,
that these United Colonies are, and of right ought to
be, Free and Independent States ; that they are ab
solved from all allegiance to the British crown, and
that all political connection between them and the
State of Great Britain, is, and ought to be, totally
dissolved." Congress also inserted after the word
"assembled," the words, "appealing to the Su-
Kreme Judge of the World for the rectitude of our
itentions. "—EDITOR.
t Congress struck out the words in italics and in
serted "by declaring us out of, his protection, and
waging war against us."— EDITOR.
\ Not adopted by Congress.— EDITOR.
33
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Alliance
Alliances
to be touched without contamination from
their other bad principles. — To T. LOMAX.
iv, 301. FORD ED., vii, 374. (M., March
I799-)
297. ALLIANCE, Coercion and.— The
British ministers equivocate on every proposal
of a treaty of commerce * * * unless, in
deed, we would agree to make it a treaty of
alliance as well as commerce, so as to under
mine our obligations with France. This
method of stripping that rival nation of its al
liances, they tried successfully with Holland,
endeavored at it with Spain, and have plainly
and repeatedly suggested to us. For this they
would probably relax some of the rigors they
exercise against our commerce. — OFFICIAL
REPORT, vii, 518. (December 1790.)
298. ALLIANCE, Dangerous.— An alli
ance [with Great Britain] with a view to
partition of the Floridas and Louisiana, is not
what we would wish, because it may eventu
ally lead us into embarrassing situations with
our best friend, and put the power of two
neighbors into the hands of one. Lord Lans-
downe has declared he gave the Floridas to
Spain rather than the United States as a
bone of discord with the House of Bourbon,
and of reunion with Great Britain. — INSTRUC
TIONS TO WILLIAM CARMICHAEL. ix, 413.
FORD ED., v, 227. (1790.)
299. ALLIANCE, Deprecated.— I sin
cerely deplore the situation of our affairs with
France. War with them, and consequent al
liance with Great Britain, will completely
compass the object of the Executive council,
from the commencement of the war between
France and England ; taken up by some of
them from that moment, by others, more lat
terly. I still, however, hope it will be avoided.
— To JAMES MADISON, iv, 162. FORD ED., vii,
108. (M., Jan. 1797.)
300. ALLIANCE, Destructive.— To take
part in European conflicts would be to divert
our energies from creation to destruction. —
To GEORGE LOGAN. FORD ED., viii, 23. (W.,
March 1801.)
301. ALLIANCE, Divorce from all.— As
to everything except commerce, we ought to
divorce ourselves from them all. But this
system would require time, temper, wisdom,
and occasional sacrifice of interest; and how
far all of these will be ours, our children may
see, but we shall not. The passions are too
high at present, to be cooled in our day. — To
EDWARD RUTLEDGE. iv, 191. FORD ED., vii,
154- (Pa., I797-)
802. . Better keep together as
we are, haul off from Europe as soon as we
can. and from all attachments to any portions
of it. — To JOHN TAYLOR, iv, 247. FORD ED.,
vii, 265. (Pa., 1798.)
303. . Commerce with all na
tions, alliance with none, should be our motto.
— To T. LOMAX. iv, 301. FORD ED., vii, 374.
(M., March 1799.)
304. . It ought to be the very
first object of our pursuits to have nothing to
do with the European interests and politics.
Let them be free or slaves, at will, navigators
or agriculturists, swallowed into one govern
ment or divided into a thousand, we have
nothing to fear from them in any form. —
To GEORGE LOGAN. FORD ED., viii, 23. (W.,
March 1801.)
305. ALLIANCES, Entangling.— I know
that it is a maxim with us, and I think it a
wise one, not to entangle ourselves with the
affairs of Europe. — To E. CARRINGTON. ii,
334- FORD ED., iv, 483. (P., 1787.)
306. . I am for free commerce
with all nations; political connection with
none; and little or no diplomatic establish
ment. And I am not for linking ourselves by
new treaties with the quarrels of Europe; en
tering that field of slaughter to preserve their
balance, or joining in the confederacy of
Kings to war against the principles of lib
erty. — To ELBRIDGE GERRY, iv, 268. FORD ED.,
vii, 328. (Pa., 1 799-)
307. . Let our affairs be disen
tangled from those of all other nations, ex
cept as to commerce. — To GIDEON GRANGER.
iv, 331. FORD ED., vii, 452. (M., 1800.)
308. . The Constitution thought
it wise to restrain the Executive and Senate
from entangling and embroiling our affairs
with those of Europe. — PARLIAMENTARY
MANUAL, ix, 81. (1800.)
309. . Honest friendship with
all nations, entangling alliances with none, I
deem [one of the] essential principles of our
government and, consequently, [one] which
ought to shape its administration. — FIRST IN
AUGURAL ADDRESS, viii, 4. FORD ED., viii, 4.
(1801.)
310. . Determined as we are to
avoid, if possible, wasting the energies of our
people in war and destruction, we shall avoid
implicating ourselves with the powers of
Europe, even in support of principles which
we mean to pursue. They have so many other
interests different from ours, that we must
avoid being entangled in them. We believe
we can enforce these principles, as to our
selves, by peaceable means, now that we are
likely to have our public councils detached
from foreign views. — To THOMAS PAINE, iv,
370. FORD ED., viii, 18. (W., March 1801.)
311. . Peace, and abstinence
from European interferences, are our objects.
—To M. DUPONT DE NEMOURS, iv, 436. (W.,
April 1802.)
312. . It is against our system
* * * to entangle ourselves at all with the af
fairs of Europe. — To PHILIP MAZZEI. iv,
553- (W., July 1864.)
313. . pur nation has wisely
avoided entangling itself in the system of
European interests, has taken no side be
tween its rival powers, attached itself to
none of its ever-changing confederacies. —
R. TO A. OF BALTIMORE BAPTISTS, viii, 137.
(1808.)
Alliances
Alluvium
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
34
314. . The less we have to do
with the amities or enmities of Europe the
better. — To THOMAS LEIPER. vi, 465. FORD
ED., ix, 520. (M., 1815.)
315. . All entanglements with
that quarter of the globe [Europe] should be
avoided if we mean that peace and justice
shall be the polar stars of the American So
cieties. — To J. CORREA. vii, 184. FORD ED., x,
164. (M., 1820.)
316. . The fundamental princi
ple of our government, — never to entangle us
with the broils of Europe. — To M. CORAY.
vii, 318. (M., 1823.)
317. . I have ever deemed it
fundamental for the United States never to
take active part in the quarrels of Europe.
Their political interests are entirely distinct
from ours. Their mutual jealousies, their
balance of power, their complicated alliances,
their forms and principles of government, are
all foreign to us. They are nations of eternal
war. — To PRESIDENT MONROE, vii, 288. FORD
ED., x, 257. (M., 1823.)
318. ALLIANCE, A generous.— If there
could have been a doubt before as to the event
of the war, it is now totally removed by the
interposition of France, and the generous al
liance she has entered into with us. — To .
i, 208. FORD ED., ii, 157. (W., 1778.)
_ ALLIANCE. The Holy.— See HOLY
ALLIANCE.
319. ALLIANCE, Horror of.— We have
a perfect horror at everything like connecting
ourselves with the politics of Europe.— To
WILLIAM SHORT, iv, 414. FORD ED., viii, 98.
(W., 1801.)
320. ALLIANCE, Inadmissible.— The
British talk of * * * a treaty of commerce
and alliance. If the object of the latter be
honorable, it is useless ; if dishonorable, inad
missible. — ToGoUVERNEUR MORRIS. Hi, l82.
FORD ED., v, 224. (N. Y., 1790.)
321. ALLIANCE, Inevitable.— The day
that France takes possession of New Orleans
* * * seals the union of two nations, who,
in conjunction, can maintain exclusive posses
sion of the ocean. From that moment, we
must marry ourselves to the British fleet and
nation. We must turn all our attention to a
maritime force * * *.— To ROBERT R. LIVING
STON, iv, 432. FORD ED., viii, 145. (W.,
April 1802.)
322. ALLIANCE, A lost.— Were the
British court to return to their senses in time
to seize the little advantage which still re
mains within their reach, from this quarter, I
judge, that, on acknowledging our absolute
independence and sovereignty, a commercial
treaty beneficial to them, and perhaps even
a league of mutual offence and defence might,
not seeing the expense or consequences of
such a measure, be approved by our people, if
nothing, in the meantime, done on your part
should prevent it. But they will continue to
grasp at their desperate sovereignty, till every
benefit short of that is forever out of their
reach. — To BENJAMIN FRANKLIN. i, 205.
FORD ED., ii, 132. (August 1777.)
323. ALLIANCE, Suggested French.—
If we can obtain from Great Britain reason
able conditions of commerce, (which, in my
idea, must forever include an admission into
her [West India] islands,) the first ground
between these two nations would seem to be
the best. But if we can obtain no equal terms
from her, perhaps Congress might think it
prudent, as Holland has done, to connect us
unequivocally with France. Holland has pur
chased the protection of France. The price
she pays is aid in time of war. It is interest
ing for us to purchase a free commerce with
the French islands. But whether it is best to
pay for it, by aids in war, or by privileges in
commerce, or not to purchase it at all, is the
question. — REPORT TO CONGRESS. ix, 244.
FORD ED., iv, 130. (P., 1785.)
324. ALLIANCE, Unwise.— I join you
* * * in a sense of the necessity of restoring
freedom to the ocean. But I doubt, with you,
whether the United States ought to join in
an armed confederacy for that purpose; or
rather I am satisfied they ought not. — To
GEORGE LOGAN. FORD ED., viii, 23. (W.,
March 1801.)
325. ALLIANCES, Insufficiency of.—
Treaties of alliance are generally insufficient
to enforce compliance with their mutual stipu
lations. — THE ANAS, ix, 88. FORD ED., i,
157. (1818.)
326. ALLIANCES, International Mar
riage. — What a crowd of lessons do the pres
ent miseries of Holland teach us! * * *
Never to let a citizen ally himself with Kings
* * *.— To JOHN ADAMS, ii, 283. FORD ED.,
iv, 455- (P-, 1787.)
_ ALLODIAL TENURE.— See LAND.
_ ALLOY IN MONEY.— See DOLLAR.
327. ALLSTON, Burr and Washington.
— I send you Allston's letter for perusal. He
thinks to get over this matter by putting a
bold face on it. I have the names of three
persons whose evidence, taken together, can
fix on him the actual endeavor to engage men
in Burr's enterprise. — To ALBERT GALLATIN.
FORD ED., ix, 13. (W., 1807.)
328. . The enclosed copy of an
affidavit from General Wilkinson authenti
cates the copy of a letter from Colonel Burr to
the General, affirming that Mr. Allston his
son-in-law, is engaged in the unlawful en
terprises he is carrying on, and is to be an
actor in them. * * * It is further well known
in Washington that Mr. Allston is an en
dorser to a considerable amount, of the bills
which have enabled Colonel Burr to prepare
his treasons. Nobody is a better judge than
yourself whether any and what measures can
be taken on this information. — To CHARLES
PINCKNEY. v, 34. FORD ED., ix, 13. (W.,
Jan. 1807.)
_ ALLUVIUM.— See BATTURE.
35
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Almanacs
America
329. ALMANACS, Improvements in.— I
received your letter on the publication of an
Ephemeris. I have long thought it desirable
that something of that kind should be published
in the United States, holding a middle station
between the nautical and the common popular
almanacs. * * * What you propose to in
sert is very well so far ; but I think you might
give it more of the character desired by the
addition of some other articles which would not
enlarge it more than a leaf or two. For in
stance, the equation of time is essential to the
regulation of our clocks and watches, and would
only add a narrow column to your second page.
The sun's declination is often desirable and
would only add another narrow column. This
last would be the more useful as an element
for obtaining the rising and setting of the sun
in every part of the United States * * if
you would add a formula for that calculation. —
To MELATIAH NASH, vi, 29. (M., 1811.)
330. ALMANACS, Value of Old.— But
why, you will ask, do I send you old almanacs,
which are proverbially useless? Because, in
these publications have appeared from time to
time, some of the most precious things in as
tronomy. I have searched out those particular
volumes which might be valuable to you on
this account. That of 1781, contains De ia
Caille's catalogue of fixed stars reduced to the
commencement of that year, and a table of the
aberrations and mutations of the principal
stars. 1784 contains the same catalogue with
the nebuleuses of Messier. 1785 contains the
famous catalogue of Hamsteed, with the posi
tions of the stars reduced to the beginning of
the year 1784, and which supersedes the use of
that immense book. 1786 gives von Euler's
lunar tables corrected; and 1787 the tables for
the planet Herschel. The two last needed not
an apology, as not being within the description
of old almanacs. * * * The volume of 1787
gives you Mayer's catalogue of the zodiacal stars.
To DR. STILES, i, 363. (P., 1785.)
— ALMIGHTY, The.— See DEITY.
_ ALMS.— See CHARITY.
331. ALTERCATIONS, Injurious.— An
instance of acquiescence on our part under a
wrong, rather than disturb our friendship by
altercations, may have its value in some fu
ture case.— To JOHN JAY. i, 603. (P., 1786.)
332. ALTERCATIONS, Nursing.— If the
British troops should pass [through our ter
ritory] without having asked leave, I should
be for expressing our dissatisfaction to the
British Court, and keeping alive an alterca
tion on the subject, till events should decide
whether it is most expedient to accept their
apologies, or profit of the aggression as a
cause of war. — To GENERAL WASHINGTON.
vii, 510. FORD ED., v, 239. (1790.)
— AMALGAMATION OF PARTIES.—
See PARTIES.
- AMBASSADORS.— See MINISTERS.
333. AMBITION, Defeating.— The minds
of the people at large should be illuminated,
as far as practicable, * * * that they may be
enabled to know ambition under all its shapes,
and prompt to exert their natural powers to
defeat its purposes. — DIFFUSION OF KNOWL
EDGE BILL. FORD ED., ii, 221. (1779.)
334. AMBITION, Eradicated.— Before I
ventured to declare to my countrymen my de
termination to retire from public employment,
I examined well my heart to know whether it
were thoroughly cured of every principle of
political ambition, whether no lurking par
ticle remained which might leave me uneasy,
when reduced within the limits of mere pri
vate life. I became satisfied that every fibre
of that passion was thoroughly eradicated. —
To JAMES MONROE, i, 317. FORD ED., iii, 56.
(M., 1782.)
335. AMBITION, Family.— I feel no
impulse from personal ambition to the office
now proposed to me, but on account of your
self and your sister and those dear to you. —
To MARY JEFFERSON EPPES. D. L. J. 274.
(W., Feb. 1801.)
336. AMBITION, Government and.— I
have no ambition to govern men; no passion
which would lead me to delight to ride in a
storm. — To EDWARD RUTLEDGE. iv, 152.
FORD ED., vii, 94. (M., 1796.)
337. . I have no ambition to
govern men. It is a painful and thankless of
fice. — To JOHN ADAMS, iv, 154. FORD ED.,
vii, 98. (M., 1796.)
338. . I have no inclination to
govern men. I should have no views of my
own in doing it ; and as to those of the gov
erned, I had rather that their disappointment
(which must always happen) should be
pointed to any other cause, real or supposed,
than to myself. — To MR. VOLNEY. iv, 158.
(M., 1797.)
339. AMBITION, Lost.— The little spice
of ambition which I had in my younger days
has long since evaporated, and I set still 'less
store by a posthumous than present name. —
To JAMES MADISON, iv, 117. FORD ED., vii,
10. (M., April 1795.)
340. AMENDMENTS TO CONSTITU
TION, First.— Congress were to proceed
about the ist of June to propose amendments
to the new Constitution. The principal would
be, the annexing a declaration of rights to
satisfy the mind of all on the subject of their
liberties. — To WILLIAM CARMICHAEL. iii, 89.
(P., Aug. 1789.) See CONSTITUTION (FED
ERAL. )
341. AMERICA, Europe and.— The Eu
ropean nations constitute a separate division
of the globe ; their treaties make them part of
a distinct system ; they have a set of interests
of their own in which it is our business never
to engage ourselves. America has a hemi
sphere to itself. It must have its separate
system of interests, which must not be sub
ordinated to those of Europe. The insulated
state in which nature has placed the American
continent, should so far avail it that no spark
of war kindled in the other quarters of the
globe should be wafted across the wide oceans
which separate us from them. And it will be
so. — To BARON VON HUMBOLDT. vi, 268.
FORD ED., ix, 431. (Dec. 1813.) See CANADA,
COLONIES. SOUTH AMERICA, UNITED STATES.
America
Ancestry
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
342. . Nothing is so important
as that America shall separate herself from
the systems of Europe, and establish one of
her own. Our circumstances, our pursuits,
our interests, are distinct; the principles of
our policy should be so also. All entangle
ments with that quarter of the globe should
be avoided if we mean that peace and justice
shall be the polar stars of the American socie
ties. * * * It would be a leading principle
with me had I longer to live. — To J. CORREA
DE SERRA. vii, 184. FORD ED., x, 164. (M.,
Oct. 1820.) See POLICY.
343. AMERICA, No Kings nor Emper
ors for. — I rejoice to learn that Iturbide is a
mere usurper, and slenderly supported. Al
though we have no right to intermeddle with
the form of government of other nations, yet
it is lawful to wish to see no emperors nor
kings in our hemisphere, and that Brazil as
well as Mexico will homologize with us. — To
JAMES MONROE. FORD ED., x, 244.
— AMERICA, South.— See SOUTH AMER
ICA.
— AMERICA, A Summary View of
the Rights of British America.— See AP
PENDIX.
— AMERICAN REVOLUTION.— See
REVOLUTION.
344. AMERICUS VESPUCCIUS, Pic
ture of. — I have sent to Florence for pictures
of Columbus (if it exists), of Americus Ves-
puccius, Magellan, &c. — To WILLIAM S. SMITH.
FORD ED., v, 2. (P., 1788.)
345. ANARCHY, Averted.— Much has
been gained by the new [Federal] Constitu
tion, for the former was terminating in an
archy, as necessarily consequent to ineffi
ciency. — To GEORGE MASON, iii, 148. FORD
ED., v, 183. (N. Y., 1790.)
346. ANARCHY, Fatal.— Our falling
into anarchy would decide forever the desti
nies of mankind, and seal the political heresy
that man is incapable of self-government. —
To JOHN HOLLINS. v, 597. (M., 1811.)
347. ANARCHY, Imputed.— From the
London gazettes and the papers copying
them, you are led to suppose that all in
America is anarchy, discontent and civil war.
Nothing, however, is less true. There are not
on the face of the earth more tranquil gov
ernments than ours, nor a happier and more
contented people.— To BARON GEISMER. i,
427. (R, 1785.)
348. . Wonderful is the effect of
impudent and persevering lying. The Brit
ish ministry have so long hired their gazet
teers to repeat, and model into every form,
lies about our being in anarchy, that the
world has at length believed them, * * *
and what is more wonderful, we have be
lieved them ourselves. Yet where does this
anarchy exist? Where did it ever exist, ex
cept in the single instance of Massachusetts?
And can history produce one instance of
rebellion so honorably conducted? — To W. S.
SMITH, ii, 318. FORD ED., iv, 466. (P., 1787.)
349. ANARCHY, Suppress.— Let this be
the distinctive mark of an American that, in
cases of commotion, he enlists himself under
no man's banner, inquires for no man's name,
but repairs to the standard of the laws. Do
this and you need never fear anarchy or
tyranny. Your government will be perpet
ual— FROM JEFFERSON'S Mss. FORD ED., viii,
i. (1801?)
350. ANATOMY, Knowledge of.— No
knowledge can be more satisfactory to a man
than that of his own frame, its parts, their
functions and actions. — To THOMAS COOPER.
vi, 390. (M., 1814.)
351. . I have just received * * *
two volumes of Comparative Anatomy by
Cuvier, probably the greatest work in that line
that has ever appeared. His comparisons em
brace every organ of the animal carcass ; and
from man to the rotifer. — To DR. BENJAMIN
RUSH, iv, 385. FORD ED., viii, 33. (W., 1801.)
352. ANCESTORS, Practices of.— I am
not bigotted to the practices of our fore
fathers. It is that bigotry which keeps the
Indians in a state of barbarism in the midst
ot the arts, would have kept us in the same
state even now, and still keeps Connecticut
where their ancestors were when they landed
on these shores. — To ROBERT FULTON, v, 516.
(M., 1810.)
353. ANCESTORS, Regimen of.— We
might as well require a man to wear still the
coat which fitted him when a boy, as civil
ized society to remain ever under the regimen
of their barbarous ancestors. — To SAMUEL
KERCHIVAL. vii, 15. FORD ED., x, 43. (M.,
1816.)
354. ANCESTRY, Equality vs.— The
foundation on which all [our constitutions]
are built, is the natural equality of man, the
denial of every pre-eminence but that an
nexed to legal office and, particularly, the de
nial of a pre-eminence by birth. — To GENERAL
WASHINGTON, i, 334. FORD ED., iii, 466. (A.,
1784.)
355. ANCESTRY, Thomas Jefferson's.
— The tradition in my father's family was that
their ancestor came to this country from Wales,
and from near the mountain of Snowdon, the
highest in Great Britain. I noted once a case
from Wales, in the law reports, where a person
of our name was either plaintiff or defendant ;
and one of the same name was secretary to the
Virginia Company.* These are the only in
stances in which I have met with the name in
that country. I have found it in our early
records ; but the first particular information I
have of any ancestor was of my grandfather,
who lived at the place in Chesterfield called
Ozborne's, and owned the lands afterwards the
glebe of the parish. He had three sons :
Thomas who died young, Field who settled on
the waters of Roanoke and left numerous de
scendants, and Peter, my father, who settled on
the lands I still own, called Shadwell, adjoining
my present residence. He was born February
* No Jefferson was ever Secretary of the Virginia
Company, but John Jefferson was a member of the
Company. He came to Virginia in the Bona Nova,
in 1619.— NOTE IN FORD'S EDITION OF JEFFERSON'S
WRITINGS.
37
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Angels
Animosities
29, 1707-8, and intermarried 1739. with Jane
Randolph, of the age of 19, daughter of Isham
Randolph, one of the seven sons of that name
and family, settled at Dungeoness in Gooch-
land. They trace their pedigree far back in
England and Scotland, to which let every one
ascribe the faith and merit he chooses. — AUTO
BIOGRAPHY, i, i. FORD ED., i, i. (1831.)
356. ANGELS, Kings as.-— Have we
found angels in the form of kings to govern
him?— FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS, viii, 3.
FORD ED., viii, 3. (1801.)
857. ANGEB, Control over.— When an
gry, count ten before you speak; if very an
gry, an hundred. — To THOMAS JEFFERSON
SMITH, vii, 402. FORD ED., x, 341. (M., 1825.)
358. ANGLOMANIA, Danger in.— I
fear nothing for our liberty from the assaults
of force ; but I have seen and felt much, and
fear more from English books, English preju
dices, English manners, and the apes, the
dupes, and designs among our professional
crafts. When I look around me for security
against these seductions, I find it in the wide
spread of our agricultural citizens, in their
unsophisticated minds, their independence
and their power, if called on, to crush the
Humists [Tories] of our cities, and to main
tain the principles which severed us from
England. — To HORATIO G. SPAFFORD. vi, 335.
(M., 1814.)
359. ANGLOMANIA, Eradicate.— The
eradication of English partialities is one of
the most consoling expectations from the war.
— To WILLIAM DUANE. vi, 76. FORD ED., ix,
366. (M., Aug. 1812.)
360. ANGLOMANIA, Politics and.—
The Anglicism of 1808, against which we are
now struggling, is but the same thing [as the
Toryism of 1777 and the Federalism of 1799]
in still another form. It is a longing for a
king, and an English King rather than any
other. — To JOHN LANGDON. v, 512. (M.,
1810.)
361. . Anglomany, monarchy,
and separation are the principles of the Es
sex federalists. Anglomany and monarchy,
those of the Hamiltonians, and Anglomany
alone, that of the portion of the people who
call themselves federalists.— To JOHN MEL-
ISH. vi, 96. FORD ED., ix, 375. (M., 1813.)
362. ANGLOMANIA, Servile.— I wish
any events could induce us to cease to copy
such a model, [the British government,] and
to assume the dignity of being original. They
had their paper system, stockjobbing, specu
lations, public debt, moneyed interest, &c.,
and all this was contrived for us. They
raised their cry against jacobinism and revo
lutionists, we against democratic societies and
anti-federalists ; their alarmists sounded in
surrection, ours marched an army to look for
one, but they could not find it. I wish the par
allel may stop here, and that we may avoid,
instead of imitating, a general bankruptcy
and disastrous war. — To HORATIO GATES, iv,
178. FORD ED., vii, 130. (Pa., 1797.)
363. ANGLOPHOBIA, Washington's
Cabinet and.— The Anglophobia has seized
violently on three members of our council.
This sets almost every day on questions of
neutrality. * * * Everything hangs upon
the opinion of a single person [Edmund
Randolph], and that the most indecisive one
I ever had to do business with. He always
contrives to agree in principle with one but
in conclusion with the other. Anglophobia,
secret Anti-Gallomany, a federalisme outree
and a present ease in his circumstances not
usual, have decided the complexion of our
dispositions, and our proceedings towards the
conspirators against human liberty, and the
asserters of it, which is unjustifiable in prin
ciple, in interest, and in respect to the wishes
of our constituents. — To JAMES MADISON, iii,
556. FORD ED., vi, 250. (May 1793.)
ANGLO-SAXON LANGUAGE.— See
LANGUAGES.
— ANIMALS, Do they Degenerate in
America P — See BUFFON.
364. ANIMOSITIES, Individual.— The
great cause which divides our countries is
not to be decided by individual animosities.
The harmony of private societies cannot
weaken national efforts. To contribute by
neighborly intercourse and attention to make
others happy, is the shortest and surest way
of being happy ourselves. As these senti
ments seem to have directed your conduct,
we should be as unwise as illiberal, were we
not to preserve the same temper of mind. —
To GEN. WILLIAM PHILLIPS. D. L. JM 53.
(I779-)
865. ANIMOSITIES, National.— The
animosities of sovereigns are temporary, and
may be allayed; but those which seize the
whole body of a people, and of a people, too,
who dictate their own measures, produce ca
lamities of long duration.* — To C. W. F.
DUMAS, i, 553. (P., 1786.)
366. ANIMOSITIES, Political.— Party
animosities here have raised a wall of separa
tion between those who differ in political sen
timents. They must love misery indeed who
would rather, at the sight of an honest man,
feel the torment of hatred and aversion than
the benign spasms of benevolence and esteem.
—To MRS. CHURCH. FORD ED., vi, 116. (Pa.,
Oct. 1792.)
367. . While I cherish with feel
ing the recollections of my friends, I banish
from my mind all political animosities which
might disturb its tranquillity, or the happi
ness I derive from my present pursuits. — To
WILLIAM DUANE. v, 532. (M., 1810.)
368. ANIMOSITIES, Rekindling.—
Peace with all the world, and a quiet descent
through the remainder of my time, are now
so necessary to my happiness that I am un
willing, by the expression of any opinion be
fore the public, to rekindle ancient animosi-
* Jefferson was describing the " hatred " of Amer
ica by the English people.— EDITOR.
Annapolis
Anti-Federalists
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
ties, covered under their ashes indeed, but
not extinguished. — To GEORGE HAY. FORD ED.,
x, 265. (M., 1823.)
_ ANNAPOLIS (FEDERAL) CON
VENTION.— See CONVENTION.
— ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY.
— See TERRITORY.
369. ANNUITIES, Government Loans
and. — Annuities for single lives are also be
yond our powers, because the single life may
pass the term of a generation. This last prac
tice is objectionable too, as encouraging ce
libacy, and the disinherison of heirs. — To J.
W. EPPES. vi, 198. FORD ED., ix, 397.. (P. F.,
1813.) See GENERATIONS.
370. ANONYMOUS WRITING, News
paper. — I never did in my life, either by my
self or by any other, have a sentence of mine
inserted in a newspaper without putting my
name to it ; and I believe I never shall. — To
JOHN ADAMS, iii, 272. FORD ED., v, 35*5. (Pa.,
1791.)
371. ANTI-FEDERALISTS, Jefferson
and. — You say that I have been dished up to
you as an anti-federalist, and ask me if it be
just. My opinion was never worthy enough
of notice to merit citing; but since you ask
it, I will tell it to you. I am not a federalist,
because I never, submitted the whole system
of my opinions to the creed of any party of
men whatever, in religion, in philosophy, in
politics, or in anything else, where I was ca
pable of thinking for myself. Such an ad
diction is the last degradation of a free and
moral agent. If I could not go to heaven but
with a party, I would not go there at all.
Therefore, I am not of the party of federal
ists. But I am much farther from that of the
anti-federalists. I approved from the first
moment of the great mass of what is in the
new Constitution; the consolidation of the
government ; the organization into executive,
legislative and judiciary; the subdivision of
the legislative; the happy compromise of in
terests between the great and little States, by
the different manner of voting in the different
Houses; the voting by persons instead of
States ; the qualified negative on laws given to
the Executive, which, however, I should have
liked better if associated with the judiciary
also, as in New York ; and the power of taxa
tion. I thought at first that the latter might
have been limited. A little reflection soon con
vinced me it ought not to be. What I disap
proved from the first moment also, was the
want of a bill of rights, to guard liberty
against the legislative as well as the execu
tive branches of the government ; that is to
say, to secure freedom in religion, freedom of
the press, freedom from monopolies, freedom
from unlawful imprisonment, freedom from
a permanent military, and a trial by jury in
all cases determinable by the laws of the land.
I disapproved also the perpetual re-eligibility
of the President. To these points of disap
probation I adhere. My first wish was that
the nine first conventions might accept the
Constitution, as the means of securing to us
the great mass of good it contained, and that
the four last might reject it, as the means of
obtaining amendments. But I was corrected
in this wish the moment I saw the much bet
ter plan of Massachusetts, and which had
never occurred to me. With respect to the
declaration of rights, I suppose the majority
of the United States are of my opinion; for
I apprehend all the anti-federalists and a very
respectable proportion of the federalists think
that such a declaration should now be
annexed. The enlightened part of Europe
have given us the greatest credit for in
venting this instrument of security for
the rights of the people, and have been
not a little surprised to see us so soon
give it up. With respect to the re-
eligibility of the President, I find myself dif
fering from the majority of my countrymen;
for I think there are but three States out of
the eleven which have desired an alteration of
this. And, indeed, since the thing is estab
lished, I would wish it not to be altered dur
ing the life of our great leader, whose execu
tive talents are superior to those, I believe,
of any man in the world, and who, alone, by
the authority of his name and the confidence
reposed in his perfect integrity, is fully quali
fied to put the new government so under way,
as to secure it against the efforts of opposi
tion. But, having derived from our error all
the good there was in it, I hope we shall cor
rect it, the moment we can no longer have
the same name at the helm. These are my
sentiments, by which you will see I was right
in saying I am neither federalist nor anti-
federalist ; that I am of neither party, nor
yet a trimmer between parties. These, my
opinions, I wrote within a few hours after I
had read the Constitution, to one or two
friends in America. I had not then read one
single word printed on the subject. I never
had an opinion in politics or religion which I
was afraid to own. A costive reserve on these
subjects might have procured me more esteem
from some people, but less from myself. My
great wish is to go on in a strict but silent
performance of my duty; to avoid attracting
notice, and to keep my name out of newspa
pers, because I find the pain of a little cen
sure, even when it is unfounded, is more
acute than the pleasure of much praise. The
attaching circumstance of my present office
[Minister] is that I can do its duties unseen
by those for whom they are done. — To F.
HOPKINSON. ii, 585. FORD ED., v, 75. (P.,
March 13, 1789.)
372. ANTI-FEDERALISTS, Malevo
lence of. — Anti-federalism is not yet dead in
this country. The gentlemen who opposed
the new Constitution retain a good deal of
malevolence towards the new government.
Henry is its avowed foe. — To WILLIAM
SHORT. FORD ED., v, 136. (Ep., Dec. 1789.)
373. ANTI-FEDERALISTS, Over
thrown. — The opposition to our new Con
stitution has almost totally disappeared.
Some few indeed had gone such lengths in
their declarations of hostility that they feel it
39
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Antiquities
Apportionment Ratio
awkward perhaps to come over; but the
amendments proposed by Congress have
brought over almost all their followers. * * *
The little vautrien, Rhode Island, will come
over with a little more time. — To MARQUIS
LAFAYETTE, iii, 132. FORD ED., v, 152. (N. Y.,
April 1790.)
374. ANTIQUITIES, American.— I thank
you for the extract of the letter * * * on
the antiquities found in the western country.
I wish that the persons who go thither would
make very exact descriptions of what they see
of that kind, without forming any theories. The
moment a person forms a theory, his imagina
tion sees, in every object, only the traits which
favor that theory. But it is too early to form
theories on those antiquities. We must wait
with patience till more facts are collected. I
wish your Philosophical Society would collect
exact descriptions of the several monuments as
yet known, and insert them naked in their
Transactions. Patience and observation may
enable us in time, to solve the problem, whether
those who formed the scattering monuments in
our western country, were colonies sent off
from Mexico, or the founders of Mexico itself?
Whether both were the descendants or the
progenitors of the Asiatic red men. — To
CHARLES THOMSON, ii, 276. (Pa., 1787.)
375. ANTIQUITIES, Roman.— From
Lyons to Nismes I have been nourished with
the remains of Roman grandeur. * * * At
Vienne, the Praetorian Palace, as it is called,
comparable, for its fine proportions, to the
Maison quarree, defaced by the barbarians who
have converted it to its present purpose, its
beautiful fluted Corinthian columns cut out, in
part, to make space for Gothic windows, and
hewed down, in the residue, to the plane of the
building, was enough * * * to disturb my
composure. At Orange, I thought of you. I was
sure you had seen with pleasure the sublime
triumphal arch of Marius at the entrance of the
city. I went then to the Arenae. Would you be
lieve that in this eighteenth century, in France,,
under the reign of Louis XVI., they are at
this moment pulling down the circular wall of
this superb remain, to pave a road ? And that,
too, from a hill which is itself an entire mass of
stone, just as fit, and more accessible. * * *
I thought of you again * * * at the Pont
du Card, a sublime antiquity, and well-pre
served ; but most of all here [Nismes], whose
Roman taste, genius and magnificence excite
ideas analogous to yours at every step. * * *
You will not expect news. Were I to attempt
to give it, I should tell you stories one thousand
years old. I should detail to you the intrigues
of the courts of the Caesars, how they affect us
here, the oppressions of their praetors, prefects,
&c. I am immersed in antiquities from morn
ing to night. For me, the city of Rome is
actually existing in all the splendor of its em
pire. I am filled with alarms for the event of
the irruptions darly mak'ng on us, by the Goths,
the Visigoths, Ostrogoths, and Vandals, lest
they should reconquer us to our original bar
barism. — To LA COMTESSE DE TESSE. ii, 132.
(N., 1787.)
_ ANTOINETTE, MARIE.— See MARIE
ANTOINETTE.
376. APOSTASY, Defined.— It is to be
considered as apostasy only when they
[schismatizing republicans] purchase the
votes of federalists with a participation in
honor and power. — To THOMAS COOPER, v,
121. FORD ED., ix, 102. (W., 1807.)
377. APOSTASY, Punished.— As to the
effect of Mr. [Patrick] Henry's name among
the people, I have found it crumble like a
dried leaf, the moment they became satisfied
of his apostasy. — To TENCH COXE. FORD ED.,
vii, 381. (M., 1799.)
378. APPLAUSE, Courting.— I am not
reconciled to the idea of a Chief Magistrate
parading himself through the several States,
as an object of public gaze, and in quest of
applause which, to be valuable, should be
purely voluntary. 1 had rather acquire silent
good will by a faithful discharge of my du
ties, than owe expressions of it to my putting
myself in the way of receiving them. — To
JAMES SULLIVAN, v, 102. FORD ED., ix, 77.
(W., 1807.)
379. APPLAUSE, Deserve.— Go on de
serving applause, and you will be sure to
meet with it : and the way to deserve it is to
be good, and to be industrious. — To J. W.
EPPES. ii, 192. (P., 1787.)
380. APPOINTMENT, The Power of.—
The Constitution, having declared that the
President shall nominate and, by and with
the advice and consent of the Senate, shall
appoint ambassadors, other public ministers,
and consuls * * * has taken care to cir
cumscribe this [power] within very strict
limits : for it gives the nomination of the for
eign agents to the President, the appoint
ments to him and the Senate jointly, and the
commissioning to the President. This analy
sis calls our attention to the strict import of
each term. To nominate must be to propose.
Appointment seems that act of the will which
constitutes or makes the agent, and the com
mission is the public evidence of it. — OPINION
ON POWERS OF SENATE, vii, 465. FORD ED.,
v, 161. (1790.)
— APPOINTMENTS TO OFFICE.— See
OFFICE.
381. APPOBTIONMENT, Basis of.—
The number of Representatives for each
county, or borough, shall be so proportioned
to the number of its qualified electors, that
the whole number of representatives shall not
exceed 300, nor be less than 125. For the
present there shall be one representative for
every — qualified electors in each county or
borough; but whenever this, or any future
proportion, shall be likely to exceed or fall
short of the limits before mentioned, it shall
be again adjusted by the House of Repre
sentatives. — PROPOSED VA. CONSTITUTION.
FORD ED., ii, 15. (June 1776.)
382. APPORTIONMENT RATIO, Arbi
trary. — If the [ratio of] representation [is]
obtained by any process not prescribed in the
Constitution, it becomes arbitrary and inad
missible. — OPINION ON APPORTIONMENT BILL.
vii, 595- FORD ED., v, 494. (1792.)
383. APPORTIONMENT RATIO, Com
mon.— The Constitution has declared that
representatives and direct taxes shall be ap
portioned among the several States according
to their respective numbers. * * * That
Apportionment Ratio THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
40
is to say. they shall be apportioned by some
common ratio — for proportion and ratio are
equivalent words ; and in the definition of
proportion among numbers, that they have a
ratio common to all, or in other words, a
common divisor. — OPINION ON APPORTION
MENT BILL, vii, 594. FORD ED., v, 493. (April
1792.)
384. APPORTIONMENT RATIO, Frac
tions and.— It will be said that, though, for
taxes there may always be found a divisor
which will apportion them among the States
according to numbers exactly, without leav
ing any remainder, yet, for representatives,
there can be no such common ratio, or di
visor, which, applied to the several numbers,
will divide them exactly, without a remainder
or fraction. I answer, then, that taxes must
be divided exactly, and representatives as
nearly as the nearest ratio will admit; and
the fractions must be neglected, because the
Constitution calls absolutely that there be an
apportionment or common ratio, and if any
fractions result from the operation, it has left
them unprovided for. In fact it could not but
foresee that such fractions would result, and
it meant to submit to them. It knew they
would be in favor of one part of the Union at
one time, and of another at another, so as,
in the end, to balance occasional irregularities.
— OPINION ON APPORTIONMENT BILL, vii, 596.
FORD ED., v, 495. ,(1792.)
385. APPORTIONMENT RATIO, Near
est Common. — The phrase [of the Constitu
tion] that " the number of representatives
shall not exceed one for every 30,000,"
is violated by this bill which has given
to eight States a number exceeding one
for every, 30,000, to wit, one for every
27.770. In answer to this, it is said
that this phrase may mean either the
30,000 in each State, or the 30,000 in the
whole Union, and that in the latter case it
serves only to find the amount of the whole
representation ; which, in the present state of
population, is 120 members. Suppose the
phrase might bear both meanings, which will
common sense apply to it? Which did the
universal understanding of our country apply
to it? Which did the Senate and Representa
tives apply to it during the pendency of the
first bill, and even till an advanced stage of
this second bill, when an ingenious gentleman
found out the doctrine of fractions, a doctrine
so difficult and inobvious, as to be rejected at
first sight by the very persons who afterwards
became its most zealous advocates? The
phrase stands in the midst of a number of
others, every one of which relates to States in
their separate capacity. Will not plain com
mon sense, then, understand it, like the rest
of its context, to relate to States in their sep
arate capacities? But if the phrase of one for
30,000 is only meant to give the aggregate of
representatives, and not at all to influence
their apportionment among the States, then
the 120 being once found, in order to appor
tion them, we must recur to the former rule
which does it according to the numbers of
the respective States; and we must take the
nearest common divisor, as the ratio of dis
tribution, that is to say, that divisor which,
applied to every State, gives to them such
numbers as, added together, come nearest to
120. This nearest common ratio will be found
to be 28,058, and will distribute 119 of the 120
members leaving only a single residuary one.
It will be found, too, to place 96,648 frac
tional numbers in the eight northernmost
States, and 105,582 in the seven southern
most * * * Whatever may have been
the intention, the effect of neglecting the
nearest divisor (which leaves but one residu
ary member), and adopting a distant one
(which leaves eight), is merely to take a
member from New York and Pennsylvania,
each, ami give them to Vermont and New
Hampshire. But, it will be said, this is giving
more than one for 30,000. True, but has it
not been just said that the one for 30,000 is
prescribed only to fix the aggregate number,
and that we are not to mind it when we come
to apportion them among the States? That
for this we must recur to the former rule
which distributes them according to the num
bers in each State? Besides does not the bill
itself apportion among seven of the States
by the ratio of 27,770? which is much more
than one for 30,000. — OPINION ON APPORTION
MENT BILL, vii, 597. FORD EDV v, 496. (1702.)
386. APPORTIONMENT RATIO, Two
Divisors. — Instead of such a single common
ratio, or uniform divisor, as prescribed by the
Constitution, the bill has applied two ratios,
at least, to the different States, to wit, that
of 30,026 to the seven following: Rhode
Island, New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland,
Virginia, Kentucky, and Georgia ; and that of
27,770 to the eight others, namely: Vermont,
New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut,
New Jersey, Delaware, North Carolina, and
South Carolina. * * * And if two ra
tios be applied, then fifteen may. and the dis
tribution become arbitrary, instead of being
apportioned to numbers. Another member of
the clause of the Constitution * * * says
" The number of representatives shall not ex
ceed one for every 30,000, but each State shall
have at least one representative." This last
phrase proves that it had no contemplation
that all fractions, or numbers below the com
mon ratio were to be unrepresented; and it
provides especially that in the case of a State
whose whole number shall be below the com
mon ratio, one representative shall be given
to it. This is the single instance where it al
lows representation to any smaller number
than the common ratio, and by providing es
pecially for it in this, shows it was under
stood that, without special provision, the
smaller number would in this case, be in
volved in the general principle. — OPINION ON
APPORTIONMENT BILL, vii, 596. FORD ED., v,
495. (1792.)
387. APPORTIONMENT RATIO, Sur
plus Members. — Where a phrase is suscepti
ble of two meanings, we ought certainly to
adopt that which will bring upon us the few
est inconveniences. Let us weigh those re
sulting from both constructions. From that
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Apportionment Ratio
Apportionment Bill
giving to each State a member for every
30,000 in that State results the single incon
venience that there may be large portions un
represented, but it being a mere hazard on
which State this will fall, hazard will equalize
it in the long run. From the others result ex
actly the same inconvenience. A thousand
cases may be imagined to prove it. Take
one. Suppose eight of the States had 45,000
inhabitants each, and the other seven 44.999
each, that is to say, each one less than each of
the others. The aggregate would be 674,993,
and the number of representatives at one for
30,000 of the aggregate, would be 22. Then,
alter giving one member to each State, dis
tribute the seven residuary members among
the seven highest fractions, and though the
difference of population be only an unit, the
representation would be double. * * *
Here a single inhabitant the more would
count as 30,000. Nor is this case imaginable
only, it will resemble the real one whenever
the fractions happen to be pretty equal
through the whole States. The numbers of
our census happen by accident to give the
fractions all very small, or very great, so as
to produce the strongest case of inequality
that could possibly have occurred, and which
may never occur again. The probability is
that the fractions will descend gradually
from 29,999 to i. The inconvenience, then,
of large unrepresented fractions attends both
constructions ; and while the most obvious
construction is liable to no other, that of the
bill incurs many and grievous ones. i. If
you permit the large fraction in one State to
choose a representative for one of the small
fractions in another State, you take from the
latter its election, which constitutes real rep
resentation, and substitute a virtual represen
tation of the disfranchised fractions. * * *
2. The bill does not say that it has given the
residuary representatives to the greatest frac
tion: though in fact it has done so. It seems
to have avoided establishing that into a rule,
lest it might not suit on another occasion.
Perhaps it may be found the next time more
convenient to distribute them among the
smaller States; at another time among the
larger States; at other times according to any
other crotchet which ingenuity may invent,
and the combinations of the day give strength
to carry ; or they may do it arbitrarily by open
bargains and cabal. In short, this construction
introduces into Congress a scramble, or a
vendue for the surplus members. It gener
ates waste of time, hot blood, and may at
some time, when the passions are high, ex
tend a disagreement between the two Houses,
to the perpetual loss of the thing, as happens
now in the Pennsylvania Assembly ; whereas
the other construction reduces the apportion
ment always to an arithmetical operation,
about which no two men can ever possibly
differ. 3. It leaves in full force the violation
of the precept which declares that representa
tives shall be apportioned among the States
according to their numbers i. e., by some com
mon ratio. — OPINION ON APPORTIONMENT
BILL, vii, 599. FORD ED., v, 498. (1792.)
388. APPORTIONMENT RATIO,
Tricks in. — No invasions of the Constitution
are fundamentally so dangerous as the tricks
played on their own numbers, apportionment,
and other circumstances respecting them
selves, and affecting their legal qualifica
tions to legislate for the Union. — OPINION ON
APPORTIONMENT BILL, vii, 601. FORD ED., v,
500. (1792.)
389. APPORTIONMENT BILL, Oppo
sition to. — The ground of the opposition to
the apportionment bill has been founded on
the discovery that the ratio of 30,000 gave
smaller fractions to the southern than to the
eastern States, and to prevent this a variety
of propositions have been made, among which
is the following : To apply the ratio of 30,000
to the aggregate population of the Union (not
that of the individual States) which will give
120 members, and then apportion those mem
bers among the several States by as many
different ratios as there are States ; or to the
population of each State, giving them one for
every 30,000 as far as it will go, making 112,
and then distribute the remaining eight members
among those States having the highest fractions
of which 5 will be given to the States east
of this [Pennsylvania]. * * * The effect of
this principle must be deemed a very perni
cious one, and in my opinion [is a] subversion
of that contained in the Constitution, which
in the 3d paragraph of the 2d Section, first
Article, founds the representation on the
population of each State, in terms as explicit
as it could well have been done. Besides it
takes the fractions of some States to supply
the deficiency of others, and thus makes the
people of Georgia the instrument of giving
a member to New Hampshire. * * * On our
part, the principle will never be yielded, for
when such obvious encroachments are made on
the plain meaning of the Constitution, the bond
of Union ceases to be the equal measure of
justice to all its parts. On theirs, a very per
severing firmness is likewise observed. They
appear to me to play a hazardous game. The
government secures them many important bless
ings, all those which it gives to us and many
more, and yet with these they seem not to be
satisfied. — To ARCHIBALD STUART. FORD ED.,
v, 453. (Pa., March 1792.)
390. APPORTIONMENT BILL, Veto of
Advised. — Viewing this bill either as a
violation of the Constitution, or as giving an
inconvenient exposition of its words, is it a
case wherein the President ought to interpose
his negative? I think it is. * * * The
majorities by which this bill has been carried
(to wit: of one in the Senate and two in the
Representatives) show how divided the opin
ions were there. The whole of both Houses
admit the Constitution will bear the other ex
position, whereas the minorities in both deny
it will bear that of the bill. The application
of any one ratio is intelligible to the people
and will, therefore, be approved, whereas the
complex operations of this bill will never be
comprehended by them, and though they may
acquiesce, they cannot approve what they do
not understand. — OPINION ON APPORTION
MENT BILL, vii, 601. FORD ED., v, 500. (1792.)
391. APPORTIONMENT BILL, Veto
Message. — The Constitution has prescribed
that representatives shall be apportioned
Apportionment Bill
Approbation
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
42
among the several States according to their
respective numbers ; and there is no one pro
portion or division which, applied to the re
spective numbers of the States, will yield the
number and allotment of representatives pro
posed by the bill. The Constitution has also
provided that the number of representatives
shall not exceed one for every thirty thou
sand, which restriction is by the contract, and
by fair and obvious construction, to be ap
plied to the separate and respective numbers
of the States; and the bill has allotted to
eight of the States more than one for thirty
thousand. — DRAFT FOR VETO MESSAGE. FORD
ED., v, 501. (April 1792.)
392. APPORTIONMENT BILL, His
tory of Veto.— The President [Washington]
* * * [referred] to the representation bill,
which he had now in his possession for the
tenth day. I had before given him my opinion
in writing, that the method of apportionment
was contrary to the Constitution. He agreed
that it was contrary to the common understand
ing of that instrument, and to what was under
stood at the time by the makers of it; that yet
it would bear the construction which the bill
put, and he observed that the vote for and
against the bill was perfectly geographical, a
northern against a southern vote, and he feared
he should be thought to be taking side with
a southern party. I admitted this motive of
delicacy, but that it should not induce him to do
wrong ; urged the dangers to which the
scramble for the fractionary members would
always lead. He here expressed his fear that
there would, ere long, be a separation of the
Union ; that the public mind seemed dissatis
fied and tending to this. He went home, sent
for Randolph, the Attorney General, desired
him to get Mr. Madison immediately and come
to me, and if we three concurred in opinion
that he should negative the bill, he desired to
hear nothing more about it, but that we would
draw the instrument for him to sign. They
came. Our minds had been before made up.
We drew the instrument. Randolph carried
it to him, and told him we all concurred in
it. He walked with him to the door, and
as if he still wished to get off, he said, J' and
you say you approve of this yourself. " " Yes,
Sir, " says Randolph, " I do upon my honor. "
He sent it to the House of Representatives
instantly. A few of the hottest friends of the
bill expressed passion, but the majority were
satisfied, and both in and out of doors, it gave
pleasure to have, at length, an instance^ of the
negative being exercised. — THE ANAS, ix, 115.
FORD ED., i, 192. April 1792.)
393. APPROBATION, Consolation in —
Though I have made up my mind not to
suffer calumny to disturb my tranquillity, yet
I retain all my sensibilities for the approba
tion of the good and just. That is, indeed,
the chief consolation for the hatred of so
many, who, without the least personal knowl
edge, and on the sacred evidence of " Por
cupine " and Fenno alone, cover me with their
implacable hatred. The only return I will
ever make to them will be to do them all the
good I can, in spite of their teeth. — To SAM
UEL SMITH, iv, 256. FORD ED., vii, 279. (M
1798.)
394. . I thank God for an op
portunity of retiring without censure, and
carrying with me the most consoling proofs of
public approbation. — To DUPONT DE NEM
OURS, v, 432. (W., 1809.)
395. APPROBATION OF THE DIS
CRIMINATING — With those who wish to
think amiss of me, I have learned to be per
fectly indifferent ; but where I know a mind to
be ingenuous, and to need only truth to set it
to rights, I cannot be as passive. — To MRS.
JOHN ADAMS, iv, 560. FORD ED., viii, 311.
(M., 1804.)
396. APPROBATION BY THE GOOD.
— To be praised by those who themselves
deserve all praise, is a gratification of high or
der. Their approbation who, having been high
in office themselves, have information and tal
ents to guide their judgment, is a consolation
deeply felt. A conscientious devotion to re
publican government, like charity in religion,
has obtained for me much indulgence from
my fellow citizens, and the aid of able coun
sellors has guided me through many diffi
culties. — To LARKIN SMITH, v, 441. (M.,
April 1809.)
397. APPROBATION. Intelligent.— It
has been a great happiness to me, to have re
ceived the approbation of so great a portion
of my fellow citizens, and particularly of
those who have opportunities of inquiring,
reading and deciding for themselves. — To C.
F. WELLES, v, 484. (M., 1809.)
398. APPROBATION, Legislative.— I
learn with pleasure the approbation, by the
General Assembly of Rhode Island, of the
principles declared by me [in the inaugural ad
dress] ; principles which flowed sincerely from
the heart and judgment, and which, with sin
cerity, will be pursued. While acting on them,
I ask only to be judged with truth and can
dor. — To THE RHODE ISLAND ASSEMBLY, iv,
397. (W., May 1801.)
399. . For the approbation which
the Legislature of Vermont has been pleased
to express of the principles and measures pur
sued in the management of their affairs, I am
sincerely thankful ; and should I be so for
tunate as to carry into retirement the equal
approbation and good will of my fellow citi
zens generally, it will be the comfort of my
future days, and will close a service of forty
years with the only reward it ever wished.* —
R. To A. VERMONT LEGISLATURE, viii, 121.
(1807.)
400. . The assurances of your
approbation, and that my conduct has given
satisfaction to my fellow citizens generally,
will be an important ingredient in my future
happiness.— R. To A. VIRGINIA ASSEMBLY.
viii, 148. (1809.)
401. APPROBATION OF NEIGHBORS.
— It is a sufficient happiness to me to know
that my fellow citizens of the country gen
erally entertain for me the kind sentiments
which have prompted this proposition [to
* To addresses from Georgia, New York, Mary
land, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island, received
about the same time, similar replies were sent—
EDITOR.
43
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Approbation
Appropriations
meet him on his way home] without giving
to so many the trouble of leaving their homes
to meet a single individual. I shall have op
portunities of taking them individually by the
hand at our court house and other public
places, and of exchanging assurances of mu
tual esteem. Certainly it is the greatest con
solation to me to know, that in returning to
the bosom of my native country, I shall be
again in the midst of their kind affections:
and I can say with truth that my return to
them will make me hapoier than I have been
since I left them.— To T. M. RANDOLPH, v,
431. FORD ED., ix, 247. (W., Feb. 1809.)
402. APPROBATION, Old friends and.
— The approbation of my ancient friends is,
above all things, the most grateful to my
heart. They know for what objects we re
linquished the delights of domestic society,
tranquillity and science, and committed our
selves to the ocean of revolution, to wear out
the only life God has given us here in scenes
the benefits of which will accrue only to
those who follow us. — To JOHN DICKINSON.
iv, 424. (W., 1801.)
403. APPROBATION, Popular.— The
approbation of my constituents is truly the
most valued reward for any services it has
fallen to my lot to render them — their con
fidence and esteem the greatest consolation of
my life.— R. To A. MASSACHUSETTS LEGISLA
TURE, viii, 116. (Feb. 1807.)
404. . In a virtuous and free
State, no rewards can be so pleasing to sen
sible minds, as those which include the ap
probation of our fellow citizens. — INAUGURA
TION SPEECH AS GOVERNOR. FORD ED., ii, 187.
(I779-)
405. APPROBATION, Principle and.—
Our part is to pursue with steadiness what is
right, turning neither to right nor left for the
intrigues or popular delusions of the day, as
sured that the public approbation will in the
end be with us.— To GENERAL BRECKENRIDGE.
vii, 238. (M., 1822.)
406. APPROBATION, Rewarded by.—
The approbation of my fellow citizens is the
richest reward I can receive. — To RICHARD
M. JOHNSON, v, 256. (W., 1808.)
407. . The approving voice of
pur fellow citizens, for endeavors to be useful,
is the greatest of all earthly rewards.* — R.
To A. NEW LONDON METHODISTS, viii, 147.
(1809.)
408. . If, in my retirement to
the humble station of a private citizen, I am
accompanied with the esteem and approbation
of my fellow citizens, trophies obtained by
the blood-stained steel, or the tattered flags
of the tented field, will never be envied. — R.
To A. MARYLAND REPUBLICANS, viii, 165.
(1809.)
409. APPROBATION, Right and.— I
have ever found in my progress through life,
* Jefferson retired with a reputation and popu
larity hardly inferior to that of Washington.— John
T. Morse, Jr., Life of Jefferson. 318.
that, acting for the public, if we do always
what is right, the approbation denied in the
beginning will surely follow us in the end.
It is from posterity we are to expect remu
neration for the sacrifices we are making for
their service, of time, quiet and good will. —
To JOSEPH C. CABELL. vii, 394. (M., 1825.)
410. APPROBATION, Undeserved.— I
have never claimed any other merit than
of good intentions, sensible that in the choice
of measures, error of judgment has too often
had its influence ; and that with whatever in
dulgence my countrymen * * * have been so
kind as to view my course, yet they would
certainly not know me in the picture here
drawn, and would, I fear, say in the words of
the poet, " praise undeserved is satire in dis
guise." Were, therefore, the piece to be pre
pared for the press, I should certainly entreat
you to revise that part with a severe eye. — To
AMELOT DE LA CROIX. v, 422. (W., 1809.)
411. APPROBATION BY THE VIRTU
OUS. — Sentiments of esteem from men of
worth, of reflection, and of pure attachment
to republican government, are my consolation
against the calumnies of which it has suited
certain writers to make me the object. Under
these I hope I shall never bend. — To HARRY
INNES. FORD ED., vii, 383. (M., 1799.)
412. APPROPRIATIONS, Borrowing
from. — There are funds sufficient and regu
larly appropriated to the fitting out [ships],
but for manning the proper funds are ex
hausted, consequently we must borrow from
other funds, and state the matter to Congress.
— ANAS. FORD ED., i, 308. (1805.)
413. APPROPRIATIONS, The Consti
tution and.— In the answer to Turreau, I
think it would be better to lay more stress on
the constitutional bar to our furnishing the
money, because it would apply in an occasion
of peace as well as war. I submit to you,
therefore, * * * the inserting, " but, in in
dulging these dispositions, the President is
bound to stop at the limits prescribed by our
Constitution and law to the authorities in his
hands. One of the limits is that ' no money
shall be drawn from the Treasury but in
consequence of appropriations made by law,'
and no law having made any appropriation of
money for any purpose similar to that ex
pressed in your letter, it lies, of course, be
yond his constitutional powers." — To JAMES
MADISON. FORD ED., viii, 474. (M., Sep.
1806.)
414. APPROPRIATIONS, Discretion
over. — The question whether the Berceau
was to be delivered up under the treaty was of
Executive cognizance entirely, and witnout
appeal. So was the question as to the con
dition in which she should be delivered. And
it is as much an invasion of its independence
for a coordinate branch to call for the reasons
of the decision, as it would be to call on the
Supreme Court for its reasons on any judi
ciary decision. If an appropriation were asked
the Legislature would have a right to ask
reasons. But in this case they had confided
Appropriations
Arbitration
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
44
an appropriation (for naval contingencies) to
the discretion of the Executive. Under this
appropriation our predecessors bought the
vessel (for there was no order of Congress
authorizing them to buy) and began her re
pairs; we completed them. I will not say
that a very gross abuse of discretion in a past
appropriation would not furnish ground to the
Legislature to take notice of it. In what form
is not now necessary to decide. But so far
from a gross abuse, the decision in this case
was correct, honorable and advantageous to
the nation. I cannot see to what legitimate ob
jects any resolution of the House on the sub
ject can lead; and if one is passed on ground
not legitimate, our duty will be to resist it. —
To WILLIAM B. GILES. FORD ED., viii, 142.
(April 1802.)
415. APPROPRIATIONS, Diverting.—
The diversion of the [French] money from
its legal appropriation offers a flaw against
the Executive which may place them in the
wrong. — To PRESIDENT WASHINGTON. FORD
ED., vi, 179. (I793-)
416. . If it should appear that
the Legislature has done their part in fur
nishing the money for the French nation, and
that the Executive departments have applied
it to other purposes, then it will certainly be
desirable that we get back on legal ground as
soon as possible, by pressing on the domestic
funds and availing ourselves of any proper
opportunity which may be furnished of re
placing the money to the foreign creditors.—
To PRESIDENT WASHINGTON. FORD ED., vi,
177- (I793-)
417. APPROPRIATIONS, Estimates
and. — I like your idea of kneading all Hamil
ton's little scraps and fragments into one
batch, and adding to it a complementary sum,
which, while it forms it into a single mass
from which everything is to be paid, will en
able us, should a breach of appropriation ever
be charged on us, to prove that the sum ap
propriated, and more, has been applied to its
specific object. — To ALBERT GALLATIN. iv,
428. FORD ED., viii, 140. (W., 1802.)
418. . Congress, aware that too
minute a specification has its evil as well as a
too general one, does not make the estimate
a part of their law, but gives a sum in gross,
trusting the Executive discretion for that
year, and that sum only; so in other depart
ments, as of War, for instance, the estimate
of the Secretary specifies all the items of
clothing, subsistence, pay, &c., of the army
And Congress throws this into such masses
as they think best, to wit, a sum in gross for
clothing, another for subsistence, a third for
pay, &c., binding up the Executive discretion
only by the sum, and the object generalized to
a certain degree. The minute details of th<
estimate are thus dispensed with in point o
obligation, and the discretion of the officer i
enlarged to the limits of the classification
which Congress thinks it best for the public
interest to make.— To ALBERT GALLATIN. iv
529. (1804.)
419. APPROPRIATIONS, Executive
power over. — The Executive * * * has the
lower, though not the right, to apply money
ontrary to its legal appropriations. Cases may
»e imagined, however, where it would be their
duty to do this. But they must be cases of
\vtreme necessity. The payment of interest
0 the domestic creditors has been mentioned
as one of the causes of diverting the foreign
und. But this is not an object of greater ne
cessity than that to which it was legally ap
propriated. It is taking the money from our
oreign creditors to pay it to the domestic
mes; a preference which neither justice,
gratitude, nor the estimation in which these
wo descriptions of creditors are held in this
country will justify. The payment of the
Army and the daily expenses of the govern
ment have been also mentioned as objects of
withdrawing this money. These indeed are
jressing objects, and might produce that de-
_ree of distressing necessity which would be
a justification. — To PRESIDENT WASHINGTON.
FORD ED., vi, 176. (Pa., 1793.)
420. APPROPRIATIONS, Expendi
tures and. — A violation of a law making ap
propriations of money, is a violation of that
section of the Constitution of the United
States which requires that no money shall be
drawn from the Treasury but in consequences
of appropriations made by law. — GILES
TREASURY RESOLUTIONS. FORD ED., vi, 168.
(I793-)
421. APPROPRIATIONS, Specific.— It
is essential to the due administration of the
government of the United States, that laws
making specific appropriations of money
should be strictly observed by the Secretary of
the Treasury thereof. — GILES TREASURY RES
OLUTIONS. FORD ED., vi, 168. (1793.)
422. . In our care of the public
contributions intrusted to our direction, it
would be prudent to multiply barriers against
their dissipation, by appropriating specific
sums to every specific purpose susceptible of
definition; by disallowing applications of
money varying from the appropriation in ob
ject, or transcending it in amount; by reduc
ing the undefined field of contingencies, and
thereby circumscribing discretionary powers
over money ; and by bringing back to a single
department all accountabilities for money
where the examination may be prompt, effica
cious, and uniform. — FIRST ANNUAL MES
SAGE, viii, 10. FORD ED., viii, 120. (Dec.
1801.) See MONEY BILLS.
423. ARBITRATION, Offer of.— As to
our dispute with Schweighauser and Dobree,
in the conversation I had with Dobree at
Nantes, he appeared to think so rationally on
the subject, that I thought there would be no
difficulty in accommodating it with him, and
1 wished rather to settle it by accommodation,
than to apply to the minister. I afterwards
had it intimated to him * * *, that I had it
in idea to propose a reference to arbitrators.
He expressed a cheerful concurrence in it. I
thereupon made the proposition to him for-
45
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Arbitration
Architecture
mally, by letter, mentioning particularly, that
we would choose our arbitrators of some neu
tral nation, and, of preference, from among
the Dutch refugees in Paris. I was surprised
to receive an answer from him, wherein, after
expressing his .own readiness to accede to this
proposition, he added, that on consulting with
Mr. Puchilberg, he had declined it. — To
JOHN JAY. ii, 496. (P., 1788.)
424. . I began by offering to
Schweighauser and Dobree an arbitration be
fore honest and judicious men of a neutral na
tion. They declined this, and had the modesty
to propose an arbitration before merchants of
their own tozvn. I gave them warning then,
that as the offer on the part of a sovereign na
tion to submit to a private arbitration was
an unusual cqndescendence, if they did not
accept them, it would not be repeated, and
that the United States would judge the case
for themselves hereafter. They continued to
decline it. — To WILLIAM SHORT. FORD ED., v,
365. (Pa., 1791.)
425. ARBORICULTURE, Coffee tree.—
Bartram is extremely anxious to get a large
supply of seeds of the Kentucky coffee tree.
I told him I would use all my interest with you
to obtain it, as I think I heard you say that
some neighbors of yours had a large number of
trees. Be so good as to take measures for
bringing a good quantity, if possible, to Bart
ram when you come to Congress. — To JAMES
MADISON, iii, 569. FORD ED., vi, 279. (1793.)
426. ARBORICULTURE, Cork Oak.— I
expect from the South of France some acorns
of the cork oak, which I propose for your so
ciety [Agricultural], as I am persuaded they
will succeed with you. I observed it to grow
in England without shelter, not well, indeed,
but so as to give hopes that it would do well
with you. — To WILLIAM DRAYTON. i, 555.
(P., 1786.)
427. . I sent you a parcel of
acorns of the cork oak by Colonel Franks. To
WILLIAM DRAYTON. ii, 202. (Pa., 1787.)
428. . I have been long endeav
oring to procure the cork tree from Europe,
but without success. A plant which I brought
with me from Paris died after languishing some
time, and of several parcels of acorns received
from a correspondent at Marseilles, not one
has ever vegetated. I shall continue my en
deavors, although disheartened by the non
chalance of our southern fellow citizens, with
whom alone they can thrive. — To JAMES
RONALDSON. Vi, 92. FORD ED., ix, 370. (M.,
Jan. 1813.)
429. ARBORICULTURE, Fruit trees.—
Should you be able to send me any plants of
good fruit, and especially of peaches and eating
grapes, they will be thankfully received. — To
PHILLIP MAZZEI. FORD ED., viii, 16. (W.,
March 1801.)
— ARBORICULTURE, the Olive.— See
OLIVE.
430. ARBORICULTURE, Pecan.-— The
pecan nut is, as you conjecture, the Illinois
nut. The former is the vulgar name south
of the Potomac, as also with the Indians and
Spaniards, and enters also into the botanical
name which is Juglano Paean. — To FRANCIS
HOPKINSON. ii, 74. (P., 1786.)
431. - — . Procure me two or three
hundred pecan nuts from the western country.
—To F. HOPKINSON. i, 506. (P., 1786.)
432. - — . I thank you for the pecan
nuts. — To JAMES MADISON, ii, 156. FORD ED.,
iv, 396. (P., 1787.)
433. ARBORICULTURE, Sensitive
Plant. — Your attention to one burthen I laid
on you, encourages me to remind you of
another, which is the sending me some of the
seeds of the Dionaa Muscipula, or Venus fly
trap, called also with you, I believe, the Sensi
tive Plant.— To MR. HAWKINS, ii, 3. (P.,
1786.)
434. ARBORICULTURE, Trees.— I send
a packet of the seeds of trees which I would
wish Anthony to sow in a large nursery, noting
well their names. — To NICHOLAS LEWIS. FORD
ED., iv, 344. (P., 1786.)
435. ARBORICULTURE, Vines.— I am
making a collection of vines for wine and for
the table.— To A. CAREY, i, 508. (P., 1786.)
436. ARCHITECTURE, Bad.— The gen
ius of architecture seems to have shed its
maledictions over this land [Virginia]. —
NOTES ON VIRGINIA, viii, 394. FORD ED., iii,
258. (1782.)
437. ARCHITECTURE, Beauty in.—
How is a taste in this beautiful art to be
formed in our countrymen unless we avail
ourselves of every occasion when public build
ings are to be erected, of presenting to them
models for their study and imitation? — To
JAMES MADISON, i, 433. (P., 1785.)
438. ARCHITECTURE, Brick, Stone,
Wood. — All we shall do in the way of ref
ormation will produce no permanent improve
ment to our country, while the unhappy prej
udice prevails that houses of brick or stone
are less wholesome than those of wood. A
dew is often observed on the walls of the for
mer in rainy weather, and the most obvious
solution is, that the rain has penetrated
through these walls. The following facts,
however, are sufficient to prove the error of
this solution : i. This dew on the walls ap
pears when there is no rain, if the state of the
atmosphere be moist. 2. It appears on the
partition as well as the exterior walls. 3.
So, also on pavements of brick or stone. 4.
It is more copious in proportion as the walls
are thicker ; the reverse of which ought to be
the case, if this hypothesis were just. If cold
water be poured into a vessel of stone, or
glass, a dew forms instantly on the outside;
but if it be poured into a vessel of wood, there
is no such appearance. It is not supposed, in
the first case, that the water has exuded
through the glass, but that it is precipitated
from the circumambient air; as the humid
particles of vapor, passing from the boiler of
an alembic through its refrigerant, are pre
cipitated from the air, in which they are sus
pended, on the internal surface of the refrig
erant. Walls of brick or stone act as the re
frigerant in this instance. They are suffi
ciently cold to condense and precipitate the
moisture suspended in the air of the room,
when it is heavily charged therewith. But
Architecture
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
46
walls of wood are not so. The question then
is, whether the air in which this moisture is
left floating, or that which is deprived of it,
be most wholesome? In both cases, the rem
edy is easy. A little fire kindled in the room,
whenever the air is damp, prevents the pre
cipitation on the walls; and this practice,
found healthy in the warmest as well as
coldest seasons, is as necessary in a wooden
as in a stone or brick house. I do not mean
to say, that the rain never penetrates through
walls of brick. On the contrary, I have seen
instances of it. But with us it is only through
the northern and eastern walls of the house,
after a north-easterly storm, these being the
only ones which continue long enough to
force through the walls. This, however, hap
pens too rarely to give a just character of
unwholesomeness to such houses. In a house,
the walls of which are of well-burnt brick and
good mortar, I have seen the rain penetrate
through but twice in a dozen or fifteen years.
The inhabitants of Europe, who dwell chiefly
in houses of stone or brick, are surely as
healthy as those of Virginia. These houses
have the advantage, too, of being warmer in
winter and cooler in summer than those of
wood ; of being cheaper in their first construc
tion, where lime is convenient, and infinitely
more durable. The latter consideration ren
ders it of great importance to eradicate this
prejudice from the minds of our countrymen.
A country whose buildings are of wood, can
never increase in its improvements to any
considerable degree. Their duration is highly
estimated at fifty years. Every half century
then our country becomes a tabula _ rasa,
whereon we have to set out anew, as in the
first moment of seating it. Whereas when
buildings are of durable materials, every new
edifice is an actual and permanent acquisition
to the State, adding to its value as well as
to its ornament. — NOTES ON VIRGINIA, viii,
395. FORD ED., iii, 258. (1782.)
439. ARCHITECTURE, Delight in.—
Architecture is my delight, and putting up
and pulling down, one of my favorite amuse
ments. — RAYNER'S LIFE OF JEFFERSON. 524.
440. ARCHITECTURE, Economy in.—
I have scribbled some general notes on the
plan of a house you enclosed. I have done
more. I have endeavored to throw the same
area, the same extent of walls, the same num
ber of rooms, and of the same sizes, into an
other form so as to offer a choice to the
builder. Indeed, I varied my plan by showing
what it would be with alcove bed rooms, to
which I am so much attached. — To JAMES
MADISON. FORD ED., vi, 259. (Pa., I793-)
441. ARCHITECTURE, English.— Eng
lish architecture is in the most wretched style
I ever saw, not meaning to except America,
where it is bad, nor even Virginia, where it is
worse than in any other part of America,
which I have seen.— To JOHN PAGE, i, 550.
FORD ED., iv, 214. (P., 1786.)
442. ARCHITECTURE, Fascination of.
— Here I am gazing whole hours at the
Maison quarree, like a lover at his mistress.
The stocking weavers and silk spinners
around it consider me a hypochondriac Eng
lishman, about to write with a pistol the last
chapter of his history. This is the second
time I have been in love since I left Paris.
The first was with a Diana at the Chateau de
Laye-Epinaye in Beaujolois, a delicious mor
sel of sculpture, by M. A. Slodtz. This, you
will say, was in rule, to fall in love with a
female beauty ; but with a house ! it is out of
all precedent. No, madame, it is not without
a precedent in my own history. While in
Paris I was violently smitten with the Hotel
de Salm, and used to go to the Tuileries al
most daily, to look at it— To MADAME LA
COMTESSE DE TESSE. ii, 131. (N., 1787.)
443. ARCHITECTURE, Faulty.— Build
ings are often erected, by individuals, of
considerable expense. To give these sym
metry and taste, would not increase their cost.
It would only change the arrangement of the
materials, the form and combination of the
members. This would often cost less than the
burden of barbarous ornaments with which
these buildings are sometimes charged. But
the first principles of the art are unknown,
and there exists scarcely a model among us
sufficiently chaste to give an idea of them. —
NOTES ON VIRGINIA, viii, 394. FORD ED., iii,
258. (1782.)
444. ARCHITECTURE, French.— Were
I to proceed to tell you how much I enjoy
French architecture * * * I should want
words. — To MR. BELLINI, i, 445. (P., 1785.)
445. ARCHITECTURE, Importance of.
— Architecture is worth great attention. As
we double our number every twenty years we
must double our houses. * * * It is, then,
among the most important arts ; and it is de
sirable to introduce taste into an art which
shows so much. — TRAVELLING HINTS, ix, 404.
(1788.)
446. ARCHITECTURE, Plan of Prison.
— With respect to the plan of a Prison, re
quested [by the Virginia authorities] in 1785,
(being then in Paris), I had heard of a benev
olent society, in England, which had been in
dulged by the government, in an experiment
of the effect of labor, in solitary confinement,
on some of their criminals : which experiment
had succeeded beyond expectation. The same
idea had been suggested in France, and an
architect of Lyons had proposed a plan of a
well-contrived edifice, on the principle of soli
tary confinement. I procured a copy, and as
it was too large for our purposes, I drew one
on a scale less extensive, but susceptible of
additions as they should be wanting. This I
sent to the directors, instead of a plan of a
common prison, in the hope that it would
suggest the idea of labor in solitary confine
ment, instead of that on the public works,
which we had adopted in our Revised Code.
Its principle, accordingly, but not its exact
form, was adopted by Latrobe in carrying the
plan into execution, by the erection of what
is now called the Penitentiary, built under his
direction. — AUTOBIOGRAPHY, i, 46. FORD ED.,
64. (1821.)
447. ARCHITECTURE, Porticos.— A
portico may be from five to ten diameters
47
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Architecture
of the column deep, or projected from the
building. If of more than five diameters,
there must be a column in the middle of each
flank, since it must never be more than five
diameters from center to center of column.
The portico of the Maison quarree is three
intercolonnations deep. I never saw as much
to a private house.— To JAMES MADISON.
FORD ED., vi, 327. (I793-)
_ ARCHITECTURE, Roman.— See AN
TIQUITIES.
448. ARCHITECTURE, Ugly.— The
private buildings [in Virginia] are very rarely
constructed of stone or brick, much the
greater portion being of scantling and boards,
plastered with lime. It is impossible to devise
things more ugly, uncomfortable, and hap
pily more perishable. — NOTES ON VIRGINIA.
viii, 393- FORD ED., iii, 257. (1782.)
449. ARCHITECTURE, Virginia Capi
tol. — I was written to in 1785 (being then in
Paris) by directors appointed to superintend
the building of a Capitol in Richmond, to ad
vise them as to a plan, and to add to it one
of a Prison. Thinking it a favorable opportun
ity of introducing into the State an example
of architecture, in the classic style of antiquity,
and the Maison qarree of Nismes, an ancient
Roman temple, being considered as the most
perfect model existing of what may be called
Cubic architecture, I applied to M. Clerissault,
who had published drawings of the Antiquities
of Nismes, to have me a model of the building
made in stucco, only changing the order from
Corinthinan to Ionic, on account of the diffi
culty of the Corinthian capitals. I yielded,
with reluctance, to the taste of Clerissault, in
his preference of the modern capital of
Scamozzi to the more noble capital of antiquity.
This was executed by the artist whom Choiseul
Goumer had carried with him to Constantinople,
and employed, while ambassador there, in mak
ing those beautiful models of the remains of
Grecian architecture which are to be seen at
Paris. To adapt the exterior to our use, I drew
a plan for the interior, with the apartments
necessary for legislative, executive, and judi
ciary purposes ; and accommodated in their size
and distribution to the form and dimensions of
the building. These were forwarded to the
directors, in 1786, and were carried into execu
tion, with some variations, not for the better,
the most important of which, however, admit
of future correction. — AUTOBIOGRAPHY, i, 45.
FORD ED., i, 63. (1821.)
450. . We took for our model
what is called the Maison quarree of Nismes,
one of the most beautiful, if not the most
beautiful and precious morsel of architecture
left us by antiquity. It was built by Caius and
Lucius Cc-esar, and repaired by Louis XIV., and
has the suffrage of all the judges of architecture
who have seen it, as yielding to no one of the
beautiful monuments of Greece, Rome, Palmyra
and Balbec, which late travellers have communi
cated to us. It is very simple, but it is noble
beyond expression, and would have done honor
to our country, as presenting to travellers a
specimen of taste in our infancy, promising
much for our maturer age. — To JAMES MADISON.
i, 432. (P., 1785.)
451. . I shall send them a plan
taken from the best morsel of ancient archi
tecture now remaining. It has obtained the
approbation of fifteen or sixteen centuries, and
is, therefore, preferable to any design which
might be newly contrived. It will give more
room, be more convenient and cost less than
the plan they sent me. Pray encourage them
to wait for it, and to execute it. It will be
superior in beauty to anything in America, and
not inferior to anything in the world. It is
very simple. — To JAMES MADISON, i, 415.
(P., 1785.)
452. . The designs for the Capi
tol are simple and sublime. More cannot be
said. They are not the brat of a whimsical
conception never before brought to light, but
copied from the most precious, the most perfect
model, of ancient architecture remaining on
earth ; one which has received the approbation
of near 2000 years, and which is sufficiently
remarkable to have been visited by all travellers.
— To DR. JAMES CURRIE. FORD EDV iv, 133.
453. . I have been much morti
fied with information I received * * * from
Virginia, that the first brick of the Capitol
would be laid within a few days. But surely,
the delay of this piece of a summer would
have been repaired by the savings in the plan
preparing here, were we to value its other
superiorities as nothing. — To JAMES MADISON.
i, 432. (P., 1785.)
454. - . Do * * * exert yourself
to get the plan [of the Capitol] begun on,
set aside and that adopted which was drawn
here. It was taken from a model which has
been the admiration of sixteen centuries ; which
has been the object of as many pilgrimages
as the tomb of Mahomet ; which will give
unrivalled honor to our State, and furnish a
model whereon to form the taste of our young
men. It will cost much less, too, than the
one begun because it does not cover one-half
the area. — To JAMES MADISON, i, 534. FORD
ED., iv, 196. (P., 1785.)
455. . Pray try if you can effect
the stopping of this work. * * * The loss will
be only of the laying the bricks already laid,
or a part of them. The bricks themselves
will do again for the interior walls, and one
side wall and one end wall may remain,
as they will answer equally well for our plan.
This loss is not to be weighed against the saving
of money which will arise, against the comfort
of laying out the public money for something
honorable, the satisfaction of seeing an object
and proof of national good taste, and the regret
and mortification of erecting a monument of
our barbarism, which will be loaded with exe
crations as long as it shall endure. — To JAMES
MADISON, i, 433. (P., 1785.)
456. . Our new Capitol, when
the corrections are made, of which it is suscep
tible, will be an edifice of first rate dignity.
Whenever it shall be finished with the proper
ornaments belonging to it (which will not be
in this age), it will be worthy of being ex
hibited alongside the most celebrated remains
of antiquity. Its extreme convenience has
acquired it universal approbation. — To WILLIAM
SHORT. FORD ED., v, 136. (1789.)
457. - — . The capitol in the city of
Richmond, in Virginia, is the model of the
Temples of F.rectheus at Athens, of Balbec,
and of the Maison quarree of Nismes. All of
which are nearly of the same form and pro
portions, and are considered as the most per
fect examples of cubic architecture, as the
Architecture
Aristocracy
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
48
Pantheon of Rome is of the spherical. Their
dimensions not being sufficient for the purposes
of the Capitol, they were enlarged, but their
proportions rigorously observed. The Capitol
is of brick, one hundred and thirty four feet
long, seventy feet wide, and forty-five feet high,
exclusive of the basement. Twenty-eight feet
of its length is occupied by a portico of the
whole breadth of the house, showing six
columns in front, and two intercolonnations in
flank. It is of a single order, which is Ionic ;
its columns four feet two inches diameter, and
their entablature running round the whole
building. The portico is crowned by a pedi
ment, the height of which is two-ninths of its
span. — JEFFERSON MANUSCRIPTS, ix, 446.
458. ARCHITECTURE, Washington
Capitol. — I have had under consideration
Mr. Hallet's plans for the Capitol, which un
doubtedly have a great deal of merit. Dr.
Thornton has also given me a view of his. *
* * The grandeur, simplicity and beauty of
the exterior, the propriety with which the apart
ments are distributed, and economy in the mass
of the whole structure, will, I doubt not, give
it a preference in your eyes, as it has done in
mine and those of several others whom I have
consulted. * * * Some difficulty arises with re
spect to Mr. Hallet, who you know was in
some degree led into his plan by ideas we all
expressed to him. This ought not to induce
us to prefer it to a better ; but while he is
liberally rewarded for the time and labor he
has expended on it, his feelings should be saved
and soothed as much as possible. — To THE
WASHINGTON COMMISSIONERS, iii, 507. (i793-)
459. . Dr. Thornton's plan of a
Capitol has * * * so captivated the eyes and
judgment of all as to leave no doubt you will
prefer it. * * * Among its admirers none is
more decided than he [Washington] whose de
cision is most important. It is simple, noble,
beautiful, excellently distributed, and moderate
in size. * * * A just respect for the right
of approbation in the commissioners will pre
vent any formal decision in the President till
the plan shall be laid before you and be ap
proved by you. — To MR. CARROLL, iii, 508.
(Pa., 1793.)
460. . The Representative's cham
ber will remain a durable monument of
your talents as an architect. * * * The Senate
room I have never seen. — To MR. LATROBE. vi,
75. (M., 1812.)
461. . I shall live in the hope
that the day will come when an opportunity
will be given you of finishing the middle build
ing in a style worthy of the two wings, and
worthy of the first temple dedicated to the sov
ereignty of the people, embellishing with
Athenian taste the course of a nation looking
far beyond the range of Athenian destinies. —
To MR. LATROBE. vi, 75- (M., 1812.) See
CAPITOL(U. S. )and WASHINGTON CITY.
462. ARCHITECTURE, Williamsburg
Capitol.— The only public buildings worthy
mention [in Virginia] are the Capitol, the
Palace, the College, and the Hospital for Luna
tics, all of them in Williamsburg, heretofore
the seat of our government. The Capitol is a
light and airy structure, with a portico in front
of two orders, the lower of which, being Doric,
is tolerably just in its proportions and orna
ments, save only that the intercolonnations are
too large. The upper is Ionic, much too small
for that on which it is mounted, its ornaments
not proper to the order, nor proportioned within
themselves. It is crowned with a pediment,
which is too large for its span. Yet, on the
whole, it is the most pleasing piece of architec
ture we have. The Palace is not handsome with
out, but it is spacious and commodious within,
is prettily situated, arid with the grounds an
nexed to it, is capable of being made an ele
gant seat. The College and Hospital are rude,
misshapen piles, which, but that they have
roofs, would be taken for brick-kilns. There
are no other public buildings but churches and
court-houses, in which no attempts are made
at elegance. Indeed, it would not be easy to
execute such an attempt, as a workman could
scarcely be found here capable of drawing an
order. — NOTES ON VIRGINIA, viii, 394. FORD
ED., iii, 257. (1782.)
463. ARISTOCRACY, Artificial vs.
Natural. — There is a natural aristocracy
among men. The grounds of this are virtue
and talents. Formerly, bodily powers gave
place among the aristoi. But since the in
vention of gunpowder has armed the weak as
well as the strong with missile death, bodily
strength, like beauty, good humor, politeness
and other accomplishments, has become but
an auxiliary ground of distinction. There is,
also, an artificial aristocracy, founded on
wealth and birth, without either virtue or tal
ents : for with these it would belong to the
first class. The natural aristocracy I consider
as the most precious gift of nature for the in
struction, the trusts, and government of so
ciety. And indeed, it would have been in
consistent in creation to have formed man for
the social state, and not to have provided vir
tue and wisdom enough to manage the con
cerns of the society. May we not even say,
that that form of government is the best,
which provides the most effectually for a pure
selection of these natural aristoi into the of
fices of government? The artificial aristoc
racy is a mischievous ingredient in govern
ment, and provision should be made to pre
vent its ascendency. On the question, what
is the best provision, you and I differ ; but we
differ as rational friends, using the free exer
cise of our own reason, and mutually indulg
ing its errors. You think it best to put the
pseudo-aristoi into a separate chamber of leg
islation, where they may be hindered from
doing mischief by their coordinate branches
and where, also, they may be a protection to
wealth against the agrarian and plundering en
terprises of the majority of the people. I think
that to give them power in order to prevent
them from doing mischief, is arming them for
it, and increasing instead of remedying the
evil. For, if the coordinate branches can
arrest their action, so may they that of the
coordinates. Mischief may be done negatively
as well as positively. Of this, a cabal in
the Senate of the United States has furnished
many proofs. Nor do I believe them neces
sary to protect the wealthy; because enough
of these will find their way into every branch
of the legislature to protect themselves. From
fifteen to twenty legislatures of our own, in
action for thirty years past, have proved that
no fears of an equalization of property are to
be apprehended from them. I think the best
remedy is exactly that provided by all our
49
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Aristocracy
constitutions, to leave to the citizens the free
election and separation of the aristoi from the
pseudo-aristoi, of the wheat from the chaff.
In general they will elect the really good and
wise. In some instances, wealth may cor
rupt, and birth blind them, but not in suf
ficient degree to endanger the society. — To
JOHN ADAMS, vi, 223. FORD ED., ix, 425.
(M., 1813.)
464. ARISTOCRACY, Banking.— I
hope we shall * * * crush in its birth the
aristocracy of our moneyed corporations,
which dare already to challenge our govern
ment to a trial of strength and bid defiance to
the laws of our country. — To GEORGE LOGAN.
FORD ED., x, 69. (P. F., Nov. 1816.)
— ARISTOCRACY, Cincinnati Soci
ety and.— See CINCINNATI..
465. ARISTOCRACY, Despised.— An in
dustrious farmer occupies a more dignified
place in the scale of beings, whether moral
or political, than a lazy lounger, valuing him
self on his family, too proud to work, and
drawing out a miserable existence by eating
on that surplus of other men's labor, which
is the sacred fund of the helpless poor. — To
M. DE MEUNIER. ix, 271. FORD ED., iv, 176.
(P., 1786.)
466. ARISTOCRACY. Education and.—
The bill [of the Revised Code of Virginia]
for the more general diffusion of learning
proposed to divide every county into wards
of five or six miles square, like the [New
England] townships; to establish in each
ward a free school for reading, writing and
common arithmetic ; to provide for the an
nual selection of the best subjects from these
schools, who might receive, at the public ex
pense, a higher degree of education at a dis
trict school ; and from these district schools
to select a certain number of the most prom
ising subjects, to be completed at an Univer
sity, where all the useful sciences should be
taught. Worth and genius would thus have
been sought out from every condition of life,
and completely prepared by education for de
feating the competition of wealth and birth
for public trusts. — To JOHN ADAMS, vi, 225.
FORD ED., ix, 427. (P., 1813.)
467. - — . This bill on education
would have raised the mass of the people to
the high ground of moral respectability nec
essary to their own safety, and to orderly
government; and would have completed the
great object of qualifying them to secure the
veritable aristoi for the trusts of government
to the exclusion of the pseudalists. * * *
Although this law has not yet been acted on
but in a small and inefficient degree, it is still
considered as before the Legislature, * * *
and I have great hope that some patriotic
spirit will, at a favorable moment, call it up,
and make it the key stone of the arch of our
government. — To JOHN ADAMS, vi, 226.
FORD ED., ix, 428. (M., 1813.)
468. ARISTOCRACY, Evils of.— To de
tail the real evils of aristocracy, they must
be seen in Europe. — To M. DE MEUNIER. ix,
267. FORD ED., iv, 172. (P., 1786.)
469. . A due horror of the evils
which flow from these distinctions could be
excited in Europe only, where the dignity of
man is lost in arbitrary distinctions, where
the human species is classed into several
stages of degradation, where the many are
crushed under the weight of the few, and
where the order established can present to the
contemplation of a thinking being no other
picture than that of God Almighty and his
angels trampling under foot the host of the
damned. — To M. DE MEUNIER. ix, 270. FORD
ED., iv, 175. (P., 1786.)
470. . To know the mass of evil
which flows from this fatal source, a person
must be in France. He must see the finest
soil, the finest climate, the most compact
state, the most benevolent character of people,
and every earthly advantage combined, in
sufficient to prevent this scourge from ren
dering existence a curse to twenty-four out
of twenty-five parts of the inhabitants of this
country. — To GENERAL WASHINGTON, ii, 62.
FORD ED., iv, 329. (P., 1786.)
471. ARISTOCRACY, Insurrection
against. — But even in Europe a change has
sensibly taken place in the mind of man.
Science has liberated the ideas of those who
read and reflect, and the American example
has kindled feelings of right in the people.
An insurrection has consequently begun of
science, talents, and courage, against rank and
birth, which have fallen into contempt. It
has failed in its first effort, because the mobs
of the cities, the instrument used for its ac
complishment, debased by ignorance, poverty
and vice, could not be restrained to rational
action. But the world will soon recover from
the panic of this first catastrophe. Science is
progressive, and talents and enterprise are
on the alert. Resort may be had to the people
of the country, a more governable power from
their principles and subordination ; and rank,
and birth, and tinsel-aristocracv will finally
shrink into insignificance, even there. This,
however, we have no right to meddle with. It
suffices for us, if the moral and physical con
dition of our own citizens qualifies them to
select the able and good for the direction of
their government, with a recurrence of elec
tions at such short periods as will enable them
to displace an unfaithful servant, before the
mischief he meditates may be irremediable. —
To JOHN ADAMS, vi, 227. FORD ED., ix, 420.
(M., 1813.)
_ ARISTOCRACY, Kings, Priests and.
—See 472.
472. ARISTOCRACY, Liberty and.—
The complicated organization of kings, nobles,
and priests, is not the wisest or best to effect
the happiness of associated man. * * * The
trappings of such a machinery consume by
their expense those earnings of industry they
were meant to protect, and, by the inequalities
they produce, expose liberty to sufferance. —
To WILLIAM JOHNSON, vii, 291. FORD ED.,
x, 227. (M., 1823.)
Aristocracy
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
473. ARISTOCRACY, Religious.— The
law for religious freedom, * * * put down
the aristocracy of the clergy [in Vir
ginia ] and restored to the citizen the free
dom of the mind. — To JOHN ADAMS, vi, 226.
FORD ED., ix, 428. (M., 1813.)
474. ARISTOCRACY, Repressed by.— A
heavy aristocracy and corruption are two
bridles in the mouths of the Irish which will
prevent them from making any effectual ef
forts against their masters. — To JAMES MAD
ISON. FORD ED., iv, 38. (P., 1785.)
475. ARISTOCRACY, Reverence for.—
From what I have seen of Massachusetts and
Connecticut myself, and still more^from what
I have heard, and the character given of the
former by yourself, who know them so
much better, there seems to be in those two
States a traditionary reverence for certain
families, which has rendered the offices of the
government nearly hereditary in those fam
ilies. I presume that from an early period of
your history, members of those families hap
pening to possess virtue and talents, have
honestly exercised them for the good of the
people, and by their services have endeared
their names to them. In coupling Connecti
cut with you, I mean it politically only, not
morally. For haying made the Bible the com
mon law of their land, they seem to have
modeled their morality on the story of Jacob
and Laban. But although this hereditary suc
cession to office with you, may, in some de
gree, be founded in real family merit, yet in
a much higher degree, it has proceeded from
your strict alliance of Church and State.
Those families are canonized in the eyes of
the people on common principles, " you tickle
me, and I will tickle you."— To JOHN ADAMS.
vi, 224. FORD ED., ix, 426. (M., 1813.)
476. ARISTOCRACY, Royalty and.—
The [French] aristocracy [in 1788-9] was
cemented by a common principle of preserving
the ancient regime, or whatever should be
nearest to it. Making this their Polar star,
they moved in phalanx, gave preponderance
on every question to the minorities of the Pa
triots, and always to those who advocated the
least change. — AUTOBIOGRAPHY, i, 104. FORD
ED., i, 144. (l82I.)
— ARISTOCRACY, Trappings of.—
See 472-
477. ARISTOCRACY, Unpopular.— In
Virginia, we have no traditional reverence for
certain families. Our clergy, before the Rev
olution, having been secured against rival-
ship by fixed salaries, did not give themselves
the trouble of acquiring influence over the
people. Of wealth, there were great accum
ulations in particular families, handed down
from generation to generation, under the
English law of entails. But the only object
of ambition for the wealthy was a seat in the
King's council. All their court was paid to
the crown and its creatures; and they Philip-
ised in all collisions between the King and
the people. Hence they were unpopular ; and
that unpopularity continues attached to their
names. A Randolph, a Carter, or a Burwell
must have great personal superiority over a
common competitor to be elected by the
people even at this day. — To JOHN ADAMS, vi,
224. FORD ED., ix, 426. (M., 1813.)
478. ARISTOCRACY, Uprooting.— At
the first session of our Legislature after the
Declaration of Independence, we passed a
law abolishing entails. And this was fol
lowed by one abolishing the privilege of prim
ogeniture, and dividing the lands of intes
tates equally among all the children, or other
representatives. These laws, drawn by myself,
laid the axe to the root of pseudo-aristocracy.
And had another which I had prepared been
adopted by the Legislature, our work would
have been complete. It was a bill for the more
general diffusion of learning. — To JOHN
ADAMS, vi, 225. FORD ED., ix, 427. (M.,
1813.)
479. . I considered four of
these bills [of the Revised Code of Virginia]
* * * as forming a system by which every
fibre would be eradicated of ancient or future
aristocracy; and a foundation laid for a gov
ernment truly republican. The repeal of the
laws of entail would prevent the accumula
tion and perpetuation of wealth, in select fam
ilies, and preserve the soil of the country from
being daily more and more absorbed in mort
main. The abolition of primogeniture, and
equal partition of inheritances removed the
feudal and unnatural distinctions which made
one member of every family rich, and all the
rest poor, substituting equal partition, the
best of all Agrarian laws. The restoration of
the rights of conscience relieved the people
from taxation for the support of a religion not
theirs; for the Establishment was truly of
the religion of the rich, the dissenting sects
being entirely composed of the less wealthy
people ; and these, by the bill for a general
education, would be qualified to understand
their rights, to maintain them, and to exer
cise with intelligence their parts in self-gov
ernment ; and all this would be effected with
out the violation of a single natural right of
any one individual citizen. — AUTOBIOGRAPHY.
i, 49. FORD ED., i, 68. (1821.)
480. ARISTOCRACY IN" VIRGINIA.—
To state the difference between the classes of
society and the lines of demarcation which
separated them [in Virginia] would be diffi
cult. The law admitted none except as to our
twelve counsellors. Yet in a country insu
lated from the European world, insulated from
its sister colonies, with whom there was
scarcely any intercourse, little visited by for
eigners, and having little matter to act upon
within itself, certain families had risen to
splendor by wealth and the preservation of it
from generation to generation under the law
of entails ; some had produced a series of
men of talents ; families in general had re
mained stationary on the grounds of their
forefathers, for there was no emigration to the
westward in those days ; the wild Irish, who
had gotten possession of the valley between
the Blue Ridge and North Mountain, forming
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Aristocracy
Arms
a barrier over which none ventured to leap,
and would still less venture to settle among.
In such a state of things, scarcely admitting
any change of station, society would settle it
self down into several strata, separated by no
marked lines, but shading off imperceptibly
from top to bottom, nothing disturbing the
order of their repose. There were there aris
tocrats, half-breeds, pretenders, a solid yeo
manry, looking askance at those above yet
venturing to jostle them, and last and lowest,
a feculum of beings called overseers, the most
abject, degraded and unprincipled race, al
ways cap in hand to the Dons who employed
them, and furnishing materials for the exer
cise of their pride, insolence and spirit of
domination.— To WILLIAM WIRT. vi, 484.
FORD ED., ix, 473. (M., 1815.)
481. . You surprise me with the
account you give of the strength of family
distinction still existing in Massachusetts.
With us it is so totally extinguished, that not
a spark of it is to be found but working in the
hearts of some of our old tories ; but all bigot
ries hang to one another, and this in the East
ern States hangs, as I suspect, to that of the
priesthood. Here youth, beauty, mind and
manners, are more valued than a pedigree. —
To JOHN ADAMS, vi, 305. (M., 1814.)
482. ARISTOCRACY, Virtuous.— Na
ture has wisely provided an aristocracy of
virtue and talent for the direction of the in
terests of society, and scattered it with equal
hand through all its conditions. — AUTOBIOG
RAPHY, i, 36. FORD ED., i, 49. (1821.)
483. ARISTOCRACY OF WEALTH.—
An aristocracy of wealth [is] of more harm
and danger than benefit to society. — AUTO
BIOGRAPHY, i, 36. FORD ED., i, 49. (1821.)
484. ARISTOCRATS, Impotent.— We,
too. have our aristocrats and monocrats, and
as they float on the surface, they show much
though they weigh little. — To J. P. BRISSOT
DE WARVILLE. FORD ED., vi, 249. (Pa., 1793.)
485. ARISTOCRATS, The People and.—
Aristocrats fear the people, and wish to trans
fer all power to the higher classes of society.
— To WILLIAM SHORT, vii, 391. FORD ED., x,
335- (M., 1825.)
486. ARISTOTLE, Writings of.— So
different was the style of society then, and
with those people, from what it is now and
with us, that I think little edification can be
obtained from their writings on the subject of
government. They had just ideas of the value
of personal liberty, but none at all of the
structure of government best calculated to
preserve it. They knew no medium between
a democracy (the only pure republic, but im
practicable beyond the limits of a town) and
an abandonment of themselves to an aristoc
racy, or a tyranny independent of the people.
It seems not to have occurred that where the
citizens can not meet to transact their business
in person, they alone have the right to choose
the agents who shall transact it ; and that in
this way a republican, or popular government,
of the second grade of purity, may be exer
cised over any extent of country. The full
experiment of a government, democratical,
but representative, was and is still reserved
for us. * * * The introduction of this new
principle of representative democracy has ren
dered useless almost everything written before
on the structure of government; and, in a
great measure, relieves our regret, if the po
litical writings of Aristotle, or of any other
ancient, have been lost, or are unfaithfully
rendered or explained to us. — To ISAAC H.
TIFFANY, vii, 32. (M., 1816.)
— ARITHMETIC.— See MATHEMATICS.
487. ARMS, Loan of.— I am in hopes that
your State [New York] will provide by the
loan of arms for your immediate safety. — To
JACOB J. BROWN, v, 240. (W. 1808.)
488. - — . I enclose you * * * an
application from * * * citizens of New York,
residing on the St. Lawrence and Lake On
tario, setting forth their defenceless situation
for the want of arms, and praying to be
furnished from the magazines of the United
States. Similar applications from other parts
of our frontier in every direction have suffi
ciently shown that did the laws permit such a
disposition of the arms of the United States,
their magazines would be completely exhausted,
and nothing would remain for actual war. But
it is only when troops take the field, that the
arms of the United States can be delivered to
them. For the ordinary safety of the citizens
of the several States, whether against dangers
within or without, their reliance must be on
the means to be provided by their respective
States. Under the circumstances I have
thought it my duty to transmit to you the rep
resentation received, not doubting that you will
have done for the safety of our fellow citizens,
on a part of our frontier so interesting and
so much exposed, what their situation requires,
and the means under your control may permit.
— To GOVERNOR TOMPKINS. v, 238. (W.,
1808.)
489. ARMS, Right to bear.— No freeman
shall be debarred the use of arms [within his
own lands].* — PROPOSED VA. CONSTITUTION.
FORD ED., ii, 27. (June, 1776.)
—ARMS OF CABOT FAMILY.— See
BIRDS.
490. ARMS, Device for the American
States. — A proper device (instead of arms)
for the American states united would be the
Father presenting the bundle of rods to his
sons. The motto " Insuperabiles si Insepara-
biles " , an answer given in part to the H. of
Lds & Comm. 4. Inst. 35. He cites 4. H. 6.
ru. 12. parl. rolls, which I suppose was the time
it happd. f — FORD ED., i, 420.
* Brackets by Jefferson.— EDITOR.
t This is a note written in Jefferson's copy of the
Virginia Almanack for — 1774. All his other entries in
this volume are contemporary with the date of the al
manac, and if, as all the internal evidence indicates,
this was also written at that time, it is not merely in
teresting as a proposed emblem, but even more so as
the earliest reference to the u American States." In a
letter of John Adams (Familiar Letters, 211), Aug. 4,
1776, on the subject of the national arms, is the follow
ing : " Mr. Jefferson proposed the children of Israel
in the wilderness, led by a cloud by day and a pillar
of fire by night ; and on the other side, Hengist and
Horsa, the Saxon chiefs from whom we claim the
honor of being descended, and whose political prin
ciples and forms of government we have assumed."
—NOTE IN FORD'S ED.
Arms
Army
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
491. ABMS, Device for Virginia State.
—I like the device of the first side of the seal
[for Virginia] much. The second I think, is
too much crowded, nor is the design so strik
ing. But for God's sake what is the " Deus
twbis haze otia facit " ! It puzzles everybody
here. If my country really enjoys that otium
it is singular, as every other Colony seems
to be hard struggling. I think it was agreed
on before Dunmore's flight from Gwyn's
Island, so that it can hardly be referred to the
temporary holiday that was given you. This
device is too enigmatical. Since it puzzles
now, it will be absolutely insoluble fifty years
hence. — To JOHN PAGE. FORD ED., ii, 70. (Pa.,
1776.)
492. ARMS OF JEFFERSON FAMILY.
—Search the Herald's office for the arms of
my family. I have what I have been told were
the family arms, but on what authority I know
not. It is possible there may be none. If so,
I would with your assistance become a pur
chaser, having Sterne's word for it that a coat
of arms may be purchased as cheap as any other
coat. — To THOMAS ADAMS. FORD ED., i, 388.
(M., 1771.)
493. ARMSTRONG (John), Hostility
against. — An unjust hostility against Gen
eral Armstrong will, I am afraid, show itself
whenever any treaty [with Spain] made by
him shall be offered for ratification. — To
WILSON C. NICHOLAS, v, 4. FORD ED., viii.
435. (W., April 1806.)
494. ARMSTRONG (John), Secretary
of War. — I have long ago in my heart con
gratulated my country on your call to the
place you now occupy. * * * Whatever you
do in office, I know will be honestly and ably
done, and although we who do not see the
whole ground may sometimes impute error,
it will be because we, not you, are in the
wrong ; or because your views are defeated by
the wickedness or inc9mpetence of those you
are obliged to trust with their execution. — To
GENERAL JOHN ARMSTRONG, vi, 103. (M., Feb.
1813-)
495. . Armstrong is presumptu
ous, obstinate and injudicious. — To J. W.
EPPES. FORD ED., ix, 484. (M., 1814.)
496. ARMY, Adverse to large.— The
spirit of this country is totally adverse to a
large military force. — To CHANDLER PRICE.
v, 47- (W., 1807.)
497. ARMY, Control over.— I like the
declaration of rights as far as it goes, but I
should have been for going further. For in
stance, the following alterations and additions
would have pleased me: * * * Article 10.
All troops of the United States shall stand
ipso facto disbanded, at the expiration of the
term for which their pay and subsistence shall
have been last voted by Congress, and all of
ficers and soldiers, not natives of^the^United
States, shall be incapable of serving in their
armies by land except during a foreign war. —
To JAMES MADISON, iii, 101. FORD ED., v,
113. (P., Aug. 1789.)
498. ARMY, Deserters.— Deserters [Brit
ish] ought never to be enlisted [by us].— To
JAMES MADISON. FORD ED v ix, 128. (M., 1807.)
499. ARMY, Deserters from Enemy's.
— American citizens, * * * whether im
pressed or enlisted into the British service,
* * * [are] equally right in returning to
:he duties they owe their own country. — To
JAMES MADISON, v, 173. FORD ED., ix, 128.
(M., Aug. 1807.)
500. . Resolved, that [Con
gress] will give all such of the * * * foreign
[Hessian] officers as shall leave the armies of
his Britannic Majesty in America, and choose
to become citizens of these States, unappro
priated lands in the following quantities and
proportions to them and their heirs in abso
lute dominion.* — CONGRESS RESOLUTION. FORD
ED., ii, 89. (August 1776.)
501. ARMY, Discipline of.— The British
consider our army * * * a rude, undisci
plined rabble. I hope they will find it a
Bunker's Hill rabble. — To FRANCIS EPPES.
FORD ED., ii, 77. (Pa., Aug. 1776.)
502. ARMY, Enlistments in.— Tardy
enlistments proceed from the happiness of our
people at home. — To JAMES MONROE, vi, 130.
(M., June 1813.)
503. . Our men are so happy at
home that they will not hire themselves to
be shot at for a shilling a day. Hence we can
have no standing armies for defence, because
we have no paupers to furnish the materials.
—To THOMAS COOPER, vi, 379. (M., 1814.)
504. ARMY, Fear of.— How happy that
our army had been disbanded [before the
Presidential crisis of 1801] ! What might
have happened otherwise seems rather a sub
ject of reflection than explanation. — To
NATHANIEL NILES. iv, 377. FORD ED., viii,
24. (W., March 1801.)
505. ARMY, Increase of. — An act has
passed for raising upon the regular establish
ment for the war 3000 additional troops and a
corps of 300 more, making in the whole about
5000 men. To this I was opposed from a con
viction they were useless and that 1200 or
1500 woodsmen would soon end the [Indian]
war, and at a trifling expense. — To ARCHI
BALD STUART. FORD ED., v, 454. (Pa., March
1792.)
506. . It is agreed [in cabinet]
that about 15000 regular troops will be req
uisite for garrisons, and about as many more
as a disposable force, making in the whole
30,000 regulars. — ANAS. FORD ED., i, 329.
(July 1807.)
507. . We are raising some
regulars in addition to our present force, for
garrisoning our seaports, and forming a nu
cleus for the militia to gather to. — To GEN
ERAL KOSCIUSKO. v, 282. (W., May 1808.)
508. ARMY, Inefficiency in.— I thank
you for the military manuals. * * * This is
the sort of book most needed in our country,
where even the elements of tactics are un
known. The young have never seen service,
the old are past it, and of those among them
who are not superannuated themselves, their
* Jefferson, Franklin and Adams reported this res
olution which was adopted.— EDITOR.
53
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Army
science is become so. — To WILLIAM DUANE.
vi, 75. FORD ED., ix, 365. (M., 1812.)
509. ARMY, A mercenary.— He [George
III.] has endeavored to pervert the exercise
of the kingly office in Virginia into a detest
able and insupportable tyranny * * * by
transporting at this time a large army of for
eign mercenaries [to complete] the works of
death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun
with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy so
unworthy the head of a civilized nation. —
PROPOSED VA. CONSTITUTION. FORD ED., ii,
ii. (June 1776.)
510. . He is at this time, trans
porting large armies of foreign mercenaries
to complete the works of death, desolation,
and tyranny, already begun, with circum
stances of cruelty and perfidy* unworthy the
head of a civilized nation. — DECLARATION OF
INDEPENDENCE AS DRAWN BY JEFFERSON.
511. . At this very time, too,
they [British people] are permitting their
chief magistrate to send over not only sol
diers of our common blood, but Scotch and
foreign mercenaries to invade and destroy us.
— DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE AS DRAWN
BY JEFFERSON.
512. ARMY, Morality in.— It is more a
subject of joy [than of regret] that we have so
few of the desperate characters which com
pose modern regular armies. But it proves
more forcibly the necessity of obliging every
citizen to be a soldier ; this was the case with
the Greeks and Romans, and must be that of
every free State. Where there is no oppres
sion there can be no pauper hirelings. — To
JAMES MONROE, vi, 130. (M., June 1813.)
513. ARMY, An obedient.— Some think
the [French] army could not be depended on
by the government ; but the breaking men to
military discipline, is breaking their spirits to
principles of passive obedience. — To JOHN
JAY. ii, 392. (P., 1788.)
514. ARMY, Obligations to the.— We
feel with you our obligations to the army
in general, and will particularly charge our
selves with the interests of those confidential
officers, who have attended your person to
this affecting moment. — CONGRESS TO WASH
INGTON SURRENDERING HIS COMMISSION.
(Dec. 1783.)
515. ARMY, Overpowering.— There is
neither head nor body in the [French] nation
to promise a successful opposition to two
hundred thousand regular troops.— To JOHN
JAY. ii, 392. (P., 1788.)
516. ARMY, The People as an.— I am
satisfied the good sense of the people is the
strongest army our government can ever
have, and that it will not fail them.— To
WILLIAM CARMICHAEL. ii, 81. FORD ED., iv,
346. (P., 1786.)
* Congress inserted after " perfidy " the words
u scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages and
totally . "—EDITOR.
t Congress struck out this passage.— EDITOR.
517. — . I am persuaded myself
that the good sense of the people will al
ways be found to be the best Army. — To
EDWARD CARRINGTON. ii, 99. FORD ED., iv,
359- (P., 1787.)
518. ARMY, Reduction of. — A statement
has been formed by the Secretary of War
* * * of all the posts and stations where gar
risons will be expedient, and of the number
of men requisite for each garrison. The
whole amount is considerably short of the
present military establishment. For the surplus
no particular use can be pointed out. For de
fence against invasion, their number is as
nothing; nor is it conceived needful or safe
that a standing army should be kept up in
time of peace for that purpose. — FIRST AN
NUAL MESSAGE, viii, n. FORD ED., viii, 121.
(Dec. 1801.)
519. . The army is undergoing a
chaste reformation. — To NATHANIEL MACON.
iv, 397. (W., May 1801.)
520. — . The session of the first
Congress convened since republicanism has
recovered its ascendency * * * will pretty
completely fulfil all the desires of the people.
They have reduced the army * * * to what
is barely necessary. — To GENERAL KOSCIUSKO.
iv, 430. (W., April 1802.)
521. — . We are now actually en
gaged in reducing our military establishment
one-third, and discharging one-third of our
officers. We keep in service no more than
men enough to garrison the small posts dis
persed at great distances on our frontiers,
which garrisons will generally consist of a
captain's company only, and in no cases of
more than two or three, in not one, of a suf
ficient number to require a field officer. * — To
GENERAL KOSCIUSKO. iv, 430. (W., April
1802.)
522. ARMY, Regulation of.— The wise
proposition of the Secretary of War for fill
ing our ranks with regulars, and putting our
militia into an effective form, seems to be
laid aside. — To M. CORREA. vi, 406. (M.,
Dec. 1814.)
523. - — . To supply the want of
men, nothing more wise or efficient could
have been imagined than what you proposed.
It would have filled our ranks with regulars,
and that, too, by throwing a just share of the
burthen on the purses of those whose per
sons are exempt either by age or office; and
it would have rendered our militia, like those
of the Greeks and Romans, a nation of war
riors. — To JAMES MONROE, vi, 408. FORD
ED., ix, 497. (M., Jan. 1815.)
524. . Nothing wiser can be de
vised than what the Secretary of War (Mon
roe) proposed in his report at the commence
ment of Congress. It would have kept our
regular army always of necessity full, and
by classing our militia according to ages,
would have put them into a form ready for
* Kosciusko had written to Jefferson, recommend
ing Polish officers for employment.— EDITOR.
Army
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
54
whatever service, distant or at home, should
require them. — To W. H. CRAWFORD, vi, 418.
FORD ED., ix, 502. (M., Feb. 1815.)
525. ARMY, Seniority in.— We received
from Colonel R. H. Lee a resolution of Con
vention, recommending us to endeavor that
the promotions of the officers be according to
seniority without regard to regiments or com
panies. In one instance, indeed, the Congress
reserved to themselves a right of departing
from seniority; that is where a person either
out of the line of command, or in an inferior
part of it, has displayed eminent talents. Most
of the general officers have been promoted in
this way. Without this reservation, the whole
continent must have been supplied with gen
eral officers from the Eastern Colonies, where
a large army was formed and officered before
any other colony had occasion to raise troops
at all, and a number of experienced, able and
valuable officers must have been lost to the
public merely from the locality of their situa
tion. — To GOVERNOR PATRICK HENRY. FORD
ED., ii, 67. (Pa., 1776.)
526. . We [Congress] wait your
recommendation for the two vacant majori
ties. Pray regard militaryment alone. — To
JOHN PAGE. FORD ED., ii, 88. (Pa., 1776.)
527.
-. Several vacancies having
happened in our battalions, we [Congress]
are unable to have them filled for want of a
list of the officers, stating their seniority. We
must beg the favor of you to furnish us
with one. — To GOVERNOR HENRY. FORD ED.,
ii, 67. (Pa., 1776.)
528. . The unfortunate obstinacy
of the Senate in preferring the greatest block
head to the greatest military genius, if one
day longer in commission, renders it doubly
important to sift well the candidates for com
mand in new corps, and to marshal them at
first, towards the head, in proportion to their
qualifications.— To GENERAL ARMSTRONG.
FORD ED., ix, 380. (M., Feb. 1813.)
529. - — . There is not, I believe,
a service on earth where seniority is per
mitted to give a right to advance beyond the
grade of captain. — To GENERAL ARMSTRONG.
FORD ED., ix, 380. (M., Feb. 1813.)
530. . We are doomed. * * * to
sacrifice the lives of our citizens by thousands
to this blind principle, for fear the peculiar in
terest and responsibility of our Executive
should not be sufficient to guard his selection
of officers against favoritism. — To GENERAL
ARMSTRONG. FORD ED., ix, 380. (M., 1813.)
531. — . When you have new corps
to raise you are free to prefer merit : and our
mechanical law of promotion, when once
men have been set in their places, makes it
most interesting indeed to place them origi
nally according to their capacities. It is not
for me even to ask whether in the raw regi
ments now to be raised, it would not be ad
visable to draw from the former the few
officers who may already have discovered
military talent, and to bring them forward
in the new corps to those higher grades, to
which, in the old, the blocks in their way do
not permit you to advance them? — To GEN
ERAL ARMSTRONG. FORD ED., ix, 380. (M.,
Feb. 1813.) See GENERALS.
532. ARMY, A standing.— Standing ar
mies [are] inconsistent with the freedom [of
the Colonies], and subversive of their quiet. —
REPLY TO LORD NORTH'S PROPOSITION. FORD
ED., i, 477. (July 1775.)
533. . There shall be no stand
ing army but in time of actual war. — PRO
POSED VA. CONSTITUTION. FORD ED., ii, 27.
(June 1776.)
534 . He [George III.] has en
deavored to pervert the exercise of the kingly
office in Virginia into a detestable and in
supportable tyranny * * * by [keeping
among us], in time of peace, standing armies
and ships of war. — PROPOSED VA. CONSTITU
TION. FORD ED., ii, 10. (June 1776.)
535. . He has kept among us, in
times of peace, standing armies and ships of
war * without the consent of our legislatures.
— DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE AS DRAWN
BY JEFFERSON.
536. . I do not like [in the new
Federal Constitution] the omission of a bill of
rights, providing clearly and without the aid
of sophisms for * * * protection
against standing armies. — To JAMES MADI
SON, ii, 329. FORD ED., iv, 476. (P., Dec.
1787.)
537. . I sincerely rejoice at the
acceptance of our new Constitution by nine
States. It is a good canvas, on which some
strokes only want retouching. What these
are, I think are sufficiently manifested by the
general voice from north to south, which
calls for a bill of rights. It seems pretty
generally understood that this should go to
* * * standing armies. * * * If no
check can be found to keep the number of
standing troops within safe bounds, while
they are tolerated as far as necessary, aban
don them altogether, discipline well the mi
litia, and guard the magazines with them.
More than magazine guards will be useless if
few, and dangerous if many. No European
nation can ever send against us such a regu
lar army as we need fear, and it is hard if
our militia are not equal to those of Canada,
or Florida. — To JAMES MADISON, ii, 445.
FORD ED., v, 45. (P., July 1788.)
538.
. By declaration of rights, I
mean one which shall stipulate *
standing armies. — To A. DONALD, ii, 355. (P.,
1788.)
539. . There are instruments so
dangerous to the rights of the nation, and
which place them so totally at the mercy of
their governors, that those governors,
whether legislative or executive, should be
restrained from keeping such instruments on
foot, but in well-defined cases. Such an in-
* Congress struck out " and ships of war." — EDITOR,
55
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Army
a standing army. — To DAVID
iii, 13. FORD ED., v, 90. (P.,
strument is
HUMPHREYS
1789.)
540. . I hope a militia bill will
be passed. Anything is preferable to nothing,
as it takes away one of the arguments for a
standing army. — To ARCHIBALD STUART. FORD
ED., v, 454. (Pa., 1792.)
541. . I am not for a standing
army in time of peace, which may overawe
the public sentiment.— To ELBRIDGE GERRY.
iv, 268. FORD ED., vii, 328. (Pa., I799-)
542. . Bonaparte has transferred
the destinies of the republic from the civil
to the military arm. Some will use this as a
lesson against the practicability of republican
government. I read it as a lesson against the
danger of standing armies. — To SAMUEL
ADAMS, iv, 322. FORD ED., vii, 425. (Pa., Feb.
1800.)
543. . It is not conceived need
ful or safe that a standing army should be
kept up in time of peace for defence against
invasion. — FIRST ANNUAL MESSAGE, viii, n.
FORD ED., 121. (1801.)
544. . I hope Kentucky will
* * * finish the matter [Burr's enterprise]
for the honor of popular government, and the
discouragement of all arguments for standing
armies.— To REV. CHARLES CLAY, v, 28.
FORDED., ix, 7. (W., 1807.)
545. . We propose to raise
seven regiments only for the present year, de
pending always on our militia for the opera
tions of the first year of war. On any other
plan, we should be obliged always to keep a
large standing army.— To CHARLES PINCK-
NEY. v, 266. (W., March 1808.)
546. . The Greeks and Romans
had no standing armies, yet they defended
themselves. The Greeks by their laws, and
the Romans by the spirit of their people, took
care to put into the hands of their rulers no
such engine of oppression as a standing army.
Their system was to make every man a sol
dier, and oblige him to repair to the standard
of his country whenever that was reared.
This made them invincible; and the same
remedy will make us so. — To THOMAS
COOPER, vi, 379- (M., 1814.)
547. ARMY, Threatened by an.— We
cannot, my lord, close with the terms of that
Resolution, [Lord North's conciliatory propo
sitions] * * * because at the very time
of requiring from us grants, they are making
disposition to invade us with large armaments
by sea and land, which is a style of asking
gifts not reconcilable to our freedom.' — AD
DRESS TO LORD DUN MORE. FORD ED., i, 457.
(I775-)
548. ARMY, An unnecessary.— One of
my favorite ideas is, never to keep an un
necessary soldier.— THE ANAS, ix, 431. FORD
ED., i, 198. (1792-)
549. . Were armies to be raised
whenever a speck of war is visible in our
horizon, we never should have been without
them. Our resources would have been ex
hausted on dangers which have never hap
pened, instead of being reserved for what is
really to take place. — SIXTH ANNUAL MES
SAGE, viii, 69. FORD ED., viii, 495. (Dec.
1806.)
550. ARMY, An unauthorized.— When,
in the course of the late war, it became ex
pedient that a body of Hanoverian troops
should be brought over for the defence of
Great Britain, his Majesty's grandfather, our
late sovereign, did not pretend to introduce
them under any authority he possessed. Such
a measure would have given just alarm to
his subjects in Great Britain, whose liberties
would not be safe if armed men of another
country, and of another spirit, might be
brought into the realm at any time without
the consent of their legislature. He, there
fore, applied to Parliament, who passed an
act for that purpose, limiting the number to
be brought in, and the time they were to con
tinue. In like manner is his Majesty re
strained in every part of the empire. — RIGHTS
OF BRITISH AMERICA, i, 140. FORD ED., i,
445- (I774-)
551. . He has combined with
others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign
to our constitutions, and unacknowledged by
our laws; giving his assent to their acts of
pretended legislation for quartering large
bodies of armed troops among us; for pro
tecting them by a mock trial from punish
ment for any murders which they should
commit on the inhabitants of these States. —
DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE AS DRAWN BY
JEFFERSON.
552 . He [George III.] has
endeavored to pervert the exercise of the
kingly office in Virginia into a detestable and
insupportable tyranny * * * by com
bining with others to subject us to a foreign
jurisdiction, giving his assent to their pre
tended acts of legislation for quartering large
bodies of armed troops among us. — PROPOSED
VA. CONSTITUTION. FORD ED., ii, 10. (June
1776.)
553. . in order to enforce [his]
arbitrary measures * * * his Majesty
has, from time to time, sent among us large
bodies of armed forces, not made up of the
people here, nor raised by authority of our
laws. Did his Majesty possess such a right
as this, it might swallow up all our other
rights whenever he should think proper. But
his Majesty has no right to land a single
armed man on our shores, and those whom he
sends here are liable to our laws made for
the suppression and punishment of riots, and
unlawful assemblies ; or are hostile bodies,
invading us in defiance of the law. — RIGHTS
OF BRITISH AMERICA, i, 140. FORD ED., i, 445.
(I774-)
554. . The proposition [of Lord
North] is altogether unsatisfactory * * *
because it does not propose to repeal the acts
of Parliament * * * for quartering sol-
Arnold (Benedict)
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
56
diers on us in times of profound peace. — RE
PLY TO LORD NORTH'S PROPOSITION. FORD ED.,
i, 480. (July I775-)
555. ARMY, A volunteer.— [With re
spect to] the proposition for substituting
32,000 twelve-month volunteers instead of
15,000 regulars as a disposable force, I like
the idea much. It will, of course, be a subject
of consideration when we all meet again, but
I repeat that I like it greatly.— To GENERAL
DEARBORN, v, 155. FORD ED., ix, 123. (M.,
Aug. 1807.)
556. . General Dearborn has
sent me a plan of a war establishment
for 15,000 regulars for garrisons, and in
stead of 15,000 others, as a disposable
force, to substitute 32,000 twelve-month
volunteers, to be exercised and paid three
months in the year, and consequently cost
ing no more than 8,000 permanent, giving
us the benefit of 32,000 for any expedition,
who would be themselves nearly equal to
regulars, but could on occasion be put into
the garrisons, and the regulars employed in
the expedition prima facie. I like it well. —
To JAMES MADISON, v, 154. FORD ED., ix,
123. (M., Aug. 1807.) See WAR.
557. ARMY, (French), Dangerous
standing.— The French flatter themselves
they shall form a, better Constitution than the
English one. I think it will be better in some
points — worse in others. * * * It will
be worse, as their situation obliges them to
keep up the dangerous machine of a standing
army. — To DR. PRICE, ii, 557. (P., Jan.
1789.)
558. ARMY (French), Decision by the.
— If the appeal to arms is made fin France]
it will depend entirely on the disposition of
the army whether it issue in liberty or des
potism. — To E. RUTLEDGE. ii, 435. FORD ED.,
v, 42. (P., 1788.)
559. ARMY OFFICERS, Accountabil
ity of. — Whereas it is apprehended that
sufficient care and attention hath not been
always had by officers to the cleanliness, to
the health and to the comfort of the soldiers
entrusted to their command, Be it therefore
enacted, that so long as any troops from this
Commonwealth [Virginia] shall be in any ser
vice to the northward thereof, it shall and may
be lawful for our delegates in Congress, and
they are hereby required from time to time
to enquire into the state and condition of the
troops, and the conduct of the officers com
manding ; and where any troops, raised in this
Commonwealth, are upon duty within the same,
or anywhere to the southward, there the
Governor and Council are required to make
similar enquiry by such ways or means as shall
be in their power : and whensoever it shall be
found that any officer, appointed by this Com
monwealth, shall have been guilty of negli
gence, or want of fatherly care, of the sol
diers under his command, they are hereby re
spectively required to report to this Assembly
the whole truth of the case, who hereby re
serve to themselves a power of removing such
officer ; and whenever they shall find that such
troops shall have suffered through the negli
gence or inattention of any officer of Conti
nental appointment, they are, in like manner,
to make report thereof to this Assembly, whose
duty it will be to represent the same to Con
gress : and they are further respectively re
quired, from time to time, to procure and lay
before this Assembly exact returns of the
numbers and conditions of such of their troops.
— ARMY BILL. FORD ED., ii, 115. (1776.)
560. ARMY OFFICERS, Foreign.— I
believe I mentioned to you, on a former occa
sion, that the last act of Congress for raising
additional troops required that the officers,
should all be citizens of the United States.
Should there be war, however, I am persuaded
this policy must be abandoned, and that we
must avail ourselves of the experience of other
nations, in certain lines of service at least. —
To AMELOT DE LA CROIX. v, 422. (W., Feb
1809.)
561. ARMY OFFICERS, Prosecutions
of.— Many officers of the army being in
volved in the offence of intending a military
enterprise [Burr's] against a nation at peace
with the United States, to remove the whole
without trial, by the paramount authority of the
executive, would be a proceeding of unusual
gravity. Some line must, therefore, be drawn
to separate the more from the less guilty. The
only sound one which occurs to me is between
those who believed the enterprise was with the
approbation of the government, open or secret,
and those who meant to proceed in defiance of
the government. Concealment would be no line
at all, because all concealed it. Applying the
line of defiance to the case of Lieutenant Mead,
it does not appear by any testimony I have seen,
that he meant to proceed in defiance of the gov
ernment, but, on the contrary, that he was made
to believe the government approved of the ex
pedition. If it be objected that he concealed a
part of what had taken place in his communica
tions to the Secretary of War, yet if a conceal
ment of the whole would not furnish a proper
line of distinction, still less would the conceal
ment of a part. This too would be a removal
for prevarication, not for unauthorized enter
prise, and could not be a proper ground for ex
ercising the extraordinary power of removal
by the President. — To GENERAL DEARBORN, v,
60. FORD ED., ix, 38. (W., March 1807.)
562. ARMY OFFICERS, Undesirable
French. — I would not advise that the French
gentlemen should come here. [Philadelphia.]
We have so many of that country, and have
been so much imposed on that the Congress
begins to be sore on that head. * * * If
you approve of the Chevalier de St. Aubin, why
not appoint him yourselves, as your troops of
horse are colonial, not continental ?— To JOHN
PAGE. FORD ED., ii, 70. (Pa., 1776.)
563. ARNOLD (Benedict), Expedition
to Quebec. — The march of Arnold [to Que
bec] is equal to Xenophon's retreat. — To JOHN
PAGE. FORD ED., i, 496. (i775-)
564. . I never understood that
Arnold formed this enterprise, nor do I believe
he did. I heard and saw all General Wash
ington's letters on this subject. I do not think
he mentioned Arnold as author of the proposi
tion ; yet he was always just in ascribing to
every officer the merit of his own works ; and
he was disposed particularly in favor of
Arnold. This officer is entitled to great merit
in the execution, but to ascribe to him that of
having formed the enterprise, is probably to
ascribe to him what belongs to General Wash-
57
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Arnold (Benedict)
Artisans
ington or some other person. — ANSWERS TO
M. SOULES. ix, 301. FORD ED., iv, 300. (P.,
1786.)
565. . General Arnold, (a fine
sailor) has undertaken to command our fleet on
the Lakes. — To FRANCIS EPPES. FORD ED. ii,
77. (Pa., 1776.)
566. ARNOLD (Benedict), RewarcJ for
capture of. — It is above all things desirable
to drag Arnold from those under whose wing
he is now sheltered. On his march to and from
this place [Richmond], I am certain it might
have been done with facility by men of enter
prise and firmness. I think it may still be
done. * * * Having peculiar confidence in
the men from the western side of the moun
tains, I meant, as soon as they should come
down, to get the enterprise proposed to a
chosen number of them : such whose courage
and whose fidelity would be above all doubt.
Your perfect knowledge of those men person
ally, and my confidence in your discretion, in
duce me to ask you to pick from among them
proper characters, in such number as you think
best, to reveal to them our desire, and engage
them to undertake to seize and bring off this
greatest of all traitors. Whether this may be
best effected by their going in (within the Brit
ish lines) as friends and awaiting their oppor
tunity, or otherwise, is left to themselves. The
smaller the number the better, so that they be
sufficient to manage him. Every necessary cau
tion must be used on their part, to prevent a
discovery of their design by the enemy ; as,
should they be taken, the laws of war will jus
tify against them the most rigorous sentence.
I will undertake, if they are successful in bring
ing him off alive, that they shall receive five
thousand guineas reward among them. And to
men, formed for such an enterprise, it must be
a great incitement to know that their names will
be recorded with glory in history, with those of
Van Wart, Paulding and Williams.*— To .
i, 289. FORD ED., ii, 441. (R., 1781.)
567. ARNOLD (Benedict), Treason of.
—The parricide Arnold. — To GENERAL
WASHINGTON, i, 284. FORD ED., ii, 408. (R.,
1781.)
568. ART, Selecting works of.— With
respect to the figures, I could only find three of
those you named, matched in size. Those were
Minerva, Diana and Apollo. I was obliged to
add a fourth, unguided by your choice. They
offered me a fine Venus ; but I thought it out
of taste to have two at table at the same time.
Paris and Helen were represented. I conceived
it would be cruel to remove them from their
peculiar shrine. When they shall pass the At
lantic, it will be to sing a requiem over our
freedom and happiness. At length a fine Mars
was offered, calm, bold, his falchion not drawn
but ready to be drawn. This will do, thinks
I. for the table of the American Minister in
London, where those whom it may concern may
look and learn that though Wisdom is our
guide, and the Song and Chase our supreme
delight, yet we offer adoration to that tutelar
God also who rocked the cradle of our birth,
who has accepted our infant offerings, and has
shown himself the patron of our rights and
avenger of our wrongs. The group then was
closed and your party formed. Envy and mal
ice will never be quiet. I hear it already whis-
* This letter is without an address, but, it is thought
was written to General George Rogers Clark or to
General Muhlenberg. Jefferson was Governor of
Virginia.— EDITOR,
pered to you that in admitting Minerva to your
table, I have departed from the principle which
made me reject Venus; in plain English that
I have paid a just respect to the daughter but
failed to the mother. No, Madam, my respect
to both is sincere. Wisdom, I know, is social.
She seeks her fellows, but Beauty is jealous,
and illy bears the presence of a rival. — To MRS.
JOHN ADAMS. FORD ED., iv, 99. (P., 1785.)
569. ARTISANS, Americans as.— While
we have land to labor, let us never wish to
see our citizens occupied at a work-bench, or
twirling a distaff. Carpenters, masons, and
smiths, are wanting in husbandry ; but for
the general operations of manufacture, let
our workshops remain in Europe. — NOTES ON
VIRGINIA, viii, 405. FORD ED., iii, 269. (1782.)
570. ARTISANS, Condemnation of.— I
consider the class of artificers as the panders of
vice, and the instruments by which the liberties
of a country are generally overturned. — To
JOHN JAY. i, 404. FORD ED., iv, 88. (P.,
1785.)
571. ARTISANS, Explanation of views
on. — Mr. Duane informed me that he meant
to publish a new edition of the Notes on Vir
ginia, and I had in contemplation some particu
lar alterations which would require little time to
make. My occupations by no means permit me
at this time to revise the text, and make those
changes in it which I should now do. I should
in that case certainly qualify several expres
sions * * * which have been construed differ
ently from what they were intended. I had
under my eye, when writing, the manufacturers
of the great cities in the old countries, at the
time present, with whom the want of food and
clothing necessary to sustain life, has begotten
a depravity of morals, a dependence and corrup
tion, which render them an undesirable acces
sion to a country whose morals are sound. My
expressions looked forward to the time when
our great cities would get into the same state.
But they have been quoted as if meant for the
present time here. As yet our manufacturers
are as much at their ease, as independent and
moral as our agricultural inhabitants, and they
will continue so as long as there are vacant
lands for them to resort to ; because whenever
it shall be attempted by the other classes to re
duce them to the minimum of subsistence, they
will quit their trades and go to laboring the
earth. A first question is, whether it is desirable
for us to receive at present the dissolute and
demoralized handicraftsmen of the old cities of
Europe? A second and more difficult one is,
when even good handicraftsmen arrive here, is
it better for them to set up their trade, or go to
the culture of the earth ? Whether their labor
in their trade is worth more than their labor on
the soil, increased by the creative energies of
the earth ? Had I time to revise that chapter,
this question should be discussed, and other
views of the subject taken, which are presented
by the wonderful changes which have taken
place here since 1781, when the Notes on Vir
ginia were written. — To MR. LITHGOW. iv, 563.
FORD ED., iii, 269. (W., Jan. 1805.)
572. ARTISANS, French and English.
— The English mechanics certainly exceed all
others in some lines. But be just to your own
nation. They have not patience, it is true, to
sit rubbing a piece of steel from morning to
night, as a lethargic Englishman will do, full
charged with porter. But do not their benev
olence, their cheerfulness, their amiability,
Artisans
Assumption of State
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
when compared with the growling temper and
manners of the people among whom you are,
compensate their want of patience? — To MAD
AME DE CARNY. ii, 161. (P., 1787.)
573. ARTISANS, Science and.— The me
chanic needs ethics, mathematics, chemistry and
natural philosophy. To them the languages are
but ornament and comfort. — To JOHN BRAZIER.
vii, 133- (P- F., 1819.)
574. ARTISTS, Member of Society of.
— I am very justly sensible of the honor the
Society of Artists of the United States has done
me in making me an honorary member of their
Society. * * * I fear that I can be but a
very useless associate. Time which withers the
fancy, as the other faculties of the mind
and body presses on me with a heavy hand, and
distance intercepts all personal intercourse.
I can offer, therefore, but my zealous good
wishes for the success of the institution, and
that, embellishing with taste a country already
overflowing with the useful productions, it may
be able to give an innocent and pleasing direc
tion to accumulations of wealth, which would
otherwise be employed in the nourishment of
coarse and vicious habits. — To THOMAS SULLY.
vi, 34- (M., Jan. 1812.)
575. ARTS, Enthusiasm for the. — I am
an enthusiast on the subject of the arts. But
it is an enthusiasm of which I am not
ashamed, as its object is to improve the taste
of my countrymen, to increase their reputa
tion, to reconcile to them the respect of the
world, and procure them its praise. — To
JAMES MADISON, i, 433. (P., 1785-)
576. ARTS, French Excellence in. —
Were I to proceed to tell you how much 1
enjoy the architecture, sculpture, painting, mu
sic [of the French], I should want words. It
is in these arts they shine. — To MR. BELLINI.
i, 445- (P-, 1785.)
577. ARTS, Mechanical.— The mechan
ical arts in London are carried to a wonderful
perfection. But of these I need not speak, be
cause of them my countrymen have unfortu
nately* too many samples before their eyes. —
To JOHN PAGE, i, 550. FORD ED., iv, 214. (P.,
1786.)
578. ASSASSINATION, Government
and. — Assassination, poison, perjury * ;
were legitimate principles [of government] in
the dark ages which intervened between an
cient and modern civilization, but exploded
and held in just horror in the eighteenth
century.— To JAMES MADISON, iii, 99. FORD
ED., v, in. (P., 1789.)
— ASSEMBLIES.— See LEGISLATURES.
_ ASSENISIPIA, Proposed State of.—
See WESTERN TERRITORY.
579. ASSIGNATS, Payments in.— I
have communicated to the President what
passed between us * * * on the subject
of the payments made to France by the
United States in the assignats of that coun
try, since they have lost their par with gold
and silver; and after conferences, by his in
struction, with the Secretary of the Treas
ury, I am authorized to assure you, that the
* The allusion is to the extravagance of the period.
—EDITOR.
government of the United States have no idea
of paying their debt in a depreciated me
dium, and that in the final liquidation of the
payments * * : due regard will be had
to an equitable allowance for the circum
stance of depreciation.* — To JEAN BAPTISTE
TERNANT. FORD ED., v, 383. (Pa., Nov.
1791.)
580. ASSUMPTION OF STATE
DEBTS, Acrimony over.— The assumption
of State debts has appeared as revolting to
several States as their non-assumption to others.
It is proposed to strip the proposition of the in
justice it would have done by leaving the States
who have redeemed much of their debts on no
better footing than those who have redeemed
none ; on the contrary, it is recommended to as
sume a fixed sum, allotting a portion of it to
every State in proportion to its census. Con
sequently, every State will receive exactly what
they will have to pay, or they will be exonerated
so far by the General Government's taking their
creditors off their hands. There will be no in
justice then. But there will be the objection
still, that Congress must then lay taxes for
those debts which would have been much better
laid and collected by the State governments.
And this is the objection on which the accommo
dation now hangs with the non-assumptioners,
many of whom committed themselves in their
advocation of the new Constitution by argu
ments drawn from the improbability that Con
gress would ever lay taxes where the States
could do it separately. These gentlemen feel the
reproaches which will be levelled at them per
sonally. I have been, and still am of their opin
ion that Congress should always prefer letting
the States raise money in their own way, where
it can be done. But, in the present instance, I
see the necessity of yielding for this time to the
cries of the creditors in certain parts of the
Union ; for the sake of Union, and to save us
from the greatest of all calamities, the total ex
tinction of our credit in Europe. — To JAMES
MONROE, iii, 153. FORD ED., v, 188. (N. Y.,
June 1790.)
581. ASSUMPTION OF STATE
DEBTS, Compromise plans. — The question
for assuming the State debts has created greater
animosities than I ever yet saw take place on
any occasion. There are three ways in which
it may yet terminate, i. A rejection of the
measure, which will prevent their funding any
part of the public debt, and will be something
very like a dissolution of the government. 2.
A bargain between the Eastern members, who
have had it so much at heart, and the middle
members, who are indifferent about it, to adopt
those debts without any modification on condi
tion of removing the seat of government to
Philadelphia or Baltimore. 3. An adoption of
them with this modification., that the whole
sum to be assumed shall be divided among the
States in proportion to their census ; so that
each shall receive as much as they are to pay ;
and perhaps this might bring about so much
good humor as to induce them to give the tem
porary seat of government to Philadelphia, and
then to Georgetown permanently. It is evident
that this last is the least bad of all the turns the
thing can take. The only objection to it will be
* Jefferson's first draft of this letter ended as fol
lows : " And that they will take measures for making
these payments in their just value, avoiding all bene
fit from depreciation, and desiring on their part to
be guarded against any unjust loss from the circum
stances of mere exchange." It was changed to meet
Hamilton's views.— EDITOR.
i
59
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA Assumption of state
that Congress will then have to lay and collect
taxes to pay these debts, which could much bet
ter have been laid and collected by the State
governments. This, though an evil, is a less one
than any of the others in which it may issue,
and will probably give us the seat of government
at a day not very distant, which will vivify our
agriculture and commerce by circulating through
our State an additional sum every year of half a
million of dollars. — To DR. GEORGE GILMER. iii,
150. FORD ED., v, 192. (N. Y., June 1790.)
582. ASSUMPTION OF STATE
DEBTS, Credit, Union and. — Congress has
been long embarrassed by two of the most ir
ritating questions that can ever be raised among
them: i. The funding of the public debt; and
2, the fixing on a more central residence. After
exhausting their arguments and patience on
these subjects, they have for some time been
resting on their oars, unable to get along as to
these businesses, and indisposed to attend to
anything else till they are settled. And, in fine,
it has become probable that unless they can be
reconciled by some plan of compromise, there
will be no funding bill agreed to ; our credit
(raised by late prospects to be the first on the
exchange at Amsterdam, where our money is
above par), will burst and vanish, and the States
separate, to take care every one of itself. This
prospect appears probable to some well-informed
and well-disposed minds. Endeavors are, there
fore, using to bring about a disposition to some
mutual sacrifices. — To JAMES MONROE, iii, 153.
FORD ED., v, 187. (N. Y., June 1790.)
583. ASSUMPTION OF STATE
DEBTS, Federal capital and. — It is proposed
to pass an act fixing the temporary residence of
twelve or fifteen years at Philadelphia, and that
at the end of that time, it shall stand ipso facto,
and without further declaration transferred to
Georgetown. In this way, there will be some
thing to displease and something to soothe
every part of the Union but New York, which
must be contented with what she has had. If
this plan of compromise does not take place, I
fear one infinitely worse, an unqualified as
sumption, and the perpetual residence on the
Delaware. The Pennsylvania and Virginia dele
gates have conducted themselves honorably and
unexceptionably on the question of residence.
Without descending to talk about bargains, they
have seen that their true interests lay in not
listening to insidious propositions, made to di
vide and defect them, and we have seen them at
times voting against their respective wishes
rather than separate. — To JAMES MONROE, iii,
153- FORD ED., v, 189. (N. Y., June 1790.)
584. ASSUMPTION OF STATE
DEBTS, Justice and. — The assumption
must be admitted, but in so qualified a form as
to divest it of its injustice. This may be done
by assuring to the creditors of every State, a
sum exactly proportioned to the contribution of
the State; so that the State will on the whole
neither gain nor lose. There will remain against
the measure only the objection that Congress
must lay taxes for these debts which might be
better laid and collected by the States. — To
T. M. RANDOLPH. FORD ED., v, 185. (N. Y.
1790.)
585. - — . I am in hopes the as-
• sumption will be put into a jxist form, by assum
ing to the creditors of each State in proportion
to the census of each State, so that the State
will be exonerated towards its creditors just as
much as it will have to contribute to the as
sumption, and consequently no injustice done.
— To FRANCIS EPPES. FORD ED., v, 194. (N. Y.,
July 1790.)
586. ASSUMPTION OF STATE
DEBTS, Mutual sacrifices.— The impossi-
Dility that certain States could ever pay the
debts they had contracted, the acknowledgment
:hat nine-tenths of these debts were contracted
tor the general defence as much as those con
tracted by Congress directly, the clamors of the
creditors within those States, and the possi
bility that they might defeat the funding of any
part of the public debt, if theirs also were not
assumed, were motives not to be neglected. I
saw the first proposition for their assumption
with as much aversion as any man, but the de
velopment of circumstances have convinced me
that if it is obdurately rejected, something
much worse will happen. Considering it, there
fore, as one of the cases in which mutual sacri
fice and accommodation are necessary, I shall
see it pass with acquiescence. — To JOHN HAR-
VIE. FORD ED., v, 214. (N. Y., July 1790.)
587. ASSUMPTION OF STATE
DEBTS, Opposition engendered. — It is not
to be expected that our system of finance has
met your approbation in all its parts. It has
excited even here great opposition ; and more
especially that part of it which transferred the
State debts to the General Government. The
States of Virginia and North Carolina are pecu
liarly dissatisfied with this measure. I believe,
however, that it is harped on by many to mask
their disaffection to the government on other
grounds. — To GOUVERNEUR MORRIS, iii, 198.
FORD ED., v, 250. (Pa., Nov. 1790.)
588. ASSUMPTION OF STATE
DEBTS, Payment by States. — With respect
to the increase of the debt by the Assumption, I
observed to him [Washington] that what was
meant and objected to was, that it increased the
debt of the General Government, and carried it
beyond the possibility of payment ; that if the
balances had been settled, and the debtor States
directed to pay their deficiencies to the creditor
States, they would have done it easily, and by
resources of taxation in their power, and ac
ceptable to the people ; by a direct tax in the
South, and an excise in the North. — THE ANAS.
ix, 118. FORD ED., i, 200. (July 1792.)
589. ASSUMPTION OF STATE
DEBTS, Review of.— The game [Funding
the debt] was over, and another was on the car
pet at the moment of my arrival * [in New
York in 1790], and to this I was most igno-
rantly and innocently made to hold the candle.
This fiscal maneuvre is well known by the name
of the Assumption. Independently of the debts
of Congress, the States had, during the war,
contracted separate and heavy debts ; and Mas
sachusetts particularly in an absurd attempt,
absurdly conducted, on the British post of
Penobscott ; and the more debt Hamilton could
rake up the more plunder for his mercenaries.
This money, whether wisely or foolishly spent,
was pretended to have been spent for general
purposes, and ought, therefore, to be paid from
* Jefferson has here made the curious errors of
separating the funding and assumption act, and of
supposing the latter " was over " before he reached
New York. Hamilton's report was debated in the
House of Representatives from February to April,
and it was not till May 6th that the funding bill was
presented, the section relating to assumption having
been negatived in committee. This bill passed the
House on June zd, and in the Senate had the assump
tion section restored. Not till August 4th did the
bill so altered become a law.— NOTE IN FORD'S ED.
Assumption of State
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
60
the general purse. But it was objected that no
body knew what these debts were, what their
amount, or what their proofs. No matter ; we
will guess them to be twenty millions. But of
these twenty millions, we do not know how
much should be reimbursed to one State, nor
how much to another. No matter ; we will
guess. And so another scramble was set on
foot among the several States, and some got
much, some little, some nothing. But the main
object was attained, the phalanx of the treasury
was reinforced by additional recruits. This
measure produced the most bitter and angry
contests ever known in Congress, before or
since the Union of the States. I arrived in the
midst of it. But a stranger to the ground, a
stranger to the actors on it, so long absent [in
France] as to have lost all familiarity with the
subject, and as yet unaware of its object, I
took no concern in it. The great and trying
question, however, was lost in the House of
Representatives. So high were the feuds ex
cited by this subject, that on its rejection busi
ness was suspended. Congress met and ad
journed from day to day without doing any.
thing, the parties being too much out of temper
to dp business together. The Eastern members
particularly, who, with Smith from South Caro
lina, were the principal gamblers in these
scenes, threatened a secession and dissolution.
Hamilton was in despair. As I was going to
the President's one day, I met him in the
street. He walked me backwards and forwards
before the President's door for half an hour.
He painted pathetically the temper into which
the Legislature had been wrought ; the disgust
of those who were called the creditor States;
the danger of the secession of their members,
and the separation of the States. He observed
that the members of the administration ought
to act in concert ; that though this question
was not one of my department, yet a common
duty should make it a common concern ; that
the President was the centre on which all ad
ministrative questions ultimately rested, and
that all of us should rally around him, and sup
port, with joint efforts, measures approved by
him ; and that the question having been lost by
a small majority only, it was probable that an
appeal from me to the judgment and discretion
of some of my friends might effect a change in
the vote, and the machine of government, now
suspended, might be again" set into motion. I
told him that I was really a stranger to the
whole subject ; that not having yet informed
myself of the system of finance adopted, I knew
not how far this was a necessary sequence ; that
undoubtedly, if its rejection endangered a dis
solution of our Union at this incipient stage, I
should deem that the most unfortunate of all
consequences, to avert which all partial and
temporary evils should be yielded. I proposed
to him, however, to dine with me the next day,
and I would invite another friend or two, to
bring them into conference together, and I
thought it impossible that reasonable men, con
sulting together coolly, could fail, by some mu
tual sacrifices of opinion, to form a compromise
which was to save the Union. The discussion
took place. I could take no part in it, but an
exhortatory one, because I was a stranger to the
circumstances which should govern it. But it
was finally agreed that, whatever importance
had been attached to the rejection of this prop
osition, the preservation of the Union, and of
,oncord among the States was more important,
and that therefore, it would be better that the
vote of rejection should be rescinded, to effect
which some members should change their votes.
But it was observed that this bill would be
peculiarly bitter to the Southern States, and
that some concomitant measure should be
adopted, to sweeten it a little to them. There
had before been proposals to fix the seat of
government either at Philadelphia, or at George
town on the Potomac ; and it was thought that
by giving it to Philadelphia for ten years, and
to Georgetown permanently afterwards, this
might, as an anodyne, calm in some degree the
ferment which might be excited by the other
measure alone. So two of the Potomac mem
bers ([Alexander] White and [Richard Bland]
Lee but White with a revulsion of stomach
almost convulsive), agreed to change their
votes, and Hamilton undertook to carry the
other point. In doing this the influence he
had established over the Eastern members,
with the agency of Robert Morris with those
of the middle States effected his side of the
engagement, and so the Assumption was
passed, and twenty millions of stock divided
among the favored States, and thrown in as
pabulum to the stock-jobbing herd. This ad
ded to the number of votaries to the Treasury,
and made its Chief the master of every vote in
the Legislature which might give to the govern
ment the directions suited to his political
views. — THE ANAS, ix, 92. FORD ED., i, 161.
(1818.)
590. ASSUMPTION OF STATE
DEBTS, Jefferson's agency in.— The As
sumption of the State debts in 1790, was a
supplementary measure in Hamilton's fiscal sys
tem. When attempted in the House of Repre
sentatives it failed. This threw Hamilton him
self, and a number of members into deep
dismay. Going to the President's one day I
met Hamilton, as I approached the door. His
look was sombre, haggard, and dejected beyond
description ; even his dress uncouth and neg
lected. He asked to speak with me. He stood
in the street near the door ; he opened the
subject of the Assumption of the State debts,
the necessity of it in the general fiscal arrange
ment, and its indispensable necessity towards
a preservation of the Union ; and particularly
of the New England States, who had made
great expenditures during the war on expedi
tions which, though of their own undertaking,
were for the common cause : that they consid
ered the Assumption of these by the Union so
just, and its denial so probably injurious that
they would make it a sine qua non of a continu
ance of the Union. That as to his own part,
if he had not credit enough to carry such a
measure as that, he could be of no use and was
determined to resign. He observed at the same
time, that though our particular business lay
in separate departments, yet the administration
and its success was a common concern, and that
we should make common cause in supporting
one another. He added his wish that I would
interest my friends from the South, who were
those most opposed to it. I answered that I
had been so long absent from my country [in
France] that I had lost a familiarity with its
affairs, and being but lately returned had not
yet got into the train of them ; that the fiscal
system being out of my department I had not
yet undertaken to consider and understand it ;
that the Assumption had struck me in an un
favorable light, but still, not having considered
it sufficiently, I had not concerned [myself] in
it, but that I would revolve what he had urged
in my mind. It was a real fact that the Eastern ^
and Southern members (South Carolina how
ever was with the former) had got into the most
extreme ill humor with one another. This
broke out on every question with the most
61
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Assumption of State
Astronomy
alarming heat ; the bitterest animosity seemed
to be engendered, and though they met every
day, little or nothing could be done from mutual
distrust and antipathy. On considering the
situation of things, I thought the first step to
wards some conciliation of views would be to
bring Mr. Madison and Colonel Hamilton to
a friendly discussion of the subject. I imme
diately wrote to each to come and dine with
me the next day, mentioning that we should
be alone, that the object was to find some
temperament for the present fever, and that
I was persuaded that men of sound heads and
honest views needed nothing more than ex
planation and mutual understanding to enable
them to unite in some measures which might
enable us to get along. They came ; I opened
the subject to them, acknowledged that my
situation had not permitted me to understand it
sufficiently but encouraged them to consider
the thing together. They did so. It ended in
Mr. Madison's acquiescence in a proposition
that the question should be again brought be
fore the House by way of amendment from the
Senate : that though he would not vote for it,
nor entirely withdraw his opposition, yet he
should not be strenuous but leave it to its fate.
It was observed, I forget by which of them,
that as the pill would be a bitter one to the
Southern States, something should be done to
soothe them ; that the removal of the seat of
government to the Potomac was a just measure,
and would probably be a popular one with
them, and would be a proper one to follow
the Assumption. It was agreed to speak to
Mr. [Hugh] White and Mr. [Richard Bland]
Lee whose districts lay on the Potomac, and to
refer to them to consider how far the interests
of their particular districts might be a sufficient
inducement in them to yield to the Assump
tion. This was done. Lee came into it without
hesitation : Mr. White had some qualms but
finally agreed. The measure came down by
way of amendment from the Senate and was
finally carried by the change of White and
Lee's votes. But the removal to the Potomac
could not be carried unless Pennsylvania could
be engaged in it. This Hamilton took on him
self, and chiefly, as I understood, through the
agency of Robert Morris, obtained a vote of
that State, on agreeing to an intermediate resi
dence at Philadelphia. This is the real history
of the Assumption, about which many erro
neous conjectures have been published. It was
unjust in itself, oppressive to the States, and
was acquiesced in merely from a fear of discus
sion. While our government was still in its
most infant state, it enabled Hamilton so to
strengthen himself by corrupt services to many
that he could afterwards carry his bank scheme,
and every measure he proposed in defiance of
all opposition. In fact, it was a principal
ground whereon was reared up that speculating
phalanx, in and out of Congress, which has
since been able to give laws to change the polit
ical complexion of the government of the United
States. — To . FORD ED., vi, 172.
(i793.)
591. ASTOB'S SETTLEMENT, Protec
tion of. — I learn with great pleasure the
progress you have made towards an establish
ment on Columbia river. I view it as the germ
of a great, free, and independent empire on that
side of our continent, and that liberty and self-
government spreading from that as well as from
this side, will insure their complete establish
ment over the whole. It must be still more
gratifying to yourself to foresee that your name
will be handed down with that of Columbus and
Raleigh, as the father of the establishment and
founder of such an empire. It would be an
afflicting thing, indeed, should the English be
able to break up the settlement. Their bigotry
to the bastard liberty of their own country, and
habitual hostility to every degree of freedom
in any other, will induce the attempt ; they
would not lose the sale of a bale of furs for the
empire of the whole world. But I hope your
party wilt be able to maintain themselves * * *
and have no doubt our government will do for
its success whatever they have power to do
and especially that at the negotiations for
peace, they will provide, by convention with
the English, for the safety and independence
of that country, and an acknowledgment of
our right of patronizing the Indians in all
cases of injury from foreign nations. — To
JOHN JACOB ASTOR. vi, 247. (M., 1813.) See
FUR TRADE.
592. ASTOB'S SETTLEMENT, Terri
tory and. — On the waters of the Pacific, we
can found no claim in right of Louisiana. If
we claim that country at all, it must be on
Astor's settlement near the mouth of the Co
lumbia, and the principle of the jus gentium of
America, that when a civilized nation takes
possession of the mouth of a river in a new
country, that possession is considered as in
cluding all its waters. — To JOHN MELISH. vii,
51. (M., 1816.)
593. ASTRONOMY, Apparatus for.—
This letter [is] to remind you of your kind
promise of making me an accurate clock ;
which, being intended for astronomical pur
poses only, I would have divested of all appara
tus for striking, or for any other purpose, which,
by increasing its complication, might disturb
its accuracy. A companion to it, for keeping
seconds, and which might be moved easily,
would greatly add to its value. — To DAVID RIT-
TENHOUSE. i, 210. FORD ED., ii, 162. (M.,
1778.)
594. ASTRONOMY, Bowditch's papers.
— I am indebted to you for Mr. Bowditch's
very learned mathematical papers, the calcula
tions of which are not for every reader, al
though their results are readily enough under
stood. One of these impairs the confidence I
had reposed in Laplace's demonstration, that
the eccentricities of the planets of our system
could oscillate only within narrow limits, and
therefore could authorize no inference that the
system must, by its own laws, come one day to
an end. This would have left the question one
of infinitude, at both ends of the line of time,
clear of physical authority. — To JOHN ADAMS.
vii, 112. (M., 1819.)
595. ASTRONOMY, Discoveries in.—
Herschel has pushed his discoveries of double
stars, now, to upwards of nine hundred, being
twice the nvimber of those communicated in the
Philosophical Transactions. You have prob
ably seen, that a Mr. Pigott had discovered
periodical variations of light in the star Algol.
He has observed the same in the ?? of Antinous,
and makes the period of variation seven days,
four hours, and thirty minutes, the duration of
the increase sixty-three hours, and of the de
crease thirty-six hours. What are we to con
clude from this? That there are suns which
have their orbits of revolution too? But this
would suppose a wonderful harmony in their
planets, and present a new scene, where the
attracting powers should be without, and not
within the orbit. The motion of our sun would
be a miniature of this. But this must be left
to you astronomers. — To PROFESSOR JAMES
MADISON, i, 447. (P., 1785.)
Astronomy
Athens
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
62
596. ASTRONOMY, Planet Herschel.— I
shall send you * * * the " Connoissance
de Terns" for the years 1786 and 1787, being
all as yet published. You will find in these the
tables for the planet Herschel, as far as the
observations hitherto made, admit them to be
calculated. You will see, also, that Herschel
was only the first astronomer who discovered it
to be a planet, and not the first who saw it.
Meyer saw it in the year 1756, and placed it in
the catalogue of his zodiacal stars, supposing it
to be such. A Prussian astronomer, in the
year 1781, observed that the 964th star of
Meyer's catalogue was missing ; and the cal
culations now prove that at the time Meyer
saw his 964th star, the planet Herschel should
have been precisely in the place where he noted
that star. — To JOHN PAGE, i, 402. (P., 1785.)
597. . It is fixed on grounds
which scarcely admit a doubt that the planet
Herschel was seen by Meyer in the year 1756,
and was considered by him as one of the zodi
acal stars, and, as such, arranged in his cat
alogue, being the 964th which he describes.
This 964th of Meyer has been since missing,
and the calculations for the planet Herschel
show that it should have been, at the time of
Meyer's observation, where he places his 964th
star.— To DR. STILES, i, 363. (P., 1785.)
598. ASTRONOMY, Solar eclipse.— We
•were much disappointed in Virginia generally
on the day of the great eclipse, which proved to
be cloudy. In Williamsburg, where it was total,
I understand only the beginning was seen. At
this place, (Montjcello,) which is latitude 38°
8' and longitude west from Williamsburg, about
i° 45', as is conjectured, n digits only were
supposed to be covered. It was not seen at all
until the moon had advanced nearly one-third
over the sun's disc. Afterwards it was seen at
intervals through the whole. The egress par
ticularly was visible. It proved, however, of
little use to me, for want of a time piece that
could be depended on. — To DAVID RITTEN-
HOUSE. i, 210. FORD ED., ii, 162. (M., July,
1778.)
599. ASTRONOMY, Variations of
light. — I think your conjecture that the peri
odical variation of light in certain fixed stars pro
ceeds from maculae, is more probable than that
of Maupertius, who supposes those bodies may
be flat, and more probable also than that which
supposes the star to have an orbit of revolution
so large as to vary sensibly its degree of light.
The latter is rendered more difficult of belief
from the shortness of the period of variation. —
To PROFESSOR J. MADISON, ii, 247. (P., 1787.)
600. ASYLUM, America as an.— Amer
ica is now, I think, the only country of tran
quillity, and should be the asylum of all those
who wish to avoid the scenes which have
crushed our friends in Paris. — To MRS.
CHURCH. FORD ED., vi, 289. (Pa., 1793.)
601. - — . I think it fortunate for
the United States to have become the asylum
for so many virtuous patriots of different de
nominations; but their circumstances, with
which you were so well acquainted before, en
abled them to be but a bare asylum, and to
offer nothing for them but an entire freedom
to use their own means and faculties as they
please. — To M. DE MEUNIER. FORD ED., vii, 13,
(M., 1795.)
602. . Small means of being
useful to you are left to me, but they shall be
freely exercised for your advantage, and that,
not on the selfish principle of increasing our
own population at the expense of other na
tions, * * * but to consecrate a sanctuary for
those whom the misrule of Europe may com
pel to seek happiness in other climes. This
refuge, once known, will produce reaction on
the happiness even of those who remain there,
by warning their task-masters that when the
evils of Egyptian oppression become heavier
than those of the abandonment of country,
another Canaan is open where their subjects
will be received as brothers, and secured
against like oppressions by a participation in
the right of self government. — To GEORGE
FLOWER, vii, 84. (P.F., 1817.)
603. ASYLUM, Consuls and.— The
clause in the Consular convention with
France of 1784 giving the right of sanctuary
to consuls' houses, was reduced to a protection
of their chancery room and its papers. —
NOTES ON CONSULAR CONVENTION, ix, 46^.
(1803.)
604. ASYLUM, Public vessels and.—
Article 12 [of the French treaty], giving
asylum in the ports of either to the armed
vessels of the other, with the prizes taken
from the enemies of that other, must be
qualified as it is in the I9th article of the
Prussian treaty; as the stipulation in the
latter part of the article, " that no shelter or
refuge shall be given in the ports of the one,
to such as shall have made prize on the sub
jects of the other of the parties," would forbid
us in case of a war between France and
Spain, to give shelter in our ports to prizes
made by the latter on the former, while the
first part of the article would oblige us to
shelter those made by the former on the lat
ter — a very dangerous covenant, and which
ought never to be repeated in any other in
stance. — MISSISSIPPI RIVER INSTRUCTIONS.
vii, 588. FORD ED., v, 478. (March 1792.)
605. - — . The Executive has never
denied the right of asylum in our ports to
the public armed vessels of [the British] na
tion. They, as well as the French, are free
to come to them, in all cases of weather, pira
cies, enemies, or other urgent necessity, and
to refresh, victual and repair, &c. — To GEORGE
HAMMOND, iv, 65. FORD ED., vi, 423. (Pa.,
1793- ) See EXPATRIATION, FUGITIVES, IM
PRESSMENT.
606. ATHEISM, Calumnious charges
of. — As to the calumny of Atheism, I am so
broken to calumnies of every kind, from
every department of government, Executive,
Legislative, and Judiciary, and from every
minion of theirs holding office or seeking it,
that I entirely disregard it, and from Chace it
will have less effect than from any other man
in the United States. — To JAMES MONROE.
FORD ED., vii, 447. (Ep., May 1800.)
607. ATHEIST, Not an.— An atheist
* * * I can never be. — To JOHN ADAMS.
vii, 281. (M., 1823.)
608. ATHENS, Government of. — The
government of Athens was that of the people
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Atmosphere
Authority
of one city making laws for the whole country
subjected to them. That of Lacedaemon was
the rule of military monks over the laboring
class of the people, reduced to abject slavery.
These are not the doctrines of the present age.
The equal rights of man, and the happiness of
every individual, are now acknowledged to be
the only legitimate objects of government. — To
M. CORAY. vii, 319. (M., 1823.)
_ ATMOSPHERE.— See 209.
_ ATTACHMENTS, Foreign.— See FOR
EIGN INFLUENCE.
609. ATTAINDER, Bills of.— The 9cca-
sion and proper office of a bill of attainder
is this : When a person charged with a
crime withdraws from justice, or resists it by
force, either in his own or a foreign country,
no other recourse of bringing him to trial or
punishment being practicable, a special act
is passed by the legislature adapted to the
particular case. This prescribes to him a
sufficient time to appear and submit to a
trial by his peers; declares that his refusal to
appear shall be taken as a confession of guilt,
as in the ordinary case of an offender at the
bar refusing to plead, and pronounces the
sentence which would have been rendered on
his confession or conviction in a court of
law. No doubt that these acts of attainder
have been abused in England as instruments
of vengeance by a successful over a defeated
party. But what institution is insusceptible
of abuse in wicked hands? — To L. H. GIRAR-
DIN. vi, 440. FORD ED., ii, 151. (M., 1815.)
_ ATTIRE.— See DRESS.
610. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Ap
pointment of. — An Attorney General shall
be appointed by the House of Representatives.
PROPOSED VA. CONSTITUTION. FORD EDV ii, 20.
(June 1776.)
611. ATTORNEYS, Federal District.—
The only shield for our republican citizens
against the federalism of the courts is to
have the attorneys and marshals republicans.
— To A. STUART, iv, 394. FORD ED., viii, 47.
(M., April 1801.)
612. . Republican attorneys and
marshals, being the doors of entrance into
the courts, are indispensably necessary as a
shield to the republican part of our fellow
citizens, which, I believe, is the main body of
the people. — To WILLIAM B. GILES, iv, 381.
FORD ED., viii, 25. (W., 1801.)
613. AUBAINE, Droit d'.— The expres
sion in the eleventh article of our treaty of
commerce and amity with France, " that the
subjects of the United States shall not be re
puted Aubaines in France, and consequently
shall be exempted from the Droit d'Aubaine,
or other similar duty, under what name so
ever," has been construed so rigorously to
the letter, as to consider us as Aubaines in
the colonies of France. Our intercourse with
those colonies is so great, that frequent and
important losses will accrue to individuals, if
this construction be continued. * * * I pre
sume that the enlightened Assembly now en
gaged in reforming the remains of feudal
abuse among them, will not leave so inhospit
able an one as the Droit d'Aubaine existing
in France, or any of its dominions. If this
may be hoped it will be better that you should
not trouble the minister with any application
for its abolition in the colonies as to us. This
would be creating into a special favor to us
the extinction of a general abuse, which will,
I presume, extinguish of itself. Only be so
good as to see, that in abolishing this odious
law in France, its abolition in the colonies,
also, be not omitted by mere oversight; but
if, contrary to expectation, this fragment of
barbarism be suffered to remain, then it will
become necessary to bring forward the en
closed case, and press a liberal and just ex
position of our treaty, so as to relieve our
citizens from this species of risk and ruin
hereafter. — To WILLIAM SHORT. iii, 189.
FORD ED., v, 234. (N.Y., 1790.)
— AURORA NEWSPAPER.— See
DUANE.
— AUSTRIA, Emperor of. — See JOSEPH
II.
614. AUTHORITY, Civil and Military.
— Instead of subjecting the military to the
civil power, his Majesty has expressly made
the civil subordinate to the military. But
can his Majesty thus put down all law under
his feet? Can he erect a power superior to
that which erected himself? He has done it
indeed by force, but let him remember that
force cannot give right. — RIGHTS OF BRITISH
AMERICA, i, 140. FORD ED., i, 445. (1774.)
615. . He [George III.], has
endeavored to pervert the exercises of the
Kingly office in Virginia into a detestable and
insupportable tyranny, * * * by [affecting] to
render the military independent of and su
perior to the civil power. — PROPOSED VA.
CONSTITUTION. FORD ED., ii, 19. (June 1776.)
616. - — .He has affected to render
the military independent of, and superior to,
the civil power. — DECLARATION OF INDEPEND
ENCE AS DRAWN BY JEFFERSON.
617. . The military shall be
subordinate to the civil power. — PROPOSED VA.
CONSTITUTION, viii, 452. FORD ED., iii, 3^2.
(1783.)
618. . A distinction is kept up
between the civil and military which it is
for the happiness of both to obliterate. — To
GENERAL WASHINGTON, i, 335. FORD ED.,
iii. 467. (A., 1784.)
619. . A distinction [will be
continued] between the civil and military
which it would be for the good of the whole
to obliterate as soon as possible. — To M. DE
MEUNIER. ix, 270. FORD ED., iv, 175. (P.,
1786.)
620. . I do not see how they [the
framers of the French constitution] can pro
hibit altogether the aid of the military in
cases of riot, and yet I doubt whether they
can descend from the sublimity of ancient
military pride, to let a MarechrJ of France
Authority
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
64
-vith his troops, be commanded by a magis
trate. They cannot conceive that General
Washington, at the head of his army, during
the late war, could have been commanded by
a common constable to go as his posse comi-
tatus to suppress a mob, and that Count
Rochambeau, when he was arrested at the
head of his army by a sheriff, must have gone
to jail if he had not given bail to appear in
court. Though they have gone astonishing
lengths, they are not yet thus far. It is
probable, therefore, that not knowing how to
use the military as a civil weapon, they will
do too much or too little with it. — To WILL
IAM CARMICHAEL. iii, 90. (P., Aug. 1789.)
621. . The military shall be
subordinate to the civil authority. — FRENCH
CHARTER OF RIGHTS, iii, 47. FORD ED., v,
102. (P., 1789.)
622. . Bonaparte has transferred
the destinies of the republic from the civil
to the military arm. Some will use this as a
lesson against the practicability of republican
government. I read it as a lesson against the
danger of standing armies. — To SAMUEL
ADAMS, iv, 322. FORD ED., vii, 425. (Pa.,
Feb. 1800.)
623. . The supremacy of the
civil over the military authority, I deem [one
of the] essential principles of our government
and, consequently [one] which ought to
shape its administration.— FIRST INAUGURAL
ADDRESS, viii, 4. FORD ED., viii, 5. (1801.)
624. . I sincerely wish General
Wilkinson could be appointed as you pro
pose. But besides the objection from prin
ciple, that no military commander should be
so placed as to have no civil superior, his
residence at Natchez is entirely inconsistent
with his superintendence of the military posts.
— To SAMUEL SMITH. FORD ED., viii, 29.
(W., March 1801.)
625. . Not a single fact has ap
peared, which occasions me to doubt that I
could have made a fitter appointment than
General Wilkinson. One qualm of principle
I acknowledge I do feel, I mean the union
of the civil and military authority. You re
member that when I went into office * * * he
was pressed on me to be made Governor of
the Mississippi Territory, and that I refused
it on that very principle. When, therefore,
the House of Representatives took that
ground, I was not insensible to _ its having
some weight. But in the appointment to
Louisiana, I did not think myself departing
from my own principle, because I consider
it not as a civil government, but merely a
military station. The Legislature had sanc
tioned that idea by the establishment of the
office of the Commandant, in which were
completely blended the civil and military
powers. It seemed therefore, that the Gov
ernor should be in suit with them. I ob
served, too, that the House of Representa
tives, on the very day they passed the stric
ture on this union of authorities, passed a bill
making the Governor of Michigan com
mander of the regular troops which should
at any time be within his government. — To
SAMUEL SMITH, v, 13. FORD ED., viii, 450.
(W., May 1806.)
626. AUTHORITY, Civil and Military
united. — From a belief that, under the pres
sure of the [British] invasion under which
we [Virginia] were then [1781] laboring, the
public would have more confidence in a mil
itary chief, and that the military commander,
being invested with the civil power also,
both might be wielded with more energy,
promptitude and effect for the defence of the
State. I resigned the administration [the
Governorship] at the end of my second year,
[1781] and General Nelson was appointed to
succeed me. — AUTOBIOGRAPHY, i, 50. FORD
ED., i, 70. (1821.)
627. AUTHORITY, Conflict of.— Con
gress having * * * directed that they [British
prisoners in Virginia] should not be removed,
and our Assembly that they should, the Ex
ecutive [of Virginia] are placed in a very dis
agreeable situation. We can order them to
the banks of the Potomac, but our authority
will not land them on the opposite shore. —
To BENJAMIN HARRISON. FORD ED., ii, 439.
628. AUTHORITY, Constitution and.
— The authority of the people is a necessary
foundation for a constitution. — To JOHN H.
PLEASANTS. vii, 345. FORD ED., x, 302. (M.,
1824.)
629. AUTHORITY, Custom as.— Gen
eral example is weighty authority. — NOTES
ON COINAGE, vii, 164. (1790.)
630. AUTHORITY, Enforcing.— We
would do anything in our power to support
and manifest your authority, were anything
wanting. But nothing can be added to the
provision which the military institutions have
made to enforce obedience, and it would be
presumption in us to say what is that pro
vision to you. — To MAJOR-GENERAL STEUBEN.
FORD ED., ii, 491. (R., 1781.)
631. --- . We cannot be respected by
France as a neutral nation, nor by the world
ourselves as an independent one, if we do
not take effectual measures to support, at
every risk, our authority in our own harbors.
—To JAMES MADISON, iv, 558. FORD ED.,
viii, 315. (M., Aug. 1804.)
632. AUTHORITY, Habits of.— If the
President can be preserved a few years till
habits of authority and obedience [to the new
government] can be established generally, we
have nothing to fear. — To M. DE LAFAYETTE.
iii, 132. FORD ED., v. 152. (N.Y., April 1790.)
633. AUTHORITY, Obligation and.— It
is not the name, but the authority that ren
ders an act obligatory. — NOTES ON VIRGINIA.
viii, 365. FORD ED., iii, 228. (1782.)
634. AUTHORITY, Opposition to.— My
long and intimate knowledge of my country
men satisfies me, that let there ever be occa
sion to display the banners of the law, and
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Authority
the world will see how few and pitiful are
those who will array themselves in opposi
tion — TO DR. JAMES BROWN, v, 379. FORD
ED., ix, 211. (W., 1808.)
635. AUTHORITY, The People and.—
Leave no authority not responsible to the
people. — To ISAAC H. TIFFANY. vii, 32.
(M., 1816.)
636. . All authority belongs to
the people. — To SPENCER ROANE. vii, 213.
FORD ED., x, 190. (M., 1821.)
637. AUTHORITY, Religion and Fed
eral. — Civil powers alone have been given to
the President of the United States, and no
authority to direct the religious exercises of
his constituents.— To REV. SAMUEL MILLER.
v, 237. FORD ED., ix, 175. (W., 1808.)
638. . No power to prescribe any
religious exercise, or to assume authority in
religious discipline, has been delegated to the
General Government. It must then rest with
States, so far as it can be in any human au
thority. — To REV. SAMUEL MILLER, v, 237.
FORD ED., ix, 174. (W., 1808.)
639. AUTHORITY, Repudiated.— The
British Parliament has no right to exercise
authority over us — RIGHTS OF BRITISH AM
ERICA, i, 130. FORD ED., i, 434. ((1774.)
640. AUTHORITY, Resistance to
usurped. — It is a dangerous lesson to say to
the people " whenever your functionaries ex
ercise unlawful authority over you, if you do
not go into actual resistance, it will be
deemed acquiescence and confirmation." How
long had we acquiesced under usurpations of
the British parliament? Had that confirmed
them in right, and made our Revolution a
wrong? Besides no authority has yet de
cided whether this resistance must be in
stantaneous: when the right to resist ceases,
or whether it has yet ceased?— To JOHN
HAMBDEN PLEASANTS. vii, 345. FORD ED.,
x, 302. (M., 1824.)
641. AUTHORITY, Self -constituted.
— I deem no government safe which is under
the vassalage of any self-constituted author
ities, or any other authority than that of the
nation, or its regular functionaries. — To AL
BERT GALLATIN. iv, 519. FORD ED., viii, 285.
(W., Dec. 1803.)
642. AUTHORITY, Source of.— I con
sider the source of authority with us to be
the Nation. Their will, declared through its
proper organ, is valid, till revoked by their
will declared through its proper organ again
also. Between 1776 and 1789. the proper or
gan for pronouncing their will, whether legis
lative or executive, was a Congress formed
in a particular manner. Since 1789, it is a
Congress formed in a different manner, for
laws, and a President, elected in a particular
way, for making appointments and doing
other executive acts. The laws and appoint
ments of the ancient Congress were as valid
and permanent in their nature, as the laws
of the new Congress, or appointments of the
new Executive ; these laws and appointments,
in both cases, deriving equally their source
from the will of the Nation. — To PRESIDENT
WASHINGTON. iii, 332. FORD ED., v, 437
(Pa., 1792.)
643- . I consider the people who
constitute a society or nation as the source
of all authority in that nation; as free to
transact their common concerns by any
agents they think proper; to change these
agents individually, or the organization of
them in form or function whenever they
please ; that all the acts done by these agents
under the authority of the nation are the acts
of the nation, are obligatory to them and in
ure to their use, and can in no wise be an
nulled or affected by any change in the form
of the government, or of the persons admin
istering it. — OPINION ON FRENCH TREATIES.
vii, 612. FORD ED., vi, 220. (1793.)
644. AUTHORITY, Upholding.— In no
country on earth is it [forcible opposition to the
law] so impracticable as in one where every
man feels a vital interest in maintaining the
authority of the laws, and instantly engages
in it as in his own personal cause. — To BEN
JAMIN SMITH, v, 293. FORD ED., ix, 195.
(M., 1808.)
645. - — . Forcible opposition [to
the embargo] will rally the whole body of
republicans of every shade to a single point. —
that of supporting the public authority. — To
ALBERT GALLATIN. v, 347. (M., Aug. 1808.)
646. AUTHORITY, Usurpation of.—
Necessities which dissolve a government do
not convey its authority to an oligarchy or a
monarchy. They throw back into the hands
of the people the powers they had delegated,
and leave them as individuals to shift for
themselves.— NOTES ON VIRGINIA, viii, 369.
FORD EDV iii, 233. (1782.)
647. AUTHORITY, Washington and
Civil. — You [General Washington] have
conducted the great military contest with
wisdom and fortitude, invariably regarding
the rights of the civil power through all dis
asters and changes.* — CONGRESS TO GEN.
WASHINGTON. (Dec. 23,1783.)
- AUTHORS.— See LITERATURE.
648. AVARICE, Commercial. — It seems
to me that in proportion as commercial ava
rice and corruption advance on us from the
North and East, the principles of free gov
ernment are to retire to the agricultural
States of the South and West, as their last
asylum and bulwark. — To HENRY MIDDLE-
TON, vi, 91. (M., 1813.)
_ BACON'S REBELLION.— See REBEL
LION.
649. BADGES, Utilizing.— Let them
[Cincinnati society] melt up their eagles and
add the mass to the distributable fund, that
* Jefferson wrote the address to Washington on
surrendering his commission. It is not included in
either of the two leading editions of Jefferson's
writings.— EDITOR.
Bainbridge (William)
Bank
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
66
their descendants may have no temptation
to hang them in their button holes. — To M.
DE MEUNIER. ix, 271. FORD ED., iv., 176.
(P., 1786.) See BIRTHDAY.
650. BAINBRIDGE (William), Victory
of.— After the loss of the Philadelphia, Cap
tain Bainbridge had a character to redeem. He
has done it most honorably, and no one is more
gratified by it than myself. — To MATTHEW
CARR. vi, 132. (M., 1813.)
651. BALLOONS, Experiments with.—
There seems a possibility that the great desid
eratum in the use of the balloon may be ob
tained. There are two persons at Javel (oppo
site to Auteuil), who are pushing this matter.
They are able to rise and fall at wity, without
expending their gas, and they can deflect forty-
five degrees from the course of the wind. — To
R. IZARD. i, 443- (P-, 1785-)
652. BALLOONS, Tall from.— An acci
dent has happened here [France] which will
probably damp the ardor with which aerial
navigation has been pursued. Monsieur Pilatre
de Roziere had been waiting for many months
at Boulogne a fair wind to cross the channel in
a balloon which was compounded of one of
inflammable air, and another called a Mont-
golfier with rarefied air only. He at length
thought the wind fair and with a companion,
Romain, ascended. After proceeding in a
proper direction about two leagues, the wind
changed and brought them again over the
French coast. Being at the height of about six
thousand feet, some accident, unknown, burst
the balloon of inflammable air, and the Mont-
golfier, being unequal alone to sustain their
weight, they precipitated from that height to
the earth and were crushed to atoms. — To
JOSEPH JONES, i, 353. (P-, June 1785.)
653. . The arts, instead of ad
vancing, have lately received a check which will
probably render stationary for awhile, that
branch of them which had promised to elevate
us to the skies. Pilatre de Roziere, who had
first ventured into that region, has fallen a sac
rifice to it. In an attempt to pass from Bou
logne over to England, a change in the wind
having brought him on the coast of France,
some accident happened to his balloon of in
flammable air, which occasioned it to burst,
and that of rarefied air combined with it being
then unequal to the weight, they fell to the
earth from a height, which the first reports
made six thousand feet, but later ones have
reduced to sixteen hundred. Pilatre de Roziere
was dead when a peasant distant one hundred
yards away, ran to him ; but Romain, his com
panion, lived about ten minutes, though speech
less, and without his senses. — To CHARLES
THOMSON, i, 355. (P., 1785.)
654. BALLOONS, Peril of.— Though
navigation by water is attended with frequent
accidents, and in its infancy must have been
attended with more, yet these are now so
familiar that we think little of them, while that
which has signalized the two first martyrs to
the aeronautical art will probably deter very
many from the experiments they would have
been disposed to make. — To CHARLES THOM
SON, i, 354. (P., 1785.)
- BALLOT.— See SUFFRAGE.
— BANISHMENT.— See EXILE.
655. BANK (National 1813), Charter
of. — The scheme is for Congress to establish
a national bank, suppose of thirty millions
capital, of which they shall contribute ten
millions in six per cent, stock, the States ten
millions, and individuals ten millions, one
half of the two last contributions to be of a
similar stock, for which the parties are to
give cash to Congress; the whole, however,
to be under the exclusive management of the
individual subscribers, who are to name all
the directors ; neither Congress nor the States
having any power of interference in its ad
ministration. Discounts are to be at five per
cent., but the profits are expected to be at seven
per cent. Congress then will be paying six
per cent, on twenty millions, and receiving
seven per cent, on ten millions, being its
third of the institution; so that on the ten
millions cash which they receive from the
States and individuals, they will, in fact, have
to pay but five per cent, interest. This is the
bait. The charter is proposed to be for forty
or fifty years, and if any future augmenta
tions should take place, the individual propri
etors are to have the privilege of being the
sole subscribers for that. Congress are fur
ther allowed to issue to the amount of three
millions of notes, bearing interest, which they
are to receive back in payment for lands at a
premium of five or ten per cent., or as sub
scriptions for canals, roads, and bridges, in
which undertakings they are, of course, to
be engaged. This is a summary of the case
as I understand it; but it is very possible I
may not understand it in all its parts, these
schemes being always made unintelligible for
the gulls who are to enter into them. — To J.
W. EPPES. vi, 228. FORD ED., ix, 403. (M.,
Nov. 1813.)
656. BANK (National 1813), Consid
erations on. — The advantages and disadvan
tages shall be noted promiscuously as they
occur; leaving out the speculation of canals
&c., which, being an episode only in the
scheme, may be omitted, to disentangle it as
much as we can. i. Congress are to receive
five millions from the States (if they will en
ter into this "partnership, which few probably
will), and five millions from the individual
subscribers, in exchange for ten millions of
six per cent, stock, one per cent, of which,
however, they will make on their ten millions
of stock remaining in bank, and so reduce it,
in effect, to a loan of ten millions at five per
cent, interest. This is good ; but, 2. They au
thorize this bank to throw into circulation
ninety millions of dollars (three times the
capital), which increases our circulating me
dium fifty per cent.; depreciates proportion-
ably the present value of a dollar, and raises
the price of all future purchases in the same
proportion. 3. This loan of ten millions at
five per cent., is to be once for all, only.
Neither the terms of the scheme, nor their
own prudence could ever permit them to
add to the circulation in the same, or any
other way, for the supplies of the succeeding
years of the war. These succeeding years
then are to be left unprovided for. and the
means of doing it in a great measure pre
cluded. 4. The individual subscribers, on
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Bank
paying their own five millions of cash to Con
gress, become the depositors of ten millions
of stock belonging to Congress, five millions
belonging to the States, and five millions to
themselves, say twenty millions, with which,
as no one has a right ever to see their books,
or to ask a question, they may choose their
time for running away, after adding to their
booty the proceeds of as much of their own
notes as they shall be able to throw into cir
culation. 5. The subscribers may be one,
two, or three, or more individuals (many
single individuals being able to pay in the five
millions), whereupon this bank oligarchy or
monarchy enters the field with ninety millions
of dollars, to direct and control the politics of
the nation ; and of the influence of these in
stitutions on our politics, and into what scale
it will be thrown, we have had abundant ex
perience. Indeed, England herself may be
the real, while her friend and trustee here
shall be the nominal and sole subscriber.
6. This state of things is to be fastened on
us, without the power of relief, for forty or
fifty years. That is to say, the eight millions
of people now existing, for the sake of re*-
ceiving one dollar and twenty-five cents
apiece, at five per cent, interest, are to sub
ject the fifty millions of people who are to
succeed them within that term, to the pay
ment of forty-five millions of dollars, prin
cipal and interest, which will be payable in the
course of the fifty years. 7. But the great
and national advantage is to be the relief of
the present scarcity of money, which is pro
duced and proved by, i. The additional in
dustry created to supply a variety of articles
for the troops, ammunition, &c. 2. By the
cash sent to the frontiers, and the vacuum oc
casioned in the trading towns by that. 3.
By the late loans. 4. By the necessity of
recurring to shavers with good paper, which
the existing banks are not able to take up;
and 5. By the numerous applications of bank
charters showing that an increase of circu
lating medium is wanting. — To J. W. EPPES.
vi, 229. FORD ED., ix, 403. (M., Nov. 1813.)
657. BANK (National 1813), Increased
Medium and. — Let us examine these causes
and proofs of the want of our increase of me
dium, one by one. i. The additional In
dustry created to supply a variety of articles
for troops, ammunition, &c. Now, I had al
ways supposed that war produced a diminu
tion of industry, by the number of hands
it withdraws from industrious pursuits for
employment in arms, &c., which are totally
unproductive. And if it calls for new in
dustry in the articles of ammunition and other
military supplies, the hands are borrowed
from other branches on which the demand is
slackened by the war ; so that it is but a shift
ing of these hands from one pursuit to another.
2. The cash sent to the frontiers occasions a
vacuum in the trading towns, which re
quires a new supply. Let us examine what
are the calls for money to the frontiers. Not
for clothing, tents, ammunition, arms, which
are all bought in the trading towns. Not for
provisions; for although these are bought
partly in the immediate country, bank bills
are more acceptable there than even in the
trading towns. The pay of the army calls
for some cash, but not a great deal, as bank
notes are as acceptable with the military men,
perhaps more so ; and what cash is sent must
find its way back again in exchange for the
wants of the upper from the lower country.
For we are not to suppose that cash stays
accumulating there forever. 3. This scarcity
has been occasioned by the late loans. But
does the government borrow money to keep
it in their coffers? Is it not instantly re
stored to circulation by payment for its nec
essary supplies? And are we to restore a
vacuum of twenty millions of dollars by an
emission of ninety millions? 4. The want of
medium is proved by the recurrence of indi
viduals with good paper to brokers at exor
bitant interest; and 5. By the numerous ap
plications to the State governments for ad
ditional banks; New York wanting eighteen
millions, Pennsylvania ten millions, &c. But
say more correctly, the speculators and spend
thrifts of New York and Pennsylvania, but
never consider them as being the States of
New York and Pennsylvania. These two
items shall be considered together. — To J. W.
EPPES. vi, 231. FORD ED., ix, 405. (M.,
Nov. 1813.)
658. BANK (National 1813), Paper,
Specie and.— It is a litigated question,
whether the circulation of paper, rather than
of specie, is a good or an evil. In the opinion
of England and of English writers it is a
good ; in that of all other nations it is an
evil ; and excepting England and her copyist,
the United States, there is not a nation ex
isting. I believe, which tolerates a paper cir
culation. The experiment is going on, how
ever, desperately in England, pretty boldly
with us. and at the end of the chapter, we
shall see which opinion experience approves :
for I believe it to be one of those cases where
mercantile clamor will bear down reason, un
til it is corrected by ruin. — To J. W. EPPES.
vi, 232. FORD ED., ix, 405. (M., Nov. 1813.)
659. BANK (National 1813), Uncon
stitutional. — After the solemn decision of
Congress against the renewal of the charter of
the Bank of the United States, and the
grounds of that decision (the want of con
stitutional power), I had imagined that ques
tion at rest, and that no "more applications
would be made to them for the incorporation
of banks. The opposition on that ground to
its first establishment, the small majority by
which it was overborne, and the means prac
ticed for obtaining it. cannot be already for
gotten. The law having passed, however, by
a majority, its opponents, true to the sacred
principle of submission to a majority, suffered
the law to flow through its term without ob
struction. During this, the nation had time
to consider the constitutional question, and
when the renewal was proposed, they con
demned it, not by their representatives in
Congress only, but by express instructions
from different organs of their will. Here
Bank
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
68
then we might stop, and consider the me
morial as answered. But, setting authority
apart, we will examine whether the Legisla
ture ought to comply with it, even if they
had the power. — To J. W. EPPES. vi, 232.
FORD ED., ix, 406. (M., Nov. 1813.)
660. . The idea of creating a
national bank, I do not concur in, because it
seems now decided that Congress has not that
power (although I sincerely wish they had
it exclusively), and because I think there is
already a vast redundancy, rather than a
scarcity of paper medium. The rapid rise in
the nominal price of land and labor (while
war and blockade should produce a fall)
proves the progressive state of the depre
ciation of our medium. — To THOMAS LAW.
FORD ED., ix, 433. (M., 1813.)
661. BANK OF NORTH AMERICA,
Incorporation of. — The Philadelphia Bank
was incorporated by Congress. This is,
perhaps, the only instance of their having
done that which they had no power to do.
Necessity obliged them to give this institution
the appearance of their countenance, because
in that moment they were without any other
resource for money. — COUNT VAN HOGEN-
DORP. ii, 24. FORD ED., iv, 286. (P., 1786.)
662. BANK OF NORTH AMERICA,
Pennsylvania , and.— The Legislature of
Pennsylvania passed an act of incorporation
for the bank, and declared that the holders of
stock should be responsible only to the
amount of their stock. Lately that Legisla
ture has repealed their act. The consequence
is, that the bank is now altogether a private
institution, and every holder is liable for its
engagements in his whole property. This
has had a curious effect. It has given those
who deposit money in the bank a greater
faith in it, while it has rendered the holders
very discontented, as being more exposed to
risk, and it has induced many to sell it, so
that I have heard (I know not how truly)
the bank stock sells somewhat below par. —
To COUNT VAN HOGENDORP. ii, 24. FORD
ED., iv, 286. (P., 1786.)
663. BANK (TJ. S.), Beginning of.
— A division, not very unequal, had * * *
taken place in the honest part of * * * [Con
gress in 1791] between the parties styled re
publican and federal. The latter, being mon
archists in principle, adhered to [Alexander]
Hamilton of course, as their leader in
that principle, and this mercenary pha
lanx,* added to them, ensured him always
a majority in both Houses; so that the
whole action of the Legislature was now un
der the direction of the Treasury. Still the
machine was not complete. The effect of the
Funding system, and of the Assumption [of
the State debts], would be temporary. It
would be lost with the loss of the individual
members whom it had enriched, and some
engine of influence more permanent must be
* Those members of Congress who, Jefferson be
lieved and charged, voted for the Assumption of the
State debts from corrupt motives. See ASSUMPTION.
—EDITOR.
contrived while these myrmidons were yet in
place to carry it through all opposition. This
engine was the Bank of the United States. —
THE ANAS, ix, 95. FORD EDV i, 164. (1818.)
664. BANK (U. S.), Constitutionality
of.— The bill for establishing a National
Bank undertakes among other things :— i. To
form the subscribers into a corporation. 2.
To enable them in their corporate capacities
to receive grants of land; and so far is
against the laws of Mortmain.* 3. To make
alien subscribers capable of holding lands;
and so far is against the laws of Alienage.
4- To transmit these lands, on the death of
a proprietor, to a certain line of successors;
and so far changes the course of Descents.
5. To put the lands out of the reach of for
feiture or escheat; and so far is against the
laws of Forfeiture and Escheat. 6. To trans
mit personal chattels to successors in a cer
tain line; and so far is against the laws of
Distribution. 7. To give them the sole and
exclusive right of banking under the national
authority; and so far is against the laws of
Monopoly. 8. To communicate to them a
power to make laws paramount to the laws
of the States ; for so they must be construed,
to protect the institution from the control of
the State Legislatures ; and so, probably, they
will be construed.
I consider the foundation of the Constitu
tion as laid on this ground : f That " all
powers not delegated to the United States,
by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to
the States, are reserved to the States or to
the people." (Xllth amendment.) To take
a single step beyond the boundaries thus spe
cially drawn around the powers of Congress,
is to take possession of a boundless field of
power, no longer susceptible of any definition.
The incorporators of a bank, and the powers
assumed by this bill, have not, in my opinion,
been delegated to the United States, by the
Constitution. I. They are not among the
powers specially enumerated: for these are:
ist A power to lay taxes for the purpose of
paying the debts of the United States; but
no debt is paid by this bill, nor any tax laid.
Were it a bill to raise money, its origination
in the Senate would condemn it by the Con
stitution. 2nd " To borrow money." But
this bill neither borrows money nor ensures
the borrowing it. The proprietors of the
bank will be just as free as any other money
holders, to lend or not to lend their money
to the public. The operation proposed in the
bill, first, to lend them two millions, and
then to borrow them back again, cannot
* Though the Constitution controls the laws of
Mortmain so far as to permit Congress itself to hold
land for certain purposes, yet not so far as to permit
them to communicate a similar right to other corpo
rate bodies.— NOTE BY JEFFERSON.
t Washington requested the written opinions of
the Cabinet on the constitutionality of the bill.
Those of the Secretaries of the Treasury, and of
War, were in favor of the constitutionalty of the act.
Those of the Secretary of State, and Attorney Gen
eral, were against it. The opinion of Jefferson is an
unanswerable argument against the doctrine of im
plied powers, and is justly considered the text of the
true republican faith, on the subject of constitutional
interpretation.— RAYNER'S Life of Jefferson, p. 304.
69
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Bank
change the nature of the latter act, which will
still be in a payment, and not a loan, call it
by what name you please. 3rd To " regulate
commerce with foreign nations, and among
the States, and with the Indian tribes." To
erect a bank, and to regulate commerce, are
very different acts. He who erects a bank,
creates a subject of commerce in its bills; so
does he who makes a bushel of wheat, or
digs a dollar out of the mines ; yet neither of
these persons regulates commerce thereby. To
make a thing which may be bought and sold,
is not to prescribe regulations for buying and
selling. Besides, if this was an exercise of
the power of regulating commerce, it would
be void, as extending as much to the internal
commerce of every State as to its external.
For the power given to Congress by the Con
stitution does not extend to the internal regu
lation of the commerce of a State (that is to
say of the commerce between citizen and
citizen), which remains exclusively with its
own legislature ; but to its external commerce
only, that is to say, its commerce with an
other State, or with foreign nations, or with
the Indian tribes. Accordingly the bill does
not propose the measure as a regulation of
trade, but as, " productive of considerable
advantages to trade." Still less are these
powers covered by any other of the special
enumerations.
II. Nor are they within either of the gen
eral phrases, which are the two following: —
i. To lay taxes to provide for the general
welfare of the United States, that is to say,
" to lay taxes for the purpose of providing
for the general welfare." For the laying of
taxes is the power, and the general welfare
the purpose for which the power is to be ex
ercised. They are not to lay taxes ad libi
tum for any purpose they please; but only
to pay the debts or provide for the welfare of
the Union. In like manner, they are not to
do anything they please to provide for the
general welfare, but only to lay taxes for that
purpose. To consider the latter phrase, not
as describing the purpose of the first, but as
giving a distinct and independent power to do
any act they please, which might be for the
good of the Union, would render all the pre
ceding and subsequent enumerations of power
completely useless. It would reduce the whole
instrument to a single phrase, that of in
stituting a Congress with power to do what
ever would be for the good of the United
States; and, as they would be the sole judges
of the good or evil, it would be also a power
to do whatever evil they please. It is an es
tablished rule of construction where a phrase
will bear either of two meanings, to give to
it that which will allow some meaning to the
other parts of the instrument and not that
which would render all the others useless.
Certainly no such universal power was meant
to be given them. It was intended to lace them
up straitly within the enumerated powers, and
those without which, as means, these powers
could not be carried into effect. It is known
that the very power now proposed as a means
was rejected as an end by the Convention
which formed the Constitution. A propo
sition was made to them to authorize Congress
to open canals, and an amendatory one to em
power them to incorporate. But the whole
was rejected, and one of the reasons for re
jection urged in debate was, that then they
would have power to erect a bank, which
would render the great cities, where there
were prejudices and jealousies on the subject,
adverse to the reception of the Constitution.
2. The second general phrase is, " to make
all laws necessary and proper for carrying
into execution the enumerated powers." But
they can all be carried into execution with
out a bank. A bank therefore is not neces
sary, and consequently not authorized by this
phrase.
It has been urged that a bank will give great
facility or convenience in the collection of
taxes. Suppose this were true: yet the Con
stitution allows only the means which are
"necessary" not those which are merely
" convenient " for effecting the enumerated
powers. If such a latitude of construction
be allowed to this phrase as to give any non-
enumerated power, it will go to every one,
for there is not one which ingenuity may not
torture into a convenience in some instance
or other, to some one of so long a list of
enumerated powers. It would swallow up
all the delegated powers, and reduce the
whole to one power, as before observed.
Therefore it was that the Constitution re
strained them to the necessary means, that
is to say, to those means without which the
grant of power would be nugatory. But let
us examine this convenience and see what it
is. The report on this subject, page 3. states
the only general convenience to be, the pre
venting the transportation and retransporta-
tion of money between the States and the
treasury (for I pass over the increase of
circulating medium, ascribed to it as a want,
and which, according to my ideas of paper
money, is clearly a demerit). Every State
will have to pay a sum of tax money into the
treasury ; and the treasury will have to pay,
in every State, a part of the interest on the
public debt, and salaries to the officers of
government resident in that State. In most
of the States there will still be a surplus of
tax money to come up to the seat of govern
ment for the officers residing there. The
payments of interest and salary in each State
may be made by treasury orders on the State
collector. This will take up the great export
of the money he has collected in his State,
and consequently prevent the great mass of it
from being drawn out of the State. If there
be a balance of commerce in favor of that
State against the one in which the govern
ment resides, the surplus of taxes will be re
mitted by the bills of exchange drawn for
that commercial balance. And so it must be
if there was a bank. But if there be no bal
ance of commerce, either direct or circuitous,
all the banks in the world could not bring up
the surplus of taxes, but in the form of
money. Treasury orders then, and bills of
exchange may prevent the displacement of the
Bank
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
70
main mass of the money collected, without
the aid of any bank; and where these fail,
it cannot be prevented even with that aid.
Perhaps, indeed, bank bills may be a more
convenient vehicle than treasury orders. But
a little difference in the degree of conve
niences, cannot constitute the necessity which
the Constitution makes the ground for as
suming any non-enumerated power.
Besides ; the existing banks will, without a
doubt, enter into arrangements for lending
their agency, and the more favorable, as there
will be a competition among them for it;
whereas the bill delivers us up bound to the
national bank, who are free to refuse all ar
rangement, but on their own terms, and the
public not free, on such refusal, to employ
any other bank. That of Philadelphia, I be
lieve, now does this business, by their post-
notes, which, by an arrangement with the
treasury, are paid by any State collector to
whom they are presented. This expedient
alone suffices to prevent the existence of that
necessity which may justify the assumption
of a non-enumerated power as a means for
carrying into effect an enumerated one. The
thing may be done, and has been done, and
well done, without this assumption ; therefore,
it does not stand on that degree of necessity
which can honestly justify it. It may be said
that a bank whose bills would have a currency
all over the States, would be more convenient
than one whose currency is limited to a single
State. So it would be still more convenient
that there should be a bank, whose bills
should have a currency all over the world.
But it does not follow from this superior
conveniency, that there exists anywhere a
power to establish such a bank; or that the
world may not go on very well without it.
Can it be thought that the Constitution in
tended that for a shade or two of convenience.
more or less, Congress should be authorized
to break down the most ancient and funda
mental laws of the several States; such as
those against Mortmain, the laws of Alienage.
the rules of Descent, the acts of Distribu
tion, the laws of Escheat and Forfeiture, the
laws of Monopoly? Nothing but a necessity
invincible by any other means, can justify
such a prostitution of laws, which constitute
the pillars of our whole system of jurispru
dence. Will Congress be too straight-laced
to carry the Constitution into honest effect,
unless they may pass over the foundation
laws of the State government for the slightest
convenience of theirs?
The negative of the President is the shield
provided by the Constitution to protect
against the invasions of the Legislature: I.
The right of the Executive. 2. Of the Ju
diciary. 3. Of the States and State Legisla
tures. The present is the case of a right re
maining exclusively with the States, and con
sequently one of those intended by the Con
stitution to be placed under its protection.
It must be added, however, that unless the
President's mind on a view of everything
which is urged for and against this bill, is
tolerably clear that it is unauthorized by the
Constitution ; if the pro and the con hang so
even as to balance his judgment, a just re
spect for the wisdom of the Legislature would
naturally decide the balance in favor of their
opinion. It is chiefly for cases where they
are clearly misled by error, ambition, or in
terest, that the Constitution has placed a
check in the negative of the President.—
NATIONAL BANK OPINION, vii, 555. FORD
ED., v, 284. (February 1791.)
665. BANK (IT. S.), Directors of.—
While the Government remained at Philadel
phia, a selection of members of both Houses
were constantly kept as directors, who, on
every question interesting to that institution,
or to the views of the federal head, voted at
the will of that head; and, together with the
stockholding members, could always make
the federal vote that of the majority. By
this combination, legislative expositions were
given to the Constitution, and all the admin
istrative laws were shaped on the model of
England, and so passed. And from this in
fluence we were not relieved, until the re
moval from the precincts of the Bank, to
Washington. — THE ANAS, ix, 95. FORD ED
i, 164. (1818.)
666. BANK (U. S.), Dividends of.— The
bank has just notified its proprietors that
they may call for a dividend of ten per cent,
on their capital for the last six months. This
makes a profit of twenty-six per cent, per an
num. Agriculture, commerce, and everything
useful must be neglected, when the useless
employment of money is so much more
lucrative. — To PLUMARD DE RIEUX. FORD
ED., v, 420. (Pa., 1792.)
667. BANK (U. S.), Fall in stock.— The
failure of some stock gamblers and some
other circumstances, have brought the public
paper low. The 6 per cents have fallen from
26 to 21 1-4, and bank paper stock from 115
or 120 to 73 or 74, within two or three weeks.
This nefarious business is becoming more
and more the public detestation, and cannot
fail, when the knowledge of it shall be suffi
ciently extended, to tumble its authors head
long from their heights. — To WILLIAM
SHORT, iii, 342. FORD ED., v, 459. (Pa.,
March 1792.)
668. BANK (U. S.), Hostility to U. S.
Government. — This institution is one of the
most deadly hostility existing, against the
principles and form of our Constitution. The
nation is, at this time, so strong and united
in its sentiments, that it cannot be shaken at
this moment. But suppose a series of unto
ward events should occur, sufficient to bring
into doubt the competency of a republican
government to meet a crisis of great danger,
or to unhinge the confidence of the people in
the public functionaries: an institution like
this, penetrating by its branches every part of
the Union, acting by command and in
phalanx, may, in a critical moment, upset the
government.. I deem no government safe
which is under the vassalage of any self-con
stituted authorities, or any other authority
than that of the nation, or its regular func-
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Bank
tionaries. What an obstruction could not this
Bank of the United States, with all its branch
banks, be in time of war? It might dictate
to us the peace we should accept, or withdraw
its aids. Ought we then to give further
growth to an institution so powerful, so
hostile? That it is so hostile we know: I,
from a knowledge of the principles of the
persons composing the body of directors in
every bank, principal or branch ; and those of
most of the stockholders; 2, from their op
position to the measures and principles of the
government, and to the election of those
friendly to them; and 3, from the sentiments
of the newspapers they support. Now, while
we are strong, it is the greatest debt we owe
to the safety of our Constitution, to bring its
powerful enemy to a perfect subordination
under its authorities. The first measure
would be to reduce them to an equal footing
only with other banks, as to the favors of the
government. But, in order to be able to meet
a general combination of the banks against
us, in a critical emergency, could we not
make a beginning towards an independent use
of our own money, towards holding our own
bank in all the deposits where it is received,
and letting the treasurer give his draft or
note, for payment at any particular place,
which, in a well-conducted government, ought
to have as much credit as any private draft,
or bank note, or bill, and would give us the
same facilities which we derive from • the
banks? — To ALBERT GALLATIN. iv, 519. FORD
ED., viii, 284. (W., Dec. 1803.)
669. BANK (U.S.), Inflation projects.
—The Bank is so firmly mounted on us that
we must go where they will guide. They
openly publish a resolution, that the national
property being increased in value, they must
by an increase of circulating medium furnish
an adequate representation of it, and by fur
ther additions of active capital promote the
enterprises of our merchants. It is supposed
that the paper in circulation in and around
Philadelphia, amounts to twenty millions of
dollars, and that in the whole Union, to one
hundred millions. — To JAMES MONROE, iv,
140. FORD ED., vii, 80. (M., June 1796.)
670. BANK (IT. S.), Regulation of.—
The Attorney General having considered and
decided that the prescription in the law for
establishing a bank, that the officers in the
subordinate offices of discount and deposit,
shall be appointed " on the same terms and
in the same manner practiced in the principal
bank," does not extend to them the principle
of rotation, established by the Legislature in
the body of directors in the principal bank,
it follows that the extension of that principle
has been merely a voluntary and prudential
act of the principal bank, from which they
are free to depart. I think the extension was
wise and proper on their part, because the
Legislature having deemed rotation useful in
the principal bank constituted by them, there
would be the same reason for it in the sub
ordinate banks to be established by the princi
pal. It breaks in upon the esprit de corps
so apt to prevail in permanent bodies: it
gives a chance for the public eye penetrating
into the sanctuary of those proceedings and
practices, which the avarice of the directors
may introduce for their personal emolument,
and which the resentments of excluded direct
ors, or the honesty of those duly admitted,
might betray to the public; and it gives an
opportunity at the end of the year, or at
other periods, of correcting a choice, which,
on trial, proves to have been unfortunate: an
evil of which themselves complain in their
distant institutions. Whether, however, they
have a power to alter this, or not, the Execu
tive has no right to decide : and their consul
tation with you has been merely an act of
complaisance, or a desire to shield so im
portant an innovation under the cover of ex
ecutive sanction. But ought we to volunteer
our sanction in such a case? Ought we to
disarm ourselves of any fair right of ani
madversion, whenever that institution shall
be a legitimate subject of consideration? I
own, I think the most proper answer would
be that we do not think ourselves authorized
to give an opinion on the question. — To AL
BERT GALLATIN. iv, 518. FORD ED., viii, 284.
(W., 1803.)
671. BANK (U. S.), Richmond Branch.
— It seems nearly settled with the Treasuro-
bankites that a branch shall be established at
Richmond. Could not a counter-bank be set
up to befriend the agricultural man by let
ting him have money on a deposit of tobacco
notes, or even wheat, for a short time, and
would not such a bank enlist the legislature in
its favor, and against the Treasury bank? —
To JAMES MADISON. FORD ED., vi, 98. (Pa.,
1792.)
672. BANK (IT. S.), Ruin by.— It was
impossible the Bank and paper mania should
not produce great and extensive ruin. The
President is fortunate to get off just as the
bubble is bursting, leaving others to hold the
bag. Yet, as his departure will mark the mo
ment when the difficulties begin to work, you
will see, that they will be ascribed to the new
administration, and that he will have his
usual good fortune of reaping credit from the
good acts of others, and leaving to them that
of his errors. — To JAMES MADISON. FORD ED.,
vii, 104. (Jan. 1797.)
673. BANK (IT. S.), Saddled by.— We
are completely saddled and bridled, and the
bank is so firmly mounted on us that we must
go where they will guide. — To JAMES MON
ROE, iv, 140. FORD ED., vii, 80. (M., June
1796.)
674. BANK (U. S.), Subscriptions to.—
You will have seen the rapidity with which
the subscriptions to the bank were filled. As
yet the delirium of speculation is too strong
to admit sober reflection. It remains to be
seen whether in a country whose capital is
too small to carry on its own commerce, to
establish manufactures, erect buildings, &c.,
such sums should have been withdrawn from
these useful pursuits to be employed in gam
bling? Whether it was well judged to force
Bank
Bankruptcy
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
on the public a paper circulation of so many
millions for which they will be paying about
7 per cent, per ann. and thereby banish as
many millions of gold and silver for which
they would have paid no interest? I am afraid
it is the intention to nourish this spirit of
gambling by throwing in from time to time
new aliment. — To EDMUND PENDLETON. FORD
ED., v, 357. (Pa., 1791-)
675. . The subscriptions to the
Bank from Virginia were almost none. * * *
This gives so much uneasiness to Colonel
Hamilton that he thinks to propose to the
President to sell some of the public shares to
subscribers from Virginia and North Caro
lina, if any more should offer. This partial
ity would offend the other States without
pleasing those two : for I presume they would
rather the capitals of their citizens should be
employed in commerce than be locked up in
a strong box here [Philadelphia] : nor can
sober thinkers prefer a paper medium at 13
per cent, interest to gold and silver for noth
ing. — To JAMES MADISON. FORD ED., v, 350.
(Pa., 1791.)
676. . The bank filled and over
flowed in the moment it was opened. In
stead of twenty thousand shares, twenty-four
thousand were offered, and a great many were
presented, who had not suspected that so
much haste was necessary. Thus it is that we
shall be paying 13 per cent, per ann. for eight
millions of paper money, instead of having
that circulation of gold and silver for noth
ing. Experience has proved to us that a
dollar of silver disappears for every dollar of
paper emitted; and, for the paper emitted
from the bank, seven per cent, profits will be
received by the subscribers for it as bank
paper (according to the last division of profits
by the Philadelphia bank), and six per cent,
on the public paper of which it is the repre
sentative. Nor is there any reason to believe,
that either the six millions of public paper,
or the two millions of specie deposited, will
not be suffered to be withdrawn, and the
paper thrown into circulation. The cash de
posited by strangers for safe keeping will
probably suffice for cash demands. — To JAMES
MONROE, iii, 268. FORD ED., v, 352. (Pa., 1791.)
677. BANKRUPTCY, Agriculture,
Commerce and.— I find you are to be har
assed again with a bankrupt law. Could you
not compromise between agriculture and com
merce by passing such a law which like the
by-laws of incorporate towns, should be bind
ing on the inhabitants of such towns only,
being the residence of commerce, leaving the
agriculturists, inhabitants of the country, in
undisturbed possession of the rights and
modes of proceedings to which their habits,
their interests and their partialities attach
them? This would be as uniform as other
laws of local obligation. — To JAMES PLEAS-
ANTS. FORD ED., x, 198. (M., 1821.)
678. BANKRUPTCY, Agriculturists
and. — A bankrupt bill is brought in in such a
form as to render almost all the landholders
south of Pennsylvania liable to be declared
bankrupts. Hitherto we had imagined that the
General Government could not meddle with
the title to lands. — To T. M. RANDOLPH. FORD
ED., vi, 149. (Pa., 1792.)
679. . The bankrupt bill is
brought on with some very threatening fea
tures to landed and farming men, who are
in danger of being drawn into its vortex. It
assumes the right of seizing and selling lands,
and so cuts the knotty question of the Consti
tution, whether the General Government may
direct the transmission of land by descent or
otherwise. — To JOHN FRANCIS MERCER, iii,
495. FORD ED., vi, 148. (Pa., 1792.)
680. BANKRUPTCY, English Law of.
— The British statute excepts expressly farm
ers, graziers, drovers, as such though they
buy to sell again. This bill has no such ex
ception. The British adjudications exempt
the buyers and sellers of bank stock, govern
ment paper, &c. What feelings guided the
draughtsman [of this bill] in adhering to his
original in this case and then departing from
it in the other? The British courts adjudge
that any artists may be bankrupts if the ma
terials of their art are bought, such as shoe
makers, blacksmiths, carpenters, &c. Will the
body of our artists desire to be brought within
the vortex of this law? It will follow as a
consequence that the master who has an artist
of this kind in his family, whether hired, in
dentured, or a slave, to serve the purposes of
his farm or family, but who may at leisure
time do something for his neighbors also, may
be a bankrupt. The British law makes a de
parture from the realm, i. e. out of the media
tion of British law, an act of bankruptcy.
This bill makes a departure from the State
wherein he resides (though into a neighbor
ing one where the laws of the United States
run equally), an act of bankruptcy. The
commissioners may enter houses, break open
doors, chests &c. Are we really ripe for
this? Is that spirit of independence and sov
ereignty, which a man feels in his own house,
and which Englishmen felt when they denom
inated their houses their castles, to be abso
lutely subdued, and is it expedient that it
should be subdued? The lands of the bank
rupt are to be taken, sold. Is not this a pre
dominant question between the General and
State legislatures? Is commerce so much the
basis of the existence of the United States as
to call for a bankrupt law? On the contrary,
are we not almost agricultural ? Should not all
laws be made with a view essentially to the
poor husbandman? When laws are wanting
for particular descriptions of other callings,
should not the husbandman be carefully ex
cused from their operation, and preserved un
der that of the general system only, which
general system is fitted to the condition of
the husbandman?* — NOTES ON THE BANK
RUPT BILL, ix, 431. FORD ED., vi, 145. (Dec.
1792.)
* This paper is without date. Jefferson gave it this
caption: "Extempore thoughts and doubts on very
superficially running over the bankrupt bill." A
bankrupt bill, introduced in the House in December,
1702, by W. L. Smith, is probably the one referred to.
—EDITOR.
73
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Banks
681. BANKS, Abuses of.— The crisis of
the abuses of banking is arrived. The banks
have pronounced their own sentence of death.
Between two and three hundred millions of
dollars of their promissory notes are in the
hands of the people, for solid produce and
property sold, and they formally declare they
will not pay them. This is an act of bank
ruptcy, of course, and will be so pronounced
by any court before which it shall be brought.
But cui bono? The laws can only uncover
their insolvency, by opening to its suitors
their empty vaults. Thus by the dupery of
our citizens, and tame acquiescence of our
legislators, the nation is plundered of two or
three hundred millions of dollars, treble the
amount of debt contracted in the Revolution
ary war, and which, instead of redeeming our
liberty, has been expended on sumptuous
houses, carriages, and dinners. A fearful
tax! if equalized on all; but overwhelming
and convulsive by its partial fall. — To
THOMAS COOPER, vi, 381. (M., Sep. 1814.)
682. . Everything predicted by
the enemies of banks, in the beginning, is now
coming to pass. We are to be ruined now by
the deluge of bank paper, as we were formerly
by the old Continental paper. It is cruel that
such revolutions in private fortunes should
be at the mercy of avaricious adventurers,
who, instead of employing their capital, if
any they have, in manufactures, commerce,
and other useful pursuits, make it an instru
ment to burthen all the interchanges of prop
erty with their swindling profits, profits
which are the price of no useful industry of
theirs. Prudent men must be on their guard
in this game of Robin's alive, and take care
that the spark does not extinguish in their
hands. I am an enemy to all banks discount
ing bills or notes for anything but coin. But
our whole country is so fascinated by this
Jack-lantern wealth, that they will not stop
short of its total and fatal explosion.* — To
DR. THOMAS COOPER, vi, 295. (M., Jan. 1814.)
683. . The enormous abuses of
the banking system are not only prostrating
our commerce, but producing revolution of
property, which without more wisdom than
we possess, will be much greater than were
produced by the Revolutionary paper. That,
too, had the merit of purchasing our liberties,
while the present trash has only furnished
aliment to usurers and swindlers. — To RICH
ARD RUSH. FORD ED., x, 133. (M., June
1819.)
684. BANKS, Aristocracy.— I hope we
shall * * * crush in its birth the aristoc
racy of our moneyed corporations, which dare
already to challenge our government to a trial
of strength, and bid defiance to the laws of
our country. — To GEORGE LOGAN. FORD ED.,
x, 69. (P.F., Nov. 1816.)
685. . The bank mania * * *
is raising up a moneyed aristocracy in our
country which has already set the govern
ment at defiance, and although forced at
* This accordingly took place four years later. —
NOTE, WASHINGTON EDITION,
length to yield a little on this first essay
of their strength, their principles are un-
yielded and unyielding. These have taken
deep root in the hearts of that class from
which our legislators are drawn, and the sop
to Cerberus from fable has become history.
Their principles lay hold of the good, their
pelf of the bad, and thus those whom the Con
stitution had placed as guards to its portals,
are sophisticated or suborned from their du
ties.— To DR. J. B. STUART, vii, 64. (M.,
1817.)
686. BANKS, Capital and.— At the time
we were funding our national debt, we heard
much about " a public debt being a public
blessing " ; that the stock representing it was
a creation of active capital for the aliment of
commerce, manufactures and agriculture.
This paradox was well adapted to the minds of
believers in dreams, and the gulls of that size
entered bond fide into it. But the art and mys
tery of banks is a wonderful improvement on
that. It is established on the principle that
" private debts are a public blessing." That
the evidences of those private debts, called
bank notes, become active capital, and aliment
the whole commerce, manufactures, and agri
culture of the United States. Here are a set
of people, for instance, who have bestowed on
us the great blessing of running in our debt
about two hundred millions of dollars, with
out our knowing who they are, where they
are, or what property they have to pay this
debt when called on ; nay, who have made us
so sensible of the blessings of letting them
run in our debt, that we have exempted them
by law from the repayment of these debts be
yond a given proportion (generally estimated
at one-third). And to fill up the measure of
blessing, instead of paying, they receive an
interest on what they owe from those to
whom they owe; for all the notes, or evi
dences of what they owe, which we see In
circulation, have been lent to somebody on
an interest which is levied again on us
through the medium of commerce. And they
are so ready still to deal out their liberalities
to us, that they are now willing to let them
selves run in our debt ninety millions more,
on our paying them the same premium of six
or eight per cent, interest, and on the same
legal exemption from the repayment of more
than thirty millions of the debt, when it shall
be called for. But let us look at this principle
in its original form, and its copy will then be
equally understood. "A public debt is a pub
lic blessing." That our debt was juggled
from forty-three up to eighty millions, and
funded at that amount, according to this opin
ion was a great public blessing, because the
evidences of it could be vested in commerce,
and thus converted into active capital, and
then the more the debt was made to be, the
more active capital was created. That is to
say, the creditors could now employ in com
merce the money due them from the public,
and make from it an annual profit of five per
cent., or four millions of dollars. But ob
serve, that the public were at the same time
paying on it an interest of exactly the same
Banks
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
74
amount of four millions of dollars. Where,
then, is the gain to either party, which makes
it a public blessing? There is no change in
the state of things, but of persons only. A
has a debt due to him from the public, of
which he holds their certificate as evidence,
and on which he is receiving an annual inter
est. He wishes, however, to have the money
itself, and to go into business with it. B has
an equal sum of money in business, but wishes
now to retire, and live on the interest. He
therefore gives it to A in exchange for A's
certificates of public stock. Now, then, A has
the money to employ in business, which B so
employed before. B has the money on inter
est to live on, which A lived on before ; and
the public pays the interest to B which they
paid to A before. Here is no new creation of
capital, no additional money employed, nor
even a change in the employment of a single
dollar. The only change is of place between
A and B in which we discover no creation of
capital, nor public blessing. Suppose, again,
the public to owe nothing. Then A not hav
ing lent his money to the public, would be in
possession of it himself, and would go into
business without the previous operation of
selling stock. Here again, the same quantity
of capital is employed as in the former case,
though no public debt exists. In neither case
is there any creation of active capital, nor
other difference than that there is a public
debt in the first case, and none in the last;
and we safely ask which of the two situa
tions is most truly a public blessing? If,
then, a public debt be no public blessing, we
may pronounce, a fortiori, that a private one
cannot be so. If the debt which the bank
ing companies owe be a blessing to anybody,
it is to themselves alone, who are realizing a
solid interest of eight or ten per cent, on it.
As to the public, these companies have ban
ished all our gold and silver medium, which,
before their institution, we had without in
terest, which never could have perished in
our hands, and would have been our salvation
now in the hour of war ; instead of which
they have given us two hundred millions of
froth and bubble, on which we are to pay
them heavy interest, until it shall vanish into
air, as Morris's notes did. We are warranted,
then, in affirming that this parody on the prin
ciple of " a public debt being a public bless
ing," and its mutation into the blessing of
private instead of public debts, is as ridicu
lous as the original principle itself. — To J. W.
EPPES. vi, 239. FORD ED., ix, 411. (M., Nov.
1813.)
687. . Capital may be produced
by industry, and accumulated by economy;
but jugglers only will propose to create it by
legerdemain tricks with paper. — To J. W.
EPPES. vi, 241. FORD ED., ix, 413. (M., Nov.
1813.)
688. BANKS, Criticism of.— I am too
desirous of tranquillity to bring such a nest of
hornets on me as the fraternity of banking
companies. — To JOSEPH C. CABELL. vi, 300.
(M., 1814.)
689. BANKS, Dangerous. — Banking es
tablishments are more dangerous than stand
ing armies. — To JOHN TAYLOR, vi, 608. FORD
ED., x, 31. (M., 1816.)
690. BANKS, Deposit.— Banks of de
posit, where cash should be lodged, and a pa
per acknowledgment taken out as its repre
sentative, entitled to a return of the cash on
demand, would be convenient for remittances,
traveling persons, &c. But, liable as its cash
would be to be pilfered and robbed, and its
paper to be fraudulently reissued, or issued
without deposit, it would require skilful and
strict regulation. This would differ from the
bank of Amsterdam, in the circumstance that
the cash could be redeemed on returning the
note. — To J. W. EPPES. vi, 247. FORD ED., ix,
417. (M., Nov. 1813.)
691. BANKS, Depreciated Paper of.—
Everything predicted by the enemies of banks,
in the beginning, is now coming to pass. We
are to be ruined now by the deluge of bank
paper, as we were formerly by the old Con
tinental paper. It is cruel that such revolu
tions in private fortunes should be at the
mercy of avaricious adventurers, who, instead
of employing their capital, if they have any, in
manufactures, commerce, and other useful
pursuits, make it an instrument to burden all
the interchanges of property with their swind
ling profits, profits which are the price of no
useful industry of theirs. Prudent men must
be on their guard in this game of Robin's
alive, and take care that the spark does not
extinguish in their hands. I am an enemy
to all banks discounting bills or notes for
anything but coin. But our whole country is
so fascinated by this Jack-lantern wealth, that
they will not stop short of its total and fatal
explosion. — To THOMAS COOPER, vi, 295.
(M., Jan. 1814.)
692. . Already there is so much
of their trash afloat that the great holders of
it show vast anxiety to get rid of it. They
perceive that now, as in the Revolutionary
war, we are engaged in the old game of Rob
in's alive. They are ravenous after lands and
stick at no price. In the neighborhood of
Richmond, the seat of that sort of sensibility,
they offer twice as much now as they would
give a year ago. — To PRESIDENT MADISON.
FORD ED., ix, 453. (M., Feb. 1814.)
693. . The depreciation of bank
paper swells nominal prices, without furnish
ing any stable index of value. I will endeavor
briefly to give you an idea of this state of
things by an outline of its history.
In 1781 we had I bank, its capital $1,000,000.
In 1791 we had 6 banks, their capital $13,-
135,000.
In 1794 we had 17 banks, their capital $18,-
642,000.
In 1796 we had 24 banks, their capital $20,-
472,000.
In 1803 we had 34 banks, their capital $29,-
112,000.
In 1804 we had 66 banks, their amount of
capital not known.
75
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Banks
And at this time we have probably one
hundred banks, with capital amounting to
one hundred millions of dollars, on which
they are authorized by law to issue notes to
three times that amount, so that our circulating
medium may now be estimated at from two
to three hundred millions of dollars, on a
population of eight and a half millions. The
banks were able for awhile, to keep this trash
at par with metallic money, or rather to de
preciate the metals to a par with their paper,
by keeping deposits of cash sufficient to ex
change for such of their notes as they were
called on to pay in cash. But the circum
stances of the war draining away all our
specie, all these banks have stopped payment,
but with a promise to resume specie ex
changes whenever circumstances shall produce
a return of the metals. Some of the most
prudent and honest will possibly do this ; but
the mass of them never will nor can. Yet,
having no other medium, we take their pa
per, of necessity, for purposes of the instant,
but never to lay by us. The government is
now issuing treasury notes for circulation,
bottomed on solid funds, and bearing interest.
The banking confederacy (and the merchants
bound to them by their debts) will endeavor
to crush the credit of these notes ; but the
country is eager for them, as something they
can trust to, and so soon as a convenient
quantity of them can get into circulation, the
bank notes die. — To JEAN BAPTISTE SAY.
vi, 434. (M., March 1815.)
694. BANKS, Difficulties caused by.—
For the emolument of a small proportion of
our society, who prefer those demoralizing
pursuits [banking and commerce] to labors
useful to the whole, the peace of the whole
is endangered, and all our present difficul
ties produced. — To ABBE SALIMANKIS. v, 516.
(M., 1810.)
695. . The fatal possession of
the whole circulating medium by our banks,
the excess of those institutions, and their
present discredit, cause all our difficulties. —
To W. H. CRAWFORD, vi, 419. FORD ED., ix,
503. (M., Feb. 1815.)
696. BANKS, Dominion of.— -The do
minion of the banks must be broken, or it
will break us. — To JAMES MONROE, vi, 409.
FORD ED., ix, 498. (M., Jan. 1815.)
697. BANKS, Dropsical.— I wish I could
see Congress get into a better train of finance.
Their banking projects are like dosing dropsy
with more water. * * * Their new bank,
if not abortive at its birth, will not last
through one campaign; and the taxes pro
posed cannot be paid. — To WILLIAM SHORT.
vi, 400. (M., Nov. 1814.)
698. BANKS, Evils of.— The evils they
[the banks] have engendered are now upon
us, and the question is how we are to get out
of them? Shall we build an altar to the old
paper money of the Revolution, which ruined
individuals but saved the republic, and burn
on that all the bank charters, present and fu
ture, and their notes with them? For these
are to ruin both republic and individuals.
This cannot be done. The mania is too
strong. It has seized by its delusions and
corruptions, all the members of pur govern
ments, general, special and individual. — To
JOHN ADAMS, vi, 305. (M., Jan. 1814.)
699. - — . I think it impossible but
that the whole system must blow up before
the year is out ; and thus a tax of three or
four hundred millions will be levied on our
citizens who had found it a work of so much
time and labor to pay off a debt of eighty
millions which had redeemed them from bond
age.— To PRESIDENT MADISON. FORD ED., ix,
453- (M., Feb. 1814.)
— . I see that this infatuation
of banks must take its course, until actual ruin
shall awaken us from its delusions. Until the
gigantic banking propositions of this winter
had made their appearance in the different
Legislatures, I had hoped that the evil might
still be checked; but I see now that it is des
perate, and that we must fold our arms and
go to the bottom with the ship. — To JOSEPH
C CABELL. vi, 300. (M., Jan. 1814.)
701. - _. The evils of this deluge
of paper money are not to be removed until
our citizens are generally and radically in
structed in their cause and consequences, and
silence by their authority the interested clam
ors and sophistry of speculating, shaving,
and banking institutions. Till then we must
be content to return, quoad hoc, to the savage
state, to recur to barter in the exchange of
our property, for want of a stable, common
measure of value, that now in use being less
fixed than the beads and wampum of the In
dian, and to deliver up our citizens, their
property and their labor, passive victims to
the swindling tricks of bankers and mounte-
bankers. — To JOHN ADAMS, vii, 115. (M.
1819.)
702. BANKS, Excess of.— That we are
overdone with banking institutions, which
have banished the precious metals, and sub
stituted a more fluctuating and unsafe me
dium, that these have withdrawn capital from
useful improvements and employments to
nourish idleness * * * are evils more
easily to be deplored than remedied. — To
ABBE SALIMANKIS. v, 516. (M., 1810.)
703. - — .A parcel of mushroom
banks have set up in every State, have filled
the country with their notes, and have thereby
banished all our specie. A twelvemonth ago
they all declared they could not pay cash for
their own notes, and notwithstanding this act
of bankruptcy, this trash has of necessity been
passing among us, because we have no other
medium of exchange, and is still taken and
passed from hand to hand, as you remember
the old Continental money to have been in
the Revolutionary war; every one getting rid
of it as quickly as he can, by laying it out in
property of any sort at double, treble and
manifold higher prices. * * * A general
crush is daily expected when this trash will
be lost in the hands of the holders. This will
take place the moment some specie returns
Banks
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
76
among us, or so soon as the government will
issue bills of circulation. The little they have
issued is greatly sought after, and a premium
given for them which is rising fast. — To
PHILLIP MAZZEI. FORD ED., ix, 524. (M.,
Aug. 1815.)
704. BANKS, Failures of.— The failure
of our banks will occasion embarrassment for
awhile, although it restores to us a fund
which ought never to have been surrendered
by the nation, and which now, prudently used,
will carry us through all the fiscal difficulties
of the war. — To PRESIDENT MADISON, vi, 386.
(M., Sep. 1814.)
705. . The banks have discon
tinued themselves. We are now without any
medium ; and necessity, as well as patriotism,
and confidence, will make us all eager to re
ceive treasury notes, if founded on specific
taxes. Congress may now borrow of the pub
lic, and without interest, all the money they
may want, to the amount of a competent cir
culation, by merely issuing their own promis
sory notes, of proper denominations for the
larger purposes of circulation, but not for the
small. Leave that door open for the entrance
of metallic money. — To THOMAS COOPER, vi,
382. (M., Sep. 1814.)
706. . Providence seems, in
deed, by a special dispensation, to have put
down for us, without a struggle, that very
paper enemy which the interest of our citi
zens long since required ourselves to put
down, at whatever risk. The work is done.
The moment is pregnant with futurity, and
if not seized at once by Congress, I know not
on what shoal our bark is next to be stranded.
— To THOMAS COOPER, vi, 382. (M., Sep.
1814.)
707. - _. The crush will be tre
mendous ; very different from that brought
on by our paper money. That rose and fell
so gradually that it kept all on their guard,
and affected severely only early or long-
winded contracts. Here the contract of yester
day crushes in an instant the one or the other
party. The banks stopping payment suddenly,
all their mercantile and city debtors do the
same; and all, in short, except those in the
country, who, possessing property, will be
good in the end. But this resource will not
enable them to pay a cent on the dollar. —
To THOMAS COOPER, vi, 381. (M., Sep. 1814.)
708. . The paper interest is now
defunct. Their gossamer castles are dis
solved, and they can no longer impede and
overawe the salutary measures of the govern
ment. Their paper was received on a belief
that it was cash on demand. Themselves
have declared it was nothing, and such
scenes are now to take place as will open the
eyes of credulity and of insanity itself to the
dangers of a paper medium, abandoned' to
the discretion of avarice and of swindlers. It
is impossible not to deplore our past follies,
and their present consequences, but let them
at least be warnings against like follies in
future. — To THOMAS COOPER, vi, 382. (M.,
Sep. 1814.)
709. BANKS, Fictitious Capital.— The
banks themselves were doing business on cap
itals, three-fourths of which were fictitious;
and to extend their profit they furnished ficti
tious capital to every man, who having noth
ing and disliking the labors of the plow,
chose rather to call himself a merchant, to
set up a house of $5,000 a year expense, to
dash into every species of mercantile gam
bling, and if that ended as gambling gen
erally does, a fraudulent bankruptcy was an
ultimate resource of retirement and compe
tence. This fictitious capital, probably of one
hundred millions of dollars, is now to be lost,
and to fall on somebody ; it must take on those
who have property to meet it, and probably
on the less cautious part, who, not aware of
the impending catastrophe have suffered
themselves to contract, or to be in debt, and
must now sacrifice their property of a value
many times the amount of their debt. We
have been truly sowing the wind, and are
now reaping the whirlwind. If the present
crisis should end in the annihilation of these
pennyless and ephemeral interlopers only, and
reduce our commerce to the measure of dur
own wants and surplus productions, it will
be a benefit in the end. But how to effect this,
and give time to real capital, and the holders
of real property, to back out of their entan
glements by degrees requires more knowledge
of political economy than we possess. I be
lieve it might be done, but I despair of its
being done. The eyes of our citizens are not
sufficiently open to the true cause of our dis
tress. They ascribe them to everything but
their true cause, the banking system ; a sys
tem, which, if it could do good in any form,
is yet so certain of leading to abuse, as to be
utterly incompatible with the public safety
and prosperity. At present, all is confusion,
uncertainty and panic. — To RICHARD RUSH.
FORD ED., x, 133. (M., June 1819.)
710. BANKS, Government Deposits
and. — The application of the Bank of Balti
more is of great importance. The considera
tion is very weighty that it is held by citizens,
while the stock of the United States bank is
held in so great a proportion by foreigners.
Were the Bank of the United States to swal
low up the others and monopolize the whole
banking business of the United States, which
the demands we furnish them with tend
shortly to favor, we might, on a misunder
standing with a foreign power, be immensely
embarrassed by any disaffection in that bank.
It is certainly for the public good to keep all
the banks competitors for our favors by a ju
dicious distribution of them, and thus to en
gage the individuals who belong to them in
the support of the reformed order of things,
or at least in an acquiescence under it. I
suppose that, on the condition of participating
in the deposits, the banks would be willing to
make such communications of their opera
tions and the state of their affairs as might
satisfy the Secretary of the Treasury of their
stability. It is recommended to Mr. Gallatin
to leave such an opening in his answer to this
letter, as to leave us free to do hereafter what
77
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Banks
shall be advisable on a broad view of all the
banks in the different parts of the Union. — To
ALBERT GALLATIN. FORD ED., viii, 172. (Oct
1802.)
711. . As to the patronage of
the Republican Bank at Providence, I am de
cidedly in favor of making all the banks re
publican, by sharing deposits with them in
proportion to the dispositions they show. If
the law now forbids it, we should not permit
another session of Congress to pass without
amending it. It is material to the safety of
republicanism to detach the mercantile in
terest from its enemies and incorporate them
into the body of its friends. — To ALBERT GAL-
LATIN. FORD ED., viii, 252. (July 1803.)
712. BANKS, Jefferson's disapproba
tion of Paper. — My original disapprobation
of banks circulating paper is not unknown,
nor have I since observed any effects either on
the morals or fortunes of our citizens, which
are any counter balance for the public evils
produced. — To J. W. EPPES. vi, 203. FORD
ED., ix, 402. (P.F., Sep. 1813.)
713. - _. The toleration of banks
of paper-discount costs the United States one
half their war taxes; or, in other words,
doubles the expense of every war. — To J. W.
EPPES. vi, 201. FORD ED., ix, 400. (P.F.,
Sep. 1813.)
714. . From the establishment
of the United States Bank to this day, I have
preached against this system, and have been
sensible no cure could be hoped, but in the
catastrophe now happening. — To THOMAS
COOPER, vi, 381. (M., 1814.)
715. . I have ever been the en
emy of banks, not of those discounting for
cash, but of those foisting their own paper
into circulation, and thus banishing our cash.
My zeal against those institutions was so
warm and open at the establishment of the
Bank of the United States, that I was derided
as a maniac by the tribe of bank-mongers,
who were seeking to filch from the public
their swindling and barren gains. — To JOHN
ADAMS, vi, 305. (M., Jan. 1814.)
716. . I am an enemy to all
banks discounting bills or notes for anything
but coin. — To DR. THOMAS COOPER, vi, 295.
(M., Jan. 1814.)
717. . The system of banking
we have both equally and ever reprobated.
I contemplate it as a blot left in all our con
stitutions, which, if not covered, will end in
their destruction, which is already hit by the
gamblers in corruption, and is sweeping away
in its progress the fortunes and morals of our
citizens. — To JOHN TAYLOR, vi, 605. FORD
ED., x, 28. (M., May 1816.)
718. . I do not know whether
you may recollect how loudly my voice was
raised against the establishment of banks in
the beginning ; but like that of Cassandra it
was not listened to. I was set down as a
madman by those who have since been vic
tims to them. I little thought then how much
I was to suffer by them myself; for I, too, am
taken in by endorsements for a friend to the
amount of $20,000, for the payment of which
I shall have to make sale of that much of my
property. And yet the general revolution of
fortunes, which these instruments have pro
duced, seems not at all to have cured our
country of this mania. — To THOMAS LEIPER.
FORD ED., x, 254. (May 1823.)
719. BANKS, Mania for.— We are un
done if this banking mania be not suppressed.
Aut Carthago, out Roma delcnda cst. — To
ALBERT GALLATIN. vi, 498. (M., Oct. 1815.)
720. . The mania * * * has
seized, by its delusions and corruptions, all
the members of our governments, general,
special, and individual. — To JOHN ADAMS.
vi, 306. (M., Jan. 1814.)
721. . Knowing well that the
Bank mania still possessed the great body of
our countrymen, it was not expected that any
radical cure of that could be at once effected.
We must go further wrong, probably to a ne
plus ultra before we shall be forced into what
is right. Something will be obtained how
ever, if we can excite, in those who think,
doubt first, reflection next, and conviction at
last. — To JOSEPH C. CABELL. FORD ED., ix,
499- (M., 1815.)
722. - — . Like a dropsical man
calling out for water, water, our deluded cit
izens are clamoring for more banks, more
banks. The American mind is now in that
state of fever which the world has so often
seen in the history of other nations. We are
under the bank bubble, as England was under
the South Sea bubble, France under the Mis
sissippi bubble, and as every nation is liable to
be, under whatever bubble, design or delusion
may puff up in moments when off their guard.
—To CHARLES YANCEY. vi, 515. FORD ED.,
x, 2. (M., Jan. 1816.)
723. - — . This infatuation of banks
is a torrent which it would be a folly for me
to get in the way of. I see that it must take
its course, until actual ruin shall awaken us
from its delusions. — To JOSEPH C. CABELL.
vi, 300. (M., Jan. 1814.)
724. BANKS, Monopoly.— The monopoly
of a single bank is certainly an evil. The
multiplication of them was intended to cure
it ; but it multiplied an influence of the same
character with the first, and completed the
supplanting of the precious metals by a paper
circulation. Between such parties the less we
meddle the better.— To ALBERT GALLATIN.
iv, 446. FORD ED., viii, 158. (W., 1802.)
725. BANKS, Paper.— Interdict forever,
to both the State and National governments
the power of establishing any paper bank; for
without this interdiction we shall have the
same ebbs and flows of medium, and the same
revolutions of property to go through every
twenty or thirty years. — To W. C. RIVES, vii,
147. FORD ED., x, 151. (M., 1819.)
726. BANKS, Power to establish.— The
States should be applied to, to transfer the
Banks
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
78
right of issuing circulating paper to Congress
exclusively, in perpetuum, if possible, but dur
ing the war at least, with a saving of charter
rights. — To J. W. EPPES. vi, 140. FORD ED.,
ix, 393. (M., June 1813.)
727. - — . The States should be
urged to concede to the General Government,
with a saving of chartered rights, the exclu
sive power of establishing banks of discount
for paper. — To J. W. EPPES. vi, 427. FORD
ED., ix, 417. (M., Nov. 1813.)
728. . I still believe that on
proper representations of the subject, a great
proportion of the Legislatures would cede to
Congress their power of establishing banks,
saving the charter rights already granted.
And this should be asked, not by way of
amendment to the Constitution, because until
three-fourths should consent, nothing could
be done ; but accepted from them one by one,
singly, as their consent might be obtained.
Any single State, even if no other should
come into the measure, would find its interest
in arresting foreign bank paper immediately,
and its own by degrees. Specie would flow
in on them as paper disappeared. Their own
banks would call in and pay off their notes
gradually, and their constituents would thus
be saved from the general wreck. Should the
greater part of the States concede, as is ex
pected, their power over banks to Congress,
besides insuring their own safety, the paper of
the non-conceding States might be so checked
and circumscribed, by prohibiting its receipt
in any of the conceding States, and even in
the non-conceding as to duties, taxes, judg
ments, or other demands of the United
States, or of the citizens of other States, that
it would soon die of itself, and the me
dium of gold and silver be universally re
stored. This is what ought to be done. But
it will not be done. Carthago non delibi-
tur. The overbearing clamor of merchants,
speculators, and projectors, will drive us be
fore them with our eyes open, until, as in
France, under the Mississippi bubble, our cit
izens will be overtaken by the crash of this
baseless fabric, without other satisfaction than
that of execrations on the heads of those func
tionaries, who, from ignorance, pusillanimity
or corruption, have betrayed the fruits of
their industry into the hands of projectors
and swindlers. — To J. W. EPPES. vi, 245.
FORD ED., ix, 415. (M., Nov. 1813.)
729. - — . The State Legislature
should be immediately urged to relinquish the
right of establishing banks of discount. Most
of them will comply, on patriotic principles,
under the convictions of the moment and the
non-complying may be crowded into concur
rence by legitimate devices. — To THOMAS
COOPER, vi, 382. (M., Sep. 1814.)
730. . I do not remember the
conversation between us which you mention
* * * on your proposition to vest in Con
gress the exclusive power of establishing
banks. My opposition to it must have been
§ rounded, not on taking the power from the
tafes, but on leaving any vestige of it in ex
istence, even in the hands of Congress, be
cause it would only have been a change of
the organ of abuse. — To JOHN ADAMS, vi,
305. (M., Jan. 1814.)
731. BANKS, Precautions against.-— In
order to be able to meet a general combination
of the banks against us, in a critical emer
gency, could we not make a beginning to
wards an independent use of our own money,
towards holding our own bank in all the de
posits where it is received, and letting the
treasurer give his draft or note, for payment
at any particular place, which, in a well-con
ducted government, ought to have as much
credit as any private draft, or bank note, or
bill, and would give us the same facilities
which we derive from the banks. — To ALBERT
GALLATIN. v, 520. FORD ED., viii, 285. (W.,
Dec. 1803.)
732. BANKS, Private Fortunes and.-—
Private fortunes, in the present state of our
circulation, are at the mercy of those self-
created money-lenders, and are prostrated by
the floods of nominal money with which their
avarice deluges us. He who lent his money
to the public or to an individual, before the
institution of the United States Bank, twenty
years ago, when wheat was well sold at a
dollar the bushel, and receives now his nom
inal sum when it sells at two dollars, is
cheated of half his fortune; and by whom ?
By the banks, which, since that, have thrown
into circulation ten dollars of their nominal
money where there was one at that time. — To
JOHN W. EPPES. vi, 142. FORD ED., ix, 394.
(M., June 1813.)
733. . It is cruel that such revo
lutions in private fortunes should be at the
mercy of avaricious adventurers, who in
stead of employing their capital, if any they
have, in manufactures, commerce, and other
useful pursuits, make it an instrument to bur
den all the interchanges of property with their
swindling profits, profits which are the price
of no useful industry of theirs. — To DR.
THOMAS COOPER, vi, 295. (M., 1814.)
734. . The flood of paper money
had produced an exaggeration of nominal
prices, and at the same time a facility of ob
taining money, which not only encouraged
speculations on fictitious capital, but seduced
those of real capital, even in private life, to
contract debts too freely. Had things con
tinued in the same course, these might have
been manageable ; but the operations of the
United States bank for the demolition of the
State banks obliged these suddenly to call in
more than half their paper, crushed all ficti
tious and doubtful capital, and reduced the
prices of property and produce suddenly to
one-third of what they had been. — To ALBERT
GALLATIN. FORD ED., x, 176. (M., Dec. 1820.)
735. BANKS, Scarcity of Medium and.
— Instead of yielding to the cries of scarcity
of medium set up by speculators, projectors
and commercial gamblers, no endeavors
should be spared to begin the work of reduc
ing it by such gradual means as may give
79
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
time to private fortunes to preserve their
poise, and settle down with the subsiding
medium. — To J. W. EPPES. vi, 246. FORD ED.,
ix, 417. (M., Nov. 1813.)
736. . We are called on to add
ninety millions more to the circulation. Pro
ceeding in this career, it is infallible, that we
must end where the Revolutionary paper
ended. Two hundred millions was the whole
amount of all the emissions of the old Con
gress, at which point their bills ceased to cir
culate. We are now at that sum, but with
treble the population, and of course a longer
tether. Our depreciation is. as yet, but about
two for one. Owing to the support its credit
receives from the small reservoirs of specie in
the vaults of the banks, it is impossible to say
at what point their notes will stop. Nothing
is necessary to effect it but a general alarm;
and that may take place whenever the public
shall begin to reflect on, and perceive the im
possibility that the banks should repay this
sum. At present, caution is inspired no
farther than to keep prudent men from selling
property on long payments. Let us suppose
the panic to arise at three hundred millions, a
point to which every session of the Legis
lature hastens us by long strides. Nobody
dreams that they would have three hundred
millions of specie to satisfy the holders of
their notes. Were they even to stop now, no
one supposes they have two hundred millions
in cash, or even the sixty-six and two-third
millions, to which amount alone the law com
pels them to repay. One hundred and thirty-
three and one-third millions of loss, then, is
thrown on the public by law; and as to the
sixty-six and two-thirds, which they are legally
bound to pay, and ought to have in their
vaults, every one knows there is no such
amount of cash in the United States, and
what would be the course with what they
really have there? Their notes are refused.
Cash is called for. The inhabitants of the
banking towns will get what is in the vaults,
until a few banks declare their insolvency ;
when, the general crush becoming evident,
the others will withdraw even the cash they
have, declare their bankruptcy at once, and
have an empty house and empty coffers for
the holders of their notes. In this scramble
of creditors, the country gets nothing, the
towns but little. What are they to do? Bring
suits? A million of creditors bring a million
of suits against John Nokes and Robert
Styles, wheresoever to be found? All non
sense. The loss is total. And a sum is thus
swindled from our citizens, of seven times
the amount of the real debt, and four times
that of the fictitious one of the United States,
at the close of the war. All this they will
justly charge on their Legislatures ; but this
will be poor satisfaction for the two or three
hundred millions they will have lost. It is
time, then, for the public functionaries to look
to this. Perhaps it may not be too late. Per
haps, by giving time to the banks, they may
call in and pay off their paper by deerrees.
But no remedy is ever to be expected while
it rests with the State Legislatures. Personal
motive can be excited through so many ave
nues to their will, that, in their hands, it will
continue to go on from bad to worse, until
the catastrophe overwhelms us. — To J. W.
EPPES. vi, 243. FORD ED., ix, 414. (M., Nov.
1813.)
— . Our circulating paper of
the last year was estimated at two hundred
millions of dollars. The new banks now
petitioned for, to the several Legislatures, are
for about sixty millions additional capital, and
of course one hundred and eighty millions
of additional circulation, nearly doubling that
of the last year, and raising the whole mass
to near four hundred millions, or forty for
one, of the wholesome amount of circulation
for a population of eight millions circum
stanced as we are, and you remember how
rapidly our money went down after our forty
for one establishment in the Revolution. I
doubt if the present trash can hold as long.
I think the three hundred and eighty mil
lions must blow all up in the course of the
present year, or certainly it will be consum
mated by the reduplication to take place of
course at the legislative meetings of the next
winter. Should not prudent men, who pos
sess stock in any moneyed institution, either
draw and hoard the cash now while they can,
or exchange it for canal stock, or such other
as being bottomed on immovable property
will remain unhurt by the crush? — To JOHN
ADAMS, vi, 306. (M., Jan. 1814.)
738. - -- . — . Two hundred millions in
actual circulation and two hundred millions
more likely to be legitimated by the legislative
sessions of this winter, will give us about
forty times the wholesome circulation for
eight millions of people. When the new emis
sions get out, our legislatures will see, what
they otherwise cannot believe, that it is pos
sible to have too much money. — To PRESIDENT
MADISON. FORD ED., ix, 453. (M., Feb. 1814.)
739. - — . The evils of this deluge
of paper money are not to be removed, until
our citizens are generally and radicallv in
structed in their course and consequences,
and silence by their authority the interested
clamors and sophistry of speculating, shav
ing, and banking institutions. Till then we
must be content to return, quoad hoc, to the
savage state, to recur to barter in the ex
change of our property, for the want of a
stable, common measure of value, that now in
use being less fixed than the beads and
wampum of the Indian, and to deliver up our
citizens, their property and their labor, pas
sive victims to the swindling tricks of bankers
and mountebankers. — To JOHN ADAMS, vii,
115. (M., 1819.)
740. BANKS, Sound Money.— But, it will
be asked, are we to have no banks ? Are mer
chants and others to be deprived of the re
source of short accommodations, found so con
venient? I answer, let us have banks; but
let them be such as are alone to be found in
any country on earth, except Great Britain.
There is not a bank of discount on the con-
Banks
Barbary States
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
80
tinent of Europe (at least there was not one
when I was there), which offers anything
but cash in exchange for discounted bills.
No one has a natural right to the trade of a
money lender, but he who has the money to
lend. Let those then among us, who have a
moneyed capital, and who prefer employing
it in loans rather than otherwise, set up
banks, and give cash or national bills for the
notes they discount. Perhaps, to encourage
them, a larger interest than is legal in the
other cases might be allowed them, on the
condition of their lending for short periods
only. It is from Great Britain we copy the
idea of giving paper in exchange for dis
counted bills ; and while we have derived
from that country some good principles of
government and legislation, we unfortunately
run into the most servile imitations of all her
practices, ruinous as they prove to her, and
with the gulf yawning before us into which
these very practices are precipitating her. —
To JOHN W. EPPES. vi, 141. FORD ED., ix,
394. (M., June 1813.)
741. . Let banks continue if
they please, but let them discount for cash
alone or for treasury notes. They discount
for cash alone in every other country on
earth except Great Britain, and her too often
unfortunate copyist, the United States. If
taken in time they may be rectified by degrees,
but if let alone till the alternative forces it
self on us, of submitting to the enemy for
want of funds, or the suppression of bank
paper, either by law or by convulsion, we can
not foresee how it will end. — To J. W. EPPES.
vi, 199. FORD ED., ix, 399. (P. F., Sept.
1813-)
742. . To the existence of banks
of discount for cash, as on the continent of
Europe, there can be no objection, because
there can be no danger of abuse, and they
are a convenience both to merchants and in
dividuals. I think they should even be en
couraged, by allowing them a larger than
legal interest on short discounts, and tapering
thence in proportion as the term of discount
is lengthened, down to legal interest on those
of a year or more. — To J. W. EPPES. vi, 247.
FORD ED., ix, 417. (M., Nov. 1813.)
743. BANKS, Suspend Specie Pay
ments. — The paper bubble is burst. This is
what you and I, and every reasoning man.
seduced by no obliquity of mind or interest,
have long foreseen. We were laboring under
a dropsical fulness of circulating medium.
Nearly all of it is now called in by the banks,
who have the regulation of the safety-valves
of our fortunes, and who condense and ex
plode them at their will. Lands in this State
[Virginia"! cannot now be sold for a year's
rent; and unless our Legislature have wis
dom enough to effect a remedy by a gradual
diminution only of the medium, there will
be a general revolution of property in this
State. Over our own paper and that of other
States coming among us, they have competent
powers ; over that of the Bank of the United
States there is doubt, not here, but elsewhere.
That bank will probably conform voluntarily
to such regulations as the Legislature may
prescribe for the others. If they do not, we
must shut their doors, and join the other
States which deny the right of Congress to
establish banks, and solicit them to agree to
some mode of settling this constitutional
question. They have themselves twice de
cided against their right, and twice for it.
Many of the States have been uniform in
denying it, and between such parties the Con
stitution has provided no umpire. — To JOHN-
ADAMS, vii, 142. FORD ED., x, 147. (M.,
Nov. 1819.) See MONEY and PAPER MONEY.
744. BANNEKER (Benjamin), Talents
of. — We have now in the United States a
negro, the son of a black man born in Africa,
and a black woman born in the United States,
who is a very respectable mathematician. I
procured him to be employed under one of our
chief directors in laying out the new Federal
city on the Potomac, and in the intervals of
his leisure, while on that work, he made an
almanac for the next year, which he sent me
in his own handwriting, and which I enclose to
you. I have seen very elegant solutions of
geometrical problems by him. Add to this that
he is a very worthy and respectable member of
society. He is a free man. I shall be delighted
to see these instances of moral eminence so
multiplied as to prove that the want of talents,
observed in them, is merely the effect of their
degraded condition, and not proceeding from
any difference in the structure of the parts on
which intellect depends. — To MARQUIS DE CON-
DORCET. FORD EDV v, 379. (Pa., 1791.)
745. BARBARISM, America and.— We
are destined to be a barrier against the re
turn of ignorance and barbarism. — To JOHN
ADAMS, vii, 27. (M., 1816.)
746. BARBARISM, End to.— Barbarism
* * * will in time, I trust, disappear from the
earth.— To WILLIAM LUDLOW. vii, 377. (M.,
1824.)
- BARBARY STATES, Algerine Cap
tives. — See CAPTIVES.
747. BARBARY STATES, A Confed
eration against. — I was very unwilling that
we should acquiesce in the European humil
iation of paying a tribute to those * * * pi
rates, and endeavored to form an association
of the powers subject to habitual depreda
tions from them. I accordingly prepared, and
proposed to their ministers at Paris, for con
sultation with their governments, articles of a
special confederation. — AUTOBIOGRAPHY. i,
65. FORD ED., i, 91. (1821.)
748. BARBARY STATES, Confedera
tion Articles.— Proposals for concerted
operation among the powers at war with the
piratical States of Barbary: i. It is proposed,
that the several powers at war with the pirat
ical States of Barbary, or any two or more of
them who shall be willing, shall enter into a
convention to carry on their operations against
those States, in concert, beginning with the
Algerines. 2. This convention shall remain
open to any other power who shall at any fu
ture time wish to accede to it ; the parties re
serving the right to prescribe the conditions of
such accession, according to the circumstances
existing at the time it shall be proposed. 3.
8i
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Barbary States
The object of the convention shall be to compel
the piratical States to perpetual peace, without
price, and to guarantee that peace to each other.
4. The operations for obtaining this peace shall
be constant cruisers on their coast, with a naval
force now to be agreed on. It is not proposed
that this force shall be so considerable as to be
inconvenient to any party. It is believed that
half a dozen frigates, with as many tenders or
Xebecs, one half of which shall be in cruise,
while the other half is at rest, will suffice. 5.
The force agreed to be necessary shall be fur
nished by the parties in certain quotas now to
be fixed ; it being expected that each will be
willing to contribute in such proportion as cir
cumstances may render reasonable. 6. The mis
carriages often proceed from the want of har
mony among officers of different nations, the
parties shall now consider and decide whether
it will not be better to contribute their quotas
in money to be employed in fitting out, and
keeping on duty, a single fleet of the force
agreed on. 7. The difficulties and delays too
which will attend the management of these
operations, if conducted by the parties them
selves separately, distant as their Courts may
be from one another, and incapable of meeting
in consultation, suggest a question whether it
will not be better for them to give full powers
for that purpose to their Ambassadors or other
Ministers Resident at some one Court of Eu
rope, who shall form a Committee or Council
for carrying this convention into effect ; wherein
the vote of each member shall be computed in
proportion to the quota of his sovereign, and
the majority so computed shall prevail in all
questions within the view of this convention.
The Court of Versailles is proposed, on account
of its neighborhood to the Mediterranean, and
because all those powers are represented there,
who are likely to become parties to this con
vention. 8. To save to that council the embar
rassment of personal solicitations for office, and
to assure the parties that their contributions
will be applied solely to the object for which
they are destined, there shall be no establish
ment of officers for the said Council, such as
Commissioners, Secretaries, or any other kind,
with either salaries or perquisites, nor any
other lucrative appointments but such whose
functions are to be exercised on board the said
vessels. 9. Should war arise between any two
of the parties to this convention it shall not
extend to this enterprise, nor interrupt it ; but
as to this they shall be reputed at peace. 10.
When Algiers shall be reduced to peace, the
other piratical States, if they refuse to dis
continue their piracies, shall become the objects
of this convention, either successively or
together, as shall seem best. n. Where this
convention would interfere with treaties actu
ally existing between any two of the parties and
the said States of Barbary, the treaty shall
prevail, and such party shall be allowed to
withdraw from the operations against that
State. — AUTOBIOGRAPHY, i, 65. FORD ED., \,
91-
749. BARBARY STATES, Congress
and. — Nothing was now wanting to bring it
into direct and formal consideration but the
assent of our government, and their author
ity to make the formal proposition. I com
municated to them the favorable prospect of
protecting our commerce from the Barbary
depredations, and for such a continuance of
time as, by an exclusion of them from the
sea, to change their habits and characters
from a predatory to an agricultural people:
towards which however it was expected they
would contribute a frigate, and its expenses
to be in constant cruise. But they were in
no condition to make any such engagement.
Their recommendatory powers for obtaining
contributions were so openly neglected by the
several States that they declined an engage
ment which they were conscious they could
not fulfil with punctuality; and so it fell
through. — AUTOBIOGRAPHY, i, 67. FORD ED.,
1, 93. (1821.)
750. BARBARY STATES, Europe and.
— Spain had just concluded a treaty with Al
giers, at the expense of three millions of dol
lars, and did not like to relinquish the benefit
of that until the other party should fail in their
observance of it. Portugal, Naples, the two
Sicilies, Venice, Malta, Denmark and Sweden
were favorably disposed to such an association ;
but their representatives at Paris expressed
apprehensions that France would interfere, and,
either openly or secretly support the Barbary
powers ; and they required that I should ascer
tain the dispositions of the Count de Vergennes
on the subject. I had before taken occasion
to inform him of what we were proposing, and
therefore did not think it proper to insinuate
any doubt of the fair conduct of his govern
ment ; but stating our propositions, I mentioned
the apprehensions entertained by us that Eng
land would interfere in behalf of those pirat
ical governments. " She dares not do it/ said
he. I pressed it no further. The other Agents
were satisfied with this indication of his senti
ments. — AUTOBIOGRAPHY, i, 67. FORD ED., i,
93- (1821.)
751. BARBARY STATES, Great Brit
ain and.— I hinted to the Count de Ver
gennes that I thought the English capable of
administering aid to the Algerines. He seemed
to think it impossible on account of the scandal
it would bring on them. — To JOHN JAY. i, 575.
FORD ED., iv, 228. (P., 1786.)
752. BARBARY STATES, Jefferson's
Views on. — Our instructions relative to the
Barbary States haying required us to proceed
by way of negotiation to obtain their peace, it
became our duty to do this to the best of our
power. Whatever might be our private opin
ions, they were to be suppressed, and the line
marked out to us was to be followed. It has
been so, honestly and zealously. It was, there
fore, never material for us to consult together,
on the best plan of conduct toward these States.
I acknowledge, I very early thought it would be
best to effect a peace through the medium of
war. Though it is a question with which we
have nothing to do, yet as you propose some
discussion of it, I shall trouble you with my
reasons. Of the four positions laid down by
you, I agree to the three first, which are, in
substance, that the good offices of our friends
cannot procure us a peace without paying its
price ; that they cannot materially lessen that
price ; and that paying it, we can have the
peace in spite of the intrigues of our enemies.
As to the fourth, that the longer the negotia
tion is delayed, the larger will be the demand ;
this will depend on the intermediate captures :
if they are many and rich, the price may be
raised ; if few and poor, it will be lessened.
However, if it is decided that we shall buy a
peace, I know no reason for delaying the opera
tion, but should rather think it ought to be
hastened ; but I should prefer the obtaining it
by war. i. Justice is in favor of this opinion.
2. Honor favors it. 3. It will procure us re
spect in Europe ; and respect is a safeguard to
Barbary States
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
82
interest. 4. It will arm the Federal head with
the safest of all the instruments of coercion
over its delinquent members, and prevent it
from using what would be less safe. I think
that so far, you go with me. But in the next
steps, we shall differ. 5. I think it least ex
pensive. I ask a fleet of one hundred and fifty
guns, the one-half of which shall be in constant
cruise. This fleet, built, manned and victualled
for six months will cost four hundred and fifty
thousand pounds sterling. Its annual expense
will be three hundred pounds sterling a gun,
including everything; this will be forty-five
thousand pounds sterling a year. I take the
British experience for the basis of my calcula
tion ; though we know, from our own experi
ence, that we can do it in this way, for pounds
lawful, what costs them pounds sterling. Were
we to charge all this to the Algerine war, it
would amount to little more than we must pay,
if we buy peace. But as it is proper and neces
sary that we should establish a small marine
force (even were we to buy a peace from the
Algerines), and as that force, laid up in our
dockyards, would cost us half as much annu
ally, as if kept in order for service, we have a
right to say that only twenty-two thousand and
five hundred pounds sterling, per annum, should
be charged to the Algerine war. 6. It will be
as effectual. To all the mismanagements of
Spain and Portugal, urged to show that war
against these people is ineffectual, I urge a
single fact to prove the contrary, where there is
any management. About forty years ago, the
Algerines having broken their treaty with
France, that court sent Monsieur de Massiac,
with one large and two small frigates ; he block
aded the harbor of Algiers three months, and
they subscribed to the terms he proposed. If it
be admitted, however, that war, on the fairest
prospects, is still exposed to uncertainties, I
weigh against this the greater uncertainty of
the duration of a peace bought with money,
from such a people, from a Dey eighty years
old, and by a nation who, on the hypothesis of
buying peace, is to have no power on the sea
to enforce an observance of it. So far, I have
gone on the supposition that the whole weight
of this war would rest on us. But, i. Naples
will join us. The character of their naval
minister (Acton), his known sentiments with
respect to the peace Spain is officiously trying
to make for them, and his dispositions against
the Algerines, give the best grounds to believe
it. 2.. Every principle of reason assures us that
Portugal will join us. I state this as taking
for granted, what all seem to believe, that they
will not be at peace with Algiers. I suppose,
then, that a convention might be formed be
tween Portugal, Naples and the United States,
by which the burthen of the war might be
quotaed on them, according to their respective
wealth ; and the term of it should be, when
Algiers should subscribe to a peace with all
three, on equal terms. This might be left open
for other nations to accede to. and many, if
not most, of the powers of Europe (except
France, England, Holland, and Spain, if her
peace be made), would sooner or later enter
into the confederacy, for the sake of having
their peace with the piratical States guaranteed
by the whole. I suppose, that, in this case, our
proportion of force would not be the half of
what I first calculated on. — To JOHN ADAMS.
i, SQL (P., July 1786.)
753. . Were the honor and ad
vantage of establishing such a confederacy
[against tbe piratical powers] out of the ques
tion, yet the necessity that the United States
should have some marine force, and the hap
piness of this, as the ostensible cause for be
ginning it, would decide on its propriety. It
will be said, there is no money in the treasury.
There never will be money in the treasury, till
the confederacy shows its teeth. The States
must see the rod ; perhaps it must be felt by
some one of them. I am persuaded, all of
them would rejoice to see every one obliged to
furnish its contributions. It is not the diffi
culty of furnishing them, which beggars the
treasury, but the fear that others will not fur
nish as much. Every rational citizen must wish
to see an effective instrument of coercion, and
should fear to see it on any other element than
the water. — To JAMES MONROE, i, 606. FORD
ED., iv, 264. (P., 1786.)
754. BABBABY STATES, The Medi
terranean and.— Algiers, Tunis and Tripoli,
remaining hostile, will shut up the Mediterra
nean to us. — To GOVERNOR HENRY, i, 601. (P.,
1786.)
755. . The Algerines form an
obstacle; but the object of our commerce in
the Mediterranean is so immense that we ought
to surmount that obstacle, and I believe it can
be done by means in our power, and which,
instead of fouling us with the dishonorable and
criminal baseness of France and England, will
place us in the road to respect with all the
world. — To E. RUTLEDGE. iii, no. (P., 1789.)
— BABBABY STATES, Morocco.— See
MOROCCO.
756. BABBABY STATES, Purchasing
Peace with.— What will you do with the
piratical States? Buy a peace at their enor
mous price; force one; or abandon the car
riage into the Mediterranean to other powers?
All these measures are disagreeable. — To EL-
BRIDGE GERRY, i, 557. (P., 1786.)
757. . The States of Algiers,
Tunis and Tripoli hold their peace at a price
which would be felt by every man in his set
tlement with the taxgatherer. — To PATRICK
HENRY, i, 601. (P., 1786.)
758. . It is not in the choice of
the States, whether they will pay money to
cover their trade against the Algerines. If they
obtain a peace by negotiation, they must pay
a great sum of money for it ; if they do noth
ing, they must pay a great sum of money in the
form of insurance ; and in either way, as great
a one as in the way of force, and probably less
effectual. — To JAMES MONROE, i, 607. FORD
ED., iv, 265. (P., 1786.)
759. . Congress must begin by
getting money. When they have this, it is a
matter of calculation whether they will buy a
peace, or force one, or do nothing. — To JOHN
ADAMS, i, 585. (P., 1786.)
760. . The continuance of [a
purchased] peace with the Barbary States will
depend on their idea of our power to enforce
it. and on the life of the particular Dey, or
other head of the government, with whom it is
contracted. Congress will, no doubt, weigh
these circumstances against the expense and
probable success of compelling a peace by arms.
— To JAMES MONROE, i, 565. FORD ED., iv,
221. (P., 1786.)
761.
In London Mr. Adams
and I had conferences with a Tripoline am
bassador, named Abdrahaman. He asked us
thirty thousand guineas for a peace with his
court, and as much for Tunis, for which he
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Barbary States
Barclay (Thomas)
said he could answer. What we were author
ized to offer, being to this but as a drop to a
bucket, our conferences were repeated only for
the purpose of obtaining information. If the
demands of Algiers and Morocco should be in
proportion to this, according to their superior
power, it is easy to foresee that the United
States will not buy a peace with money. — To
WILLIAM CARMICHAEL. i, 551. (P., 1786.)
762. . The Tripoline ambassa
dor offered peace for 30,000 guineas for Tripoli,
and as many for Tunis. Calculating on this
scale, Morocco should ask 60,000, and Algiers
120,000. — To DAVID HUMPHREYS, i, 559. (P.,
1786.)
763. . A second plan might be
to obtain peace by purchasing it. For this we
have the example of rich and powerful nations,
in this instance counting their interest more
than their honor. — REPORT ON MEDITERRANEAN
TRADE, vii, 522. (1790.)
764. . As the duration of this
peace cannot be counted on with certainty, and
we look forward to the necessity of coercion by
cruises on their coast, to be kept up during the
whole of their cruising season, you will be
pleased to inform yourself * * * of every
circumstance which may influence or guide us
in undertaking and conducting such an opera
tion. — To JOHN PAUL JONES, iii, 438. (Pa.,
1792.)
765. BABBABY STATES, Suppression
of- — The attempts heretofore made to sup
press the [Barbary] powers have been to exter
minate them at one blow. They are too nu
merous and powerful by land for that. A small
effort, but long continued, seems to be the only
method. By suppressing their marine and trade
totally, and continuing this till the present race
of seamen should be pretty well out of the way,
and the younger people betake themselves to
husbandry for which their soil and climate are
well fitted, these nests of banditti might be re
formed. — To JAMES MONROE. FORD ED., iv, -n.
(P., 1785.)
766. BABBABY STATES, Tribute to.
—It is impossible I fear to find out what
[tribute] is given by other countries [to the
piratical States]. Either shame or jealousy
makes them wish to keep it secret. — To JAMES
MONROE. FORD ED., iv, 31. (P., 1785.)
767. . The Algerines, I fear,
will ask such a tribute for the forbearance of
their piracies as the United States would be
unwilling to pay. When this idea comes across
my mind my faculties are absolutely suspended
between indignation and impotence. I think
whatever sums we are obliged to pay for free
dom of navigation in the European seas, should
be levied on European commerce with us, by a
separate impost ; that these powers may see
that they protect these enormities for their own
loss. To NATHANIEL GREENE. FORD ED., iv,
*5- (P, 1785.)
768. . Such [European] powers
as should refuse [to join a confederation to
suppress the Barbary piracies] would give us a
just right to turn pirates also on their West
India trade, and to require an annual tribute
which might reimburse what we may be obliged
to pay to obtain a safe navigation in their seas.
— To JAMES MONROE. FORD ED., iv, 33. (P.,
769. BABBABY STATES, War with.
—From what I learn from the temper of my
countrymen and their tenaciousness of money,
it will be more easy to raise ships to fight these
pirates into reason than money to bribe them. —
To EZRA STILES, ii, 78. (P., 1786.)
770. - — . The motives pleading
for war rather than tribute [to the piratical
States] are numerous and honorable ; those op
posing them are mean and short-sighted. — To
JAMES MONROE. FORD ED., iv, 32. (P., 1785.)
— BABBABY STATES, War with
Tripoli.— See TRIPOLI.
771. BABBABY STATES, Weakness
°f- — These pirates are contemptibly weak.
Morocco, who has just dared to commit an out
rage on us, owns only four or five frigates of
1 8 or 20 guns. There is not a port in their
country which has more than 13 feet of water.
Tunis is not quite so strong (having three or
four frigates only, small and worthless) ; is
more mercantile than predatory, and would
easily be led to treat either by money or
fear. Tripoli has one frigate only. Algiers
alone possesses any power, and they are
brave. As far as I have been able to discover,
she possesses about sixteen vessels, from 22 up
to 52 guns ; but the vessels of all these powers
are wretched in the last degree, being mostly
built of the discordant pieces of other vessels
which they take and pull asunder ; their cord
age and sails are of the same kind, taken from
vessels of different sizes and powers, seldom
any two guns of the same bore and all of them
light. — To JAMES MONROE. FORD ED., iv, 31.
(P., 1785.) See MOROCCO, TRIPOLI and TUNIS.
772. BABCLAY (Thomas), Missions to
Morocco. — Though we are not authorized to
delegate to Mr. Barclay the power of ulti
mately signing the treaty, yet such is our re
liance on his wisdom, his integrity, and his at
tention to the instructions with which he is
charged, that we assure his Majesty, the con
ditions which he shall arrange and send to
us, shall be returned with our signature.* — To
THE EMPEROR OF MOROCCO, i, 419. (P.,
1/85.)
773. . Mr. Barclay's mission
has been attended with complete success. For
this we are indebted, unquestionably, to the
influence and good offices of the court of Mad
rid. — To JOHN JAY. ii, 85. (P., 1786.)
774. . You have my full and
hearty approbation of the treaty you obtained
from Morocco, which is better and on better
terms than I expected. — To THOMAS BARCLAY.
ii, 125. (P., 1787.)
775. . You are appointed by the
President * * * to go to the court of Morocco,
for the purpose of obtaining from the new
Emperor, a recognition of our treaty with his
father. As it is thought best that you should
go in some definite character, that of consul
has been adopted. — To THOMAS BARCLAY, iii,
261. (P., 1791.)
776. . As you have acted since
my arrival in France, in the characters of
Consul General for that country, and Minister
to the Court of Morocco, and also as agent in
some particular transactions for the State of
Virginia, I think it is a duty to yourself, to
truth, and to justice, on your departure for
America, to declare that in all these characters,
* Mr. Barclay was U. S. Consul-General at Paris.
Jefferson and Adams appointed him to negotiate a
treaty with the Emperor of Morocco.— EDITOR.
Barlow (Joel)
Bastrop's Case
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
84
as far as has come within my notice, you have
acted with judgment, with attention, with in
tegrity and honor.* — To THOMAS BARCLAY, ii,
211. (P., 1787-)
777. BARLOW (Joel), Proposed His
tory by. — Mr. Madison and myself have cut
out a piece of work for you, which is to write
the history of the United States, from the close
of the war downwards. We are rich ourselves
in materials, and can open all the public
archives to you ; but your residence here
[Washington] is essential, because a great deal
of the knowledge of things is not on paper,
but only within ourselves, for verbal commu
nication. John Marshall is writing the life of
General Washington from his papers. It is in
tended to come out just in time to influence
the next Presidential election. It is written,
therefore, principally with a view to election
eering purposes. But it will consequently be
out in time to aid you with information, as
well as to point out the perversions of truth
necessary to be rectified. — To JOEL BARLOW.
iv, 438. FORD ED., viii, 151. (W., May
1802.)
778. . You owe to republican
ism, and indeed to the future hopes of man, a
faithful record of the march of this govern
ment, which may encourage the oppressed to
go and do likewise. Your talents, your princi
ples, and your means of access to public and
private sources of information, with the
leisure which is at your command, point you
out as the person, who is to do this act of jus
tice to those who believe in the improvability
of the condition of man, and who have acted
on that behalf, in opposition to those who con
sider man as a beast of burthen made to be
ridden by him who has genius enough to get a
bridle into his mouth. — To JOEL BARLOW, v,
496. FORD ED., ix, 269. (M., 1810.)
779. . I felicitate you on your
destination to Paris [as minister]. * _* * Yet
it is not unmixed with regret. What is to be
come of our post-revolutionary history? _ Of
the antidotes of truth to the misrepresentations
of Marshall? This example proves the wis
dom of the maxim, never put off till to-mor
row what can be done to-day. — To JOEL BAR
LOW, v, 587. FORD ED., ix, 322. (M., April
1811.)
780. BARLOW (Joel), Works of.— I
thank you for your " Conspiracy of Kings "
and advice to the privileged orders. Be as
sured that your endeavors to bring the trans-
Atlantic world into the road of reason, are not
without their effect in America. Some here
are disposed to move retrograde, and to take
their stand in the rear of Europe, now advanc
ing to the high ground of natural right. — To
JOEL BARLOW, iii, 451- FORD ED., vi, 88. (P.,
1792.)
781. . Thomas Jefferson re
turns thanks to Mr. Barlow for the copy of
the " Columbiad " he has been so kind as to
send him ; the eye discovers at once the excel
lence of the mechanical execution of the work,
and he is persuaded that the mental part will
be found to have merited ^ it. He will not do
it the injustice of giving it such a reading as
his situation here [Washington] would admit
* Mr. Barclay, while acting for the United States
in Europe, was engaged in commercial transactions
on his own account. His arrest for debt by credit
ors led to some discussion with the French govern
ment which is embodied in Jefferson's Writings.
—EDITOR.
of a few minutes at a time, and at intervals of
many days. He will reserve it for that retire
ment after which he is panting, and not now
very distant, where he may enjoy it in full con
cert with its kindred scenes, amidst those rural
delights which join in chorus with the poet,
and give to his song all its magic effect. — To
JOEL BARLOW, v, 238. (W., 1808.)
— BARRUEL (Abbe), Book by.— See
ILLUMINATI.
— BARRY, Commodore J.— See MOURN
ING.
782. BASTILE, Fall of the.— The mob,
now openly joined by the French guards,
forced the prison of St. Lazare, released all the
prisoners, and took a great store of corn,
which they carried to the corn market. Here
they got some arms, and the French guards
began to form and train them. The committee
determined to raise forty-eight thousand Bour-
geoise, or rather to restrain their numbers to
forty-eight thousand. On the i4th [July], they
sent one of their members (Monsieur de
Corny, whom we knew in America) to the
Hotel des Invalides, to ask arms for their
Garde Bourgeoise. He was followed by, or he
found there, a great mob. The Governor _ of
the Invalides came out, and represented the im
possibility of delivering his arms, without the
orders of those from whom he received them.
De Corny advised the people then to retire,
and retired himself ; and the people took pos
session of the arms. It was remarkable, that
not only the Invalides themselves made no op
position, but that a body of five thousand
foreign troops, encamped within four hundred
yards, never stirred. Monsieur de Corny and
five others were then sent to ask arms of
Monsieur de Launey, Governor of the Bastile.
They found a great collection of people already
before the place, and they immediately planted
a flag of truce, which was answered by a like
flag hoisted on the parapet. The deputation
prevailed on the people to fall back a little,
advanced themselves to make their demand of
the Governor, and in that instant a discharge
from the Bastile killed four of those nearest to
the deputies. The deputies retired ; the people
rushed against the place, and almost in an in
stant were in possession of a fortification, de
fended by one hundred men, of infinite strength,
which in other times had stood several regular
sieges, and had never been taken. How they
got in, has, as yet, been impossible to discover.
Those who pretend to have been of the party
tell so many different stories, as to destroy the
credit of them all. They took all the arms,
discharged the prisoners, and such of the gar
rison as were not killed in the first moment
of fury: carried the Governor and Lieutenant
Governor to the Greve (the place of public
execution), cut off their heads, and sent them
through the city in triumph to the Palais
Royal. — To JOHN JAY. iii, "76. (P., July 19
1789.)
783. BASTROP'S CASE, Account of.—
I find Bastrop's case less difficult than I had
expected. My view of it is this : The Gov
ernor of Louisiana being desirous of introduc
ing the culture of wheat into that province,
engages Bastrop as an agent for carrying that
object into effect. He agrees to lay off twelve
leagues square on the Washita and Bayou
Hard as a settlement for the culture of wheat,
to which Bastrop is to bring five hundred fam
ilies, each of which families is to have four
hundred arpens of the land ; the residue of
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
"Batture
the twelve leagues square, we may understand,
was to be Bastrop's premium. The government
was to bear the expense of bringing these emi
grants from New Madrid, and was to allow
them rations for six months, — Bastrop under
taking to provide the rations, and the govern
ment paying a seal and a half for each. Bas
trop binds himself to settle the five hundred
families in three years, and the Governor es
pecially declares that if within that time the
major part of the establishment shall not have
been made good, the twelve leagues square,
destined for Bastrop's settlers, shall be occu
pied by the families first presenting themselves
for that purpose. Bastrop brings on some set
tlers, — how many does not appear, and the
intendant, from a want of funds, suspends
further proceeding in the settlement until the
King's decision. (His decision of what?
Doubtless whether the settlement shall proceed
on these terms, and the funds be furnished
by the King? or shall be abandoned?) He
promises Bastrop, at the same time, that the
former limitation of three years shall be ex
tended to two years, after the course of the
contract shall have again commenced to be
executed, and the determination of the King
shall be made known to Bastrop. Here, then,
is a complete suspension of the undertaking
until the King's decision, and his silence from
that time till, and when, he ceded the province,
must be considered as an abandonment of the
project. There are several circumstances in
this case offering ground for question, whether
Bastrop is entitled to any surplus of the lands.
But this will be an investigation for the At
torney General. But the uttermost he can
claim is a surplus proportioned to the number
of families to be settled, that is to say, a quota
ol land bearing such a proportion to the num
ber of families he settled (deducting four hun
dred arpens for each of them) as one hun
dred and forty-four square leagues bear to
the whole number of five hundred families.
The important fact, therefore, to be settled,
is the number of families he established there
before the suspension. — To ALBERT GALLATIN.
v, 231. (Jan. 1808.)
784. BATTURE, Authority over.— Mr.
Livingston, * * * finding that we considered
the Batture as now resting with Congress,*
and that it is our duty to keep it clear of all
adversary possession till their decision is ob
tained [has written] a letter to the Secretary
of State, which, if we understand it, amounts
to a declaration that he will * * * bring the
authority of the court into array against that of
the Executive, and endeavor to obtain a forci
ble possession. But I presume that the court
knows too well that the title of the United
States to land is subject to the jurisdiction
of no court, it having never been deemed safe
to submit the major interests of the nation
to an ordinary tribunal, or to any one but such
as the Legislature establishes for the special
occasion ; and the marshal will find his duty
too plainly marked out in the act of March 3,
1807, to be at a loss to determine what author
ity he is to obey. — To GOVERNOR CLAIBORNE.
v, 319. (W., July 1808.)
785. BATTURE, Jefferson's action in.
— The interposition noticed by the Legisla
ture of Orleans was an act of duty of the office
I then occupied. Charged with the care of
the general interests of the nation, and among
these with the preservation of their lands from
intrusion, I exercised, on their behalf, a right
* Jefferson in a special message, March 7, 1808, laid
the case before Congress for its action.— EDITOR.
given by nature to all men, individual or as
sociated, that of rescuing their own property
wrongfully taken. In cases of forcible entry
on individual possessions, special provisions,
both of the common and civil law, have re
strained the right of rescue by private force,
and substituted the aid of the civil power. But
no law has restrained the right of the nation
itself from removing by its own arm, in
truders on its possessions. On the contrary,
a statute recently passed, had required that
such removals should be diligently made. The
Batture of New Orleans, being a part of the
bed contained between the two banks of the
river, a naked shoal indeed at low water, but
covered through the whole season of its regular
full tides, and then forming the ground of the
port and harbor for the upper navigation, over
which vessels ride of necessity when moored to
the bank, I deemed it public property, in
which all had a common use. The removal,
too, of the force which had possessed itself of
it, was the more urgent from the interruption
it might give to the commerce, and other law
ful uses, of the inhabitants of the city and of
the Western waters generally. — To GOVERNOR
CLAIBORNE. v, 518. (M, 1810.)
786. BATTURE, Livingston's suit.—
Livingston has served a writ on me, stating
damages at $100,000. — To PRESIDENT MADISON.
FORD ED., ix, 275. (M., 1810.)
787. BATTURE, Marshall's bias and.
— In speaking of Livingston's suit, I omitted
to observe that it is a little doubted that his
knowledge of Marshall's character has induced
him to bring this action. His testifications
in the case of Marbury, in that of Burr, and the
Yazoo case show how dexterously he can
reconcile law to his own personal biasses ; and
nobody seems to doubt that he is ready pre
pared to Decide that Livingston's right to the
batture is unquestionable, and that I am
bound to pay for it with my private fortune. —
To PRESIDENT MADISON. FORD ED., ix, 276.
(M., 1810.)
788. . What the issue of the
case ought to be, no unbiased man can doubt.
What it will be, no one can tell. The judge's
[Marshall's] inveteracy is profound, and his
mind of that gloomy malignity which will never
let him forego the opportunity of satiating it
on a victim. His decisions, his instructions to
a jury, his allowances and disallowances and
garblings of evidence, must all be subjects of
appeal. I consider that as my only chance of
saving my fortune from entire wreck. And to
whom is my appeal? From the judge in
Burr's case to himself and his associate judges
in the case of Marbury v. Madison. Not ex
actly, however. I observe old Gushing is dead.
At length, then, we have a chance of getting a
republican majority in the Supreme judiciary.
— To ALBERT GALLATIN. FORD ED., ix, 284.
(M., Sep. 1810.)
789. BATTURE, Title to.— I have no
concern at all in maintaining the title to the
batture. It would be totally unnecessary for
me to employ counsel to go into the question at
all for my own defence. That is solidly built
on the simple fact, that if I were in error, it
was honest, and not imputable to that gross
and palpable corruption or injustice which
makes a public magistrate responsible to a
private party. — To ALBERT GALLATIN. v, 537.
(M., 1810.)
790. BATTURE, True course in.— If
human reason is not mere illusion, and law a
JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
86
labyrinth without a clew, no error has been
committed ['in the Batture case]. — BATTURE
CASE, viii, 604. (1812.)
791. BAYARD (James A.), Aaron Burr
and. — Edward Livingston tells me that Bay
ard applied to-day or last night to General
Samuel Smith, and represented to him the ex
pediency of his coming over to the States who
vote for Burr [for President], that there was
nothing in the way of appointment which he
might not command, and particularly mentioned
the Secretaryship of the Navy. Smith asked
him if he was authorized to make the offer.
He said he was authorized. Smith told this to
Livingston, and to W. C. Nicholas who confirms
it to me. Bayard, in like manner, tempted
Livingston, not by offering any particular office,
but by representing to him his (Livingston's)
intimacy and connection with Burr ; that from
him he had everything to expect, if he would
come over to him. To Doctor Linn of New
Jersey, they have offered the government of
New Jersey. — THE ANAS, ix, 202. FORD ED.,
i, 291. (Feb. 1808.) See ELECTIONS, PRESI
DENTIAL, 1800.
792. BEAUMARCHAIS (M.), Claim of.
—I hear that Mr. Beaumarchais means to
make himself heard, if the memorial which he
sends by an agent in the present packet is not
attended to as he thinks it ought to be. He
called on me with it and desired me to recom
mend his case to a decision, and to note in
my dispatch that it was the first time he had
spoken to me on the subject. This is true, it
being the first time I ever saw him ; but my
recommendations would be as displaced as un
necessary. I assured him Congress would do
in that business what justice should require,
and their means enabled them. — To JOHN JAY.
ii, 232. (P., 1787.)
793. . A final decision of some
sort should be made on Beaumarchais's affairs.
— To JAMES MADISON, ii, 209. FORD ED., iv, 423.
(P., 1787.)
794. BEE, The Honey.— The honey-bee
is not a native of our continent. Marcgrove,
indeed, mentions a species of honey-bee in
Brazil. But this has no sting, and is therefore
different from the one we have, which resem
bles perfectly that of Europe. The Indians
concur with us in the tradition that it was
brought from Europe ; but when, and by whom,
we know not. The bees have generally ex
tended themselves into the country, a little in
advance of the white settlers. The Indians,
therefore, call them the white man's fly, and
consider their approach as indicating the ap
proach of the settlements of the whites. —
NOTES ON VIRGINIA, viii, 319. FORD ED., iii,
175. (1782.)
795. . How far northwardly
have these insects been found? That they
are unknown in Lapland, I infer from Schef-
fer's information, that the Laplanders eat the
pine bark, prepared in a certain way, instead
of those things sweetened with sugar. * * *
Certainly if they had honey, it would be a bet
ter substitute for sugar than any preparation of
the pine bark. Kalm tells us the honey-bee
cannot live through the winter in Canada. They
furnish then an additional remarkable fact, first
observed by the Count de Buffon, and which
has thrown such a blaze of light on the field
of natural history, that no animals are found in
both continents, but those which are able to
bear the cold of those regions where they prob
ably join. — NOTES ON VIRGINIA, viii, 320.
FORD ED., iii, 176. (1782.)
796. BEER vs. WHISKY.— There is be
fore the Assembly [of Virginia] a petition of a
Captain Miller, which I have at heart, because
I have great esteem for the petitioner as an
honest and useful man. He is about to settle
in pur country, and to establish a brewery, in
which art I think him as skilful a man as has
ever come to America. I wish to see this
beverage become common instead of the whis
ky which kills one-third of our citizens, and
ruins their families. He is staying with me
until he can fix himself, and I should be thank
ful for information from time to time of the
progress of his petition. — To CHARLES YANCEY.
vi, 515. FORD ED., x, 2. (M., 1815.)
797. BELLIGERENTS, Code of Rules
for. — First. The original arming and equip
ping of vessels in the ports of the United
States by any of the belligerent powers for
military service, offensive or defensive, is
deemed unlawful. Second. Equipment of
merchant vessels by either of the belligerent
parties in the ports of the United States,
purely for the accommodation of them as such,
is deemed lawful. Third. Equipments in the
ports of the United States of vessels of war
in the immediate service of the government
of any of the belligerent parties, which, if
done to other vessels, would be of a doubtful
nature, as being applicable either to commerce
or war, are deemed lawful, except those
which shall have made prize of the subjects,
people or property of France, coming with
their prizes into the ports of the United
States, pursuant to the seventeenth article of
our treaty of amity and commerce with
France. Fourth. Equipments in the ports of
the United States by any of the parties at war
with France, of vessels fitted for merchandise
and war, whether with or without commis
sions, which are doubtful in their nature, as
being applicable either to commerce or war,
are deemed lawful, except those which shall
have made prize, &c. Fifth. Equipments of
any of the vessels of France in the ports of
the United States, which are doubtful in their
nature, as being applicable to commerce or
war, are deemed lawful. Sixth, Equipments
of every kind in the ports of the United
States of privateers of the powers at war
with France, are deemed unlawful. Seventh.
Equipments of vessels in the ports of the
United States which are of a nature solely
adapted to war, are deemed unlawful ; except
those stranded or wrecked, as mentioned in
t, i eighteenth article of our treaty with
France, the sixteenth of our treaty with the
United Netherlands, the ninth of our treaty
with Prussia, and except those mentioned in
the nineteenth article of our treaty with
France, the seventeenth of our treaty with
the United Netherlands, the eighteenth of
our treaty with Prussia. Eighth. Vessels of
either of the parties not armed, or armed pre
vious to their coming into the ports of the
United States, which shall not have infringed
any of the foregoing rules may lawfully en
gage or enlist therein their own subjects, or
aliens not being inhabitants of the United
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Belligerents
Berlin Decrees
States, except privateers of the powers at
war with France, and except those vessels
which shall have made prize, &c. The fore
going rules, having been considered by us
[the Cabinet] at several meetings, and being
now unanimously approved, they are sub
mitted to the President of the United States.
— CABINET DECISION, ix, 440. FORD ED., vi,
358. (Aug. 3,1793.)
798. BELLIGERENTS, History of
Bules. — At a cabinet meeting on account of
the British letter-of-marque ship Jane, said
to have put up waste boards, to have pierced
two port-holes, and mounted two cannon
(which she brought in) on new carriages
which she did not bring in, and consequently
having sixteen, instead of fourteen, guns
mounted, it was agreed that a letter-of-
marque, or vessel arme en guerre, and en
marchandise, is not a privateer, and, there
fore, not to be ordered out of our ports. It
was agreed by Hamilton, Knox, and myself,
that the case of such a vessel does not depend
on the treaties, but on the law of nations.
Edmund Randolph thought, as she had a
mixed character of merchant vessel and pri
vateer, she might be considered under the
treaty; but this being overruled, the follow
ing paper was written : Rules proposed by
Attorney General : i. That all equipments
purely for the accommodation of vessels, as
merchantmen, be admitted. (Agreed.) 2d.
That all equipments, doubtful in their nature,
and applicable equally to commerce or war,
be admitted, as producing too many minutiae.
(Agreed.) 3. That all equipments, solely
adapted to military objects, be prohibited.
(Agreed.) Rules proposed by the Secretary
of the Treasury: 1st. That the original arm
ing and equipping of vessels for military ser
vice, offensive or defensive, in the ports of
the United States, be considered as prohibited
to all. (Agreed.) 2d. That vessels which
were armed before their coming into our
ports, shall not be permitted to augment these
equipments in the ports of the United States,
but may repair or replace any military equip
ments which they had when they began their
voyage for the United States ; that this, how
ever, shall be with the exception of privateers
of the parties opposed to France, who shall
not fit or repair (Negatived, the Secretary of
the Treasury only holding this opinion). 3d.
That for convenience, vessels armed and
commissioned before they come into our
ports, may engage their own citizens, not
being inhabitants of the United States.
(Agreed.) I subjoined the following: I con
cur in the rules proposed by the Attorney-
General, as far as respects materials or means
of annoyance furnished by us ; and I should
be for an additional rule, that as to means
or materials brought into this country, and
belonging to themselves, they are free to use
them. — THE ANAS, ix, 161. FORD ED., i,
250. (July 1793.)
799. BELLIGERENTS, Policy toward.
— Far from a disposition to avail our
selves of the peculiar situation of any bellig
erent nation to ask concessions incompatible
with their rights, with justice, or reciprocity,
we have never proposed to any the sacrifice
of a single right : and in consideration of ex
isting circumstances, we have ever been will
ing, where our duty to other nations permit
ted us, to relax for a time, and in some cases,
that strictness of right which the laws of na
ture, the acknowledgments of the civilized
world, and the equality and independence of
nations entitle us to. — R. To A. ORLEANS
LEGISLATURE, viii, 129. (June 1808.)
800. BELLIGERENTS, Recruiting by.
— May an armed vessel, arriving here, be
prohibited to employ their own citizens found
here, as seamen or mariners? They cannot
be prohibited to recruit their own citizens. —
THE ANAS. ix, 158. FORD ED., i, 242.
(I793-)
801. BELLIGERENTS, Sale of Arms
to. — Our citizens have been always free to
make, vend and export arms. It is the con
stant occupation and livelihood of some of
them. To suppress their callings, the only
means perhaps of their subsistence, because
a war exists in foreign and distant countries,
in which we have no concern, would scarcely
be expected. It would be hard in principle,
and impossible in practice. The law of na
tions, therefore, respecting the rights of
those at peace, does not require from them
such an internal derangement in their occu
pations. It is satisfied with the external pen
alty pronounced in the President's proclama
tion, that of confiscation of such portion of
these arms as shall fall into the hands of any
of the belligerent powers on their way to the
ports of their enemies. To this penalty our
citizens are warned that they will be aban
doned ; and that even private contraven
tions may work no inequality between the
parties at war, the benefits of them will be
left equally free and open to all. — To GEORGE
HAMMOND, iii, 558. FORD ED., vi, 253. (May
I793-)
802. BELLIGERENTS, Sale of Ships
to. — The United States, being a ship-building
nation, may they sell ships, prepared for war,
to both parties? They may sell such ships in
their ports to both parties, or carry them for
s?le to the dominions of both parties. — ANAS.
ix, 158. FORDED., i, 242. (1793-)
803. BELLIGERENTS, Transit Priv
ileges. — It is well enough agreed, in the law
of nations, that for a neutral power to give or
refuse permission to the troops of either
belligerent party to pass through their ter
ritory, is no breach of neutrality, provided
the same refusal or permission be extended
to the other party. — OFFICIAL OPINION, vii,
500. (Aug. 1790.) See NEUTRALITY.
804. BENEFICENCE, Humanity and.—
I believe * * * that every human mind feels
pleasure in doing good to another. — To JOHN
ADAMS, vii, 39. (M.. 1816.)
805. BERLIN DECREES, Piratical
Meaning of. — These decrees and orders [of
council!, taken together, want little of
amounting to a declaration that every neutral
bible
Bill of Bights
THE JBFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
88
vessel found on the high seas, whatsoever be
her cargo, and whatsoever foreign port be
that of her departure or destination, shall be
deemed lawful prize; and they prove, more
and more, the expediency of retaining our
vessels, our seamen, and property, within our
own harbors, until the dangers to which they
are exposed can be removed or lessened. —
SPECIAL MESSAGE, viii, 100. FORD ED., ix,
185. (March 17 1808.) See EMBARGO.
806. BIBLE, Circulation of the.— I had
not supposed there was a family in this State
[Virginia] not possessing a Bible, and wish
ing without haying the means to procure one.
When, in earlier life, I was intimate with
every class, I think I never was in a house
where that was the case. However, circum
stances may have changed, and the [Bible]
Society, I presume, have evidence of the fact.
I, therefore, enclose you cheerfully, an order
* * * for fifty dollars, for the purposes of
the Society.— To SAMUEL GREENHOW. vi,
308. (M., 1814.)
807. BIBLE, Morality in the.— There
never was a more pure and sublime system
of morality delivered to man than is to be
found in the four Evangelists. — To SAMUEL
GREENHOW. vi, 309. (M., 1814.)
808. BIBLE, Protestants and the. — As
to tradition, if we are Protestants we reject
all tradition, and rely on the Scripture alone,
for that is the essence and common principle
of all the Protestant churches.— NOTES ON
RELIGION. FORD ED., ii, 96. (1776?.)
809. BIBLE, Translation of the. — I pro
pose [after retirement], among my first em
ployments, to give to the Septuagint an at
tentive perusal.* — To CHARLES THOMSON, v,
403. FORD ED., ii, 234. (W., 1808.)
810. BIGOTRY, A Disease. — Bigotry is
the disease of ignorance, of morbid minds;
enthusiasm of the free and buoyant. Educa
tion and free discussion are the antidotes of
both.— To JOHN ADAMS, vii, 27. (M., 1816.)
811. BIGOTRY, Political and Relig
ious. — What an effort of bigotry in politics
and religion have we gone through ! The bar
barians really flattered themselves they should
be able to bring back the times of Vandalism,
when ignorance put everything into the hands
of power and priestcraft. All advances in
science were proscribed as innovations. They
pretended to praise and encourage education,
but it was to be the education of our ances
tors. We were to look backwards, not for
wards for improvement ; the President him
self [John Adams] declaring * * * that we
were never to expect to go beyond them in
real science. — To DR. JOSEPH PRIESTLEY, iv,
373. FORD ED., viii, 21. (W., March 1801.)
812. BIGOTRY, Self-government and.
— Ignorance and bigotry, like other insanities,
are incapable of self-government. — To MAR
QUIS LAFAYETTE, vii, 67. FORD ED., x, 84.
(M., 1817.)
* Thomson's translation of the Septuagint.— ED
ITOR.
813. BIGOTRIES, Union of.— All big
otries hang to one another. — To JOHN ADAMS.
vi, 305. (M., 1814.)
814. BILL OF RIGHTS, An American
Idea. — The enlightened part of Europe have
given us the greatest credit for inventing this
instrument of security for the rights of the
people, and have been not a little surprised to
see us so soon give it up [not having incor
porated one in the new Constitution]. — To
F. HQPKINSON. ii, 586. FORD ED., v, 77.
(P., March 1789.)
815. BILL OF RIGHTS, The Constitu
tion and.— [ do not like [in the Federal Con
stitution] first, the omission of a bill of
rights, providing clearly and without the aid
of sophisms for freedom of religion, freedom
of the press, protection against standing
armies, restriction against monopolies, the
eternal and unremitting force of the habeas
corpus laws, and trials by jury in all matters
of fact triable by the laws of the land, and
not by the law of nations. To say, as Mr.
Wilson does, that a bill of rights was not
necessary, because all is reserved in the case
of the General Government ' which is not
given> while in the particular ones, all is
given which is not reserved, might do for the
audience to whom it was addressed; but it is
surely a gratis dictum, opposed by strong in
ferences from the body of the instrument, as
well as from the omission of the clause of
our present confederation, which had declared
that in express terms. It was a hard conclu
sion to say, because there has been no uni
formity among the States as to the cases tri
able by jury, because some have been so in
cautious as to abandon this mode of trial,
therefore the more prudent States shall be
reduced to the same level of calamity. It
would have been much more just and wise to
have concluded the other way, that as most
of the States had judiciously preserved this
palladium, those who had wandered should
be brought back to it, and to have established
general right instead of general wrong.* Let
me add that a bill of rights is what the people
are entitled to against every government on
earth, general or particular ; and what no
just government should refuse or rest on in
ferences. — To JAMES MADISON, ii, 329. FORD
ED., iv, 476. (P., Dec. 1787.)
816. . I am in hopes that the
annexation of a bill of rights to the Consti
tution will alone draw over so great a propor
tion of the minorities, as to leave little dan
ger in the opposition of the residue ; and that
this annexation may be made by Congress
and the Assemblies, without calling a con
vention which might endanger the most valu
able parts of the system. — To GENERAL
WASHINGTON, ii, 533. FORD ED., v, 56. (P.,
Dec. 1788.)
* The Congress edition contains the following pas
sage: "For I consider all the ill as established,
which may be established. I have a right to noth
ing, which another has a right to take away ; and
Congress will have a right to take away trials by
jury in all civil cases." — EDITOR.
S9
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Bill of Bights
817. BILL OF BIGHTS, Demand for.—
I sincerely rejoice at the acceptance of our
new Constitution by nine States. It is a
good canvas on which some strokes only
want retouching. What these are, I think
are sufficiently manifested by the general
voice from north to south, which calls for a
bill of rights. It seems pretty generally un
derstood that this should go to juries, habeas
corpus, standing armies, printing, religion,
and monopolies. I conceive there may be dif
ficulty in finding general modifications of
these, suited to the habits of all the States.
But if such cannot be found, then it is better
to establish trials by jury, the right of habeas
corpus, freedom of the press, and freedom of
religion, in all cases, and to abolish standing
armies in time of peace, and monopolies in all
cases, than not to do it in any. The few
cases wherein these things may do evil, can
not be weighed against the multitude wherein
the want of them will do evil. In disputes
between a foreigner and a native, a trial by
jury may be improper. But if this exception
cannot be agreed to, the remedy will be to
model the jury by giving the mediatas lingua
in civil as well as criminal cases. Why sus
pend the habeas corpus in insurrections and
rebellions ? The parties who may be arrested,
may be charged instantly with a well-defined
crime; of course, the judge will remand them.
If the public safety requires that the govern
ment should have a man imprisoned on less
probable testimony in this than in other emer
gencies, let him be taken and tried, and re
taken and retried, while the necessity contin
ues, only giving them redress against the gov
ernment, for damages. Examine the history
of England. See how few of the cases of the
suspension of the habeas corpus law have
been worthy of that suspension. They have
been either real treason, wherein the parties
might as well have been charged at once, or
sham plots, where it was shameful they
should ever have been suspected. Yet for the
few cases wherein the suspension of the
habeas corpus has done real good, that opera
tion is now become habitual, and the mass of
the nation almost prepared to live under its
constant suspension. A declaration, that the
Federal government will never restrain the
presses from printing anything they please,
will not take away the liability of the printers
for false facts printed. The declaration, that
religious faith shall be unpunished, does not
give impunity to criminal acts, dictated by
religious error. The saying there shall be no
monopolies, lessens the incitements to ingenu
ity, which is spurred on by the hope of a
monopoly for a limited time, as of fourteen
years; but the benefit of even limited mon
opolies is too doubtful to be opposed to that
of their general suppression. If no check can
be found to keep the number of standing
troops within safe bounds, while they are tol
erated as far as necessary, abandon them al
together: discipline well the militia, and
guard the magazines with them. More than
magazine guards will be useless if few, and
dangerous if many. No European nation can
ever send against us such a regular army as
we need fear; and it is hard if our militia
are not equal to those of Canada or Florida.
My idea then, is that though proper excep
tions to these general rules are desirable, and
probably practicable, yet if the exceptions
cannot be agreed on, the establishment of the
rules in all cases will do ill in very few. I
hope, therefore, a bill of rights will be formed,
to guard the people against the Federal Gov
ernment, as they are already guarded against
their State governments in most instances. —
To JAMES MADISON, ii, 445. FORD ED., v,
45- (P., July 1788.)
818. BILL OF BIGHTS, Fetters
against Evil.— By a declaration of rights I
mean one which shall stipulate freedom of
religion, freedom of the press, freedom of
commerce against monopolies, trial by juries
in all cases, no suspensions of the habeas cor
pus, no standing armies. These are fetters
against doing evil which no honest government
should decline. — To A. DONALD, ii, 355. (P.,
Feb. 1788.)
819. BILL OF BIGHTS, A Guard to
Liberty. — I disapproved from the first mo
ment [in the new Constitution] the want of
a bill of rights, to guard liberty against the
legislative as well as the executive branches
of the government; that is to say, to secure
freedom in religion, freedom of the press,
freedom from monopolies, freedom from un
lawful imprisonment, freedom from a per
manent military, and a trial by jury, in all
cases determinable by the laws of the land. —
To F. HOPKINSON. ii, 586. FORD ED., v, 76.
(P., March 1789.)
820. BILL OF BIGHTS, An Insuffi
cient. — I like the declaration of rights as far
as it goes, but I should have been for going
further. For instance, the following altera
tions and additions would have pleased me.
" Article IV. The people shall not be deprived
or abridged of their right to speak, to write,
or otherwise to publish anything but false
facts affecting injuriously the life, liberty, or
reputation of others, or affecting the peace
of the Confederacy with foreign nations.
Article VII. All facts put in issue before any
judicature shall be tried by jury except, I,
in cases of admiralty jurisdiction wherein a
foreigner shall be interested ; 2, in cases cog
nizable before a court martial, concerning
only the regular officers and soldiers of the
United States, or members of the militia in
actual service in time of war or insurrection ;
and, 3, in impeachments allowed by the Con
stitution. Article VIII. No person shall be
held in confinement more than days after
he shall have demanded and been refused a
writ of habeas corpus by the judge appointed
by law, nor more than days after such a
writ shall have been served on the person
holding him in confinement, and no order
given on due examination for his remandment
or discharge, nor more than hours in any
place of a greater distance than miles
from the usual residence of some judge au
thorized to issue the writ of habeas corpus:
nor shall that writ be suspended for any term
Bill of Rights
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
90
exceeding one year, nor in any place more
than miles distant from the station or
encampment of enemies, or of insurgents.
Article IX. Monopolies may be allowed to
persons for their own productions in litera
ture, and their own inventions in the arts,
for a term not exceeding years, but for
no longer term, and for no other purpose.
Article X. All troops of the United States
shall stand ipso facto disbanded, at the ex
piration of the term for which their pay and
subsistence shall have been last voted by
Congress, and all officers and soldiers, not
natives of the United States, shall be incapa
ble of serving in their armies by land, ex
cept during a foreign war." These restric
tions, I think, are so guarded as to hinder
evil only. However, if we do not have them
now, I have so much confidence in my coun
trymen, as to be satisfied that we shall have
them as soon as the degeneracy of our gov
ernment shall render them necessary. — To
JAMES MADISON, iii, 100. FORD ED., v, 112.
(P., Aug. 1789.)
821. BILL OF RIGHTS, The Judiciary
and. — In the arguments in favor of the
declaration of rights, you omit one which
has great weight with me: the legal check
which it puts into the hands of the judiciary.
This is a body which, if rendered independent
and kept strictly to their own department,
merits great confidence for their learning and
integrity. In fact, what degree of confidence
would be too much for a body composed of
such men as Wythe, Blair and Pendleton?
On characters like these, the " civium ardor
prava jubentium" would make no impres
sion. I am happy to find that, on the
whole, you are a friend to this amendment.
The declaration of rights is, like all other
human blessings, alloyed with some incon
veniences, and not accomplishing fully its ob
ject. But the good in this instance vastly out
weighs the evil. — To JAMES MADISON, iii, 3.
FORD ED., v, 80. (P., March 1789.)
822. BILL OF BIGHTS, The People
and. — A bill of rights is what the people are
entitled to against every government on earth,
general or particular; and what no just gov
ernment should refuse, or rest on inferences.
— To JAMES MADISON, ii, 330. FORD ED., iv,
477- (P-, Dec. 1787.)
823. BILL OF BIGHTS, Security in.—
A general concurrence of opinion seems to
authorize us to say the Constitution has some
defects. I am one of those who think it a de
fect that the important rights, not placed in
security by the frame of the Constitution it
self, were not explicitly secured by a supple
mentary declaration. There are rights which
it is useless to surrender to the govern
ment, and which governments have yet al
ways been found to invade. These are the
riehts of thinking, and publishing our
thoughts by speaking or writing ; the right of
free commerce; the right of personal free
dom. There are instruments for administer
ing the government so particularly trust
worthy, that we should never leave the legis
lature at liberty to change them. The new
Constitution has secured these in the Execu
tive and Legislative departments: but not in
the Judiciary. It should have established
trials by the people themselves, that is to say,
by jury. There are instruments so dangerous
to the rights of the nation, and which place
them so totally at the mercy of their govern
ors, that those governors, whether legisla
tive or executive, should be restrained from
keeping such instruments on foot, but in well
defined cases. Such an instrument is a
standing army. We are now allowed to say
such a declaration of rights, as a supplement
to the Constitution where that is silent, is
wanting, to secure us in these points. The
general voice has legitimated this objection. —
To DAVID HUMPHREYS, iii, 12. FORD ED., v,
89. (P., March 1789.)
824. . I am one of those who
think it a defect [in the new Constitution],
that the important rights, not placed in se
curity by the frame of the Constitution it
self, were not explicitly secured by a sup
plementary declaration [of rights]. — To DA
VID HUMPHREYS, iii, 12. FORD ED., v, 89.
(P., March 1789.)
825. BILL OF BIGHTS, Where Nec
essary. — I cannot refrain from making short
answers to the objections which your letter
states to have been raised, i. That the
rights in question are reserved by the man
ner in which the Federal powers are granted.
Answer. A constitutive act may, certainly.
be so formed as to need no declaration of
rights. The act itself has the force of a dec
laration as far as it goes ; and if it goes to
all material points, nothing more is wanting.
In the draft ot a Constitution which I had
once a thought of proposing in Virginia, I
endeavored to reach all the great objects of
public liberty, and did not mean to add a
declaration of rights. Probably the object
was imperfectly executed; but the deficien
cies would have been supplied by others, in
the course of discussion. But in a constitu
tive act which leaves some precious articles
unnoticed, and raises implications against
others, a declaration of rights becomes nec
essary by way of supplement. This is the
case of our new Federal Constitution. This
instrument forms us into one State, as to
certain objects, and gives us a legislative and
executive body for these objects. It should,
therefore, guard against their abuses of power
within the field submitted to them. 2. A
positive declaration of some essential rights
could not be obtained in the requisite lati
tude. Answer. Half a loaf is better than
no bread. If we cannot secure all our rights,
let us secure what we can. 3. The limited
powers of the Federal Government, and jeal
ousy of the subordinate governments, af
ford a security which exists in no other in
stance. Answer. The first member of this
seems resolvable into the first objection be
fore stated. The jealousy of the subordi
nate governments is a precious reliance. But
observe that these governments are only
agents. They must have principles furnished
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Bill of Bights
them whereon to found their opposition. The
declaration of rights will be the text, whereby
they will try all the acts of the Federal Gov
ernment, In this view, it is necessary to the
Federal Government also, as by the same
text, they may try the opposition of the sub
ordinate governments. 4. Experience proves
the inefficacy of a Bill of Rights. Answer.
True. But though it is not absolutely effica
cious under all circumstances, it is of great
potency always and rarely inefficacious. A
brace the more will often keep up the build
ing which would have fallen with that brace
the less. There is a remarkable difference
between the characters of the inconveniences
which attend a declaration of rights, and
those which attend the want of it. The in
conveniences of the declaration are that it
may cramp government in its useful exer
tions. But the evil of this is short-lived,
moderate and reparable. The inconveniences
of the want of a declaration are permanent,
afflicting and irreparable. They are in con
stant progression from bad to worse. The
executive, in our governments, is not the
sole, it is scarcely the principal, object of my
jealousy. The tyranny of the legislatures is
the most formidable dread at present, and
will be for many years. That of the executive
will come in its turn; but it will be at a re
mote period. I know there are some among
us who would now establish a monarchy. But
they are inconsiderable in number and weight
of character. The rising race are all republi
cans. We were educated in royalism ; no
wonder if some of us retain that idolatry
still. Our young people are educated in repub
licanism; an apostasy from that to royalism
is unprecedented and impossible. I am much
pleased with the prospect that a declaration
of rights will be added ; and I hope it will be
done in that way which will not endanger
the whole frame of government, or any essen
tial part of it. — To JAMES MADISON, iii, 4.
FORD ED., v, 81. (P., March 1789.)
826. BILL OF BIGHTS (French), Draft
of. — i. The States General shall assemble, un
called, on the first day of November, annu
ally, and shall remain together so long as
they shall see cause. They shall regulate
their own elections and proceedings, and un
til they shall ordain otherwise, their elec
tions shall be in the forms observed in the
present year, and shall be triennial. 2.. The
States General alone shall levy money on the
nation, and shall appropriate it. 3. Laws
shall be made by the States General only,
with the consent of the King. 4. No person
shall be restrained of his liberty, but by regu
lar process from a court of justice, author
ized by a general law. (Except that a Noble
may be imprisoned by order of a -court of
justice, on the prayer of twelve of his nearest
relations.) On complaint of an unlawful im
prisonment, to any judge whatever, he shall
have the prisoner immediately brought before
him, and shall discharge him, if his imprison
ment be unlawful. The officer in whose cus
tody the prisoner is, shall obey the orders of
the judge ; and both judge and officer shall be
responsible, civilly and criminally, for a fail
ure of duty herein. 5. The military shall be
subordinate to the civil authority. 6. Printers
shall be liable to legal prosecution for print
ing and publishing false facts, injurious to
the party prosecuting; but they shall be un
der no other restraint. 7. All pecuniary priv
ileges and exemptions, enjoyed by any de
scription of persons, are abolished. 8. All
debts already contracted by the King, are
hereby made the debts of the nation; and
the faith thereof is pledged for their payment
in due time. 9. Eighty million of livres are
now granted to the King, to be raised by
loan, and reimbursed by the nation; and the
taxes heretofore paid, shall continue to be
paid to the end of the present year, and no
longer. 10. The States General shall now
separate, and meet again on the ist day of
November next. Done, on behalf of the whole
nation, by the King and their representatives
in the States General, at Versailles, this
day of June, 1789. Signed by the King, and
by every member individually, and in his pres
ence.* — FRENCH CHARTER OF RIGHTS, iii, 47.
FORD ED., v, 101. (P., June 1789.)
827. BILL OF BIGHTS (French), His
tory of.— After you [M. de St. Etienne]
quitted us yesterday evening, we continued
our conversation (Monsr de Lafayette, Mr.
Short and myself) on the subject of the dif
ficulties which environ you. The desirable
object being to secure the good which the
King has offered and to avoid the ill which
seems to threaten, an idea was suggested,
which appearing to make an impression on
Mons de Lafayette, I was encouraged to
pursue it on my return to Paris, to put it
into form, and now to send it to you and him.
It is this, that the King, in a seance royale
should come forward with a Charter of
Rights in his hand, to be signed by himself,
and by every member of the three orders.
This Charter to contain the five great points
which the Resultat of December offered on
the part of the King, the abolition of pecu
niary privileges offered by the privileged or
ders, and the adoption of the national debt,
and a grant of the sum of money asked from
the nation. This last will be a cheap price for
the preceding articles, and let the same act
declare your immediate separation till the
next anniversary meeting. You will carry
back to your constituents more good than
ever was effected before without violence,
and you will stop exactly at the point where
violence would otherwise begin. Time will
be gained, the public mind will continue
to ripen and to be informed, a basis of sup
port may be prepared with the people them
selves, and expedients occur for gaining still
something further at your next meeting, and
for stopping again at the point of force. I have
ventured to send to yourself and Monsieur
de Lafayette a sketch of my ideas of what this
act might contain without endangering any
dispute. But it is offered merely as a canvas
*This paper is entitled "A Charter of Rights, Sol
emnly established by the King and Nation".— ED
ITOR.
Bill of Rights
Birthday
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
for you to work on, if it be fit to work on at
all. I know too little of the subject, and you
know too much of it to justify me in offering
anything but a hint. I have done it too in a
hurry; insomuch that since committing it to
writing it occurs to me that the 5th article
may give alarm, that it is in a good degree
included in the 4th, and is, therefore, useless.
But, after all, what excuse can I make, Sir,
for this presumption? I have none but an
unmeasurable love for your nation, and a
painful anxiety lest despotism, after an unac
cepted offer to bind its own hands, should
seize you again with tenfold fury. — To M. DE
ST. ETIENNE. FORD ED., v, 99. (P., June
1789) See RIGHTS.
- BIMETALISM.— See DOLLAR and
MONEY.
828. BI3STGHAM (William), Character
of. — Though Bingham is not in diplomatic
office, yet as he wishes to be so, I will mention
such circumstances of him, as you might other
wise be deceived in. He will make you believe
he was on the most intimate footing with the
first characters in Europe, and versed in the
secrets of every cabinet. Not a word of this
is true. He had a rage for being presented
to great men, and had no modesty in the meth
ods by which he could if he attained acquaint
ance. — To JAMES MADISON, ii, 108. FORD ED.,
iv, 366. (P., 1787.)
829. BIRDS, Mocking-bird.— Teach all
the children to venerate the mocking-bird as a
superior being in the form of a bird, or as a
being which will haunt them if any harm is
done to itself or its eggs. I shall hope that the
multiplication of the cedar in the neighborhood,
and of the trees and shrubs round the house
[Monticello] will attract more of them ; for
they like to be in the neighborhood of our
habitations if they furnish cover. — To MARTHA
JEFFERSON RANDOLPH. D. L. J., 221. (Pa.,
I/93-)
830. BIRDS, Nightingale.— I have heard
the nightingale in all its perfection, and I do
not hesitate to pronounce that in America it
would be deemed a bird of the third rank only,
our mocking-bird, and fox-colored thrush being
unquestionably superior to it. — To MRS. JOHN
ADAMS. FORD ED., iv, 63. (P., 1785.)
831. . I have been for a week
past sailing on the canal of Languedoc, cloud
less skies above, limpid waters below, and on
each hand a row of nightingales in full chorus.
This delightful bird had given me a rich treat
before, at the fountain of Vaucluse. After vis
iting the tomb of Laura at Avignon, I went to
see this fountain — a noble one of itself, and
rendered famous forever by the songs of Pe
trarch, who lived near it. I arrived there some
what fatigued, and sat down by the fountain
to repose myself. It gushes, of the size of a
river, from a secluded valley of the mountains,
the ruins of Petrarch's chateau being perched
on a rock two hundred feet perpendicular
above. To add to the enchantment of the
scene, every tree and bush was filled with night
ingales in full song. I think you told me that
you had not yet noticed this bird. As you
have trees in the garden of the convent, there
might be nightingales in them, and this is the
season of their song. Endeavor to make your
self acquainted with the music of this bird,
that when you return to your own country,
you may be able to estimate its merit in com
parison with that of the mocking-bird. The
latter has the advantage of singing through a
great part of the year, whereas the nightingale
sings about five or six weeks in the spring, and
a still shorter term, and with a more feeble
voice, in the fall. — To MARTHA JEFFERSON.
FORD ED., iv, 388. (1787.)
832. BIRDS, Skylark.— There are two
or three objects which you should endeavor to
enrich our country with, — the skylark, the red-
legged partridge. I despair too much of the
nightingale to add that. — To JAMES MONROE.
FORD ED., vii, 21. (M., 1795.)
833. BIRDS, Turkey.— I suppose the
opinion to be universal that the turkey is a
native of America. Nobody, as far as I know,
has ever contradicted it but Daines Harrington ;
and the arguments he produces are such as
none but a head, entangled and kinked as his
is, would ever have urged. Before the discov
ery of America, no such bird is mentioned
in a single author, all those quoted by Bar-
rington, by description referring to the crane,
hen, pheasant, or peacock ; but the book of
every traveller, who came to America soon
after its discovery, is full of accounts of the
turkey and its abundance ; and immediately
after that discovery we find the turkey served
up at the feasts of Europe, as their most ex
traordinary rarity. — To DR. HUGH WILLIAM
SON, iv, 346. FORD ED., vii, 480. (W., Jan.
1801.)
834. BIRDS, The Crested Turkey.— I
have taken measures to obtain the crested tur
key, and will endeavor to perpetuate that beau
tiful and singular characteristic, and shall be
not less earnest in endeavors to raise the Mor-
onnier. — To M. CORREA. vii, 95. (P. F., 1817.)
835. BIRDS, The Turkey in Heraldry.
— Mr. William Strickland, the eldest son of
St. George Strickland, of York, in England,
told me this anecdote : Some ancestor of his
commanded a vessel in the navigations of Ca
bot. Having occasion to consult the Herald's
office concerning his family, he found a petition
from that ancestor to the Crown, stating that
Cabot's circumstances being slender, he had been
rewarded by the bounties, he needed from the
Crown ; that as to himself, he asked nothing in
that way, but that as a consideration for his
services in the same way, he might be permitted
to assume for the crest of his family arms, the
turkey, an American bird ; and Mr. Strick
land observed that their crest is actually a
turkey. — To DR. HUGH WILLIAMSON, iv, 346.
FORD ED., vii, 480. (W., Jan. 1801.)
836. BIRTH, Public Office and. — For
promoting the public happiness, those per
sons, whom nature has endowed with genius
and virtue, should be rendered by liberal
education worthy to receive, and able to
guard the sacred deposit of the rights and
liberties of their fellow citizens; and they
should be called to that charge without re
gard to * * * birth, or other accidental
condition or circumstance. — DIFFUSION OF
KNOWLEDGE BILL. FORD ED., ii, 221. (1779.)
837. BIRTHDAY, Jefferson's.— Disap
proving myself of transferring the honors and
veneration for the great birthday of our Re
public to any individual, or of dividing them
with individuals, I have declined letting my
own birthday be known, and have engaged
mv family not to communicate it. This has
been the uniform answer to every applica
tion of the kind. — To LEVI LINCOLN", iv, 504.
FORD ED., viii, 246. (M., Aug. 1803.)
93
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Birthday
Bishop (Samuel)
838. . The only birthday which
I recognize is that of my country's liberties.*
— RAYNER'S LIFE OF JEFFERSON, p. 18.
839. BIRTHDAY, Celebration of Wash
ington's. — A great ball is to be given here
[Philadelphia] on the 22d, and in other great
towns of the Union. This is, at least, very
indelicate, and probably excites uneasy sensa
tions in some. I see in it, however, this use
ful deduction, that the birthdays, which have
been kept, have been, not those of the Presi
dent, but of the General. — To JAMES MADISON.
iv, 212. FORD ED., vii, 203. (Pa., Feb. 1798.)
-. The late birth-night has
tares among the exclusive
840.
certainly sown
federalists. It has winnowed the grain from
the chaff. The sincerely Adamites did not go.
The Washingtonians went religiously, and took
the secession of the others in high dudgeon.
The one sect threaten to desert the levees, the
other the parties. The whigs went in number,
to encourage the idea that the birth-nights
hitherto kept had been for the General and not
the President, and of course that time would
bring an end to them. — To JAMES MADISON.
iv, 218. FORD EDV vii, 211. (Pa., Feb. 1798.)
841. BISHOP (Samuel), Appointment
as Collector. — I have received the remon
strance you were pleased to address to me,
on the appointment of Samuel Bishop to the
office of Collector of New Haven, lately va
cated by the death of Daniel Austin. The
right of our fellow citizens to represent to the
public functionaries their opinion on proceed
ings interesting to them, is unquestionably
a constitutional right, often useful, some
times necessary, and will always be respect
fully acknowledged by me. Of the various
executive duties, no one excites more anx
ious concern than that of placing the inter
ests of our fellow citizens in the hands of
honest men, with understandings sufficient
for their stations. No duty, at the same time,
is more difficult to fulfil. The knowledge of
characters possessed by a single individual
is, of necessity, limited. To seek out the
best through the whole Union, we must re
sort to other information, which, from the
best of men, acting disinterestedly and with
the purest motives, is sometimes incorrect.
In the case of Samuel Bishop, however, the
subject of your remonstrance, time was
taken, information was sought, and such ob
tained as could leave no room for doubt of
his fitness. From private sources it was
learned that his understanding was sound.
his integrity pure, his character unstained.
And the offices confided to him within his
own State, are public evidences of the es
timation in which he is held by the State
in general, and the city and township par
ticularly in which he lives. He is said to
be the town clerk, a justice of the peace,
mayor of the city of New Haven, an office
held at the will of the legislature, chief judge
of the court of common pleas for New
Haven County, a court of high criminal and
* Jefferson thought he discovered in the birthday
celebrations of particular persons, a germ of aristo-
cratical distinction, which it was incumbent upon all
such persons, by a timely concert of example, to
crush in the bud..— RAYNER'S Life of Jefferson^ p. 17.
civil jurisdiction wherein most causes are de
cided without the right of appeal or review,
and sole judge of the court of Probates,
wherein he singly decides all questions of
wills, settlement of estates, testate and in
testate, appoints guardians, settles their ac
counts, and in fact has under his jurisdiction
and care all the property, real and personal, of
persons dying. The two last offices, in the
annual gift of the legislature, were given to
him in May last. Is it possible that the man
to whom the legislature of Connecticut has
so recently committed trusts of such diffi
culty and magnitude, is " unfit to be the col
lector of the district of New Haven," though
acknowledged in the same writing, to have
obtained all this confidence " by a long life
of usefulness"? It is objected, indeed, in
the remonstrance, that he is seventy-seven
years of age ; but at a much more advanced
age, our Franklin was the ornament of hu
man nature. He may not be able to perform
in person all the details of his office; but if
he gives us the benefit of his understanding,
his integrity, his watchfulness and takes
care that all the details are well per
formed by himself or his necessary assist
ants, all public purposes will be answered.
The remonstrance, indeed, does not allege
that the office has been illy conducted, but
only apprehends that it will be so. Should
this happen in event, be assured I will do in it
what shall be just and necessary for the
public service. In the meantime, he should
be tried without being prejudged.— To THE
NEW HAVEN COMMITTEE, iv, 402. FORD ED.,
viii, 67. (W., July 1801.)
842. BISHOP (Samuel), Goodrich's re
moval and. — The removal, as it is called, of
Mr. [Elizur] Goodrich, promises another
subject of complaint. Declarations by my
self in favor of political tolerance, exhorta
tions to harmony and affection in social in
tercourse, and to respect for the^equal rights
of the minority, have, on certain occasions,
been quoted and misconstrued into assur
ances that the tenure of offices was to be un
disturbed. But could candor apply such a
construction? It is not, indeed, in the re
monstrance that we find it; but it leads to
the explanations which that calls for. When
it is considered, that during the late adminis
tration, those who were not of a particular
sect of politics were excluded from all office :
when, by a steady pursuit of this measure,
nearly the whole officers of the United States
were monopolized by that sect; when
the public sentiment at length declared itself,
and burst open the doors of honor and con
fidence to those whose opinions they more
approved, was it to be imagined that this
monopoly of office was still to be continued
in the hands of the minority? Does it vio
late their equal rights, to assert some rights
in the majority also? Is it political intoler
ance to claim a proportionate share in the
direction of the public affairs? Can they
not harmonise in society unless they have
everything in their own hands? If the will
of the nation, manifested by their various
Bishop (Samuel)
Bland (Richard)
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
94
elections, calls for an administration of gov
ernment according with the opinions of those
elected; if, for the fulfilment of that will,
displacements are necessary, with whom can
they so justly begin as with persons ap
pointed in the last moments of an adminis
tration, not for its own aid. but to begin a
career at the same time with their success
ors, by whom they had never been approved,
and who could scarcely expect from them a
cordial cooperation? Mr. Goodrich was one
of these. Was it proper for him to place
himself in office, without knowing whether
those whose agent he was to be would have
confidence in his agency? Can the prefer
ence of another, as the successor to Mr.
Austin, be candidly called a removal of Mr.
Goodrich? If a due participation of office
is a matter of right, how are vacancies to be
obtained? Those by death are few; by res
ignation, none. Can any other mode than
that of removal be proposed ? This is a pain
ful office ; but it is made my duty, and I meet
it as such. I proceed in the operation with
deliberation and inquiry, that it may injure
the best men least, and effect the purposes of
justice and public utility with the least pri
vate distress ; that it may be thrown, as much
as possible, on delinquency, on oppression,
on intolerance, on incompetence, on ante-
revolutionary adherence to our enemies. The
remonstrance laments " that a change in the
administration must produce a change in the
subordinate officers," in other words, that
it should be deemed necessary for all offi
cers to think with their principal? But on
whom does this imputation bear? On those
who have excluded from office every shade
of opinion which was not theirs? Or on
those who have been so excluded? I lament
sincerely that unessential differences of po
litical opinion should ever have been deemed
sufficient to interdict half the society from
the rights and blessings of self-government,
to proscribe them as characters unworthy of
every trust. It would have been to me a
circumstance of great relief, had I found a
moderate participation of office in the hands
of the majority. I would gladly have left
to time and accident to raise them to their
just share. But their total exclusion calls
for prompter correctives. I shall correct the
procedure ; but that done, disdain to follow
it, shall return with joy to that state of
things, when the only questions concerning
a candidate shall be: Is he honest? Is he
capable? Is he faithful to the Constitu
tion? — To THE NEW HAVEN COMMITTEE, iv,
403. FORD ED., viii, 69. (W., July 1801.)
843. BISHOP (Samuel), New Haven
Remonstrance and. — Mr. Goodrich' s re
moval has produced a bitter remonstrance,
with much personality against the two Bish
ops. I am sincerely sorry to see the inflex
ibility of the federal spirit there, for I cannot
believe they are all monarchists. — To LEVI
LINCOLN, iv, 399. FORD ED., viii, 67. (W.,
July 1801.)
844. . Some occasion of public
explanation was eagerly desired, when the
New Haven remonstrance offered us that oc
casion. The answer was meant as an ex
planation to our triends. It has had ori
them, everywhere, the most wholesome effect.
Appearances of schismatizing from us have
been entirely done away. I own I expected
it would check the current with which the
republican federalists were returning to their
brethren, the republicans. I extremely la
mented this effect ; for the moment which
should convince me that a healing of the na
tion into one is impracticable, would be the
last moment of my wishing to remain where
I am. — To LEVI LINCOLN, iv, 406. FORD ED.,
viii, 84. (M., Aug. 1801.) See GOODRICH. .
845. BLACKSTONE (Sir William),
Commentaries. — The exclusion from the
courts of the malign influence of all author
ities after the Georgium Sidus became as
cendant, would uncanonize Blackstone,
whose book, although the most elegant and
best digested of our law catalogue, has been
perverted, more than all others, to the de
generacy of legal science. A student finds
there a smattering of everything, and his
indolence easily persuades him that if he
understands that book, he is master of the
whole body of the law. The distinction be
tween these, and those who have drawn their
stores from the deep and rich mines of Coke
on Littleton, seems well understood even by
the unlettered common people, who apply
the appellation of Blackstone lawyers to
these ephemeral insects of the law. — To JUDGE
TYLER, vi, 66. (M., 1812.)
846. BLACKSTONE (Sir William),
Toryism of. — Blackstone and Hume have
made tories of all England, and are making
tories of those young Americans whose native
feelings of independence do not place them
above the wily sophistries of a Hume or a
Blackstone. These two books, but especially
the former, have done more towards the
suppression of the liberties of man, than all
the million of men in arms of Bonaparte, and
the millions of human lives with the sacrifice
of which he will stand loaded before the
judgment seat of his Maker. — To HORATIO G.
SPAFFORD. vi, 335. (M., 1814.)
847. BLAND (Richard), Character of.—
Colonel Richard Bland was the most learned
and logical man of those who took prominent
lead in public affairs, profound in constitu
tional lore, a most ungraceful speaker (as were
Peyton Randolph and Robinson, in a remark
able degree.) He wrote the first pamphlet on
the nature of the connection with Great Brit
ain which had #ny pretension to accuracy of
view on that subject, but it was a singular one.
He would set out on sound principles, pursue
them Logically till he found them leading to the
precipice which he had to leap, start back
alarmed, then resume his ground, go over it in
another direction, be led again by the correct
ness of his reasoning to the same place, and
again back out, and try other processes to
reconcile right and wrong, but finally left his
reader and himself bewildered between the
steady index of the compass in their hand, and
the phantasm to which it seemed to point. Still
there was more sound matter in his pamphlet
than in the celebrated " Farmer's Letters,"
95
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Blockades
|{.)llm,ni (Eric)
which were really but an ignis fatuus, mislead
ing us from true principles. — To WILLIAM
WIRT. vi, 485. FORD ED., ix, 474. (M., 1815.)
848. BLOCKADES, Law of. —When the
fleet of any nation actually beleaguers the
port of its enemy, no other has a right to
enter their line any more than their line of
battle in the open sea, or their lines of cir-
cumvallation, or of encampment, or of battle
array on land. The space included within
their lines in any of those cases, is either the
property of their enemy, or it is common
property, assumed and possessed for a mo
ment, which cannot be intruded on, even by
a neutral, without committing the very tres
pass we are now considering, that of intrud
ing into the lawful possession of a friend. —
To ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON, iv, 410. FORD
ED., viii, 91. (M., 1801.)
849. BLOCKADES, Neutrals and.—
When two nations go to war, it does not
abridge the rights of neutral nations but in
the two articles of blockade and contraband
of war. — To BENJAMIN STODDERT. v, 425.
FORD ED., ix, 245. (W., 1809.)
850. BLOCKADES, Seizure of Ships.—
The instruction [to commanders of British
war ships] which allows the armed vessels
of Great Britain to seize, for condemnation,
all vessels, on their first attempt to enter a
blockaded port, except those of Denmark and
Sweden, which are to be prevented only, but
not seized, on their first attempt. Of the
nations inhabiting the shores of the Atlantic
ocean, and practising its navigation, Den
mark, Sweden and the United States, alone
are neutral. To declare, then, all neutral
vessels (for as to the vessels of the belliger
ent powers no order was necessary) to be
legal prize, which shall attempt to enter a
blockaded port, except those of Denmark
and Sweden, is exactly to declare that the
vessels of the United States shall be lawful
prize, and those of Denmark and Sweden
shall not. It is of little consequence that the
article has avoided naming the United
States, since it has used a description ap
plicable to them, and to them alone, while it
exempts the others from its operation, by
name. You will be pleased to ask an ex
planation of this distinction ; and you will
be able to say in discussing its justice, that
in every circumstance, we treat Great Brit
ain on the footing of the most favored na
tion, where our treaties do not preclude us,
and that even these are just as favorable to
her as hers are to us. Possibly she may be
bound by treaty to admit this exception in
favor of Denmark and Sweden, but she can
not be bound by treaty to withhold it from us ;
and if it be withheld merely because not
established with us by treaty, what might
not we, on the same ground, have with
held from Great Britain, during the short
course of the present war, as well as the
peace which has preceded it ? — To THOMAS
PINCKNEY. iv, 62. FORD ED., vi, 416. (Pa.,
Sept. 1793.)
851. . You express your appre
hension that some of the belligerent powers
may stop our vessels going with grain to the
ports of their enemies, and ask instructions
which may meet the question in various
points of view, intending, however, in the
meantime to contend for the amplest freedom
of neutral nations. Your intention in this
is perfectly proper, and coincides with the
ideas of our own government in the particu
lar case you put, as in general cases. Such a
stoppage to an unblockaded port would be
so unequivocal an infringement of the neu
tral rights, that we cannot conceive it will be
attempted. — To THOMAS PINCKNEY. iii, 551.
FORD ED., vi, 242. (Pa., May 1793.)
852. BLOUNT (William), Impeach
ment of. — It is most evident, that the anti-
republicans wish to get rid of Blpunt's impeach
ment. Many metaphysical niceties are handing
about in conversation, to show that it cannot be
sustained. To show the contrary, it is evident
must be the task of the republicans, or of no
body. — To JAMES MADISON, iv, 206. FORD
ED., vii, 190. (Pa., Jan. 1798.) See IMPEACH
MENT.
853. BOLINGBROKE, Writings of
Lord. — Lord Bolingbroke and Thomas Paine
were alike in making bitter enemies of the
priests and pharisees of their day. Both
were honest men ; both advocates for human
liberty. Paine wrote for a country which per
mitted him to push his reasoning to whatever
length it would go. Lord Bolingbroke in one
restrained by a constitution, and by public opin
ion. He was called indeed a tory ; but his
writings prove him a stronger advocate for lib
erty than any of his countrymen, the whigs of
the present day. Irritated by his exile, he com
mitted one act unworthy of him, in connecting
himself momentarily with a prince rejected by
his country. But he redeemed that single act
by his establishment of the principles which
proved it to be wrong. These two persons dif
fered remarkably in the style of their writing,
each leaving a model of what is most perfect
in both extremes of the simple and sublime.
No writer has exceeded Paine in ease and fa
miliarity of style, in perspicuity of expression,
happiness of elucidation, and in simple and un
assuming language. In this he may be com
pared with Dr. Franklin ; and indeed his Com
mon Sense was, for awhile, believed to have
been written by Dr. Franklin, and published
under the borrowed name of Paine, who had
come over with him from England. Lord
Bolingbroke's. on the other hand, is a style of
the highest order. The lofty, rythmical, full-
flowing eloquence of Cicero ; periods of just
measure, their members proportioned, their
close full and round. His conceptions, too, are
bold and strong, his diction copious, polished
and commanding as his subject. His writings
are certainly the finest samples in the English
language of the eloquence proper for the sen
ate. His political tracts are safe reading for
the most timid religionist, his philosophical, for
those who are not afraid to trust their reason
with discussions of right and wrong. — To
FRANCIS EPPES. vii, 197. FORD ED., x, 183.
(M., 1821.)
854. BOLLMAN (Eric), Burr and.— I
am sorry to tell you that Bollman was Burr's
right hand man in all his guilty schemes. On
being brought to prison here [Washington], he
communicated to Mr. Madison and myself the
whole of the plans, always, however, apolo
getically for Burr, as far as they would bear.
But his subsequent tergiversations have proved
Bollman (Eric)
Bouaparte (N.)
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
96
him conspicuously base. I gave him a pardon,
however, which covers him from everything but
infamy. I was the more astonished at his en
gaging in this business, from the peculiar mo
tives he should have felt for fidelity. When I
came into the government, I sought him out on
account of the services he had rendered you,
cherished him, offered him two different ap
pointments of value, which, after keeping them
long under consideration, he declined for com
mercial views, and would have given him any
thing for which he was fit. Be assured he is
unworthy of ever occupying again the care of
any honest man. — To MARQUIS DE LAFAYETTE.
v, 130. FORD ED., ix, 114. (W., July 1807.)
855. BOLLMAN (Eric), Pardon of.—
Dr. Bollman, on his arrival in Washington in
custody in January, voluntarily offered to make
communications to me, which he accordingly
did, Mr. Madison also being present. I pre
viously and subsequently assured him. (without,
however, his having requested it), that they
should never be used against himself. Mr.
Madison on the same evening committed to
writing, by memory, what he had said ; and
I moreover asked of Bollman to do it himself,
which he did, and I now enclose it to you.
The object is, as he is to be a witness, that
you may know how to examine him, and draw
everything from him. I wish the paper to be
seen and known only to yourself and the gen
tlemen who aid you, and to be returned to me.
If he should prevaricate, I should be willing
you should go so far as to ask him whether he
did not say so, and so to Mr. Madison and my
self, in order to let him see that his prevarica
tions will be marked. Mr. Madison will for
ward you a pardon for him, which we mean
should be delivered previously. It is suspected
by some he does not intend to appear. If he
does not, I hope you will take effectual meas
ures to have him immediately taken into cus
tody. Some other blank pardons are sent on
to be filled up at your discretion, if you should
find a defect of evidence, and believe that this
would supply it, * * * avoiding to give
them to the gross offenders, unless it be visi
ble that the principal will otherwise escape. —
To GEORGE HAY. FORD ED., ix, 52. (W., May
1807.)
856. BONAPARTE (Jerome), Marriage
of. — A report reaches us from Baltimore,
* * * that Mr. Jerome Bonaparte, brother
of the First Consul, is married to Miss Patter
son, of that city. The effect of this measure
on the mind of the First Consul, is not for me
to suppose ; but as it might occur to him,
prima facie, that the Executive of the United
States ought to have prevented it, I have
thought it advisable to mention the subject to
you, that, if necessary, you may by explana
tion set that idea to rights. You know that by
our laws, all persons are free to enter into
marriage, if of twenty-one years of age, no one
having a power to restrain it, not even their
parents ; and that under that age, no one can
prevent it but the parent or guardian. The
lady is under age, and the parents, placed be
tween her affections, which were strongly fixed,
and the considerations opposing the measure,
yielded with pain and anxiety to the former.
Mr. Patterson is the President of the Bank
of Baltimore, the wealthiest man in Maryland,
perhaps in the United States, except Mr. Car
roll ; a man of great virtue and respectability ;
the mother is the sister of the lady of General
Samuel Smith ; and, consequently, the station
of the family in society is with the first of
the United States. These circumstances fix
rank in a country where there are no heredi
tary titles. — To ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON, iv,
510. FORD ED., viii, 277. (W., Nov. 1803.)
857. BONAPARTE (N.), Brutuses for.
— If Bonaparte declares for royalty, either in
his own person, or for Louis XVIII., he has
but a few days to live. In a nation of so
much enthusiasm, there must be a million of
Brutuses who will devote themselves to de
stroy him. — To HENRY INNES. iv, 315. FORD
EDV vii, 412. (Pa., Jan. 1800.)
858. . Had the consuls been put
to death in the first tumult, and before the
nation had time to take sides, the Directory
and Councils might have reestablished
themselves on the spot. But that not being
done, perhaps it is now to be wished that
Bonaparte may be spared, as, according to
his protestations, he is for liberty, equality
and representative government, and he is
more able to keep the nation together, and
to ride out the storm than any other. Per
haps it may end in their establishing a single
representative, and that in his person. I
hope it will not be for life, for fear of the in
fluence of the example on our countrymen.
It is very material for the latter to be made
sensible that their own character and situa
tion are materially different from the French ;
and that whatever may be the fate of republi
canism there, we are able to preserve it in
violate here. — To JOHN BRECKENRIDGE. FORD
ED., vii, 418. (Pa., Jan. 1800.)
859. BONAPARTE (N.), Cromwell,
Washington and. — My confidence has been
placed in the head, not in the heart of Bona
parte. I hoped he would calculate truly the
difference between the fame of a Washington
and a Cromwell. — To SAMUEL ADAMS, iv,
321. FORD EDV vii, 425. (Pa., Feb. 1800.)
860. BONAPARTE (N.), Detested.— No
man on earth has stronger detestation than
myself of the unprincipled tyrant who is del
uging the continent of Europe with blood.
No one was more gratified by his disasters of
the last compaign.* — To DR. GEORGE LOGAN.
vi, 216. FORD ED., ix, 423. (M., Oct. 1813.)
861. BONAPARTE (N.), Embargo and.
— The explanation of his principles given you
by the French Emperor, in conversation, is
correct as far as it goes. He does not wish
us to go to war with England, knowing we
have no ships to carry on that war. To sub
mit to pay to England the tribute on our com
merce which she demands by her orders of
council, would be to aid her in the war
against him, and would give him just ground
to declare war with us. He, concludes, there-
* This extract got into the newspapers contrary to
Jefferson's wishes, and led to a long interruption of
the correspondence between him and Dr. Logan. At
length, in 1816, he wrote to Logan, complaining of
the publication, and said: " this [extract] produced
to me more complaints from my best friends and
called for more explanations than any transaction of
my life had ever done. They inferred from this par
tial extract an approbation of the conduct of Eng
land, which yet the same letter censured with equal
rigor. It prodticed, too, from the minister of Bona
parte a complaint, not indeed formal, for I was but a
private citizen, but serious, of my volunteering with
England in the abuse of his sovereign."— EDITOR.
Thomas Jefferson
Age about J
'rom the painting by Charles Wilson IValo hanging in
Hall, Philadelphia.
[2]
97
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Bonaparte (N.)
fore, as every rational man must, that the
Embargo, the only remaining alternative, was
a wise measure. These are acknowledged
principles, and should circumstances arise
which may offer advantage to our country in
making them public, we shall avail ourselves
of them. But as it is not usual nor agreeable
to governments to bring their conversations
before the public, I think it would be well to
consider this on your part as confidential,
leaving to the government to retain or make
it public, as the general good may require.
Had the Emperor gone further, and said that
he condemned our vessels going voluntarily
into his ports in breach of his municipal laws,
we might have admitted it rigorously legal,
though not friendly. But his condemnation
of vessels taken on high seas, by his pri
vateers and carried involuntarily _ into his
ports, is justifiable by no law; is piracy, and
this is the wrong we complain of against
him.— To ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON, v, 370.
FORD ED., ix, 209. (W., Oct. 1808.)
862. BONAPARTE (N.), England and.
— To complete and universalize the desola
tion of the globe, it has been the will of Provi
dence to raise up, at the same time, a tyrant
as unprincipled and as overwhelming, for
the ocean. Not in the poor maniac George,
but in his government and nation. Bonaparte
will die, and his tyrannies with him. But a
nation never dies. The English government,
and its piratical principles and practices, have
no fixed term of duration. Europe feels, and
is writhing under the scorpion whips of Bona
parte. We are assailed by those of England.
The one continent thus placed under the gripe
of England, and the other of Bonaparte, each
has to grapple with the enemy immediately
pressing on itself. We must extinguish the
fire kindled in our own house, and leave to
our friends beyond the water that which is
consuming theirs. — To MADAME DE STAEL.
vi, 115. (M., May 1813.)
863. BONAPARTE (N.), Execrated.— I
know nothing which can so severely try the
heart and spirit of man, and especially of the
man of science, as the necessity of a passive
acquiescence under the abominations of an
unprincipled tyrant who is deluging the earth
with blood to acquire for himself the reputa
tion of a Cartouche or a Robin Hood. The
petty larcenies of the Blackbeards and Buc
caneers of the ocean, the more immediately
exercised on us, are dirty and grovelling
things addressed to our contempt, while the
horrors excited by the Scelerat of France are
beyond all human execrations. — To DR. MOR-
RELL. vi, 100. (M., Feb. 1813.)
864. BONAPARTE (N.), A Great Scoun
drel. — Bonaparte was a lion in the field only.
In civil life, a cold-blooded, calculating, un
principled usurper, without a virtue ; no
statesman, knowing nothing of commerce,
political economy, or civil government, and
supplying ignorance by bold presumption. I
had supposed him a great man until his en
trance into the Assembly des cinq cens.
eighteen Brumaire (an. 8.) From that date,
however, I set him down as a great scoundrel
only. — To JOHN ADAMS, vi, 352. FORD ED.,
ix, 461. (M., July 1814.)
865. BONAPARTE (N.), Hatred of
United States. — Bonaparte hates our gov
ernment because it is a living libel on his. —
To WILLIAM DUANE. v, 553. FORD ED., ix,
287. (M., 1810.)
866. . Bonaparte's hatred of us
is only a little less than that he bears to Eng
land, and England to us. Our form of govern
ment is odious to him, as a standing contrast
between republican and despotic rule ; and as
much from that hatred, as from ignorance in
political economy, he had excluded inter
course between us and his people, by pro
hibiting the only articles they wanted from
us, cotton and tobacco. — To THOMAS LEIPER.
vi, 464. FORD ED., ix, 520. (M., June 1815.)
867. . It is not possible Bona
parte should love us; and of that our com
merce had sufficient proof during his power.
Our military achievements, indeed, which he
is capable of estimating, may in some degree,
moderate the effect of his aversions; and he
may, perhaps, fancy that we are to become the
natural enemies of England, as England her
self has so steadily endeavored to make us,
and as some of our own over-zealous patriots
would be willing to proclaim; and in this
view, he may admit a cold toleration of
some intercourse and commerce between the
two nations. He has certainly had time to see
the folly of turning the industry of France
from the cultures for which nature has so
highly endowed her, to those of sugar, cotton,
tobacco, and others, which the same creative
power has given to other climates; and, on
the whole, if he can conquer the passions of
his tyrannical soul, if he has understanding
enough to pursue from motives of interest,
what no moral motives lead him to, the tran
quil happiness and prosperity of his country,
rather than a ravenous thirst for human
blood, his return may become of more advan
tage than injury to us. — To JOHN ADAMS.
vi, 458 (M., June 1815.)
868. BONAPARTE (N.), Havoc by.—
A conqueror roaming over the earth with
havoc and destruction. — To DR. WALTER
JONES, v, 511. FORD ED., ix, 274. (M., 1810.)
869. BONAPARTE (N.), His Ideas on
Government.— Should it be really true that
Bonaparte has usurped the government with
an intention of making it a free one, whatever
his talents may be for war, we have no proofs
that he is skilled in forming governments
friendly to the people. Wherever he has
meddled, we have seen nothing but fragments
of the old Roman government stuck into ma
terials with which they can form no cohesion.
We see the bigotry of an Italian to the ancient
splendor of his country, but nothing which
bespeaks a luminous view of the organization
of rational provernment. Perhaps, however,
this may end better than we augur; and it
certainly will, if his head is equal to true and
Bonaparte (N.)
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
solid calculations of glory. — To T. M. RAN
DOLPH, iv, 319. FORD ED., vii, 422. (Pa.,
Feb. 1800.)
870. BONAPARTE (N.), Human Mis
ery and.— Bonaparte has been the author of
more misery and suffering to the world, than
any being who ever lived before him. After
destroying the liberties of his country, he has
exhausted all its resources, physical and mor
al, to indulge his own maniac ambition, his
own tyrannical and overbearing spirit. His
sufferings cannot be too great. — To ALBERT
GALLATIN. vi, 499. (M., Oct. 1815.)
871. BONAPARTE (N.), Ignorance of
Commerce. — Of the principles and advan
tages of commerce, Bonaparte appears to be
ignorant. — To JOEL BARLOW, v, 601. (M.,
1812.)
872. BONAPARTE (N.), Imprison
ment of. — The Attila of the age dethroned,
the ruthless destroyer of ten millions of the
human race, whose thirst for blood appeared
unquenchable, the great oppressor of the
rights and liberties of the world, shut up
within the circle of a little island of the Med
iterranean, and dwindled to the condition of
an humble and degraded pensioner on the
bounty of those he had most injured. How
miserable, how meanly, has he closed his
inflated career ! What a sample of the bathos
will his history present ! He should have per
ished on the swords of his enemies, under the
walls of Paris. — To JOHN ADAMS, vi, 352.
FORD ED., ix, 461. (M., July 1814.)
873. BONAPARTE (N.), Invasion of
U. S. by.— The fear that Bonaparte will
come over and conquer us also, is too chimer
ical to be genuine. Supposing him to have
finished Spain and Portugal, he has yet Eng
land and Russia to subdue. The maxim of
war was never sounder than in this case, not
to leave an enemy in the rear; and especially
where an insurrectionary flame is known to
be under the embers, merely smothered, and
ready to burst at every point. These two
subdued (and surely the Anglomen will not
think the conquest of England alone a short
work), ancient Greece and Macedonia, the
cradle of Alexander, his prototype, and Con
stantinople, the seat of empire for the world,
would glitter more in his eye than our bleak
mountains and rugged forests. Egypt, too,
and the golden apples of Mauritania, have for
more than half a century fixed the longing
eyes of France; and with Syria, you know,
he has an old affront to wipe out. Then come
" Pontus and Galatia, Cappadocia, Aeolia and
Bithynia," the fine countries on the Eu
phrates and Tigris, the Oxus and Indus, and
all beyond the Hypasis, which bounded the
glories of his Macedonian rival ; with the in
vitations of his new British subjects on the
banks of the Ganges, whom, after receiving
under his protection the mother country, he
cannot refuse to visit. When all this is done
and settled, and nothing of the old world re
mains unsubdued, he may turn to the new
one. But will he attack us first, from whom
he will get but hard knocks and no money?
Or will he first lay hold of the gold and silver
of Mexico and Peru, and the diamonds of
Brazil ? A republican emperor, from his af
fection to republics, independent of motives
of expediency, must grant to ourselves the
Cyclop's boon of being the last devoured.
While all this is doing, are we to suppose the
chapter of accidents read out, and that noth
ing can happen to cut short or disturb his
enterprises? — To JOHN LANGDON. v, 512.
(M., March 1810.)
874. BONAPARTE (N.), Louisiana
and. — I assured M. Pichon [French Minis
ter] that I had more confidence in the word
of the First Consul than in all the parchment
we could sign. — To ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON.
iv, 511. FORD ED., viii, 278. (W., Nov. 1803.)
875. . Your emperor has done
more splendid things, but he has never done
one which will give happiness to so great a
number of human beings as the ceding of
Louisiana to the United States.* — To MAR
QUIS DE LAFAYETTE. FORD ED., ix, 67. (W.,
May 1807.) See LOUISIANA.
876. BONAPARTE (N.), No Moral
Sense. — O'Meara's book proves that nature
had denied Bonaparte the moral sense, the first
excellence of well organized man. If he could
seriously and repeatedly affirm that he had
raised himself to power without ever having
committed a crime, it proves that he wanted
totally the sense of right and wrong. If he
could consider the millions of human lives
which he had destroyed, or caused to be de
stroyed, the desolations of countries by plun-
derings, burnings and famine, the destitutions
of lawful rulers of the world without the
consent of their constituents, to place his
brothers and sisters on their thrones, the cut
ting up of established societies of men and
jumbling them discordantly together again at
his caprice, the demolition of the fairest hopes
of mankind for the recovery of their rights
and amelioration of their condition, and all
the numberless train of his other enormities ;
the man I say, who could consider all these
as no crimes, must have been a moral mon
ster, against whom every hand should have
been lifted to slay him. — To JOHN ADAMS.
vii, 275. (M., 1823.)
877. BONAPARTE (N.), Peace and.—
Bonaparte's restless spirit leaves no hope of
peace to the world. — To THOMAS LEIPER.
vi, 464. FORD ED., ix, 520. (M., 1815.)
878. BONAPARTE (N.), Policy to
ward United States.— As to Bonaparte, I
should not doubt the revocation of his edicts,
were he governed by reason. But his policy
is so crooked that it eludes conjecture.
1 fear his first object now is to dry up
the sources of British prosperity by ex
cluding her manufactures from the con
tinent. He may fear that opening the
ports of Europe to our vessels will open them
to an inundation of British wares. He ought
* This accession of territory strengthens forever
the power of the United States, and I have just given
to England a maritime rival that will sooner or later
humble her pride.— NAPOLEON.
99
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Bonaparte (N.)
to be satisfied with having forced her to re
voke the orders [in council] on which he
pretended to retaliate, and to be particularly
satisfied with us, by whose unyielding ad
herence to principle she has been forced into
the revocation. He ought the more to con
ciliate our good will, as we can be such an
obstacle to the new career opening on him
in the Spanish Colonies. That he would give
us the Floridas to withhold intercourse with
the residue of those colonies, cannot be
doubted. But that is no price ; because they
are ours in the first moment of the first war ;
and until a war they are of no particular ne
cessity to us. But, although with difficulty,
he will consent to our receiving Cuba into
our Union, to prevent our aid to Mexico and
the other provinces. That would be a price,
and I would immediately erect a column on
the southernmost limit of Cuba, and inscribe
on it a ne plus ultra as to us in that direction.
We should then only have to include the
North in our Confederacy, which would be of
course in the first war, and we should have
such an empire for liberty as she has never
surveyed since the creation ; and I am per
suaded no Constitution was ever before so
well calculated as ours for extensive empire
and self-government. — To PRESIDENT MAD
ISON, v, 444. (M., April 1809.)
879. BONAPARTE (N.), Political Wick
edness of. — I view Bonaparte as a political
engine only, and a very wicked one ; you, I
believe, as both political and religious, and
obeying, as an instrument, an Unseen Hand.
I still deprecate his becoming sole lord of
the continent of Europe, which he would
have been, had he reached in triumph the
gates of St. Petersburg. The establishment
in our day of another Roman Empire, spread
ing vassalage and depravity over the face of
the globe, is not, I hope, within the purposes
of Heaven.— To THOMAS LEIPER. vi, 463.
FORD ED., ix, 519. (M., June 1815.)
880. BONAPARTE (N.), Promises of.—
Promises cost him nothing when they could
serve his purpose. On his return from Elba,
what did he not promise? But those who had
credited them a little, soon saw their total in
significance, and, satisfied that they could
not fall under worse hands, refused every ef
fort after the defeat of Waterloo.— To BEN
JAMIN AUSTIN, vi, 554. FORD ED., x, n.
(M., 1816.)
881. BONAPARTE (N.), Republicans
and. — Here you will find rejoicings on the
[restoration] of Bonaparte, and by a strange
quid pro quo, not by the party hostile to lib
erty, but by its zealous friends. In this they
see nothing but the scourge reproduced for
the back of England. They do not permit
themselves to see in it the blast of all the
hopes of mankind, and that however it may
jeopardize England, it gives to her self-de
fence the lying countenance again of being
the sole champion of the rights of man, to
which in all other nations she is most ad
verse. — To M. DUPONT DE NEMOURS, vi,
457- (M., May 1815.)
882. -- . I have grieved to see even
good republicans so infatuated as to this man,
as to consider his downfall as calamitous to
the cause of liberty. In their indignation
against England which is just, they seem to
consider all her enemies as our friends, when
it is well known there was not a being on
earth who bore us so deadly a hatred. * * *
To whine after this exorcised demon is a
disgrace to republicans, and must have arisen
either from want of reflection, or the indul
gence of passion against principle. — To BEN
JAMIN AUSTIN, vi, 553. FORD ED., x, n.
(M., Feb. 1816.)
883. BONAPARTE (N.), Restoration of.
— You despair of your country, and so do
I. A military despotism is now fixed upon it
permanently, especially if the son of the ty
rant should have virtues and talents. What
a treat it would be to me, to be with you, and
to learn from you all the intrigues, apostacies
and treacheries which have produced this last
death's blow to the hopes of France. For, al
though not in the will, there was in the im
becility of the Bourbons a foundation of
hope that the patriots of France might obtain
a moderate representative government. — To
M. DUPONT DE NEMOURS, vi, 457. (M., May
884. BONAPARTE (N.), Rights of Na
tions and.— The new treaty of the allied
powers declares that the French nation shall
not have Bonaparte, and shall have Louis
XVIII. for their ruler. They are all then as
great rascals as Bonaparte himself. While he
was in the wrong, I wished him exactly as
much success as would answer our purposes,
and no more. Now that they are in the
wrong and he in the right, he shall have all
my prayers for success, and that he may de
throne every man of them. — To THOMAS
LEIPER. vi, 467. FORD ED., ix, 522. (M.,
June 1815.)
885. -- . As far as we can judge
from appearances, Bonaparte, from being a
mere military usurper, seems to have become
the choice of his nation ; and the allies in
their turn, the usurpers and spoliators of the
European world. The rights of nations to
self-government being my polar star, my par
tialities are steered by it, without asking
whether it is a Bonaparte or an Alexander
towards whom the helm is directed. — To M.
CORREA. vi, 480. (M., June 1815.)
886. -- . No man more severely
condemned Bonaparte than myself during his
former career, for his unprincipled enterprises
on the liberty of his own country, and the
independence of others. But the allies hav
ing now taken up his pursuits, and he ar
rayed himself on the legitimate side, I also
am changed as to him. He is now fighting
for the independence of nations, of which his
whole life hitherto had been a continued viola
tion, and he has now my prayers as sincerely
for success as he had before for his over
throw. He has promised a free government to
his own country, and to respect the rights of
others ; and although his former conduct does
Bonaparte (N.)
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
100
not inspire entire faith in his promises ; yet
we had better take the chance of his word for
doing right than the certainty of the wrong
which his adversaries avow. — To PHILLIP
MAZZEI. FORD ED., ix, 525. (M., Aug. 1815.)
887. . At length Bonaparte has
got on the right side of a question. From
the time of his entering the legislative hall to
his retreat to Elba, no man has execrated him
more than myself. I will not except even the
members of the Essex Junto; although for
very different reasons ; I, because he was war
ring against the liberty of his own country,
and independence of others ; they, because he
was the enemy of England, the Pope and the
Inquisition. But at length, and as far as we
can judge, he seems to have become the choice
of his nation. At least, he is defending the
cause of his nation, and that of all mankind,
the rights of every people to independence
and self-government. He and the allies have
now changed sides. They are parcelling out
among themselves, Poland, Belgium, Saxony,
Italy, dictating a ruler and government to
France, and looking askance at our republic,
the splendid libel on their governments, and
he is fighting for the principles of national
independence of which his whole life hitherto
has been a continued violation. He has
promised a free government to his own coun
try, and to respect the rights of others ; and
although his former conduct inspires little
confidence in his promises, yet we had better
take the chance of his word for doing right,
than the certainty of the wrong which his ad
versaries are doing and avowing. If they
succeed ours is only the boon of the Cyclops
to Ulysses, of being the last devoured.* — To
JOHN ADAMS, vi, 490. FORD ED., ix, 529.
(M., Aug. 1815.)
888. BONAPARTE (N.), Robespierre
and. — Robespierre met the fate, and his
memory the execration, he so justly merited.
The rich were his victims, and perished by
thousands. It is by millions that Bonaparte
destroys the poor, and he is eulogized and
deified by the sycophants even of science.
These merit more than the mere oblivion to
which they will be consigned : and the day
will come when a just posterity will give
to their hero the only preeminence he has
earned, that of having been the greatest of
the destroyers of the human race. What year
of his military life has not consigned a million
of human beings to death, to poverty and
wretchedness ! What field in Europe may not
raise a monument of the murders, the burn
ings, the desolations, the famines, and mis
eries it has witnessed from him? And all
* To the letter from which this extract is taken Jef
ferson appended a postscript as follows : " I had fin
ished my letter yesterday and this morning' (Aug.
n), received the news of Bonaparte's second abdica
tion. Very well. For him, personally, I have no
feeling but reprobation. The representatives of the
nations have deposed him. They have taken the
allies at their word, that they had no object in the
war but his removal. The nation is now free to give
itself a good government, either with or without a
Bourbon ; and France, unsubdued, will still be a bri
dle on the enterprises of the combined powers, and a
bulwark to others. "—EDITOR.
this to acquire a reputation, which Cartouche
attained with less injury to mankind, of being
fearless of God or man. — To MADAME DE
STAEL. vi, 114. (M., May 1813.)
889. BONAPARTE (N.), Self-govern
ment and.— I see in Bonaparte's expulsion
of the Bourbons, a valuable lesson to the
world, as showing that its ancient dynasties
may be changed for their misrule. Should
the allied powers presume to dictate a ruler
and government to France, and follow the
example he had set of parcelling and usurping
to themselves their neighbor nations, I hope
he will give them another lesson in vindica
tion of the rights of independence and self-
government, which himself had hitherto so
much abused, and that in this contest he will
wear down the maritime power of England
to limitable and safe dimensions. So far,
good. It cannot be denied, on the other hand,
that his successful perversion of the force
(committed to him for vindicating the rights
and liberties of his country) to usurp its gov
ernment, and to enchain it under an hered
itary despotism, is of baneful effect in en
couraging future usurpations, and deterring
those under oppression from rising to redress
themselves. — To THOMAS LEIPER. vi, 464.
FORD ED., ix, 519. (M., 1815.)
890. . If adversity should have
taught him wisdom, of which I have little
expectation, he may yet render some service
to mankind, by teaching the ancient dynasties
that they can be changed for misrule, and
by wearing down the maritime power of Eng
land to limitable and safe dimensions. — To
JOHN ADAMS, vi, 458. (M., June 1815.)
891. BONAPARTE (N.), Selfishness of.
—Bonaparte saw nothing in this world but
himself, and looked on the people under him
as his cattle, beasts for burthen and slaughter.
— To BENJAMIN AUSTIN, vi, 553. FORD ED.,
x, ii. (M., 1816.)
892. BONAPARTE (N.), Statesmanship
o*-— I have just finished reading O'Meara's
Bonaparte. It places him in a higher
scale of understanding than I had allotted
him. I had thought him the greatest of all
military captains, but an indifferent states
man, and misled by unworthy passions. The
flashes, however, which escaped from him in
these conversations with O'Meara, prove a
mind of great expansion, although not of dis
tinct development and reasoning. He seizes
results with rapidity and penetration, but
never explains logically the processes of
reasoning by which he arrives at them.— To
JOHN ADAMS, vii, 275. (M., 1823.)
893. BONAPARTE (N.), Sufferings of.
— O'Meara's Bonaparte makes us forget his
atrocities ^ for a moment, in commiseration of
his sufferings. I will not say that the author
ities of the world, charged with the care of
their country and people, had not a right to
confine him for life, as a lion or a tiger, on
the principle of self-preservation. There was
no safety to nations while he was permitted
to roam at large. But the putting him to
101
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Bonaparte (N.)
death in cold blood, by lingering tortures- or
mind, by vexations, insults, and deprivations,
was a degree of inhumanity to which the
poisonings and assassinations of the school of
Borgia and the den of Marat never attained.
— To JOHN ADAMS, vii, 275. (M., 1823.)
894. BONAPARTE (N.), Temper of.—
Bonaparte's domineering temper deafens him
to the dictates of interest, of honor, and of
morality. — To JOEL BARLOW, v, 601. (M.,
1811.)
895. BONAPARTE (N.), Tyranny of.—
A ruthless tyrant, drenching Europe in
blood to obtain through future time the char
acter of the destroyer of mankind. — To
HENRY MIDDLETON. vi, 91. (M., Jan. 1813.)
896. . That Bonaparte is an un
principled tyrant, who is deluging the con
tinent of Europe with blood, there is not a
human being, not even the wife of his bosom
who does not see. — To THOMAS LEIPER. vi,
283. FORD ED., ix, 445. (M.. Jan. 1814.)
897. BONAPARTE (N.), United States
and. — Considering the character of Bona
parte, I think it material at once to let him
see that we are not of the powers who will
receive his orders.— To JAMES MADISON, iv,
585. FORD ED., viii, 377. (M., Aug. 1805.)
898. . I never expected to be
under the necessity of wishing success to
Bonaparte. But the English being equally ty
rannical at sea as he is on land, and that^ tyr
anny bearing on us in every point of either
honor or interest, I say, " down with Eng
land," and as for what Bonaparte is then to
do to us, let us trust to the chapter of acci
dents. I cannot, with the Anglomen, prefer
a certain present evil to a future hypothetical
one.— To THOMAS LEIPER. FORD ED., ix, 130.
(M., Aug. i8#.)
899. . Although we neither ex
pected, nor wished any act of friendship from
Bonaparte, and always detested him as a
tyrant, yet he gave employment to much of
the force of the nation who was our common
enemy. So far, his downfall was illy timed
for us; it gave to England an opportunity
to turn full-handed on us, when we were un
prepared. No matter, we can beat her on our
own soil, leaving the laws of the ocean to be
settled by the maritime powers of Europe,
who are equally oppressed and insulted by the
usurpations of England on that element. — To
W H CRAWFORD, vi, 418. FORD ED., ix, 502.
(M.. Feb. 1815.)
900. BONAPARTE (N.), United States,
Russia and. — There cannot, I think, be a
doubt as to the line we wish drawn between
Bonaparte's successes and those of Alexan
der. Surely none of us wish to see Bonaparte
conquer Russia, and lay thus at his feet the
whole continent of Europe. This done. Eng
land would be but a breakfast : and although
I am free from the visionary fears which the
votaries of England have affected to entertain,
because I believe he cannot effect the conquest
of Europe ; yet put all Europe into his hands,
and he might spare such a force, to be sent
in British ships, as I would as lief not have
to encounter, when I see how much trouble a
handful of soldiers in Canada has given us.
No. It cannot be to our interest that all
Europe should be reduced to a single mon
archy. The true line of interest for us, is,
that Bonaparte should be able to effect the
complete exclusion of England from the whole
continent of Europe, in order, bv this peace
able engine of constraint to make her re
nounce her views of dominion over the ocean,
of permitting no other nation to navigate it
but with her license, and on tribute to her,
and her aggressions on the persons of our
citizens who may choose to exercise their
right of passing over that element. And this
would be effected by Bonaparte succeeding
so far as to close the Baltic against her. This
success I wished him the last year, this I wish
him this year; but were he again advanced
to Moscow, I should again wish him such
disasters as would prevent his reaching St.
Petersburg. And were the consequences even
to be the longer continuance of our war, I
would rather meet them than see the whole
force of Europe wielded by a single hand. —
To THOMAS LIEPER. vi, 283. FORD ED., ix,
445- (M., Jan. 1814.)
901. . I have gone into this ex
planation * * * because I am willing to
trust to your discretion the explaining me
to our honest fellow laborers, and the bring
ing them to pause and reflect, if any of them
have not sufficiently reflected on the extent
of the success we ought to wish to Bona
parte, with a view to our own interests only;
and even were we not men, to whom nothing
human should be indifferent. But is our par
ticular interest to make us insensible to all
sentiments of morality? Is it then become
criminal, the moral wish that the torrents
of blood this man is shedding in Europe, the
sufferings of so many human beings, good as
ourselves, on whose necks he is trampling,
the burnings of ancient cities, devastations of
great countries, the destruction of law and
order, and demoralization of the world,
should be arrested, even if it should place our
peace a little further distant? No. You and
I cannot differ in wishing that Russia, and
Sweden, and Denmark, and Germany, and
Spain, and Portugal, and Italy, and even
England, may retain their independence. —
To THOMAS LEIPER. vi, 283. FORD ED., ix,
446. (M., Jan. 1814.)
902. - — . It is cruel that we should
have been forced to wish any success to such
a destroyer of the human race. Yet while
it was our interest and that of humanity that
he should not subdue Russia, and thus lay
all Europe at his feet, it was desirable to us
that he should so far succeed as to close the
Baltic to our enemy, and force him, by the
pressure of internal distress, into a disposition
to return to the paths of justice towards us. —
To JOHN CLARKE, vi, 308. (M., Jan. 1814.)
903. BONAPARTE (N.), Vanquished.
— The unprincipled tyrant of the land is
Bonaparte (N.)
Books, l>uty on
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
IO2
fallen, his power reduced to its original noth
ingness, his person only not yet in the mad
house, where it ought always to have been. —
To CESAR A. RODNEY, vi, 448. (M., 1815.)
004. . On the general scale of
nations, the greatest wonder is Napoleon at
St. Helena; and yet it would have been well
for the lives and happiness of millions and
millions, had he been deposited there twenty
years ago. France would now have a free
government, unstained by the enormities she
has enabled him to commit on the rest of the
world, and unprostrated by the vindictive
hand, human or divine, now so heavily bear
ing upon her.— To MRS. TRIST. D. L. J. 363.
(P. F., April 1816.)
905. . What is infinitely inter
esting [in the letters you enclosed to me], is
the scene of the exchange of Louis XVIII. for
Bonaparte. What lessons of wisdom Mr.
[John Quincy] Adams must have read in that
short space of time! More than fall to the
lot of others in the course of a long life. Man,
and the man of Paris, under those circum
stances, must have been a subject of profound
speculation ! It would be a singular addition
to that spectacle to see the same beast in the
cage at St. Helena, like a lion in the tower.
That is probably the closing verse of the chap
ter of his crimes.— To MRS. JOHN ADAMS.
vii, 52. FORD ED., x, 69. (M., 1817.)
906. . Had Bonaparte reflected
that such is the moral construction of the
world, that no national crime passes unpun
ished in the long run, he would not now be
in the cage of St. Helena.— M. DE MARBOIS.
vii, 76. (M., 1817.) See FRANCE.
907. BOOKS AS CAPITAL.— Some few
years ago when the tariff was before Con
gress, I engaged some of our members of
Congress to endeavor to get the duty re
pealed, and wrote on the subject to some
other acquaintances in Congress, and press-
ingly to the Secretary of the Treasury. The
effort * * * failed. * * * There is a consid
eration going to the injustice of the tax *
Books constitute capital. A library book lasts
as long as a house, for hundreds of years.
It is not, then, an article of mere consump
tion but fairly of capital, and often in the case
of professional men, settiner out in life, it is
their only capital. Now there is no other
form of capital which is first taxed 18 per
cent, on the gross, and the proprietor then
left to pay the same taxes in detail with
others whose capital has paid no tax on the
gross. Nor is there a description of men less
proper to be singled out for extra taxation. —
To JAMES MADISON. FORD ED., x, 194. (M.,
Sep. 1821.)
908. BOOKS, Censorship of.— I am mor
tified to be told that., in the United States of
America, the sale of a book* can become a
subject of inquiry, and of criminal inquiry
too, as an offence against religion; that a
* A work in French by M. De Becourt entitled
" Sur la Creation du Monde, un Systeme d'Organisa-
tion Primitive".— EDITOR.
question like this can be carried before the
civil magistrate. Is this then our freedom of
religion? And are we to have a censor
whose imprimatur shall say what books may
be sold, and what we may buy? And who
is thus to dogmatize religious opinions for
our citizens? Whose foot is to be the meas
ure to which ours are all to be cut or
stretched? Is a priest to be our inquisitor, or
shall a layman, simple as ourselves, set up
his reason as the rule for what we are to read,
and what we must believe? It is an insult to
our citizens to question whether they are
rational beings or not, and blasphemy against
religion to suppose it cannot stand the test
of truth and reason. If M. de Becourt's book
be false in its facts, disprove them; if false
in its reasoning, refute it. But, for God's
sake, let us freely hear both sides, if we
choose. I know little of its contents, having
barely glanced over here and there a passage,
and over the table of contents. From this,
the Newtonian philosophy seemed the chief
object of attack, the issue of which might be
trusted to the strength of the two combat
ants ; Newton certainly not needing the aux
iliary arm of the government, and still less
the Holy Author of our religion, as to what
in it concerns Him. I thought the work
would be very innocent, and one which might
be confided to the reason of any man ; not
likely to be much read if let alone, but, if
persecuted, it will be generally read. Every
man in the United States will think it a duty
to buy a copy, in vindication of his right to
buy. and to read what he pleases. — To M.
DUFIEF. vi, 340. (M., 1814.)
909. . I have been just reading
the new constitution of Spain. One of its
fundamental bases is expressed in these
words : " The Roman Catholic religion, the
only true one, is, and always shall be, that
of the Spanish nation. The government pro
tects it by wise and just laws, and prohibits
the exercise of any other whatever." Now I
wish this presented to those who question
what you may sell,* or we may buy with a re
quest to strike out the words, " Roman Cath
olic," and to insert the denomination of
their own religion. This would ascertain the
code of dogmas which each wishes should
domineer over the opinions of all others, and
be taken, like the Spanish religion, under
the " protection of wise and just laws." It
would show to what they wish to reduce the
liberty for which one generation has sacri
ficed life and happiness. It would present
our boasted freedom of religion as a thing of
theory only, and not of practice, as what
would be a poor exchange for the theoretic
thraldom, but practical freedom of Europe. —
To M. DUFIEF. vi, 340. (M., 1814.)
910. BOOKS, Duty on.— To prohibit us
from the benefit of foreign light, is to con
sign us to a long darkness. — To
vii, 221. (M., 1821.)
911. . I hope a crusade will be
kept up against the duty on books until those
* M. Dufief was a Philadelphia bookseller.— EDITOR.
103
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Books
in power shall become sensible of this stain
on our legislation, and shall wipe it from their
code, and from the remembrance of man, if
possible.— To JARED SPARKS, vii, 335. FORD
ED., x, 293. (M., 1824.)
912. . I hear nothing definitive
of the three thousand dollars duty [on books
for the University of Virginia] of which we
are asking the remission from Congress. — To
JAMES MADISON, vii, 433. FORD ED., x, 376.
(M., 1826.)
913. . The government of the
United States, at a very early period, when
establishing its tariff on foreign importations,
were very much guided in their selection of
objects by a desire to encourage manufac
tures within ourselves. Among other ar
ticles then selected were books, on the im
portation of which a duty of fifteen per cent,
was imposed, which, by ordinary custom
house charges, amounts to about eighteen per
cent., and adding the importing booksellers'
profit on this, becomes about twenty-seven
per cent. This was useful at first, perhaps,
towards exciting our printers to make a be
ginning in that business here. But it is found
in experience that the home demand is not
sufficient to justify the reprinting any but the
most popular English works, and cheap
editions of a few of the classics for schools.
For the editions of value, enriched by notes,
commentaries, &c., and for books in foreign
living languages, the demand here is too small
and sparse to re-imburse the expense of re
printing them. None of these, therefore, are
printed here, and the duty on them becomes
consequently not a protecting, but really a
prohibitory one. It makes a very serious ad
dition to the price of the book and falls
chiefly on a description of persons little able
to meet it. Students who are destined for
professional callings, as most of our scholars
are, are barely able for the most part to
meet the expenses of tuition. The addition
of eighteen or twenty-seven per cent, on the
books necessary for their instruction, amounts
often to a prohibition as to them. For want
of these aids, which are open to the students
of all other nations but our own, they enter
on their course on a very unequal footing
with those of the same professions in foreign
countries, and our citizens at large, too. who
employ them, do not derive from that em
ployment all the benefit which higher qualifi
cations would give them. It is true that no
duty is required on books imported for sem
inaries of learning, but these, locked up in li
braries, can be of no avail to the practical
man when he wishes a recurrence to them for
the uses of life. Of many important books of
reference there is not perhans a single copy
in the United States; of others but a few,
and these too distant often to be accessible
to scholars generally. It is believed, there
fore, that if the attention of Congress could
be drawn to this article, they would, in their
wisdom, see its impolicy. Science is more
important in a republican than in any other
government. And in an infant country like
ours, we must much depend for improvement
on the science of other countries, longer es
tablished, possessing better means, and more
advanced than we are. To prohibit us from
the benefit of foreign light, is to consign us to
long darkness. The northern seminaries fol
lowing with parental solicitude the interest of
their elcves in the course for which they have
prepared them, propose to petition Congress
on this subject, and wish for the cooperation
of those of the south and west, and I have
been requested, as more convenient in posi
tion than they are, to solicit that cooperation.
Having no personal acquaintance with those
who are charged with the direction of the
college of , I do not know how more
effectually to communicate these views to
them, than by availing myself of the knowl
edge I have of your zeal for the happiness and
improvement of our country. I take the lib
erty, therefore, of requesting you to place the
subject before the proper authorities of that
institution, and if they approve the measure,
to solicit a concurrent proceeding on their
part to carry it into effect. Besides petition
ing Congress, I would propose that they ad
dress, in their corporate capacity, a letter to
their delegates and senators in Congress, so
liciting their best endeavors to obtain the
repeal of the duty on imported books. I
cannot but suppose that such an application
will be respected by them, and will engage
their votes and endeavors to effect an object
so reasonable. A conviction that science is
important to the preservation of our repub
lican government, and that it is also essential
to its protection against foreign power, in
duces me, on this occasion, to step beyond the
limits of that retirement to which age and
inclination equally dispose me. — To
vii, 220. (M., 1821.)
914. BOOKS, Lending.— The losses I
have sustained by lending my books will be
my apology to you for asking your particular
attention to the replacing them in the presses
as fast as you finish them, and not to lend
them to anybody else, nor suffer anybody to
have a book out of the study under cover of
your name. — To JOHN GARLAND JEFFERSON.
FORD ED., v, 182. (N. Y., 1790.)
915. BOOKS, Love of.— I cannot live
without books. — To JOHN ADAMS, vi, 460.
(M., 1815.)
916. BOOKS, Prices of.— French books
are to be bought here [Paris] for two-thirds
of what they can in England. English and
Greek and Latin authors cost from twenty-
five to fifty per cent, more here than in Eng
land. — To EDMUND RANDOLPH, i, 434. (P.,
1785.)
917. . Greek and Roman au
thors are dearer here [France] than I believe
anywhere in the world. Nobody here reads
them, wherefore they are not printed. — To
JAMES MADISON, i, 414. (P., 1785.)
918. BOOKS, Becommending. — It is
with extreme reluctance that I permit myself
to usurp the office of an adviser of the public,
what books they should read, and what not.
I yield, however, on this occasion to your
wish and that of Colonel Taylor, and do
Books
Boston Port Bill
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
104
what (with a single exception only) I never
did before, on the many similar applications
made to me. — To SPENCER ROANE. vii, 212.
FORD ED., x, 189. (M., 1821.)
919. . This book [" Construc
tions Construed "] is the most effectual retrac
tion of our government to its original prin
ciples which has ever yet been sent by
heaven to our aid. Every State in the Union
should give a copy to every member they elect,
as a standing instruction, and ours should set
the example. — To ARCHIBALD THWEAT. vii,
199. FORD ED., x, 184. (M., 1821.)
920. . You ask for my opinion
of the work you send me, and to let it go out
to the public. This I have ever made a point
of declining (one or two instances only ex-
cepted). Complimentary thanks to writers who
have sent me their works, have betrayed me some
times before the public, without my consent hav
ing been asked. But I am far from presuming
to direct the reading of my fellow citizens,
who are good enough judges themselves of
what is worthy their reading. — To THOMAS
RITCHIE, vii, 192. FORD ED., xvi, 171. (M.,
1820.)
921. BOOKS, Time and.— The [French]
literati are half a dozen years before us.
Books, really good, acquire just reputation in
that time, and so become known to us, and
communicate to us all their advances in knowl
edge. Is not this delay compensated, by our
being placed out of the reach of that swarm
of nonsensical publications which issues daily
from a thousand presses, and perishes almost
in issuing? — To MR. BELLINI, i, 445. (P.,
1785.)
922. BOOKS, Translations of.— I make it
a rule never to read translations when I can
read the original. — To EDMUND RANDOLPH.
iv, 101. (M., 1794.)
923. BOOKS, Warfare by.— After the se
vere chastisement given by Mr. Walsh in his
American Register to English scribblers, which
they well deserved, and I was delighted to see,
I hoped there would be an end of this inter-
crimination, and that both parties would prefer
the course of courtesy and conciliation, and I
think their considerate writers have since
shown that disposition, and that it would pre
vail if equally cultivated by us. Europe is
doing us full justice ; why then detract from
her? — To CHARLES JARED INGERSOLL. FORD
ED., x, 325. (M., 1824.)
924. BOSTON POUT BILL, Denounced.
— All such assumptions of unlawful power
[as the Boston Port act] are dangerous to the
right of the British empire in general, and
should be considered as its common cause ;
and we will ever be ready to join with our
fellow-subjects in every part of the same, in
executing all those rightful powers which
God has given us. for the reestablishment
and guaranteeing * * * their constitutional
rights, when, where, and by whomsoever in
vaded.* — RESOLUTION OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY.
FORD ED., i, 419. (July 26, 1774.)
925. BOSTON PORT BILL, A Fast
Proclaimed.- The Legislature of Virginia
happened to be in session, in Williamsburg,
when news was received of the passage by
the British Parliament of the Boston Port
* Jefferson's own county.— EDITOR.
Bill, which was to take effect on the first
day of June [1774] then ensuing. The House
of Burgesses thereupon passed a resolution,
recommending to their fellow citizens, that
that day should be set apart for fasting and
prayer to the Supreme Being, imploring Him
to avert the calamities then threatening us,
and to give us one heart and one mind to
oppose every invasion of our liberties. The
next day, May 20, 1774, the Governor dis
solved us. — JEFFERSON PAPERS, i, 122. (1821.)
See FAST DAYS.
926. BOSTON PORT BILL, Ruin by.—
By an act (7. G. 3) to discontinue in such
manner, and for such time as they are therein
mentioned, the landing and discharging, la
ding or shipping of goods, wares and merchan
dize, at the town and within the harbor of
Boston, * * * a large and populous town,
whose trade was their sole subsistence, was
deprived of that trade, and involved in utter
ruin. Let us for a while, suppose the question
of right suspended, in order to examine this
act on principles of justice: An act of Par
liament had been passed imposing duties on
teas, to be paid in America, against which
act the Americans had protested as inauthor-
itative. The East India Company, who till
that time had never sent a pound of tea to
America on their own account, step forth on
that occasion the asserters of Parliamentary
right, and send hither many ship loads of
that obnoxious commodity. The masters of
their several vessels, however, on their ar
rival in America, wisely attended to admoni
tion, and returned with their cargoes. In
the province of Massachusetts alone, the re
monstrances of the people were disregarded,
and a compliance, after being many days
waited for, was flatly refused. Whether in
this the master of the vessel was governed
by his obstinacy, or his instructions, let those
who know say. There are extraordinary sit
uations which require extraordinary inter
position. An exasperated people, who feel
that they possess power, are not easily re
strained within limits strictly regular. A
number of them assembled in the town of
Boston, threw the tea into the ocean, and
dispersed without doing any other act of
violence. If in this they did wrong, they
were known and were amenable to the laws
of the land, against which it could not be ob
jected that they had ever, in any instance, been
obstructed or diverted froâ„¢i their regular
course in favor of popular offenders. They
should, therefore, not have been distrusted on
this occasion. But that ill-fated colony had
formerly been bold in their enmities against
the house of Stuart, and were now devoted
to ruin by that unseen hand which governs
the momentous affairs of this great empire.
On the partial representations of a few worth
less ministerial dependents, whose constant
office it has been to keep that government
embroiled, and who, by their treacheries, hope
to obtain the dignity of British Knighthood,*
without calling for the party accused, with-
* Alluding to the Knighting of Sir Francis Bernard.
—NOTE BY JEFFERSON.
105
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Boston Port Bill
Bottetourt (Lord)
out asking a proof, without attempting a dis
tinction between the guilty and the innocent,
the whole of that ancient and wealthy town,
is in a moment reduced from opulence to
beggary. Men who had spent their lives in
extending the British commerce, who had in
vested in that place the wealth their honest
endeavors had merited, found themselves and
their families thrown at once on the world
for subsistence by its charities. Not the hun
dredth part of the inhabitants of that town
had been concerned in the act complained of ;
many of them were in Great Britain and in
other parts beyond the sea; yet all were in
volved in one indiscriminate ruin by a new
executive power, unheard of till then, that of
a British Parliament. A property of the
value of many millions of money was sacri
ficed to revenge, not repay, the loss of a few
thousands. This is administering justice with
a heavy hand indeed ! And when is this tem
pest to be arrested in its course? Two
wharves are to be opened again when his
Majesty shall think proper. The residue,
which lined the extensive shores of the Bay
of Boston, are forever interdicted the exer
cise of commerce. This little exception seems
to have been thrown in for no other purpose
than that of setting a precedent for investing
his Majesty with legislative powers. If the
pulse of his people shall beat calmly under this
experiment, another and another shall be
tried, till the measure of despotism be rilled
up. It would be an insult on common sense
to pretend that this exception was made in
order to restore its commerce to that great
town. The trade which cannot be received at
two wharves alone must of necessity be trans
ferred to some other place ; to which it will
soon be followed by that of the two wharves.
Considered in this light, it would be insolent
and cruel mockery at the annihilation of the
town of Boston. — RIGHTS OF BRITISH AMER
ICA, i, 131. FORD ED., i, 436. (i734-) See
DEPORTATION, TEA.
927. BOTANY, Attractiveness of.— You
will find botany offering its charms to you, at
every step during summer. — To T. M. RAN
DOLPH, JR. FORD ED., iv, 290. (P., 1786.)
928. BOTANY, New York.— We were
* * * pleased with the botanical objects which
continually presented themselves. Those either
unknown or rare in Virginia were the sugar
maple in vast abundance, the silver fir, white
pine, pitch pine, spruce pine, a shrub with de
cumbent stems which they call juniper, an
azalea, very different from the nudiflora, with
very large clusters of flowers, more thickly set
on the branches, of a deeper red, and high
pink-fragrance. It is the richest shrub I have
seen. The honeysuckle of the gardens grow
ing wild on the banks of Lake George, the
paper birch, an aspen with a velvet leaf, a
shrub willow with downy catkins, a wild goose
berry, the wild cherry with single fruit (not
the bunch cherry), strawberries in abundance. —
To T. M. RANDOLPH. FORD ED., v, 340. (June
1791.)
929. BOTANY, School of.— It is time to
think of the introduction of the school of Botany
into our institution. (University of Virginia).
* * * i. Our first operation must be the se
lection of a piece of ground of proper soil and
site, suppose of about six acres, as M. Correa
proposes. In choosing this we are to regard
the circumstances of soil, water, and distance.
I have diligently examined all our grounds with
this view, and think that on the public road, at
the upper corner of our possessions, where the
stream issues from them, has more of the req
uisite qualities than any other spot we possess.
One hundred and seventy yards square, taken
at that angle, would make the six acres we
want. * * * 2. Enclose the ground with a ser
pentine brick wall seven feet high. This
would take about 80,000 bricks and cost $800,
and it must depend on our finances whether
they will afford that immediately, or allow us,
for awhile, but enclosure of posts and rails.
3. Form all the hill sides into level terraces of
convenient breadth, curving with the hill, and
the level ground into beds and alleys. 4. Make
out a list of the plants thought necessary and
sufficient for botanical purposes, and of the
trees we propose to introduce, and take meas
ures in time for procuring them. As to the
seeds of plants, much may be obtained from the
gardeners of our own country. I have, more
over, a special resource. For three and twenty
years of the last twenty-five, my good old
friend Thonin, superintendent of the Jardin
des Plantes at Paris, has regularly sent me a
box of seeds of such exotics, as to us, as would
suit our climate, and containing nothing indig
enous to our country. These I regularly
sent to the public and private gardens of the
other States, having as yet no employment for
them here. * * The trees I should pro
pose would be exotics of distinguished use
fulness, and accommodated to our climate ;
such as the Larch, Cedar of Libanus, Cork,
Oak, the Maronnier, Mahogany? the Catachu
or Indian rubber tree of Napul (30°), Teak
tree, or Indian oak of Burmah (23°), the
various woods of Brazil, &c. The seed of
the Larch can be obtained from a tree at
Monticello. Cones of the Cedar of Libanus
are in most of our seed shops, but may be had
fresh from the trees in the English gardens.
The Maronnier and Cork tree I can obtain
from France. ^ There is a Maronnier at Mount
Vernon, but it is a seedling, and not, there
fore, select. The others may be got through
the means of our ministers and consuls in
the countries where they grow, or from the
seed shops of England, where they may
very possibly be found. Lastly, a gardener of
sufficient skill must be found.* — To DR. EM-
METT. vii. 438. (M., 1826.)
930. BOTANY, Value of.— Botany I
rank with the most valuable sciences, whether
we consider its subjects as furnishing the
principal subsistence of life to man and beast,
delicious varieties for our tables, refreshments
from our orchards, the adornments of our
flower borders, shade and perfume of our
groves, materials for our buildings, or medi
caments for our bodies. To the gentleman it
is certainly more interesting than mineralogy
(which I by no means, however, undervalue),
and is more at hand for his amusement ; and
to a country family it constitutes a great por
tion of their social entertainment. No country
gentleman should be without what amuses
every step he takes into his fields. — To
THOMAS COOPER, vi, 390. (M., 1814.)
_ BOTTA'S (C.), History.— See HISTORY.
931. BOTTETOURT (Lord), Character
of. — Lord Bottetourt was an honourable man.
* Dr. Emmett was Professor of Natural History in
the University of Virginia.— EDITOR.
Bottetourt (Lord)
Boundaries
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
1 06
His government had authorized him to make
certain assurances to the people here [Vir
ginia], which he made accordingly. He wrote
to the minister that he had made these assur
ances, and that, unless he should be enabled
to fulfil them, he must retire from his situa
tion. This letter he sent unsealed to Peyton
Randolph for his inspection. Lord Botte-
tourt's great respectability, his character for
integrity, and his general popularity, would
have enabled him to embarrass the measures
of the patriots exceedingly. His death was,
therefore, a fortunate event for the cause of
the Revolution. He was the first governor in
chief that had ever come over to Virginia.
Before his time, we had received only depu
ties, the governor residing in England, with
a salary of five thousand pounds, and paying
his deputy one thousand pounds. — CONVERSA
TION WITH DANIEL WEBSTER. FORD ED., x,
330. (1824.)
932. BOUNDARIES, Louisiana.— The
boundaries of Louisiana, which I deem not ad
mitting question, are the highlands on the
western side of the Mississippi enclosing all
its waters, the Missouri of course, and termi
nating in the line drawn from the northwestern
point of the Lake of the Woods to the nearest
source of the Mississippi, as lately settled
between Great Britain and the United States.
We have some claims, to extend on the sea-
coast westwardly to the Rio Norte or Bravo,
and better, to go eastwardly to the Rio Perdido,
between Mobile and Pensacola, the ancient
boundary of Louisiana. Those claims will be a
subject of negotiation with Spain, and if, as
soon as she is at war, we push them strongly
with one hand, holding out a price in the
other, we shall certainly obtain the Floridas,
and, all in good time. In the meanwhile,
without waiting for permission, we shall enter
into the exercise of the natural right we have
always insisted on with Spain, to wit, that of
a nation holding the upper part of streams,
having a right of innocent passage through
them to the ocean. We shall prepare her to
see us practice on this, and she will not op
pose it by force. — To JOHN C. BRECKENRIDGE.
iv, 498. FORD ED., viii, 242. (M., Aug. 1803.)
933. . We are attached to the
retaining of the Bay of St. Bernard, because
it was the first establishment of the unfortunate
La Salle, was the cradle of Louisiana, and more
incontestibly covered and conveyed to us by
France, under that name, than any other spot
in the country. — To JAMES BOWDOIN. v, 19.
(W., 1806.)
934. . You know the French
considered themselves entitled to the Rio Bravo,
and that Laussat declared his orders to be to
receive possession to that limit, but not to
Perdido; and that France has to us been al
ways silent as to the western boundary, while
she spoke decisively as to the eastern. ^You
know Turreau agreed with us that neither
party should strengthen themselves in the dis
puted country during negotiation ; and [Gen
eral] Armstrong, who says Monroe concurs
with him, is of opinion, from the character of
the Emperor, that were we to restrict ourselves
to taking posts on the west side of the Missis
sippi, and threaten a cessation of intercourse
with Spain, Bonaparte would interpose effi
ciently to prevent the quarrel going further.
Add to these things the fact that Spain has
sent five hundred colonists to San Antonio,
and one hundred troops to Nacogdoches, and
probably has fixed or prepared a post at the
Bay of St. Bernard, at Matagordo. Supposing,
then, a previous alliance with England to
guard us in the worst event, I should propose
that Congress should pass acts, i, authorizing
the Executive to suspend intercourse with
Spain at discretion ; 2, to dislodge the new
establishments of Spain between the Missis
sippi and Bravo ; and, 3, to appoint commis
sioners to examine and ascertain all claims
for spoliation that they might be preserved for
future indemnification. — To JAMES MADISON.
iv, 587. FORD ED., viii, 379. (M., Sept. 1805.)
935. . By the charter of Louis
XIV. all the country comprehending the
waters which flow into the Mississippi, was
made a part of Louisiana. Consequently its
northern boundary was the summit of the high
lands in which its northern waters rise. But
by the Xth Art. of the Treaty of Utrecht,
France and England agreed to appoint commis
sioners to settle the boundary between their
possessions in that quarter, and those com
missioners settled it at the 49th degree of
latitude. (See Hutchinson's Topographical
Description of Louisiana, p. 7.) This it
was which induced the British Commissioners,
in settling the boundary with us, to follow the
northern water line to the Lake of the Woods,
at the latitude of 49°, and then go off on that
parallel. This, then, is the true northern
boundary of Louisiana. The western boundary
of Louisiana is, rightfully, the Rio Bravo (its
main stream), from its mouth to its source,
and thence along the highlands and mountains
dividing the waters of the Mississippi from
those of the Pacific. The usurpations of
Spain on the east side of that river, have in
duced geographers to suppose the Puerco or
Sal a do to be the boundary. The line along
the highlands stands on the charter of _ Louis
XIV., that of the Rio Bravo on the circum
stance that, when La Salle took possession
of the Bay of St. Bernard, Panuco was the
nearest possession of Spain, and the Rio
Bravo the natural half-way boundary between
them. On the waters of the Pacific, we can
found no claims in right of Louisiana. — To
JOHN MELLISH. vii, 51. (M., 1816.)
936. BOUNDARIES, Massachusetts
and New York. — I enclose you a Massachu
setts paper, whereby you will see that some
acts of force have taken place on our eastern
boundary. * * * The want of an accurate
map of the Bay of Passamaquoddy renders
it difficult to form a satisfactory opinion in
the point in contest. * * * There is a re
port that some acts of force have taken place
on the northern boundary of New York, and
are now under the consideration of the gov
ernment of that State. The impossibility of
bringing the court of London to an adjust
ment of any difference whatever, renders our
situation perplexing. Should any applications
from the States or their citizens be so urgent
as to require something to be said before your
return, my opinion would be that they should
be desired to make no new settlements on our
part, nor suffer any to be made on the part of
the British, within the disputed territory; and
if any attempt should be made to remove them
from the settlements already made, that they
are to repel force by force, and ask aid of the
neighboring militia to do this and no more. I
see no other way of forcing the British govern
ment to come forward themselves and demand
an amicable settlement. — To PRESIDENT WASH
INGTON, iii, 230. (Pa., March 1791-)
937. BOUNDARIES, Northwest.— [In a
conversation with George Hammond, the
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Boundaries
British minister], he observed that the treaty
[of peace] was of itself so vague and inconsist
ent in many of its parts as to require an ex
planatory convention. He instanced the two
articles, one of which gave them the navigation
of the Mississippi, and the other bounded them
by a due west line from the Lake of the Woods,
which being now understood to pass beyond
the most northern sources of the Mississippi,
intercepted all access to that river ; that to
reconcile these articles, that line should be so
run as to give them access to the navigable
waters of the Mississippi, and that it would
even be for our interest to introduce a third
power between us and the Spaniards. He
asked my idea of the line from the Lake of
the Woods, and of now settling it. I told
him I knew of no objection to the settlement
of it ; that my idea of it was, that if it was an
impassable line, as proposed in the treaty, it
should be rendered passable by as small and
unimportant an alteration as might be, which
I thought would be to throw in a line running
due north from the northernmost source of the
Mississippi till it should strike the western
line from the Lake of the Woods ; that the arti
cle giving them a navigation in the Mississippi
did not relate at all to this northern boundary,
but to the southern one, and to the secret arti
cle respecting that ; that he knew that our
Provisional Treaty was made seven weeks be
fore that with Spain ; that at the date of purs,
their ministers had still a hope of retaining
Florida, in which case they were to come up
to the 32d degree, and in which case also the
navigation of the Mississippi would have been
important ; but that they had not been able, in
event, to retain the country to which the navi
gation was to be an appendage. (It was evi
dent to me that they had it in view to claim a
slice on our northwestern quarter, that they
may get into the Mississippi ; indeed, I thought
it presented as a sort of make-weight with the
Posts to compensate the great losses their citi
zens had sustained by the infractions charged
on us). — THE ANAS, ix, 428. FORD ED., i,
195. (June 1792.)
938. BOUNDARIES, Pennsylvania and
Virginia.— The principle on which the bound
ary between Pennsylvania and this State is
to be run having been fixed, it is now proposed
by President Reed that commissioners proceed
to execute the work from the termination of
Mason and Dixon's line to the completion of
five degrees of longitude, and thence on a
meridian to the Ohio. We propose that the
extent of the five degrees of longitude shall
be determined by celestial observation. Of
course it will require one set of astronomers
to be at Philadelphia, and another at Fort Pitt.
We ask the favor of yourselves to undertake
this business, the one to go to the one place,
the other to the other, meaning to add a co
adjutor to each of you. — To REV. JAMES MADI
SON AND ROBERT ANDREWS. FORD ED., ii, 513.
(R., 1781.)
939. . No mode of determining
the extent of the five degrees of longitude of
Delaware river, in the latitude of Mason and
Dixon's Line having been pointed out by your
Excellency [Joseph Reed], I shall venture to
propose that this be determined by astronom
ical observations., to be made at or near the
two ^ extremities of the line, as being in our
opinion the most certain and unexceptionable
mode of determining that point which, being
fixed, everything else will be easy. — To PRESI
DENT REED. FORD ED., iii, 15. (R., 1781.)
940. BOUNDARIES, United States and
Great Britain.— A further knowledge of the
ground in the north-eastern and north-western
angles of the United States has evinced that
the boundaries established by the treaty of
Paris, between the British territories and
ours in those parts, were too imperfectly de
scribed to be susceptible of execution. It has,
therefore, been thought worthy of attention, for
preserving and cherishing the harmony and
useful intercourse subsisting between the two
nations, to remove by timely arrangements
what unfavorable incidents might otherwise
render a ground of future misunderstanding.
A convention has, therefore, been entered into,
which provides for a practical demarcation of
those limits to the satisfaction of both parties.
— THIRD ANNUAL MESSAGE, viii, 26. FORD ED.,
viii, 270. (Oct. 1803.)
941. BOUNDARIES, United States and
Spain. — The southern limits of Georgia de
pend chiefly on, i. The charter of Carolina
to the Lords Proprietors, in 1663, extending
southwardly to the river Matheo, now called St.
John's, supposed in the charter to be in latitude
31°, and 50° west in a direct line as far as the
South Sea. See the charter in 4th Manoires
de 1'Amerique, 554. 2. On the proclamation of
the British King, in 1763, establishing the
boundary between Georgia and the two Flori-
das, to begin in the Mississippi, in thirty-one
degrees of latitude north of the equator, and
running eastwardly to the Apalachicola ; thence,
along the said river to the mouth cf the Flint ;
thence, in a direct line, to the source of the
St Mary's River, and down the same to the
ocean. 3. On the treaties between the United
States and Great Britain, of November 30, 1782,
and September 3, 1783, repeating and confirm
ing these ancient boundaries. There was an
intermediate transaction, to wit : a convention
concluded at the Pardo, in 1739, whereby it
was agreed that Ministers Plenipotentiary
should be immediately appointed by Spain and
Great Britain for settling the limits of Florida
and Carolina. The convention is to be found
in the collections of treaties. But the proceed
ings of the Plenipotentiaries are unknown
here. * * * — MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN
STRUCTIONS, vii, 573. FORD ED., v, 464.
(1792.)
942. . To this demonstration of
our rights may be added the explicit declara
tion of the court of Spain, that she would ac
cede to them. This took place in conversa
tions and correspondence thereon between
Mr. Jay, Minister Plenipotentiary for the
United States at the court of Madrid, the
Marquis de Lafayette, and the Count de Florida
Blanca. Monsieur de Lafayette, in his letter
of February 19, 1783, to the Count de Florida
Blanca, states the result of their conversations
on limits in these words : " With respect to
limits, his Catholic Majesty has adopted those
that are determined by the preliminaries of
the 3oth of November, between the United
States and the court of London." The Count
de Florida Blanca, in his answer of February
22d, to M. de Lafayette, says, " although it is
his Majesty's intention to abide for the present
by the limits established by the treaty of the
30th of November, 1782, between the English
and the Americans, the King intends to inform
himself particularly whether it can be in any
ways inconvenient or prejudicial to settle that
affair amicably with the United States;" and
M. de Lafayette, in his letter of the same day
to Mr. Jay, wherein he had inserted the pre
ceding, says, " On receiving the answer of the
Boundaries
Brazil
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
1 08
Count de Florida Blanca (to wit : his answer,
before mentioned, to M. de Lafayette), I de
sired an explanation respecting the addition
that relates to the limits. I was answered
that it was a fixed principle to abide by the
limits established by the treaty between the
English and the Americans : that his remark
related only to mere unimportant details, which
he wished to receive from the Spanish com
mandants, which would be amicably regulated,
and would by no means oppose the general prin
ciple. I asked him, before the Ambassador of
France (M. de Montmorin), whether he would
give me his word of honor for it ; he assured
me he would, and that I might engage it to the
United States." — MISSISSIPPI RIVER INSTRUC
TIONS, vii, 574. FORD ED., v, 465. (1792.)
943. . To conclude the subject
of boundary, the following condition is to be
considered by the commissioners as a sine qua
non : That our southern boundary remain es
tablished at the completion of thirty-one de
grees of latitude on the Mississippi, and so on
to the ocean, * * * and our western one
along the middle of the channel of the Missis
sippi, however that channel may vary, as it is
constantly varying, and that Spain cease to
occupy, or to exercise jurisdiction in any part
northward or eastward of these boundaries. —
MISSISSIPPI RIVER INSTRUCTIONS, vii, 585.
FORD ED., v, 475. (1792.)
944. . It is not true that our
ministers, in agreeing to establish the Colorado
as our western boundary, had been obliged to
exceed the authority of their instructions. Al
though we considered our title good as far as
the Rio Bravo, yet in proportion to what they
could obtain east of the Mississippi, they were
to relinquish to the westward, and successive
sacrifices were marked out, of which even the
Colorado was not the last.* — To W. A. BUR-
WELL, v, 20. FORD EDV viii, 469. (M., Sep.
1806.)
945. BOUNDARIES, Virginia and
Maryland. — I suppose you are informed oj
the proceeding commenced by the Legislature
of Maryland, to claim the south branch of the
Potomac as their boundary, and thus of Albe-
marle, now the central county of the State, to
make a frontier. As it is impossible upon any
consistent principles, and after such a length o:
undisturbed possession, that they can expect to
establish their claim, it can be ascribed to no
other than intention to irritate and divide ; am
there can be no doubt from what bow the shaf
is shot. However, let us cultivate Pennsyl
vania, and we need not fear the universe. The
Assembly have named me among those who
are to manage this controversy. But I am so
averse to motion and contest, and the othe
members are so fully equal to the business
that I cannot undertake to act in it. I wisl
you were added to them. — To JAMES MADISON
iv, 162. FORD ED., vii, 109. (M., Jan. 1797.
946. BOUNTIES, Policy regarding.—
It is not the policy of the government i
America to give aid to works of any kinc
They let things take their natural course with
out help or impediment, which is generall
the best policy. — To THOMAS DIGGES.
413. FORD ED., v, 29. (P., 1788.)
947. BOUNTIES, Recommended.—
Among the purposes to which the Constitutio
* This was one of the newspaper charges made b
John Randolph against the administration of Jeffer
son.— EDITOR.
)ermits Congress to apply money, the grant-
ng premiums or bounties is not enumerated,
nd there has never been a single instance of
icir doing it, although there has been a mul-
plicity of applications. The Constitution has
eft these encouragements to the separate
States. I have in two or three messages to
Tongress recommended an amendment to the
Constitution, which shall extend their power
0 these objects. But nothing is yet done in
t. I fear, therefore, that the institution you
propose must rest on the patronage of the
State in which it is to be. I wish I could
have answered you more to my own mind, as
well as yours; but truth is the first object. —
To DR. MAESE. v, 412. (W., Jan. 1809.)
948. BOURBONS, Incompetent.— A new
:rial of the Bourbons has proved to the world
heir incompetence to the functions of the sta-
ions they have occupied ; and the recall of the
usurper has clothed him with the semblance
of a legitimate autocrat. — To JOHN ADAMS, vi,
458. (M., June 1815.)
949. BOWLES (W. A.), Incites Creek In
dians.— I * * * enclose you [the British
Minister] an extract of a letter * * * giv-
ng information of a Mr. Bowles,* lately come
from England into the Creek country, endeav
oring to excite that nation of Indians to war
against the United States, and pretending to be
employed by the government of England. We
lave other testimony of these pretensions, and
that he carries them much farther than there
stated. We have too much confidence in the
justice and wisdom of the British government
to believe they can approve of the proceedings
01 this incendiary and impostor, or countenance
ior a moment a person who takes the liberty
of using their name for such a purpose. — To
GEORGE HAMMOND. FORD ED., v. (Pa., 1791.)
950.
Of this adventurer the
Spanish government rid us. — To CARMICHAEL
AND SHORT, iv, u. FORD ED., vi, 332. (Pa.,
I793-)
951. BOYS, Sound Principles and.— The
boys of the rising generation are to be the
men of the next, and the sole guardians of
the principles we deliver over to them. — To
REV. MR. KNOX. v, 502. (M., 1810.) See
CHILDREN.
952. BRAZIL, Condition of.— Procure
for us all the information possible as to the
strength, riches, resources, lights and dispo
sitions of Brazil. The jealousy of the court
of Lisbon on this subject will, of course, in
spire you with due caution in making and
communicating these inquiries. — To DAVID
HUMPHREYS. FORD ED., v, 317. (Pa., 1791.)
953. BRAZIL, Empire of. — Having
learned the safe arrival of your Royal High
ness at the city of Rio Janeiro I perform with
pleasure the duty of offering you my sincere
congratulations * * * . I trust that this
event will be as propitious to the prosperity
of your faithful subjects^as to the happiness
of your Royal Highness in which the United
* A Maryland Loyalist, who later styled himself a
chief of the Creek Indians. See FORD'S Writings of
Washington, xii. 159, and Maryland Loyalist, 33.—
NOTE in FORD ED.
109
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Brazil
Bubbles
States of America have ever taken a lively
interest. Inhabitants now of the same land,
of that great continent which the genius of
Columbus has given to the world, the United
States feel sensibly that they stand in new
and closer relations with your Royal High
ness, and that the motives which heretofore
nourished the friendly relations which have so
happily prevailed, have acquired increased
strength on the transfer of your residence to
their shores. They see in prospect, a system
of intercourse between the different regions
of this hemisphere of which the peace and
happiness of mankind may be the essential
principle. To this principle your long tried
adherence, for the benefit of those you gov
erned, in the midst of warring powers, is a
pledge to the new world that its peace, its
free and friendly intercourse, will be your
chief concern. On the part of the United
States I assure you, that these which have
hitherto been their ruling objects, will be most
particularly cultivated with your Royal High
ness and your subjects at Brazil, and they
hope that that country so favored by the gifts
of nature, now advanced to a station under
your immediate auspices, will find, in the in
terchange of mutual wants and supplies, the
true aliment of an unchanging friend
ship with the United States of America. —
To THE EMPEROR OF BRAZIL, v, 285. (May
1808.)
954. BRAZIL, Republicanism in.— I
shall not wonder if Brazil should revolt in
mass, and send their royal family back to Por
tugal. Brazil is more populous, more wealthy,
more energetic, and as wise as Portugal. — To
MARQUIS LAFAYETTE, vii, 68. FORD ED., x,
85. (M., 1817.)
955. . Although we have no
right to intermeddle with the form of gov
ernment of other nations, yet it is lawful to
wish to see no emperors nor kings in our
hemisphere, and that Brazil as well as Mex
ico will homologize with us. — To PRESIDENT
MONROE. FORD EDV x, 244. (M., Dec. 1822.)
956. BRIBERY, Electoral.— No person
shall be capable of acting in any office, civil,
military, or ecclesiastical, who shall have
given any bribe to obtain such office. — PRO
POSED VA. CONSTITUTION. FORD ED., ii, 28.
(June 1776.)
957. . Every person * * *
qualified to elect [to the House of Represen
tatives of Virginia], shall be capable of being
elected [to the House of Representatives] ;
provided he shall have given no bribe, either
directly or indirectly, to any elector. — PRO
POSED VA. CONSTITUTION. FORD ED., ii, 14.
(June 1776.)
958. - — . The Senators' qualifica
tions shall be * * * the having given no
bribe, directly or indirectly, to obtain their ap
pointment.— PROPOSED VA. CONSTITUTION.
FORD ED., ii, 16. (June 1776.)
959. BRIBERY, Great Britain and.—
The known practice [of the British Govern
ment] is to bribe whom they can, and whom
they cannot to calumniate. They have found
scoundrels in America, and either judging
from that, or their own principles, they would
pretend to believe all are so. If pride of
character be of worth at any time, it is when
it disarms the efforts of malice. What a mis
erable refuge is individual slander to so glo
rious a nation as Great Britain has been. — To
GENERAL NELSON. FORD ED., ii, 464. (R.,
1781.)
960. BRIBERY, Jefferson and.— Of
you, my neighbors, I may ask, in the face of
the world, " whose ox have I taken, or whom
have I defrauded? Whom have I oppressed,
or of whose hand have I received a bribe to
blind mine eyes therewith? On your ver
dict I rest with conscious security. — To THE
INHABITANTS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, v, 439.
FORD ED., ix, 251. (M., April 1809.)
961. BRIBERY OF OFFICIALS.— In
general, I am confident that you will receive
notice of the [trade] regulations of this coun
try [France] respecting their islands, by the
way of those islands before you will from
hence [Paris]. Nor can this be remedied but
by a system of bribery which would end in the
corruption of your own ministers, and pro
duce no good adequate to the expense. — To
JAMES MONROE, i, 590. FORD ED., iv, 250. (P.,
1786.) See CORRUPTION.
962. BRIGGS (Isaac), Scientific At
tainments of.— I have appointed Isaac
Briggs, of Maryland, surveyor of the lands
south of Tennessee. He is a Quaker, a sound
republican, and of a pure and unspotted char
acter. In point of science, in astronomy,
geometry and mathematics, he stands in a line
with Mr. Ellicott, and second to no man in the
United States. I recommend him to your
particular patronage ; the candor, modesty and
simplicity of his manners cannot fail to gain
ycur esteem. For the office of surveyor, men of
the first order of science in astronomy and
mathematics are essentially necessary. — To GOV
ERNOR CLAIBORNE. iv, 489. (W., 1803.)
963. BROGLIO (Marshal de), Charac
ter of.— The Marshal de Broglio, is a high
flying aristocrat, cool and capable of every
thing. — To JOHN JAY. iii, 74. (P., 1789.)
964. BROWN (James), Loyalty of.—
That you ever participated in any plan for a
division of the Union, I never for a moment
believed. I knew your Americanism too well.
But as the enterprise against Mexico was of a
very different character, I had supposed what I
heard on that subject to be possible. You dis
avow it ; that is enough for me, and I forever
dismiss the idea. — To DR. JAMES BROWN, v,
378. FORD ED., ix, 210. (W., 1808.)
965. BUBBLES, Speculative.— The Amer
ican mind is now in that state of fever
which the world has so often seen in the his
tory of other nations. We are under the bank
bubble, as England was under the South Sea
bubble, France under the Mississippi bubble,
and as every nation is liable to be, under what
ever bubble, design, or delusion may puff up
in moments when off their guard. — To
CHARLES YANCEY. vi, 515. FORD ED., x, 2.
(M., Jan. 1816.) See SPECULATION.
Buchan (Karl of)
Bunker Mill
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
110
966. BUCHAN (Earl of), Character.—
He is an honorable, patriotic, and virtuous char
acter [and], was in correspondence with Dr.
Franklin and General Washington. — To JAMES
MONROE. FORD ED., viii, 287. (W., 1804.)
967. BUCHANAN (George), Works of.
— The title of the tract of Buchanan which
you propose to translate was familiar to me, and
I possessed the tract ; but no circumstance had
ever led me to look into it. Yet I think noth
ing more likely than that, in the free spirit of
that age and state of society, principles should
be avowed, which were felt and followed, al
though unwritten in the Scottish constitution.
Undefined powers had been intrusted to the
crown, undefined rights retained by the people,
and these depended for their maintenance on
the spirit of the people, which, in that day was
dependence sufficient.* — To REV. MR. KNOX.
v, 502. (M., 1810.)
968. . His latinity is so pure as
to claim a place in school reading. — To REV.
MR. KNOX. v, 502. (M., 1810.)
969. BUFFON (Count de), Animal the
ories refuted.— The opinion advanced by
the Count de Buffon, is, i. That the animals
common both to the old and new world are
smaller in the latter. 2. That those peculiar
to the new are on a smaller scale. 3. That
those which have been domesticated in both
have degenerated in America ; and 4. That
on the whole it exhibits fewer species. And
the reason he thinks is, that the heats of
America are less ; that more waters are spread
over its surface by nature, and fewer of these
drained off by the hand of man. In other
words, that heat is friendly, and moisture ad
verse to the production and development of
large quadrupeds. I will not meet this hypothe
sis on its first doubtful ground, whether the
climate of America be comparatively more
humid, because we are not furnished with ob
servations sufficient to decide this question.
And though, till it be decided, we are as free
to deny as others are to affirm the fact, yet
for a moment let it be supposed. The hy
pothesis after this supposition, proceeds to an
other ; that moisture is unfriendly to animal
growth. The truth of this is inscrutable to
us by reasonings a priori. Nature has hidden
from us her modus agendi. Our only appeal
on such questions is to experience ; and I
think that experience is against the supposi
tion. It is by the assistance of heat and mois
ture that vegetables are elaborated from the
elements of earth, air, water, and fire. We
accordingly see the more humid climates pro
duce the greater quantity of vegetables. Veg
etables are mediately or immediately the food
of every animal; and in proportion to the
quantity of food, we see animals not only mul
tiplied in their numbers, but improved in
their bulk, as far as the laws of their nature
will admit. Of this opinion is the Count de
Buffon himself in another part of his work :
" En g.eneral il paroit que les pays un peu
froids conviennent mieux a nos boeufs que
les pays chauds et qu'ils sont d'autant plus
gros et plus grands que le climat est plus
* Buchanan's works were publicly burned at Ox
ford. See Macaulay's History of England, Chap. II.
—EDITOR.
humide et plus abondans en paturages. Les
boeufs de Danemarck, de la Podolie, de
1'Ukraine et de la Tartarie qu'habitent les Cal-
mouques sont les plus Brands de tous."
Here then a race of animals, and one of the
largest too, has been increased in its dimen
sions by cold and moisture, in direct opposi
tion to the hypothesis, which supposes that
these two circumstances diminish animal bulk,
and that it is their contraries, heat and dry-
ness which enlarge it. — NOTES ON VIRGINIA.
viii, 290. FORD ED., iii, 135. (1782.)
970. . The mammoth should
have sufficed to have rescued the earth
it inhabited, and the atmosphere it breathed,
from the imputation of impotence in the
conception and nourishment of animal life
on a large scrale; to have stifled, in its
birth, the opinion of a writer, the most
learned, too, of all others in the science of
animal history, that in the new world. " La
nature vivante est beaucoup moins agissante,
beaucoup moins forte " ; that nature is less
active, less energetic on one side of the globe
than she is on the other. As if both sides
were not warmed by the same genial sun ; as
if a soil of the same chemical composition
was Jess capable of elaboration into animal
nutriment; as if the fruits and grains from
that soil and sun yielded a less rich chyle,
gave less extension to the solids and fluids
of the body, or produced sooner in the carti
lages, membranes, and fibres, that rigidity
which restrains all further extension, and ter
minates animal growth. The truth is that a
pigmy and a Patagonian, a mouse and a mam
moth, derive their dimensions from the same
nutritive juices. The difference of increment
depends on circumstances unsearchable to be
ings with our capacities. Every race of ani
mals seems to have received from their Maker
certain laws of extension at the time of their
formation. Their elaborate organs were
formed to produce this, while proper obsta
cles were opposed to its further progress. Be
low these limits they cannot fall, nor rise
above them. What intermediate station they
shall take may depend on soil, on climate, on
food, on a careful choice of breeders. But
all the manna of heaven would never raise
the mouse to the bulk of the mammoth. —
NOTES ON VIRGINIA, viii, 289. FORD ED., iii,
134. (1782.) See MAMMOTH.
971. BUFFON (Count de), Gifts to.—
I wrote to some of my friends in America de
siring they would send me such of the spoils of
the moose, caribou, elk and deer, as might
throw light on that class of animals. * * *
I am happy to be able to present to you * * *
the bones and skin of a moose, the horns of the
caribou, the elk, the deer, the spiked horned
buck, and the roebuck of America. They all
come from New Hampshire and Massachusetts.
— To COMTE DE BUFFON. ii, 285. FORD ED.,
iv, 457- (P-, 1787.)
972. BUNKER HILL, Battle of.— Bun
ker's Hill, or rather Breed's Hill, whereon the
action was, is a peninsula joined to the main
land by a neck of land almost, level with the
water, a few paces wide, and about one or two
hundred toises long. On one side of this neck
III
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
liurke (Edmund)
Burr (Aaron)
lay a vessel of war, and on the other several
gunboats. The body of our army was on the
mainland ; and only a detachment had been
sent into the peninsula. When the enemy de
termined to make the attack, they sent the ves
sel of war and gunboats to take the position,
before mentioned, to cut off all reinforcements,
which they effectually did. Not so much as a
company could venture to the relief of the men
engaged, who therefore fought through the
whole action, and at length were obliged to re
tire across the neck through the cross fire of
the vessels before mentioned. Single persons
passed along the neck during the engagement,
particularly General Putnam. — To M. SOULES.
ix, 293. FORD ED., iv, 301. (P., 1786.)
973. BURKE (Edmund), Toryism of.—
The Revolution of France does not astonish me
so much as the revolution of Mr. Burke. I wish
I could believe the latter proceeded from as
pure motives as the former. But what demon
stration could scarcely have established before,
less than the hints of Dr. Priestley and Mr.
Paine establish firmly now. How mortifying
that this evidence of the rottenness of his mind
must oblige us now to ascribe to wicked mo
tives those actions of his life which wore the
mark of virtue and patriotism. — To BENJAMIN
VAUGHAN. FORD ED., v, 333. (1791.)
974. BUSINESS, Visionary Principles
in. — Men come into business at first with vis
ionary principles. It is practice alone which
can correct and conform them to the actual cur
rent of affairs. In the meantime, those to
whom their errors were first applied have been
their victims. — To JAMES MADISON. FORD ED.,
v, 16. (P., 1788.)
975. BURR (Aaron), Characteristics of.
— I never thought him an honest, frank-deal
ing man, but considered him as a crooked
gun, or other perverted machine, whose aim
or shot you could never be sure of. Still,
while he possessed the confidence of the na
tion, I thought it my duty to respect in him
their confidence, and to treat him as if he de
served it. — To WILLIAM B. GILES, v, 68.
FORD ED., ix, 46. (M., April 1807.)
976. BURR (Aaron), Distrust of.— I had
never seen Colonel Burr till he came here as
a member of the Senate. His conduct very
soon inspired me with distrust. I habitually
cautioned Mr. Madison against trusting him
too much. I saw afterwards that under Gen
eral Washington's and Mr. Adams's admin
istrations, whenever a great military appoint
ment or a diplomatic one was to be made, he
came post to Philadelphia to show himself and
in fact that he was always at market, if they
had wanted him. He was indeed told by Day
ton in 1800 he might be Secretary of War ;
but this bid was too late. His election as
V. P. was then foreseen. With these impres
sions of Colonel Burr there never had been
any intimacy between us, and but little asso
ciation. When I destined him for a high ap
pointment, it was out of respect for the fa
vor he had obtained with the republican party
by his extraordinary exertions and successes
in the New York election in 1800. — ANAS, ix,
207. FORD ED., i, 304. (1804.)
977. BURR (Aaron), Feeling toward.—
Against Burr, personally, I never had one
hostile sentiment. — To WILLIAM B. GILES, v,
68. FORD ED., ix, 46. (M., April 1807.)
978. BURR (Aaron), Honesty and.— No
man's history proves better the value of hon
esty. With that, what might he not have
been! — To LEVI LINCOLN, v, 55. (W., 1807.)
979. BURR (Aaron), Overrated Tal
ents. — Burr has indeed made a most inglo
rious exhibition of his much overrated tal
ents. — To ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON, v, 55. FORD
ED., ix, 38. (W., 1807.)
980. - — .A great man in little
things, he is really small in great ones. — To
GEORGE HAY. v, 88. FORD ED., ix, 55. (W.,
1807.)
981. BURR (Aaron), Political Services.
— He has certainly greatly merited of his
country, and the republicans in particular, to
whose efforts his have given a chance of suc
cess. — To PIERCE BUTLER. FORD ED., vii, 449.
(Aug. 1800.)
982. . While I must congratu
late you on the issue of this contest [the Presi
dential], because it is more honorable, and,
doubtless, more grateful to you than any station
within the competence of the Chief Magistrate,
yet for myself, and for the substantial service of
the public, I feel most sensibly the loss we sus
tain of your aid in our new administration. It
leaves a chasm in my arrangements, which can
not be adequately filled up. I had endeavored to
compose an administration whose talents, integ
rity, names, and dispositions, should at once in
spire unbounded confidence in the public mind,
and insure a perfect harmony in the conduct of
the public business. I lose you from the list,
and am not sure of all the others. Should
the gentlemen, who possess the public confi
dence, decline taking a part in their affairs,
and force us to take persons unknown to the
people, the evil genius of this country may
realize his avowal that " he will beat down the
administration." — To AARON BURR. iv, 341.
FORD ED., vii, 467. (W., Dec. 1800.)
983. BURR (Aaron), Presidential Con
test. — It was to be expected that the enemy
would endeavor to sow tares between us, that
they might divide us and our friends. Every
consideration satisfies me you will be on your
guard against this, as I assure you I am strong
ly. I hear of one stratagem so imposing and so
base that it is proper I should notice it to you.
Mr. Munford says he saw at New York an
original letter of mine to Judge Breckenridge,
in which are sentiments highly injurious to you.
He knows my handwriting, and did not doubt
that to be genuine. I enclose you a copy
taken from the press copy of the only letter I
ever wrote to Judge Breckenridge in my life.
* * Of consequence, the letter seen by
Mr. Munford must be a forgery, and if it con
tains a sentiment unfriendly or disrespectful to
you, I affirm it solemnly to be a forgery ; as
also if it varies from the copy enclosed. With
the common trash of slander I should not think
of troubling you ; but the forgery of one's
handwriting is too imposing to be neglected. —
To AARON BURR, iv, 349. FORD ED., vii, 485.
(W., Feb. 1801.) See ELECTIONS — PRESIDEN
TIAL, 1800.
984. BURR (Aaron), Relations with
Jefferson.— Colonel Burr, the Vice Presi-
Burr (Aaron)
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
112
dent, called on me in the evening [January 26th,
1804], having previously asked an opportunity
of conversing with me. He began by recapit
ulating summarily, that he had come to New
York a stranger, some years ago ; that he
found the country in possession of two rich
families (the Livingstons and Clintons) ; that
his pursuits were not political, and he meddled
not. When the crisis, however, of 1800 came
on, they found their influence worn out, and
solicited his aid with the people. He lent it
•without any views of promotion. That his be
ing named as a candidate for Vice-President
was unexpected by him. He acceded to it with
a view to promote my fame and advancement,
and from a desire to be with me, whose com
pany and conversation had always been fasci
nating to him. That since, those great families
had become hostile to him, and had excited
the calumnies which I had seen published.
That in this Hamilton had joined, and had even
written some of the pieces against him. That
his attachment to me had been sincere, and was
still unchanged, although many little stories had
been carried to him, and he supposed to me also,
which he despised ; but that attachment must
be reciprocal or cease to exist, and, therefore,
he asked if any change had taken place in mine
towards him ; that he had chosen to have this
conversation with myself directly; and not
through any intermediate agent. He reminded
me of a letter written to him about the time of
counting the votes (say February, 1801),
mentioning that his election had left a chasm in
my arrangements ; that I had lost him from my
list in the Administration, &c. He observed,
he believed it would be for the interest of the
republican cause for him to retire ; that a dis
advantageous schism would otherwise take
place ; but that were he to retire, it would be
said he shrunk from the public sentence, which
he never would do ; that his enemies were using
my name to destroy him, and something was
necessary from me to prevent and deprive
them of that weapon, some mark of favor from
me which would declare to the world that he
retired with my confidence.
I answered by recapitulating to him what had
been my conduct previous to the election of
i Sop. That I had never interfered directly or
indirectly with my friends or any others, to
influence the election either for him or myself ;
that I considered it as my duty to be merely
passive, except that in Virginia, I had taken
some measures to procure for him the unani
mous vote of that State, because I thought any
failure there might be imputed to me. That in
the election now coming on, I was observing
the same conduct, held no councils with anybody
respecting it, nor suffered any one to speak to
me on the subject, believing it my duty to leave
myself to the free discussion of the public ;
that I do not at this moment know, nor have
ever heard, who were to be proposed as candi
dates for the public choice, except so far as
could be gathered from the newspapers. That
as? to the attack excited against him in the
newspapers, I had noticed it but as the passing
wind ; that I had seen complaints that Cheet-
ham, employed in publishing the laws, should
be permitted to eat the public bread and
abuse its second officer ; that as to this, the
publishers of the laws were appointed by the
Secretary of State, without any reference to
me ; that to make the notice general, it was
often given to one republican and one federal
printer of the same place ; that these federal
printers did not in the least intermit their
abuse of me. though receiving emoluments from
die government, and that I never thought it
proper to interfere for myself, and consequently
not in the case of the Vice-President. That as
to the letter he referred to, I remembered it,
and believed he had only mistaken the date at
which it was written ; that I thought it must
have been on the first notice of the event of
the election of South Carolina; and that I had
taken that occasion to mention to him, that I
had intended to have proposed to him one of
the great offices, if he had not been elected ;
but that his election in giving him a higher sta
tion had deprived me of his aid in the Admin
istration. The letter alluded to was, in fact,
mine to him of December the isth, 1800. I
now went on to explain to him verbally, what I
meant by saying I had lost him from my list.
That in General Washington's time, it had been
signified to him that Mr. Adams, the Vice-Presi
dent, would be glad of a foreign embassy ; that
General Washington mentioned it to me, ex
pressed his doubts whether Mr. Adams was a
fit character for such an office, and his still
greater doubts, indeed his conviction, that it
would not be justifiable to send away the
person who, in case of his death, was provided
by the Constitution to take his place; that it
would moreover appear indecent for him to be
disposing of the public trusts, in apparently
buying off a competitor for the public favor. I
concurred with him in the opinion, and, if I
recollect rightly, Hamilton, Knox, and Randolph
were consulted and gave the same opinions.
That when Mr. Adams came to the Administra
tion, in his first interview with me, he men
tioned the necessity of a mission to France,
and how desirable it would have been to him if
he could have got me to undertake it ; but that
he conceived it would be wrong in him to send
me away, and assigned the same reasons General
Washington had done ; and, therefore, he should
appoint Mr. Madison, &c. That I had myself
contemplated his (Colonel Burr's) appointment
to one of the great offices, in case he was not
elected Vice-President ; but that as soon as that
election was known, I saw it could not be done,
for the good reasons which had led General
Washington and Mr. Adams to the same con
clusion ; and therefore, in my first letter to
Colonel Burr, after the issue was known, I
had mentioned to him that a chasm in my ar
rangements had been produced by this event.
I was thus particular in rectifying the date of
this letter, because it gave me an opportunity
of explaining the grounds on which it was
written, which were, indirectly an answer to
his present hints. He left the matter with me
for consideration, and the conversation was
turned to indifferent subjects. I should here
notice, that Colonel Burr must have thought
that I could swallow strong things in my own
favor, when he founded his acquiescence in
the nomination as Vice-President. to his de
sire of promoting my honor, the being with me,
whose company and conversation had always
been fascinating with him. &c. — THE ANAS, ix,
204. FORD ED., i, 301. (Jan. 1804.)
985. BURR (Aaron), Threatens Jeffer
son.— About a month ago [March 1806]
Colonel Burr called on me, and entered into a
conversation, in which he mentioned that a
little before my coming into office, I had written
to him a letter intimating that I had destined
him for high employ, had he not been placed by
the people in a different one; that he had signi
fied his willingness to resign as Vice-President,
to give aid to the Administration in any other
place, that he had never asked an office, how
ever ; he asked aid of nobody, but could walk
on his own legs and take care of himself; that
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Burr •. AM roii)
tturr's i A.) Treason
I had always used him with politeness, but noth
ing more ; that he aided in bringing on the
present order of things ; that he had supported
the Administration ; and that he could do me
much harm ; he wished, however, to be on dif
ferent ground ; he was now disengaged from
all particular business — willing to engage in
something — should be in town some days, if I
should have anything to propose to him. I ob
served to him, that I had always been sensible
that he possessed talents which might be em
ployed greatly to the advantage of the public,
and that as to myself, I had a confidence that if
he were employed, he would use his talents for
the public good ; but that he must be sensible
the public had withdrawn their confidence from
him, and that in a government like ours it was
necessary to embrace in its administration as
great a mass of public confidence as possible,
by employing those who had a character with
the public, of their own, and not merely a sec
ondary one through the Executive. He ob
served, that if we believed a few newspapers,
it might be supposed he had lost the public
confidence, but that I knew how easy it was
to engage newspapers in anything. I observed,
that I did not refer to that kind of evidence of
his having lost the public confidence, but to
the late Presidential election, when, though in
possession of the office of Vice-President, there
was not a single voice heard for his retaining
it. That as to any harm he could do me, I
knew no cause why he should desire it. but,
at the same time, I feared no injury which any
man could do me ; that I never had done a
single act, or been concerned in any transac
tion, which I feared to have fully laid open, or
which could do me any hurt, if truly stated ;
that I had never done a single thing with a view
to my personal interest, or that of any friend, or
with any other view than that of the greatest
public good ; that, therefore, no threat or fear
on that head would ever be a motive of action
with me. I did not commit these things to
writing at the time, but I do it now, because in
a suit between him and Cheetham, he has had
a deposition of Mr. Bayard taken, which seems
to have no relation to the suit, nor to any other
object than to calumniate me. Bayard pretends
to have addressed to me, during the pending of
the Presidential election in February, 1801,
through General Samuel Smith, certain condi
tions on which my election might be obtained,
and that General Smith, after conversing with
me, gave answers from me. This is absolutely
false. No proposition of any kind was ever
made to me on that occasion by General Smith,
nor any answer authorized by me. And this
fact General Smith affirms at this moment. —
THE ANAS, ix, 208. FORD EDV i, 311. (April
1806.)
986. BURR'S (A.) TREASON, Counter
acted. — During the last session of Congress,
Colonel Burr who was here [Washington], find
ing no hope of being employed in any depart
ment of the government, opened himself con
fidentially to some persons on whom he thought
he could rely, on a scheme of separating the
Western from the Atlantic States, and erecting
the former into an independent confederacy.
He had before made a tour of those States
u'hich had excited suspicions, as every nation
does of such a Catalinian character. * * *
We [the cabinet] are of opinion unanimously,
that confidential letters be written to the
Governors of Ohio, Indiana, Mississippi and
Orleans * * * to have him strictly watched
and on his committing any overt act unequivo
cally, to have him arrested and tried for treason,
misdemeanor, or whatever other offence the act
may amount to. And in like manner to arrest
and try any of his followers committing acts
against the laws. — ANAS. FORD ED., i, 318.
(July 1806.)
987. BURR'S (A.) TREASON, Decoys.
— Burr has been able to decoy a great propor
tion of his people by making them believe the
government secretly approves of this expedition
against the Spanish territories. We are look
ing with anxiety to see what exertions the
Western country will make in the first instance
for their own defence ; and I confess that my
confidence in them is entire. — To GOVERNOR
CLAIBORNE. FORD ED., viii, 502. (W., Dec.
1806.)
988. . It is understood that
wherever Burr met with subjects who did not
choose to embark in his projects, unless ap
proved by their government, he asserted that he
had that approbation. Most of them took his
word for it, but it is said that with those who
would not, the following stratagem was prac
ticed. A forged letter, purporting to be from
General Dearborn, was made to express his ap
probation, and to say that I was absent at
Monticello, but that there was no doubt that,
on my return, my approbation of his enterprises
would be given. This letter was spread open
on his table, so as to invite the eye of whoever
entered his room, and he contrived occasions
of sending up into his room those whom he
wished to become witnesses of his acting under
sanction. By this means he avoided committing
himself to any liability to prosecution for
forgery, and gave another proof of being a great
man in little things, while he is really small in
great ones. I must add General Dearborn's
declaration, that he never wrote a letter to Burr
in his life, except that when here, once in a
winter, he usually wrote him a billet of invita
tion to dine. — To GEORGE HAY. v, 87. FORD
ED., ix, 54. (W., June 1807.)
989. BURR'S (A.) TREASON, Designs
of. — The designs of our Cataline are as real as
they are romantic, but the parallel he has se
lected from history for the model of his own
course corresponds but by halves. It is true in
its principal character, but the materials to be
employed are totally different from the scour-
ings of Rome. I am confident he will be com
pletely deserted on the appearance of the procla
mation, because his strength was to consist of
people who had been persuaded that the govern
ment connived at the enterprise. — To CAESAR A.
RODNEY. FORD EDV viii, 497. (W., Dec. 1806.)
990. . Burr's object is to take
possession of New Orleans, as a station whence
to make an expedition against Vera Cruz and
Mexico. His party began their formation at
the mouth of the Beaver, whence they started
the ist or 2d of this month, and would collect
all the way down the Ohio. We trust that the
opposition we have provided at Marietta, Cin
cinnati, Louisville, and Massac will be sufficient
to stop him ; but we are not certain because we
do not know his strength. It is, therefore, pos
sible he may escape, and then his great ren
dezvous is to be at Natchez. * * * We
expect you will collect all your force of militia,
act in conjunction with Colonel Freeman, and
take such a stand as shall be concluded best. —
To GOVERNOR CLAIBORNE. FORD ED., viii. 501.
(W., Dec. 1806.)
991. . His first enterprise was
to have been to seize New Orleans, which he
Burr's (A.) Treason
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
114
supposed would powerfully bridle the upper
country, and place him at the door of Mexico.
— To MARQUIS DE LAFAYETTE, v, 131. FORD
ED., x, 144. (W., July 1807.)
992. . Burr's enterprise is the
most extrarodinary since the days of Don Qui
xote. It is so extravagant that those who know
his understanding, would not believe it if the
proofs admitted doubt. He has meant to place
himself on the throne of Montezuma, and ex
tend his empire to the Alleghany, seizing on
New Orleans as the instrument of compulsion
for western States. — To REV. CHAS. CLAY, v,
28. FORD ED., ix, 7. (W., Jan. 1807.)
993. BURR'S (A.) TREASON, Fearless
of. — For myself, even in Burr's most flatter
ing periods of the conspiracy, I never enter
tained one moment's fear. My long and intimate
knowledge of my countrymen, satisfied and sat
isfies me, that let there ever be occasion to dis
play the banners of the law, and the world will
see how few and pitiful are those who shall
array themselves in opposition. — To DR. JAMES
BROWN, v, 379. FORD ED., ix, 211. (W., Oct.
1808.)
994. BURR'S (A.) TREASON", Flagi
tious. — His conspiracy has been one of the
most flagitious of which history will ever furnish
an example. He meant to separate the Western
States from us, to add Mexico to them, place
himself at their head, establish what he would
deem an energetic government, and thus provide
an example and an instrument for the subver
sion of our freedom. The man who could ex
pect to effect this, with American materials,
must be a fit subject for Bedlam. — To MARQUIS
DE LAFAYETTE, v, 129. FORD ED., ix, 113.
(W., July 1807.)
995. . Burr's conspiracy has
been one of the most flagitious of which history
will ever furnish an example. He had combined
the objects of separating the Western States
from us, of adding Mexico to them, and of pla
cing himself at their head. But he who could
expect to effect such objects by the aid of
American citizens, must be perfectly ripe for
Bedlam. — To DUPONT DE NEMOURS, v, 128.
FORD ED., ix, in. (W., July 1807.)
996. BURR'S (A.) TREASON, Louis
iana and. — It has given me infinite satisfac
tion that not a single native Creole of Louisiana,
and but one American, settled there before the
delivery of the country to us, were in his inter
est. His partisans there were made up of fugi
tives from justice, or from their debts, who had
flocked there from other parts of the United
States, after the delivery of the country, and
of adventurers and speculators of all descrip
tions. — To DUPONT DE NEMOURS, v, 128. FORD
ED., ix, 113. (W., July 1807.)
997. . The native inhabitants
were unshaken in their fidelity. But there was
a small band of American adventurers who had
fled from their debts, and who were longing to
dip their hands into the mines of Mexico, en
listed in Burr's double project of attacking that
country, and severing our Union. Had Burr
had a little success in the upper country, these
parricides would have joined him. — To MARQUIS
DE LAFAYETTE. FORD ED., ix, 65. (W., May
1807.)
998. BURR'S (A.) TREASON, The Peo
ple and. — The hand of the people has given
the mortal blow to a conspiracy which, in other
countries, would have called for an appeal to
armies, and has proved that government to be
the strongest of which every man feels himself a
part. It is a happy illustration, too, of the im
portance of preserving to the State authorities
all that vigor which the Constitution foresaw
would be necessary, not only for their own
safety, but for that of the whole. — To GOVERNOR
H. D. TIFFIN, v, 38. FORD ED., ix, 21. (W.,
Feb. 1807.)
999. . The whole business has
shown that neither Burr nor his [associates]
knew anything of the people of this country. A
simple proclamation informing the people of
these combinations, and calling on them to sup
press them, produced an instantaneous levee en
masse of our citizens wherever there appeared
anything to lay hold of, and the whole was
crushed in one instant. — To MARQUIS DE LA
FAYETTE. FORD ED., ix, 66. (W., May 1807.)
1000. BURR'S (A.) TREASON, Punish
ment of.— -Their crimes are defeated, and
whether they shall be punished or not belongs
to another department, and is not the subject of
even a wish on my part. — To J. H. NICHOLSON.
v, 45. FORD ED., ix, 31. (W., Feb. 1807.)
1001. BURR'S (A.) TREASON, Self-
government and. — The suppression of the
late conspiracy by the hand of the people, up
lifted to destroy it wherever it reared its head,
manifests their fitness for self-government, and
the power of a nation, of which every individual
feels that his own will is part of the public au
thority. — R. TO A. NEW JERSEY LEGISLATURE.
viii, 122. (Dec. 1807.)
1002. BURR'S (A.) TREASON, Strength
of Government and. — The proof we have
lately seen of the innate strength of our govern
ment, is one of the most remarkable which his
tory has recorded, and shows that we are a
people capable of self-government, and worthy
of it. The moment that a proclamation apprised
our citizens that there were traitors among
them, and what was the object, they rose upon
them wherever they lurked, and crushed by
their own strength what would have produced
the march of armies and civil war in any other
country. The government which can wield the
arm of the people must be the strongest possible.
To MR. WEAVER, v, 89. (W., June 1807.)
1003. . Nothing has ever so
strongly proved the innate force of our form of
government, as this conspiracy. Burr had prob
ably engaged one thousand men to follow his
fortunes, without letting them know his projects,
otherwise than by assuring them that the gov
ernment approved them. The moment a proc
lamation was issued, undeceiving them, he
found himself left with about thirty desperadoes
only. The people rose in mass wherever he
was, or was suspected to be, and by their own
energy the thing was crushed in one instant,
without its having been necessary to employ a
man of the military but to take care of their
respective stations. — To MARQUIS DE LAFAYETTE.
v, 130. FORD ED., ix, 114. (W., July 1807.)
1004. . This affair has been a
great confirmation in my mind of the innate
strength of the form of our government. He
had probably induced near a thousand men to
engage with him, by making them believe the
government connived at it. A proclamation
alone, by undeceiving them, so completely dis
armed him, that he had not above thirty men
left, ready to go all lengths with him. — To DU
PONT DE NEMOURS, v, 128. FORD ED., ix, in.
(W., July 1807.)
,
THE JEFFERSONIAN CYCLOPEDIA
Burr's (A.) Treason
Burr's (A.) Trial
1005. BURR'S (A.) TREASON, Sup
pressed. — I informed Congress at their last
session * of the enterprises against the public
peace which were believed to be in preparation
by Aaron Burr and his associates, of the meas
ures taken to defeat them, and to bring the of
fenders to justice. Their enterprises were hap
pily defeated by the patriotic exertions of the
militia wherever called into action, by the fidel
ity of the army, and energy of the commander-
in-chief in promptly arranging the difficulties
presenting themselves on the Sabine, repairing to
meet those arising on the Mississippi, and dis
sipating, before their explosion, plots engender
ing them. — SEVENTH ANNUAL MESSAGE, viii,
87. FORD ED., ix, 162. (Oct. 1807.)
1006. BURR'S (A.) TREASON, Western
Loyalty. — The enterprise has done good by
proving that the attachment of the people in the
West is as firm as that in the East to the union
of our country, and by establishing a mutual and
universal confidence. — To MARQUIS DE LAFAY
ETTE. FORD ED., ix, 66. (W., May 1807.)
1007. BURR'S (A.) TRIAL, Arrest.—
Your sending here [Washington] Swartwout
and Ballman and adding to them Burr, Blenner-
hassett and Tyler, should they fall into your
hands, will be supported by the public opinion.
* * * I hope, however, you will not extend this
deportation to persons against whom there is
only suspicion, or shades of offence not strongly
marked. In that case, I fear the public senti
ment would desert you : because seeing no dan
ger here, violations of law are felt with strength.
— To GENERAL WILKINSON, v, 39. FORD ED.,
ix, 4. (W., Feb. 1807.)
1008. . That the arrest of Col
onel Burr was military has been disproved ; but
had it been so, every honest man and good citi
zen is bound, by any means in his power, to
arrest the author of projects so daring and dan
gerous. — To EDMUND PENDLETON GAINES. v,
141. FORD ED., ix, 122. (W., July 1807.)
— BURR'S (A.) TRIAL, Bollman's con
fession. — See BOLLMAN.
1009. BURR'S (A.) TRIAL, Charges.— I
do suppose the following overt acts will be
proved, i. The enlistment of men in a regular
way. 2. The regular mounting of guard round
Blennerhassett's Island * * * . 3. The ren
dezvous of Burr with his men at the mouth of
the Cumberland. 4. His letter to the acting
Governor of Mississippi, holding up the prospect
of civil war. 5. His capitulation regularly
signed with the aids of the Governor, as be
tween two independent and hostile commanders.
— To WILLIAM B. GILES, v, 66. FORD ED., ix,
43. (M., April 1807.)
1010. BURR'S (A.) TRIAL, Conviction
doubtful. — That there should be anxiety and
doubt in the public mind, in the present defect
ive state of the proof, is not wonderful ; and
this has been sedulously encouraged by the
tricks of the judges to force trials before it is
possible to collect the evidence, dispersed
through a line of two thousand miles from
Maine to Orleans. — To WILLIAM B. GILES, v,
65. FORD ED., ix, 42. (M., April 1807.)
1011. . Although there is not a
man in the United States who doubts his guilt,
such are the jealous provisions of our laws in
* Jefferson sent a message to Congress, January 22,
1807, giving a record of the facts in Burr's conspiracy.
—EDITOR.
favor of the accused against the accuser, that
1 question if he is convicted. â€